野性的呼唤中文毕业论文

英文读后感--《野性的呼唤》（The Call of the Wild）的读后感 My Call of the Wild ------ Enlightenment of The Call of the Wild " He sings a song of the younger world, which is the song of the pack." (Chapter VII The Sounding of the Wild) When the last sentence vanished from my eyes, I can still perceive an echo of a song - a wild song, which knocks up my dizzy mind that always cheerfully sink into the so-called civilized world without questioning. Wild, is no longer a symbol of the law of jungle but a headspring where streams out love, passion, bravery, loyalty, friendship, venture, competition and tolerance all these virtues can easily be found in the Call of the Wild. Jack London (1876-1916) is a worldwide renowned novelist. His stories successfully reflect the contradictory views of man’s nature and destiny in and against the wild, and his "fight to survive" notion has gained him and his works timeless popularity, particularly, the Call of the Wild It tells a story of a gigantic dog, named Buck, who is stolen from a rich and comfortable home and forced to learn to survive as an Alaskan sled dog. Buck, at first, is too savage for the company of man until he coincidently encounters his beloved master-kindhearted John Thornton. Finally, John’s incidental death breaks Buck’s last tie to the man and drives him into his long-desired wild with his pack. In the story, Buck and John simply adopt themselves to answer the call of the wild. When it comes to Buck’s mind that one day he will eventually leave John- his master, all he wants to do is just to help him finish the gold-rush-trip. He " from then on, night and day, never put a halt, in desperation, he burst into long stretch of flight, did not to stay him (John)…" (Chapter VII The Sounding of The Wild) Buck wished to remember John’s image forever, he "for two days and nights never left camp, never let Thornton out of his sight. He followed him about at his work, watched him while saw him into blankets at night and out of them in the morning…" (Chapter VII) When I read these words I just could not hold my tears bursting. Can a real man devote himself to loyalty and friendship in such a way? On the other hand, John Thornton is not only a dog-lover but also a brave and venturous man. He is so straightforward and simple that makes him an accommodating man. Once he firmly roots a goal into his heart, it seems that nothing could prevent him from accomplishing it except death. I do not know whether the persistence is the most vital element to make a man successful, but what I know is that you are not far away from success once you occupy it. It is Jack London who plunges me into the animated wild from the hustle-and-bustle and from desperate city. There, I merely cannot deny the attraction of Buck’s bark, which enlightens me to pursue another lost half of the nature in mankind, and to dig out a true meaning of life. Dare we imagine that London intentionally employs Buck to set us a model with perfect characters (count barbarity out)? The answer is affirmed. We, as animals, are from the wild but shedding off more and more wild signs, which demonstrate us as the "uncivilized". However, who can fully guarantee that we have not overlooked some essential wild-endowed virtues? Especially, nowadays, it seems more crucial for us to stop looking at the post-industrialized world and to ponder for a while. When cheats, betrayals, lies, lusts and crimes stuff a materialized society, whether London uses this novel to help himself escape the reality or warn the earthy people, to us, modern man, is all the same. It appears horrible that in modern society many people are enthusiastically talking about how to build up "special relations" to the authority, deceiving and lying to each other. To them life is a mask-wearing process rather than a hard work. Every time, you browse WebPages, scandals in politics, business, the entertainment circle and even on campus crowd into your eyes. Oh, what is the essence of human beings? What is the civilization to us? Do we need to look back at where we came from? Is it good or bad for us to speak out what we think and to do what the consciences demand us to? Are we wasting talents given by the mighty nature? Be an honest, straightforward, warmhearted, emotional and responsible man or be a shrewd, cold hearted and astute hypocrite? While embracing the "civilized" rubbish, we are losing those good virtues, which are the calls of the wild. Once we lose them, we are to lose ourselves, and we will get nowhere. I wish this dreadful thought is totally a fallacy, but, now, it is chilling me hard. One day when I happen to stand on the top of a grand mountain to observe a boundless prairie enveloped by the sapphire firmament and combed by gusts of the rhythmical west wind, a morning sun sprinkles me her warmth and brilliance in a graceful way, however, at that moment, I am afraid that I cannot appreciate these beauties, I am a lost " civilized man" then. Please, please do not let come true while we are still able to answer the call of the wild.

你去看苍蝇王,看过之后你就会对人性有个深刻的理解.

英文读后感--《野性的呼唤》（The Call of the Wild）的读后感 My Call of the Wild ------ Enlightenment of The Call of the Wild " He sings a song of the younger world, which is the song of the pack." (Chapter VII The Sounding of the Wild) When the last sentence vanished from my eyes, I can still perceive an echo of a song - a wild song, which knocks up my dizzy mind that always cheerfully sink into the so-called civilized world without questioning. Wild, is no longer a symbol of the law of jungle but a headspring where streams out love, passion, bravery, loyalty, friendship, venture, competition and tolerance all these virtues can easily be found in the Call of the Wild. Jack London (1876-1916) is a worldwide renowned novelist. His stories successfully reflect the contradictory views of man’s nature and destiny in and against the wild, and his "fight to survive" notion has gained him and his works timeless popularity, particularly, the Call of the Wild It tells a story of a gigantic dog, named Buck, who is stolen from a rich and comfortable home and forced to learn to survive as an Alaskan sled dog. Buck, at first, is too savage for the company of man until he coincidently encounters his beloved master-kindhearted John Thornton. Finally, John’s incidental death breaks Buck’s last tie to the man and drives him into his long-desired wild with his pack. In the story, Buck and John simply adopt themselves to answer the call of the wild. When it comes to Buck’s mind that one day he will eventually leave John- his master, all he wants to do is just to help him finish the gold-rush-trip. He " from then on, night and day, never put a halt, in desperation, he burst into long stretch of flight, did not to stay him (John)…" (Chapter VII The Sounding of The Wild) Buck wished to remember John’s image forever, he "for two days and nights never left camp, never let Thornton out of his sight. He followed him about at his work, watched him while saw him into blankets at night and out of them in the morning…" (Chapter VII) When I read these words I just could not hold my tears bursting. Can a real man devote himself to loyalty and friendship in such a way? On the other hand, John Thornton is not only a dog-lover but also a brave and venturous man. He is so straightforward and simple that makes him an accommodating man. Once he firmly roots a goal into his heart, it seems that nothing could prevent him from accomplishing it except death. I do not know whether the persistence is the most vital element to make a man successful, but what I know is that you are not far away from success once you occupy it. It is Jack London who plunges me into the animated wild from the hustle-and-bustle and from desperate city. There, I merely cannot deny the attraction of Buck’s bark, which enlightens me to pursue another lost half of the nature in mankind, and to dig out a true meaning of life. Dare we imagine that London intentionally employs Buck to set us a model with perfect characters (count barbarity out)? The answer is affirmed. We, as animals, are from the wild but shedding off more and more wild signs, which demonstrate us as the "uncivilized". However, who can fully guarantee that we have not overlooked some essential wild-endowed virtues? Especially, nowadays, it seems more crucial for us to stop looking at the post-industrialized world and to ponder for a while. When cheats, betrayals, lies, lusts and crimes stuff a materialized society, whether London uses this novel to help himself escape the reality or warn the earthy people, to us, modern man, is all the same. It appears horrible that in modern society many people are enthusiastically talking about how to build up "special relations" to the authority, deceiving and lying to each other. To them life is a mask-wearing process rather than a hard work. Every time, you browse WebPages, scandals in politics, business, the entertainment circle and even on campus crowd into your eyes. Oh, what is the essence of human beings? What is the civilization to us? Do we need to look back at where we came from? Is it good or bad for us to speak out what we think and to do what the consciences demand us to? Are we wasting talents given by the mighty nature? Be an honest, straightforward, warmhearted, emotional and responsible man or be a shrewd, cold hearted and astute hypocrite? While embracing the "civilized" rubbish, we are losing those good virtues, which are the calls of the wild. Once we lose them, we are to lose ourselves, and we will get nowhere. I wish this dreadful thought is totally a fallacy, but, now, it is chilling me hard. One day when I happen to stand on the top of a grand mountain to observe a boundless prairie enveloped by the sapphire firmament and combed by gusts of the rhythmical west wind, a morning sun sprinkles me her warmth and brilliance in a graceful way, however, at that moment, I am afraid that I cannot appreciate these beauties, I am a lost " civilized man" then. Please, please do not let come true while we are still able to answer the call of the wild.貌似长了点。。。。。

中文：野性的呼唤是一本很好的书，不像童话那样可爱生动活泼，有时候甚至是让人感到恐怖，其实这不是它的缺点，而是它的优点。班上大部分同学都喜欢恐怖的故事，我也不例外，大家应该看题目都有点起鸡皮疙瘩了吧？！那就让我来简单说一下吧：巴克（注意：巴克就是主人公，它是一只狗）在冰天雪地里面拉雪橇，不到一个月就瘦了足足15斤，只好卖掉巴克买其它的狗。和：南极的温度是零下50摄氏度左右，每天要拉12个小时的雪橇。从这两个地方就足以看出有点恐怖了，不用像后面就比前面还有让人胆战心惊了！ 每人心中都有一分狂野，正如那条银色的狗，或者说是狼。 人的内心是很隐秘的，我们无法了解他，许多人甚至不知道他的存在。等到我们经历了很多，许多沧海变做桑田，自己的心也累了，甚至连跳动的力量也没有了，猛然做梦时发现了自己祖先也与狼一般于禁林中召唤，我们会义无返顾的回到本就属于也是我们本影在的地方吗？ 野性不光在呼唤我们的心，甚至灵魂也为他屈服。忽的想起了那句“随风奔跑自由是方向”原始的自有他的美丽。这个复杂的世界正是由自然用最简单的方法造就的。这只是个时间问题，时间可以改变坚固的山石，清明的流水，让世界毁灭又让它重生。但他永远不能磨灭生命的骨髓——野性。因为他是不可改变的。没有他则生命也无从谈起，他有无穷的哲理。唤起了野性不是重生就是涅盘。也正是他的矛盾让人们渴望野性之火的燃烧又惧怕他焚毁自己。 野性的呼唤，来隐秘的深处。 英文： My Call of the Wild ------ Enlightenment of The Call of the Wild " He sings a song of the younger world, which is the song of the pack." (Chapter VII The Sounding of the Wild) When the last sentence vanished from my eyes, I can still perceive an echo of a song - a wild song, which knocks up my dizzy mind that always cheerfully sink into the so-called civilized world without questioning. Wild, is no longer a symbol of the law of jungle but a headspring where streams out love, passion, bravery, loyalty, friendship, venture, competition and tolerance all these virtues can easily be found in the Call of the Wild. Jack London (1876-1916) is a worldwide renowned novelist. His stories successfully reflect the contradictory views of man’s nature and destiny in and against the wild, and his "fight to survive" notion has gained him and his works timeless popularity, particularly, the Call of the Wild It tells a story of a gigantic dog, named Buck, who is stolen from a rich and comfortable home and forced to learn to survive as an Alaskan sled dog. Buck, at first, is too savage for the company of man until he coincidently encounters his beloved master-kindhearted John Thornton. Finally, John’s incidental death breaks Buck’s last tie to the man and drives him into his long-desired wild with his pack. In the story, Buck and John simply adopt themselves to answer the call of the wild. When it comes to Buck’s mind that one day he will eventually leave John- his master, all he wants to do is just to help him finish the gold-rush-trip. He " from then on, night and day, never put a halt, in desperation, he burst into long stretch of flight, did not to stay him (John)…" (Chapter VII The Sounding of The Wild) Buck wished to remember John’s image forever, he "for two days and nights never left camp, never let Thornton out of his sight. He followed him about at his work, watched him while saw him into blankets at night and out of them in the morning…" (Chapter VII) When I read these words I just could not hold my tears bursting. Can a real man devote himself to loyalty and friendship in such a way? On the other hand, John Thornton is not only a dog-lover but also a brave and venturous man. He is so straightforward and simple that makes him an accommodating man. Once he firmly roots a goal into his heart, it seems that nothing could prevent him from accomplishing it except death. I do not know whether the persistence is the most vital element to make a man successful, but what I know is that you are not far away from success once you occupy it. It is Jack London who plunges me into the animated wild from the hustle-and-bustle and from desperate city. There, I merely cannot deny the attraction of Buck’s bark, which enlightens me to pursue another lost half of the nature in mankind, and to dig out a true meaning of life. Dare we imagine that London intentionally employs Buck to set us a model with perfect characters (count barbarity out)? The answer is affirmed. We, as animals, are from the wild but shedding off more and more wild signs, which demonstrate us as the "uncivilized". However, who can fully guarantee that we have not overlooked some essential wild-endowed virtues? Especially, nowadays, it seems more crucial for us to stop looking at the post-industrialized world and to ponder for a while. When cheats, betrayals, lies, lusts and crimes stuff a materialized society, whether London uses this novel to help himself escape the reality or warn the earthy people, to us, modern man, is all the same. It appears horrible that in modern society many people are enthusiastically talking about how to build up "special relations" to the authority, deceiving and lying to each other. To them life is a mask-wearing process rather than a hard work. Every time, you browse WebPages, scandals in politics, business, the entertainment circle and even on campus crowd into your eyes. Oh, what is the essence of human beings? What is the civilization to us? Do we need to look back at where we came from? Is it good or bad for us to speak out what we think and to do what the consciences demand us to? Are we wasting talents given by the mighty nature? Be an honest, straightforward, warmhearted, emotional and responsible man or be a shrewd, cold hearted and astute hypocrite? While embracing the "civilized" rubbish, we are losing those good virtues, which are the calls of the wild. Once we lose them, we are to lose ourselves, and we will get nowhere. I wish this dreadful thought is totally a fallacy, but, now, it is chilling me hard. One day when I happen to stand on the top of a grand mountain to observe a boundless prairie enveloped by the sapphire firmament and combed by gusts of the rhythmical west wind, a morning sun sprinkles me her warmth and brilliance in a graceful way, however, at that moment, I am afraid that I cannot appreciate these beauties, I am a lost " civilized man" then. Please, please do not let come true while we are still able to answer the call of the wild.

1.周国平说“恨是狭隘，爱是超越”他说在读《圣经》时读出了一种真正博大的爱的精神。又说“只爱你的亲人和朋友 是容易的”，“这是出自于一个有局限性的人的本能”。读到这里，我不禁自言自语“容易吗？不容易！谁说容易了？”在利益的唆使下，在虚荣的驱动下，谁不是殉葬品？父亲 与儿女，丈夫与妻子就能置身事外了吗？“天下熙熙，皆为利来”，到头来也只能是“落了片白茫茫大地真干净”！他说这是容易的，我不信，殊不知天下本为容易其实却极难的事情也不占少数。又云耶稣说“有人打了你了右脸，连左脸也让他打吧！”我想自己不是有那么大肚量的人，这一点我很清楚。要知道，一个人能任何人却永远也不了自己的心，当你扪心自问的时候对自己说实话，上帝会听到的。不管你做错了什么也好，什么都没错也好，只要自己问心无愧便是最好的。一个人如果以假面具对别人却能拿真面孔对这自己，即便是心底最邪恶的念头也敢对自己说，并且承认下来。那他还算是一个人，即便有错，有罪却是明事理的，你可以理解为这是生存的需要；反过来说，如果这个人连自己都欺，那他连人都不是。他可以毫无愧疚的欺自己，就等同于他可以真大光明的把一切丑陋的事物以美的观点来审视，以错为对，以丑为美，以邪恶为正义。这样的人难道不是最可怕的人吗？说的好听点是“披着羊皮的狼”，说的难听点就是“衣冠禽兽”，或者连禽兽都不如，禽兽尚且还知有恩必还，有仇必报。而这种人未必知道。贾雨村便可推为这类人的典型代表。换而言之，就是连天生万物最基本的天性都泯灭了，人乎？禽兽乎？该置于三界之外了吧！古话云：“冤冤相报何时了？”我也常想这个问题。倘或人真的有下辈子，是不是该报今生之仇？再如说，今生他害了我，来世我又来害他，再来世他再害我。这样一来一去何时才是个头啊？但是若将此恨了了，又何来“善恶都头终有报”之说？说什么“不是不报，时候未到”又岂不是空话？这一来一去不是相互矛盾了吗？我想，或许对立和联系并不都是相互矛盾的，关键看自己怎么想。我们自己的思想虽不能改变世界上的对与错，却能左右自己分辨对与错的态度。你是怎么想的，这一点最关键！不过我想，能说出“有人打了你的右脸，连左脸也让他打”这话的人，有两种，一者是大圣大贤之人，此一者像我们这样的凡夫俗子不能望其项背；二者便只是说说而已，多半是玩嘴上功夫的，或是故作高深。他们并不曾遇到很值得他们思考是否该将自己的左脸也一并送上的事情。不过，是“很值得”，如若只是一般的事，我想但凡有些气量的人也不会斤斤计较的。与“送上左脸”这种说法相反的，就是我所厌恶的捏着别人的错不放的人。这种人会应为别人说错的一句话而斤斤计较，耿耿于怀。不说将其当做过眼云烟，反而没事拿出来宣扬宣扬，将其当做把柄，抓住一切可趁之机旁敲侧股，端着一副不可一世的霸气，没的叫人恶心！就好像是说：“我永远是对的，你永远是错的！”是啊，你是大贤，是至圣，我该如何待你呢？把你当做圣贤高高供起？然后每日歌功颂德？三炷香不离手？天生万物，样样各别。然道真像电视里所说的那样“这人造的多了，次品也就多了”？当然，这只是句玩笑话，但是，生活中这样那样的次品还真不少呢！作文这种胸襟狭小之人虽可恨，却也没什么值得横加指责的，毕竟每个人是不一样的，因为谁也不好强迫谁怎么做。在我看来，虚伪之人才是最可恨之人！我不敢奢望你是君子，你哪怕是真小人，我也会佩服你敢作敢当。但你偏偏是伪君子，这伪的却也怪，对外是君子，对内却是小人。虽说这个世界上让我佩服的人不多，憎恶的却不少。只可惜，你却是后者之一。然而，我也不得不回到俗事上来。就拿这次高考填报志愿的事来说，我一生一世不会忘记的是你行为的拙劣。而我，则成为令你摆布的木偶。自此，我深知我的人生之舵将不在自己手上，而是掌握在你的手中。你若只是对我，我也就认了，只怪自己生错了地方。但是你那样对她，我则不能原谅。你说的是什么话？是人话吗？偏不只是这样，你还拉上一个帮凶。而这个帮凶却是使我曾经觉得是值得敬重的。但我还是错了，悔恨自己是那么的不知世，涉世是那样的浅，又是那样的不识人。为了内心的一点见不得人的私欲，你可以不惜牺牲我的前途，剥夺我的快乐！。想起在临川的时候，我的房东是一个信佛的老人，她是个明眼人。房东婆婆说“好好考，为自己争口气！你看吧！考到了大学他就不是这样对你了。”虽然她很多话是对的，只可惜这句话却是错的。但我又是多么希望这句话如其所言。看来，我是太痴心妄想了些。抱着一个不切实际的想法活着这些年。但你却不知道，我的痴心妄想换做别人却是一件简单之极，天经地义的的事情。我真的不明白，你还有什么不满足的呢？人的私欲是多么的可怕呀！对此，我不想再多说什么，我又还能再说什么呢？就让这一切连同这永远得不到满足的人的欲望一起沉默！我真的该认真思考一下路在何方……… 2.讲道理谁都会，可是如何让沉沦的人们心动甚至心痛呢？我并不是想取悦于大众，让所有人难过，我的专业也并非多愁善感，可是，我知道我的灵魂深处依附着一撮永不退色的阴霾，它指引我去探索人间的挚情挚爱。《野性的呼唤》一书，我不能说它是尘世间最有价值的书，那会是对其他优秀文学作品的一种否定和打击，甚至是诽谤，的确，它没有四大名着般显赫的名声，所以它鲜为人知，然而它的魅力毋庸置疑，它的吸引力直到我的骨髓里，同时也带给我人性的感悟。感悟终究是一个过程，无法用只言片语来做完美的阐述，一切只能用心去聆听，因为，世界的声音是属于每个人的。《野性的呼唤》是一篇长篇小说，书的主角是一只叫做布克的狗，其大概内容如下：自从阿拉斯加发现金矿后，引来一批又一批淘金人潮，这些人需要大量的狗来替他们拉雪橇，于是很多狗被卖到北方去，布克就是这样的一条狗。它本来生活在温馨的南方，在法官家里过着舒适的生活，直到有一天被园丁偷偷卖掉，它的生活从此发生了翻天覆地的变化。布克在北方经受了种种艰难困苦，同时也磨练了它的意志……小说虽然是虚拟的，然而它也是人类幻想的另一种境界。读完此书后，我仿佛听见了来自那个世界的虚弱的喘息声，那是人性的呼唤，像颤巍巍的小溪，从溪涧穿过，却穿进了我的心，穿透了我的世界，我的脑海里开始浮现出布克那凶猛强悍的形象，它那霸道的眼神，隐隐之中流露出七分聪慧三分狡猾，它终究是野兽，有来自体内的野性与兽性，可是一想到它对主人桑顿那忠诚的爱，我觉得它是那样的温柔，尤其是书中描写布克得知桑顿被害后那个惊心动魄的场面，布克疯狂的扑向那群毫无准备的印第安人，他不停地撕着、吼着、扯着人们的喉咙，鲜血在那一刻像喷泉一样涌出……它的动作像风雷般迅速，使得人们射出的箭毫无效用，最后，所有的人都倒在了血泊之中，布克回到了属于它的森林……在此，我并不同情人类，反而憎恶他们的欲望，一批又一批的淘金人潮令我反感，欲望越大，心就越贪婪。其实，一个人从生活中汲取的蜜浆越多，那么储存在他体内的“脂肪”也就越多，最终人类自己也会觉得臃肿甚至累赘，于是又开始盲目的虚伪的“减肥”。我懂得不多，只是我不想装傻，世界没有那么浑浊，我也没有那么单纯，却也没有那么复杂。天空永远不可能是透明的，我要的高度绝不是地平线。生活，我不要重叠，更不要空隙，我只要不反复的充实。最后，我想再次发出人性的呼唤，竟是人类不要吮吸过多的蜜浆。或许，没有人需要我的召唤，而我的心声或许空气都不如，因为，至少人类需要空气，却不需要我所谓的劝导……

读《野性的呼唤》有感 《野性的呼唤》是美国作家杰克-伦敦的小说。故事主要叙述一只强壮勇猛的狼狗巴克从人类文明社会回到狼群原始生活的过程。 《野狼的呼唤》虽然说是一部小说，但读了它以后给我的感想很深刻。也许有些人读了没什么感觉，甚至有些人很可能会说“没意思”，当然，每个人看问题的角度不一样嘛。这个故事的大略的内容情节如下： 巴克是一条体重140磅的十分强壮的狗。他本来在一个大法官家里过着由于的生活，后来被法官的园丁偷走，辗转卖给邮局，又被送到阿拉斯加严寒地区拉运送邮件的雪橇。巴克最初被卖给两个法裔加拿大人。这些被买来的狗不仅受到了人类的冷酷略待，而且在狗之间为了振铎勾裙的领导权么无时不在互相争斗、残杀．由于体力超群、机智勇敢，巴克最终打败斯比茨成为狗的领队狗。他先后换过几个主人，作后被约瀚－索顿收留。那是在巴克被残暴的住人哈尔打得遍体鳞伤，奄奄一息时，索顿救了他，并悉心为他疗伤。在索顿的精心互利下巴克恢复得很快. 一条狗！不！一条狼……又回到拉那n久前的嚎叫，祖先原始的野性在他身上重生拉！ 我从没有看到过哪个人或哪样东西有他如此毅力和精神！面对没有末日的北地跋涉，随处又都是末日！一路上打败了身边的对手……一条狗却表现出与众不同的喜悦和滴着野性的露水的笑容。 对生命如此执著的追求！那还是只狗吗？分明是人嘛！正是对生命内在的呼唤激发了他的潜能，他成为“莫尔人”的图腾！真的成就拉狗历史上不灭的传说！ 但是回到社会现实来说，就象爱情“只有有了生活，爱才有所附丽！”。把狗放到现实社会中，我想才是著名作家的心声，这样杰克.伦敦的作品才有了新的生命力，是把？正如这条狗逐渐演变成狼的过程不正是过去社会工人或贫苦大众亦或当今社会的真实写照吗？旧社会非人的生活，当今的煤矿工人；旧社会的强权专制，当今的媒体封杀。 野性的狗终于还是成为了一匹狼！一匹能在旷野里尽情嚎叫的领头狼！而当今的人类又会不会象那一匹狼狗一样做出反抗而拯救已经藏有危机的中国大地呢？ 那不知死神一直在身边的煤矿工人，下岗工人，那“总是受害者”的农民，那过度的贫富分化而走向抢劫犯罪的罪犯！都是用泪串起来的一串新中国的弱势群体啊！我真想向总理说回实话，真想疯狂的问总理几个问题。为什么中国的事故是他国的几倍？为什么出了问题有些关键人物还心安理得的到处演讲还安安稳稳的坐在办公桌前？为什么中国的工人农民比别个国家的都善良？为什么中国的布衣的话比德国等过的公民讲话更不引起本国有关部门的重视？为什么我们是国家的“和谐”口号真的只是所谓的口号？…… 翻译一下就可以了