sci投稿dr

SCI投稿信件模板 一、投稿信 1. Dear Dr. XXX I am sending a manuscript entitled “XXXX” by XXXX, which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of XXXX. Yours sincerely 2. Dear Dr. XXX Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “XXX” by XXX, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of XXX. We have chosen this journal because it deals with XXX. We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.3. Dear Dr. XXX Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “XXX” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source. We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. 二、询问有无收到稿件 Dear Editor, We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help. 三、询问论文审查回音 Dear Editor, It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciate your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible. 四、关于论文的总体审查意见 1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below. 2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below. 3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as XXX. 4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added. 5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of XXX. 6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory. 7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker. 8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined. 9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays. 10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used? 五、给编辑的回信 1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that XXX One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result. 2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission. 3. Thank you for your letter of XXX and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “XXX”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval. 4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed. 5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red. 6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript. 7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence. 8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision. 9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account. 10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper. 11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 results from a misinterpretation of the data. 12. We would have included a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available. 13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.

第一步：sci论文投稿前准备

1、sci论文投稿，要有明确的对象，且不能一稿多投。这需要作者在投稿前，确定要投稿的SCI期刊是谁。

2、sci期刊有投稿要求，需要作者核实自己的文章是否满足要求，若不满足，要及时修改完善。

3、sci期刊有多个收稿渠道，主要分为官网投稿系统投稿，以及合作者推送投稿。

4、其他资料准备，比如推荐的审稿人是谁、作者简介、介绍信等等。

第二步：完成投稿信息的填写

投稿过程中，是有一些信息必填的，不填写就无法按提交按钮。这些必填信息，要在第一步中有所准备，且注意填写要求，以免出错，影响文章录用。

第三步：上传稿件并提交

稿件是要以附件的形式上传，关于稿件的要求、图片的要求等，要与期刊规定相符，核实无误后，点击提交，完成论文投稿。

SCI论文的投稿流程说起来很简单，先写好一篇英文的论文，然后找合适的刊物投稿过去就行了，录用或不录用等着就行，这个录用周期在3-4个月左右，录用后一般2个月左右会上线。

SCI期刊对收到的稿件有明确的要求，那么在投稿SCI论文投稿需要准备什么材料或做哪些准备呢？ 1、格式排版。投稿前需要按照期刊的格式要求进行格式排版，有一些期刊还提供格式模板，作者投稿前应该按照期刊格式要求仔细排版。排版可以起到美化论文的作用，一篇没排版的论文就像裸妆的美女是很难给人好印象的。 排版的过程中，尤其要注意的是参考文献的排版，各个期刊对参考文献格式都有明确要求，按照参考文献排版是一个繁琐和考验耐心的工作，您可以借助endnote等参考文献管理工具进行参考文献排版。图表的格式是排版过程另外一个需要特别注意的问题，很多期刊对图表有严格的要求，比如图片的分辨率不能低于300。图片中的字体和字号期刊也有明确的要求。有一些期刊图表可以放到正文里面一起提交，也有很多期刊要求图表是分别单独提交的，而不是放到正文里面。 2、撰写cover letter。cover letter是作者向期刊编辑推荐自己的稿件，一般包括稿件内容介绍、为什么适合投稿期刊、推荐专家、稿件没投稿、作者联系信息等情况。cover letter是不会公开出版的。 3、撰写highlight。为了让读者更快了解文章的要点，很多期刊还要求作者撰写3-5条highlight来概括文章的亮点。highlight要求必须精练，有明确的字数要求，一般不超过85个字符（含空格）。 4、推荐3-5个审稿专家。找到合适的专家是编辑头疼的事情之一，推荐3-5个审稿专家可以帮助期刊编辑迅速寻找到合适的审稿专家。

SCI论文投稿需要准备以下的材料。

01. Manuscript/Blind manuscript、Title Page(论文初稿)

①Manuscript/Blind manuscript(论文初稿)

②Title Page(封面)

02. Cover Letter介绍信

主要包含：期刊编辑的姓名、投稿文章的标题、投稿文章的类型、论文简介、作者信息。

Cover Letter需要包含的内容包括以下核心3点：

A.表明以什么为题的文章拟投杂志，简要介绍文章的主要发现和重要意义；

B.表明所有作者均已经知晓拟投本期刊，且没有一稿多投；

C.最后附上通讯作者的电话、邮箱、地址等信息。

03 Highlights 亮点

04 Graphical Abstract 图文摘要

05 Checklist核对清单

06 Reviewer suggestions 推荐审稿人

如果在论文写作和发表上有什么疑问，欢迎随时联系英才君哦。