发布时间：
求一篇经济法商业秘密的法律保护有关的毕业论 不知道,肯定关键的确
什么要求呢，要多少字数啊
可惜啊！偶不会…
The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding errors1. irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or misunderstandings. Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or punishment. Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually occurs.（1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately elements. Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have understanding. Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui reason." Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig".2）Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility theory. Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective stance. 3）That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding illegality. While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already meaningless. Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is harm. Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social consciousness. Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society values. Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and observe. Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already know. With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are unified. Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately discretion. （2） Misunderstandings treatment principle. PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence performance. If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider disclaimer. Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not inexcusable. Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in shake. Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of humanity. In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement actor. The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but . The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong understanding. From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error object. It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime object. The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects different. Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not consistent. Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the crime. For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was wounded. A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the object. Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing together. This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted ）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object irrtumslehre. These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre irrtumslehre. In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same situation. This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal responsibility. As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a rap. This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the ） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature irrtumslehre. That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary defense. Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect crime. Second, the behavior tools (methods) irrtumslehre. That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to succeed. And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party and. Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu itself. The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide accomplishment. The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, accomplished. Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of )Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between errors. Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened actor. This generally constitute a crime. Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime accomplishment. Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime accomplishment. In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a crime. In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into our. 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory category. 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to law. Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the mistake. From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often difficult. If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to prove. Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to handle. Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is established. From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the law.
law and order是个固定词组，中文解释即：法律与秩序(右派针对犯罪与暴力所提出的口号)“与”字有和之意，所以按此题目故而应写两者。中国具有代表性的计划生育就是一个很好的素材，不过要是从这两者下笔，我认为从中国法律的历史来写更容易些。以上只是个人见解，希望能对你有所帮助。
奇怪的是,最终的观点,这种思维方式往往是最现代化的发展,公司法律,旨在为永久的需要,不含任何继承它很有特色的罗马人,无遗嘱继承是被迫背景正常的演替,罗马人发明的,如果曾有过一个不,可以肯定的是,在成熟的罗马法的痕迹更早的工作性质是家庭财产,但从一个退出ealy日期死亡显然是作为一种catstrophe,必须事先规定的,它被认为是自然地放弃对变化的财产和其他权利。每件事物开始重新用意志;它很有特色,虽然了不起,这在遗嘱继承这个假定的标题的继承人,开始管理通常不被自动,但依靠一些行为的继承人。 你不需要劳动合同关系的点《合同法》中明显存在,以便于改变事实上,它是为这个原因,一般发展晚在合同法律制度它不是很晚于罗马法到目前为止,我们的记录中检测一段不合法的历史Romsn时,它是不可能的,一个人将他由一个极其简单的形式来做几乎都可能进入他的脑袋唯一的限制是相类似的,现代法的合同,防止是非法的,不道德的,还是反对公共政策的. 罗马法相比,甚至更自由,现代法没有阻止一个人从销售自己成为奴隶。 我们怎样说法则的黑社会性质组织犯罪或侵权行为它是一种必要的任何法律体系的一部分…人们必须行动来保护自己的aggressions取款机的其他人,这种行为不能被逼入背景在任何法律论文但这并不完全是令人惊讶的是,不规律的运动,它并没有带来最好的努力,并在法学家的某些显著的发展》、《保留了许多非常原始特征黑社会性质组织犯罪和总的来说是最令人满意的一部分,因为至少阐述了罗马私法。 法律的行为实质上是通过一项法律,再告诉你如何在某些circumstancees如果事情出了差错,他们不会对自己…你有什么事物,也就是说,但你可能不愿意,你必须接受的必要性,探讨了一些改变,如果只有方式反应,以恢复原来的位置。
问题一：全国法学的核心期刊有哪些？哪些可以免费投稿？谢谢！ 法学核心期刊可以提供，免费投稿的很少。 法律类核心期刊表 1、法学研究 2、中国法学 3、法学 4、法商研究 5、政法论坛 6、现代法学 7、中外法学 8、法学评论 9、法律科学 10、法制与社会发展 11、法学家 12、比较法研究 13、环球法律评论 14、当代法学 15、法学论坛 16、政治与法律 17、河北法学 18、法学杂志 19、法律适用 20、行政法学研究 21、中国刑事法杂志 22、人民司法 23、华东政法学院学报（改名为：华东政法大学学报） 24、人民检察 25、知识产权 26、中国法医学杂志 27、中国司法鉴定 问题二：想了解一下，法律和法学的核心期刊有那些啊？ 中国法学 2.法学研究 3.法学 4.法学评论 5.中外法学 6.现代法学 7.法商研究 8.法律科学 9. 法学家 10. 政法论坛 11.人民检察 12. 河北法学 13.法制与社会发展 14.政治与法律 15.环境法律评论 16.比较法研究 17.法学杂志 18.当代法学 19.人民司法 20.法律适用 21.法学论坛 以上是2004年公布的法学核心期刊目录。此外，在综合类核心期刊上也经常刊登高水平的法学论文。以下是综合类核心期刊： 1.中国社会科学 2.北京大学学报.哲学社会科学版 3.社会科学战线 4.学术月刊 5.中国人民大学学报 6.天津社会科学 7.学术研究 8.江海学刊 9.江汉论坛 10.江苏社会科学 11.北京师范大学学报．人文社会科学版 12.复旦学报.社会科学版 13.文史哲 14.南京大学学报.哲学、人文科学、社会科学 15.浙江学刊 16.浙江社会科学 17.社会科学研究 18.求是学刊 19.社会科学(上海)(吸收:上海社会科学院学术季刊) 20.社会科学辑刊 21.华东师范大学学报.哲社版 22.华中师范大学学报.人文社会科学版 23.中州学刊 24.南开学报.哲学社会科学版 25.人文杂志 26.求索 27.思想战线 28.中山大学学报.社会科学版 29.吉林大学社会科学学报 30.国外社会科学 31.南京社会科学 32.厦门大学学报.哲学社会科学版 33.浙江大学学报.人文社会科学版 34.四川大学学报.哲学社会科学版 35.齐鲁学刊 36.西南民族学院学报.哲学社会科学版(改名为西南民族大学学报.人文社科版) 37.学海 38.武汉大学学报.人文科学版 39.江西社会科学 40.东北师大学报.哲学社会科学版 41.郑州大学学报.哲学社会科学版 42.河北学刊 43.学术界 44.东岳论丛 45.湖南师范大学社会科学学报 46.东南学术 47.首都师范大学学报.社会科学版 48.中国社会科学院研究生院学报 49 上海社会科学院学术季刊(并入:社会科学) 50.湖北大学学报.哲学社会科学版 51.西南师范大学学报.人文社会科学版 52.北京社会科学 53.河南大学学报.社会科学版 54.学术论坛 55.南京师大学报.社会科学版 56.广东社会科学 57.陕西师范大学学报.哲学社会科学版 58.中央民族大学学报.哲学社会科学版 59.福建论坛.人文社会科学版 60.西北大学学报.哲学社会科学版 61.山东社会科学 62.探索 63.学术交流 64.湘潭大学社会科学学报 65.暨南学报.哲学社会科学版 66.华南师范大学学报.社会科学版 67.安徽大学学报.哲学社会科学版 68.北方论丛 69.山东师大学报.人文社会科学版 70.广西民族学院学报.哲学社会科学版 71.西北师大学报.社会科学版 72.深圳大学学报.人文社会科学版 73.河南师范大学学报.哲学社会科学版 74.上海师范大学学报.哲学社会科学版 75.宁夏社会科学 76.兰州大学学报.社会科学版 77.辽宁大学学报.哲学社会科学版 78.云南社会科学 79.长白学刊 80.河北师范大学学报.哲学社会科学版 81.天津师范大学学报.社会科学版 82.江淮论坛 83.福建师范大学学报.哲学社会科学版 84.河南社会科学 85.内蒙古社会科学 86.南昌大学学报.人文社会科学版 87.甘肃社会科学 88.上海大学学报.社会科学版 89.内蒙古大学学报.人文社会科学版 90.扬州大学学报.人文社会科学版 91.晋阳学刊 92.四川师范大学学......>> 问题三：法学类核心期刊有哪些 核心期刊网上有各种版本，但万变不离其宗，都差不多是那些。 问题四：法学中文核心期刊有哪些？ ②公开发行的法学期刊指有公开刊号、公开发行的以刊登法学论文为主的刊物，包括区内的《检察理论与实践》、《广西法治日报》、《广西政法干部管理学院学报》、《广西警官高等专科学校学报》等和区外的类似刊物处《法制日报》、《检察日报》、《人民法院报》、《人民公安报》等。③知名期刊包括：《中外法学》、《清华法学》、《法学家》、《法学评论》、《当代法学》、《政法论坛》、《法商研究》、《法学》、《现代法学》、《法律科学》、《西南政法大学学报》、《华东政法大学学报》、《黑龙江社会科学》、《东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）》、《吉林大学社会科学学报》、《法制与社会发展》、《辽宁大学学报（哲学社科版）》、《环球法律评论》、《比较法研究》、《行政法学研究》、《法学杂志》、《中国司法》、《人民司法》、《北京大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》、《清华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》、《中国人民大学学报》、《北京师范大学学报（社会科学版）》、《中国刑事法杂志》、《人民检察》（地方版除外）、《国家检察官学院学报》、《南开学报（哲学社会科学版）》、《天津社会科学》、《河北法学》、《内蒙古社会科学》、《西安交通大学学报（社会科学版）》、《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》、《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》、《法学论坛》、《河南社会科学》、《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》、《宁夏社会科学》、《兰州大学学报（社会科学版）》、《新疆社会科学》、《青海社会科学》、《南京大学学报（哲学・人文科学・社会科学）》、《苏州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》、《复旦学报（社会科学版）》、《政治与法律》、《华东师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》、《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》、《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》、《浙江社会科学》、《武汉大学学报（人文社科版）》、《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》、《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》、《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》、《西南师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》、《贵州社会科学》、《云南大学学报（法学版）》、《湖南社会科学》、《中南大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》、《江西社会科学》、《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》、《中山大学学报（社会科学版）》、《海南大学学报（人文社科版）》。④权威报刊是指《中国法学》、《法学研究》、《中国社会科学》、《求是》、《人民日报（理论版）》。 这些都是核心的法学期刊，希望我的回答能帮助到你，有什么问题可以随时咨询，如果帮助到你了 请采纳 谢谢 问题五：法学核心期刊有哪些 核心期刊“‘’”包括中国法学》法学研究》法商研究》中外法学》清华法学》 问题六：本科生可以发表的法学核心期刊有哪些？ 只要文章写的好，不怕没杂志发。介绍三个期刊： 政治与法律，河北法学，河南省政法管理干部学院学报 第一个是双核心难发点，后面两个稍容易些。 可以进我的空间咨询我 问题七：有哪些著名的法学期刊 《河北法学》，《法学评论》，《前沿》也有法学的文章 问题八：谁给介绍一下我国比较权威的法学期刊有哪些？ 三大权威期刊是：《中国社会科学》《法学研究》《中国法学》 其他的核心期刊有《法学》《法学评论》《法商研究》《中外法学》《现代法学》《政法论坛》《人民检察》《环球法律评论》《当代法学》《比较法研究》《法学杂志》《法律适用》《法学论坛》《法律科学》《政法论坛》《法学家》《政治与法律》《法制与社会发展》《河北法学》《华东政法学院学报》《中国刑事法杂志》《知识产权》等 问题九：求国家级法学期刊列表！ 国家级法学核心期刊前十名一般是: 1.法学研究(社科院法学所)2.中国法学（中国法学会） 3.中外法学（北大） 4.政法论坛（中国政法） 5.现代法学(西南政法) 6.法商研究（中南财经政法） 7.法学（华东政法） 7.法律科学（西北政法） 8.法制与社会发展（吉大） 9.法学评论（武大） 10.环球法律评论(社科院法学所)
当前，我国比较权威的法学期刊有《中国社会科学》、《法学研究》、《中国法学》等等。
根据最新的排名分布，2020年中国法学核心科研评价来源期刊（CLSCI）的正式成员将为：《中国社会科学》《中国法学》《法学研究》《中外法学》《法学家》《法商研究》《法学》《法律科学》《法学评论》《政法论坛》《法制与社会发展》《现代法学》《比较法研究》《环球法律评论》《清华法学》《政治与法律》《当代法学》《法学论坛》《法学杂志》《华东政法大学学报》《中国刑事法杂志》《东方法学》等22家。
说明:
RCCSE权威、核心学术期刊排行榜
分级标准:分学科、按各期刊的综合评价得分排序并依次分为6个等级:
①A+等为权威期刊，即排在最前面的5%的期刊;
②A等和A-等为核心期刊，A占各学科期刊总数的15%，即排在5%-20%的期刊;A-占各学科期刊总数的10%，即排在20%-30%的期刊;
③B+等为准核心期刊，占期刊总数的30%，即排在30%-60%的期刊;④B等为一般期刊，占总数的30%，即排在60%-90%的期刊;
⑤c等为较差期刊，占总数的10%，即排在90%-100%的期刊。
O. J. Simpson murder case辛普森杀妻案The O. J. Simpson murder case has been described as the most publicized criminal trial in history,[1] in which O. J. Simpson, former American football star and actor, was brought to trial for the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. Simpson was acquitted in 1995 after a lengthy trial, the longest jury trial in California history.[2]Simpson hired a high-profile defense team led by Johnnie Cochran and F. Lee Bailey. Los Angeles County believed it had a solid prosecution case, but Cochran created in the minds of the jury the belief that there was reasonable doubt about the DNA evidence (then a relatively new type of evidence in trials),[3] including that the blood-sample evidence had allegedly been mishandled by lab scientists and technicians.[4] Cochran and the defense team also alleged other misconduct by the Los Angeles Police Department. The televising of the lengthy trial riveted national attention on the dramatic case. By the end of the criminal trial, national surveys showed dramatic differences between most blacks and most whites in terms of their assessment of Simpson's guilt.[5]Later, both the Brown and Goldman families sued Simpson for damages in a civil trial, which has a lower standard of proof for determining responsibility.[citation needed] On February 5, 1997, the jury unanimously found there was a preponderance of evidence to find Simpson liable for damages in the wrongful death of Goldman and battery of Brown. In its conclusions, the jury effectively found Simpson liable for the death of his ex-wife and Ron Goldman.[6] On February 21, 2008, a Los Angeles court upheld a renewal of the civil judgment against him.这个案子很经典，上面的一段是wiki上的英文案例，你可以找一些关于这个的中文资料，然后选择一个角度（比如种族歧视与陪审团制度的矛盾、毒树之果原则、媒体和舆论与司法公正的矛盾等等），或者一篇参考的中文文章（很多中国的法律人也会研究这个案子，发表一些观点），自己写或者翻译一篇英文论文出来就是了。下面引用一段英文资料，有个人在提问，为什么法院在刑事诉讼中判决辛普森无罪，但是在民事诉讼中又判决他赔偿自己妻子死亡赔偿金。 Jeralyn Merritt对这个问题进行了简略的回答。我想你大一的论文，字数要求不会太多，所以参考一下他这段答复吧。如果字数不够就把上面wiki的资料加一些进去,简单的交待一下案情。Q. I am a high school government student, and I have a question that has been bothering me that my teacher refuses to answer. In the . Simpson case I know that the state jury did not find him guilty on the charge of murder, but the federal court did on the charge of wrongful death. What is the difference and why were they able to do that? -- Geni A. . Simpson was charged with first degree murder in the state court in California. The jury found him "Not Guilty." A "not guilty" verdict means the state failed to prove the charges "beyond a reasonable doubt", which is the standard of proof in all criminal prosecutions. Criminal cases are brought on behalf of the citizens of a particular state or federal district, not by the victims or their . Simpson was found not guilty in the criminal case, the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman sued him in the state (not federal) court in California for wrongfully causing their deaths. Civil lawsuits for wrongful death are tried for money damages, not to put the defendant in prison. Civil cases are brought in the name of individuals, not in the name of the evidence was introduced in the . Simpson civil and criminal trials. For example, although . Simpson denied it, evidence was presented in the civil trial that . Simpson owned a pair of Bruno Magli shoes that matched shoeprints left at the murder . Simpson exercised his constitutional right against self-incrimination and chose not to testify in the criminal trial. All defendants in criminal cases have this right. In the civil trial, . no longer had such a right because he had been found not guilty of murder and could not be tried again for it. He had to testify when the opposing side called him as a witness. Thus, the jury in the civil case got to hear 's testimony while the criminal jury did the criminal case, the jury got to see that the glove left at the scene of the crime did not fit . Simpson. This experiment was not repeated for the civil jury. The jury in the criminal trial got a far stronger portrayal of the problems with the DNA and other scientific evidence in the case, and the poor management of the crime scene, than did the civil jury. And the criminal jury got to hear the false testimony of Los Angeles police officer Mark Furman, who later admitted lying and pleaded guilty to , the burden of proof in criminal and civil cases is different. In criminal cases, the standard is "proof beyond a reasonable doubt." There is also a presumption of innocence that stays with the defendant until and unless the jury returns a guilty verdict. In civil cases, the standard of proof is "by a preponderance of the evidence," which essentially means "more likely than not," or put another way, proof by 51% or jury's verdict in the civil case was not that . Simpson was guilty of murder, but that he was liable for (which essentially means responsible for causing) the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron light of the different evidence presented, burdens of proof and ultimate issues the juries were called upon to decide, the verdicts in the criminal and civil trials were not really all that inconsistent. -- Jeralyn Merritt
通常英语专业毕业从事法律工作的，一般都是做法律文件的翻译，如果同时有法律背景的，一般就是做法律文件英文版本的起草。所以，如果你没有法律教育背景，建议还是从“如何做好法律文件的翻译”的某一个题目去写。比如，法律文件翻译和一般文件翻译的不同之处什么的。。希望对你有帮助。
law and order是个固定词组，中文解释即：法律与秩序(右派针对犯罪与暴力所提出的口号)“与”字有和之意，所以按此题目故而应写两者。中国具有代表性的计划生育就是一个很好的素材，不过要是从这两者下笔，我认为从中国法律的历史来写更容易些。以上只是个人见解，希望能对你有所帮助。
2012年02月13日 09时00分，《英语资源网:英语论文：法律英语的汉译[1]》由英语我整理. 摘要: 法律英语有其独特特征,表现为用词正式庄重,句式复杂冗长,篇章结构规范严谨。本文从“功能对等”理论出发,结合其文体特征,在分析其遣词造句和篇章特点的基础上,探讨如何实现法律英语汉译的“功能对等”。 关键词:尤金?奈达 功能对等 法律英语 一、引言 刘宓庆认为,法律文书即狭义上的公文文体;贾文波将法律文书归类为经贸文体;而吕俊等人则认为法律文书属于专门用途文体。尽管看法不一,但都强调了法律语言的特殊性,即:用词准确规范,句子长且复杂,语篇结构严谨。奈达提出“功能对等”翻译原则。论文论文参考网他强调在语言的诸多功能中信息功能最为重要,认为翻译应追求一种“共同语言”,使得译文读者能够以原文读者理解和欣赏原文的方式理解和欣赏译文文本。因此法律文本的译者不仅要熟悉原语和目的语的法律术语和文体特点,还要对这两种语言的词汇、句法以及语篇有深刻的认识,从而达到翻译的“功能对等”。 二、法律英语的功能对等汉译 (一)语言特征下的功能对等汉译 1.法律词汇 法律英语用词正式庄重。它有许多专业词汇,使用古体词和外来词,一些普通词有其特殊的法律意义。译者应遵循语言“规范化”,即使用官方认可的规范化语言,也应在两种语言中建立完全对等的语义关系,以找到等价术语。译者还需注重语言的“一致性”,即一个术语在同一个语篇中只用一个表达。 2.法律词组 法律文本经常使用近义词,近义词组rectify,amend or modify体现了法律语言“准确性”特征,译为校正、修改和修正。法律英语也常使用大量的同义词来表达同一概念的现象。这些同义词组只表达一个含义,如fair and equitable(合理的)。译者应遵循“精炼性”,做到精练准确。 3.动词名词化 动词名词化在法律英语中较普遍。汉语是动词占优势的语言,所以英译汉时应将名词翻译为动词,以符合汉语表达方式。如:The obligations under Articles 3 and 4 do not apply to procedures provided in multilateral agreements concluded under the auspices of WIPO relating to the acquisition or maintenance of intellectual property rights.划线部分应译为动词:获得和维护。 4.情态动词 法律英语中使用大量情态动词,如shall和may。shall的使用表现出立法成员的强烈意志,具有强制性,通常译为应该、必须,但在翻译时注重其“规约性”,把这种强制的语气表达出即可。 5.模糊语言 法律文书有时须使用意义模糊灵活的词语去准确表达法律概念或事实。如:necessary,as early as possible等,可译为:所需和尽早,这些词是对无法量定的情况进行限制概括,体现了法律的“科学性”。 (二)句式特征下的功能对等汉译 法律英语句式复杂冗长。刘宓庆将长句翻译分六步:紧缩主干、辨析词义、区分主从、捋清层次、调整搭配及润饰词语。通过庖丁解牛,分析句子逻辑关系和语义关系,理解句子的各成分之间的关系,并用符合中文的表达方式进行翻译,译者方可达到翻译的“功能对等”。如: China shall establish or designate an official journal dedicated to the publication of all laws,regulations and other measures pertaining to or affecting trade in goods,services,TRIPS or the control of foreign exchange and,after publication of its laws,regulations or other measures in such journal,shall provide a reasonable period for comment to the appropriate authorities before such measures are implemented,except for those laws,regulations and other measures involving national security,specific measures setting foreign exchange rates or m
论建设社会主义法制文明的必要性
论文题目建议要切入点小以下都是优秀的经济法和商法的论文题 1、国家干预和市场调节的法律互动与平衡 2、“政府失灵”的经济法调整 3、“市场失灵”的经济法调整 4. 社会公共利益与经济法的关系 5、城乡协调发展的经济法思考 6、论企业的社会责任 7、论我国的银行监管体制 8、论我国的证券监管体制 9、关于政府采购的经济法思考 10、税制改革与经济法的创新 11、论国有资产监管体制的完善 12、论我国反垄断法的立法思考 13、论产品质量责任的确定 14、关于我国新公司法的若干思考 15、论不正当竞争行为的认定及处理 16、反垄断法中的知识产权保护 17、论劳动债权的优先权 18、我国社会保障制度的缺陷及完善 19、民营经济发展中的经济法思考 20、论集体谈判制度
1 “郎顾之争”的法律分析 2 论电子商务中消费者权益保护的法律问题 3 论民事纠纷证明责任 4 论民事诉讼程序的改革与完善 5 论民事诉讼的处分原则 6 论名誉权的损害及其法律责任 7 人民陪审制度问题研究 8 论商事纠纷解决机制 9 论网络作品的著作权保护 10 国有企业MBO的法律分析 11 论证券市场的诚信建设 12 论网络世界“虚拟财产”的法律保护 13 论我国破产制度的完善 14 我国信托业发展的法律环境探讨 15 信托关系当事人法律地位探析 16 缔约过失责任的认定与处理 17 电信互联互通的法律思考 18 对民事诉讼基本原则的重构研究 19 各国信托业比较研究 20 关于刑讯逼供的理性思考 21 合法垄断刍议 22 互联网域名抢注的法律思考 23 环境民事侵权的规则与救济 24 计算机软件最终用户法律责任探讨 25 家庭暴力问题浅析 26 建立中国宪法法院—探析与重构 27 论保险代位权 28 论辩诉交易制度在中国的建立 29 论表见代理 30 论不安抗辩与预期违约 31 论不当得利之请求权 32 论沉默权制度 33 论程序正义 34 论驰名商标的保护 35 论驰名商标与域名保护争议中的冲突与解决 36 论大陆法对清末法制形成的影响 37 论代位执行 38 论单身女性生育权 39 论单位犯罪主体及其处罚 40 论当代中国法律文化传统的重塑 41 论缔约过失责任 42 论动产抵押权的效力 43 论独立董事制度在我国公司中的应用 44 论法律解释 45 论法律行为在法律关系中的意义 46 论非法人组织 47 论非法证据 48 论夫妻财产制度 49 论腐败与法制监督 50 论妇女权益保障 51 论格式合同及其规制 52 论根本违约、情势变更与合同解除 53 论公民隐私权的法律保护 54 论公司法注册资本制度的完善—以一种价值比较之角度 55 论公司合并 56 论公益诉讼 57 论公众人物隐私权的保护 58 论共同犯罪 59 论共有知识产权 60 论国际私法中的当事人意思自治 61 论国际直接投资之国际法调整 62 论国民待遇不构成WTO体系的基本原则 63 论合同的撤消权 64 论合同的效力 65 论合同无效 66 论合同罪 67 论环境法的公众参与原则 68 论环境法制建设 69 论缓刑制度的适用 70 论回避制度 71 论会计信息失真及其法律责任 72 论婚内强奸的认定 73 论货物贸易中的国民待遇适用标准 74 论计算机软件的知识产权保护
1． 论经济法与行政法的互动关系 2． 经济法与社会法关系辨正 3． 经济法与弱势群体的保护 4． 市场经济与反垄断的立法建设 5． 论规模经济与反垄断法的关系 6． 我国反垄断法的价值取向 7． 反垄断法若干问题的比较研究 8． 加入WTO与加强消费者权益法律保护的研究 9． 论消费者权益保护法的基本精神 10． 新型消费领域消费者权利保护研究 11． 税负公平原则和农村税费改革 12． 税收司法保障研究 13． 税法公平价值论 14． 政策性银行运行模式的国际比较及对我国的启示 15． 加入WTO后我国对外资银行的监管策略研究 16． 银行业与证券业混业经营的若干法律问题 17． 社会保障法律制度在改革中的问题与对策 18． 论社会保障法律制度的基础 19． 我国社会保障制度的缺陷及其完善 20． 新形势下农村社会保障体系与法律制度的建构 21． 国外社会保障税对我国社会保障税法的借鉴 22． 国外社会救助制度的比较与借鉴 23． 工伤保险若干法律问题研究 24． 论土地征用制度 25． 房地产项目公司的法律问题研究 26． 土地储备制度研究 27． 论农村土地承包制度 28． 农村土地权属法律模式研究 29． 城市失地农民利益保护的法律思考 30． 罢工权法律制度研究 31． 劳动合同若干法律问题研究 32． 劳动争议解决程序研究 33． 论商法的基本原则 34． 我国《证券法》存在的主要问题及修改建议 35． 论上市公司信息披露的法律监管 36． 证券发行保荐人民事责任研究 37． 证券投资基金法律制度研究 38． 试论我国证券发行制度的完善 39． 试论我国企业立法体系的重构 40． 合伙协议法律性质研究 41． 公司章程法律性质研究 42． 论有限责任与债权人保护 43． 有限责任公司股东退出机制创新研究 44． 上市公司小股东利益保护机制研究 45． 《破产法》若干问题研究 46． 论独立董事的义务 47． 公司资本制度研究 48． 论股权 49． 我国股份回购的现实意义与立法完善 50． 股东知情权研究 51． 企业并购的若干法律问题研究 52． 关联交易法律问题研究 53． 股东诉权的司法实务研究 54． 股权转让合同效力与股东登记的法律问题研究 55． 公司法人治理结构的立法模式及其发展趋势 56． 清算中公司的性质及其责任的承担 57． 审理证券虚假陈述民事赔偿的法律问题研究 58． 论保险利益 59． 票据权利研究 60． 信托的法律性质与基本理念 61． 保险委付研究 62． 论保险中的诚实信用原则 …………………………………………………………………………… 需要更多内容可参考中国论文援助中心