论文范文人物分析英文

Character Analysis Essay，也就是人物分析论文，也是我们留学生经常遇到的一类essay作业，不知道怎么写的同学们通常有可以从以下几个方面入手，分别为人物描写，人物环境，情节发展，人物关系和主题。

1.分析人物描写，展示人物形象

我们可以通过分析展现人物个性的外貌、语言、行动和心理活动等方面，来把我人物的性格特点，深刻理解文章的主题。外貌、神态和动作的描写，很好地展现了人物的内心世界以及性格特征。而语言的描写，可以刻画人物性格，使他的形象栩栩如生，跃然纸上，同时促进故事情节的发展。而对心理细节的描写，可以直接表现人物的思想和内心情感，表现人物的思想品质和人物性格。

2.解析环境描写，侧观人物性格

文学作品中的人物，通常都是在一个特定的环境下活动的，所以对于环境描写的分析，也是理解人物形象很重要的一个方面。环境的描写不仅包括自然环境描写也包括社会环境描写。前者主要包括人物所处的时间、地点和景物等，而后者通常表明了时代特征，人物所处的时代环境可能是他命运、性格以及最终结局很重要的原因。结合环境描写，尤其是社会坏境描写来分析人物，是代写人物分析论文中非常重要的一环。

3.分析情节发展，窥测人物性格。

故事发展的情节本身就是由人物的行为和活动串联而成的。在情节展开的过程中，通过对人物细节的描写，再现了人物活生生的鲜明个性。因此，我们可以从故事情节入手，来分析人物形象。

通过这个角度来做人物分析时，需要注意以下几点：第一，全面。也就是说我们不能片面的通过某个情节来对人物做出判断，而应纵观全局，才能合理地解读人物。第二，人物的复杂性。通常主要人物的性格都会有多重性，没有绝对的好与坏，所以我们应该从多个角度来分析人物。第三，分清主次，需要判断哪些是人物的主要性格，对于情节的发展有着决定性的作用。最后，要动态地看待人物的发展，把我人物的性格变化。

除了以上的三种人物分析方法之外，我们还可以通过分析几个人物之间的关系，来把握主要人物的性格。或者我们可以从小说的主题出发，来揣摩作者的创作意图，从而准确地把握人物的性格特征。回答来源于Top论文网，原文链接

Analysis of Major Characters Robinson Crusoe While he is no flashy hero or grand epic adventurer, Robinson Crusoe displays character traits that have won him the approval of generations of readers. His perseverance in spending months making a canoe, and in practicing pottery making until he gets it right, is praiseworthy. Additionally, his resourcefulness in building a home, dairy, grape arbor, country house, and goat stable from practically nothing is clearly remarkable. The Swiss philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau applauded Crusoe’s do-it-yourself independence, and in his book on education, Emile, he recommends that children be taught to imitate Crusoe’s hands-on approach to life. Crusoe’s business instincts are just as considerable as his survival instincts: he manages to make a fortune in Brazil despite a twenty-eight-year absence and even leaves his island with a nice collection of gold. Moreover, Crusoe is never interested in portraying himself as a hero in his own narration. He does not boast of his courage in quelling the mutiny, and he is always ready to admit unheroic feelings of fear or panic, as when he finds the footprint on the beach. Crusoe prefers to depict himself as an ordinary sensible man, never as an exceptional hero. But Crusoe’s admirable qualities must be weighed against the flaws in his character. Crusoe seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his cold account of leaving his family—he worries about the religious consequences of disobeying his father, but never displays any emotion about leaving. Though he is generous toward people, as when he gives gifts to his sisters and the captain, Crusoe reveals very little tender or sincere affection in his dealings with them. When Crusoe tells us that he has gotten married and that his wife has died all within the same sentence, his indifference to her seems almost cruel. Moreover, as an individual personality, Crusoe is rather dull. His precise and deadpan style of narration works well for recounting the process of canoe building, but it tends to drain the excitement from events that should be thrilling. Action-packed scenes like the conquest of the cannibals become quite humdrum when Crusoe narrates them, giving us a detailed inventory of the cannibals in list form, for example. His insistence on dating events makes sense to a point, but it ultimately ends up seeming obsessive and irrelevant when he tells us the date on which he grinds his tools but neglects to tell us the date of a very important event like meeting Friday. Perhaps his impulse to record facts carefully is not a survival skill, but an irritating sign of his neurosis. Finally, while not boasting of heroism, Crusoe is nonetheless very interested in possessions, power, and prestige. When he first calls himself king of the island it seems jocund, but when he describes the Spaniard as his subject we must take his royal delusion seriously, since it seems he really does consider himself king. His teaching Friday to call him “Master,” even before teaching him the words for “yes” or “no,” seems obnoxious even under the racist standards of the day, as if Crusoe needs to hear the ego-boosting word spoken as soon as possible. Overall, Crusoe’s virtues tend to be private: his industry, resourcefulness, and solitary courage make him an exemplary individual. But his vices are social, and his urge to subjugate others is highly objectionable. In bringing both sides together into one complex character, Defoe gives us a fascinating glimpse into the successes, failures, and contradictions of modern man. Friday Probably the first nonwhite character to be given a realistic, individualized, and humane portrayal in the English novel, Friday has a huge literary and cultural importance. If Crusoe represents the first colonial mind in fiction, then Friday represents not just a Caribbean tribesman, but all the natives of America, Asia, and Africa who would later be oppressed in the age of European imperialism. At the moment when Crusoe teaches Friday to call him “Master” Friday becomes an enduring political symbol of racial injustice in a modern world critical of imperialist expansion. Recent rewritings of the Crusoe story, like J. M. Coetzee’s Foe and Michel Tournier’s Friday, emphasize the sad consequences of Crusoe’s failure to understand Friday and suggest how the tale might be told very differently from the native’s perspective. Aside from his importance to our culture, Friday is a key figure within the context of the novel. In many ways he is the most vibrant character in Robinson Crusoe, much more charismatic and colorful than his master. Indeed, Defoe at times underscores the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, exhibits far more emotion toward his family than Crusoe. Whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again, Friday jumps and sings for joy when he meets his father, and this emotional display makes us see what is missing from Crusoe’s stodgy heart. Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does. Friday’s sincere questions to Crusoe about the devil, which Crusoe answers only indirectly and hesitantly, leave us wondering whether Crusoe’s knowledge of Christianity is superficial and sketchy in contrast to Friday’s full understanding of his own god Benamuckee. In short, Friday’s exuberance and emotional directness often point out the wooden conventionality of Crusoe’s personality. Despite Friday’s subjugation, however, Crusoe appreciates Friday much more than he would a mere servant. Crusoe does not seem to value intimacy with humans much, but he does say that he loves Friday, which is a remarkable disclosure. It is the only time Crusoe makes such an admission in the novel, since he never expresses love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. The mere fact that an Englishman confesses more love for an illiterate Caribbean ex-cannibal than for his own family suggests the appeal of Friday’s personality. Crusoe may bring Friday Christianity and clothing, but Friday brings Crusoe emotional warmth and a vitality of spirit that Crusoe’s own European heart lacks. The Portuguese Captain The Portuguese captain is presented more fully than any other European in the novel besides Crusoe, more vividly portrayed than Crusoe’s widow friend or his family members. He appears in the narrative at two very important junctures in Crusoe’s life. First, it is the Portuguese captain who picks up Crusoe after the escape from the Moors and takes him to Brazil, where Crusoe establishes himself as a plantation owner. Twenty-eight years later, it is again the Portuguese captain who informs Crusoe that his Brazilian investments are secure, and who arranges the sale of the plantation and the forwarding of the proceeds to Crusoe. In both cases, the Portuguese captain is the agent of Crusoe’s extreme good fortune. In this sense, he represents the benefits of social connections. If the captain had not been located in Lisbon, Crusoe never would have cashed in on his Brazilian holdings. This assistance from social contacts contradicts the theme of solitary enterprise that the novel seems to endorse. Despite Crusoe’s hard individual labor on the island, it is actually another human being—and not his own resourcefulness—that makes Crusoe wealthy in the end. Yet it is doubtful whether this insight occurs to Crusoe, despite his obvious gratitude toward the captain. Moreover, the Portuguese captain is associated with a wide array of virtues. He is honest, informing Crusoe of the money he has borrowed against Crusoe’s investments, and repaying a part of it immediately even though it is financially difficult for him to do so. He is loyal, honoring his duties toward Crusoe even after twenty-eight years. Finally, he is extremely generous, paying Crusoe more than market value for the animal skins and slave boy after picking Crusoe up at sea, and giving Crusoe handsome gifts when leaving Brazil. All these virtues make the captain a paragon of human excellence, and they make us wonder why Defoe includes such a character in the novel. In some ways, the captain’s goodness makes him the moral counterpart of Friday, since the European seaman and the Caribbean cannibal mirror each other in benevolence and devotion to Crusoe. The captain’s goodness thus makes it impossible for us to make oversimplified oppositions between a morally bankrupt Europe on the one hand, and innocent noble savages on the other.

在英文论文写作中，常见的一种论文类型是人物分析，就是我们常说的Character Analysis Essay（人物分析论文）。这一类型的文章需要学生对人物角色做一个独特深入的分析。

文学作品中的人物通常可以分为以下几类。

Protagonists (heroes):故事的主角。

Antagonists:是故事中与主角互相敌对的角色或组织，换言之、是反对主角的个人或群体。但对立角色并不一定都是反派角色。

Major:主要人物，通常每个故事中只有一到两个主要人物。

Minor:次要人物，他们对主要人物的形象有着对比衬托的作用，尤其是和主要人物处于对立面的人物。次要人物能力越强，主要人物的形象就越突出，情节越跌宕起伏。

Dynamic(changing)：动态人物，即该人物随着故事的发展而变化。

Static(unchanging)：静态人物，该人物不随故事发展而发生变化，通常为次要角色。

Foils:指在与主角形成对立的人物，通常通过这种对比，来凸显主角的某一特点。

分析人物描写，展示人物形象

我们可以通过分析展现人物个性的外貌、语言、行动和心理活动等方面，来把握人物的性格特点，深刻理解文章的主题。外貌、神态和动作的描写，很好地展现了人物的内心世界以及性格特征。

而语言的描写，可以刻画人物性格，使他的形象栩栩如生，跃然纸上，同时促进故事情节的发展。而对心理细节的描写，可以直接表现人物的思想和内心情感，表现人物的思想品质和人物性格。