发布时间：
在投稿模板中点击作者信息位置，弹出对话框。首次填写需点击添加，打开文本输入框，按文本框中的提示逐项填写即可。如果所填作者同时是通信联系人，请勾选中，并填写对应信息。（备注：1、“*”为必填项。2、通信作者的地址、电话请如实填写，方便日后文章星级证明的邮寄，及论文收录在精品期刊中的及时沟通。3、作者单位可自动记录，在重复填写时直接选择表单项即可。4、不同单位的作者姓名右上方会对应单位自动编号，修改单位，编号也会对应修改。）填好后单击保存，此时，在作者列表中即可看到您刚刚添加的作者。如果不只一位作者，您可以继续选择添加。在作者列表中，名字前方有“*”号的为通信作者，在这里您可以通过鼠标拖动操作，调整作者顺序，但请注意，第一作者和通信作者的作者简介等内容为必填。这些内容会部分出现在脚注上，为了严格保护您的个人信息中，作者的联系方式和电话手机不会出现。
不需要分栏排版的，只要文章是正常的论文格式就可以。投稿录用后，杂志社会有专门的排版编辑在做校对和排版的。
SCI投稿信件模板 一、投稿信 1. Dear Dr. XXX I am sending a manuscript entitled “XXXX” by XXXX, which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of XXXX. Yours sincerely 2. Dear Dr. XXX Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “XXX” by XXX, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of XXX. We have chosen this journal because it deals with XXX. We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.3. Dear Dr. XXX Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “XXX” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source. We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. 二、询问有无收到稿件 Dear Editor, We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help. 三、询问论文审查回音 Dear Editor, It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciate your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible. 四、关于论文的总体审查意见 1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below. 2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below. 3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as XXX. 4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added. 5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of XXX. 6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory. 7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker. 8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined. 9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays. 10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used? 五、给编辑的回信 1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that XXX One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result. 2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission. 3. Thank you for your letter of XXX and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “XXX”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval. 4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed. 5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red. 6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript. 7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence. 8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision. 9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account. 10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper. 11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 results from a misinterpretation of the data. 12. We would have included a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available. 13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.
投稿不需要自己排版。 投稿稿件只需要内容，排版有专门的编辑人员的。 稿件要符合文档的格式。 文档格式要求 一、页面材料格式模板 1. 页边距：上下边距为2.54cm；左右边距为2.8cm 2. 页眉、页脚：页眉为1.5cm；页脚为1.75cm 3. 行间距：20p行距...
分三步走：
第一步，在word（Office 系列软件）中找到“开始”，如图（1）
第二步，在开始中看到，图（2）中，2 的地方红色箭头，好，亲，点一下！
第三步， 继续哈，图（3），4 看到对应的是 “BD”or“TA”,在模式中点一下即可。嗨嗨，在就这么简单哈。
我也是折腾了一会才琢磨出来的，看网上需要的人挺多，没有一个有效答，希望对您有用！
01一、期刊发表论文的标准格式为：文章标题 作者姓名 作者单位： （包括单位全称、邮政编码）[摘 要]（以摘录或缩编方式复述文章的主要内容）50～300 字[关键词]（选用可表达文章主要内容的词或词组）3～8 个关键词正文参考文献：[1] [2] [3]…… （有的期刊还要求英文摘要和英文关键词）作者简介与作者联系方式02二、针对以上格式组成还须注意的是：1、标题期刊发表论文题目是一篇论文给出的涉及论文范围与水平的第一个重要信息， 也是必须考虑到有助于选定关键词和编制题录、索引等二次文献可以提供检索的特定实用信息。 论文题目十分重要，必须用心斟酌选定。有人描述其重要性，用了下面的一 句话："论文题目是文章的一半"。（1） 准确得体要求论文题目能准确表达论文内容，恰当反映所研究的范围和深度。（2） 简短精炼力求题目的字数要少，用词需要精选。至于多少字算是合乎要求， 并无统一的"硬性"规定，一般希望一篇论文题目不要超出 20 个字.（3） 外延和内涵要恰如其分外延和内涵属于形式逻辑中的概念。 所谓外延，是指一个概念所反映的每一个对象；而所谓内涵，则是指对每一个概 念对象特有属性的反映。2、正文期刊发表论文格式要求正文篇幅一般在 2000--8000 字不等， 包括简短引言、 论述分析、 结果和结论等内容。 文中出现的外文缩写除公知公用的首次出现一律应标有中文翻译或外文全称。 文中图、表应有自明性，且随文出现，并要有相应的英文名。文中图的数量一般不超过 6 幅。图中文字、符号、坐标中的标值和标值线必须写清，所有出现的数值都应标有明确的量与单位。文中表格一律采用"三线表"。文中有关量与单位必须符合国家标准和国际标准。 用单个斜体外文字母表示 （国家标准中专门规定的有关特征值除外；如要表示量的状态、序位、条件等， 可对该单个字母加上下角标、阿拉伯数字以及"′""＾"等） ，避免用中文表示。 正文章节编号采用三级标题顶格排序。一级标题形如 1，2，3，…排序；二级标题形如 1.1，1.2，1.3，…排序；三级标题形如 1.1.1，1.1.2，1.1.3，… 排序；引言不排序。3、参考文献期刊发表论文格式要求有专著（M），论文集（C），报纸文集（N），期刊文章 （J） ，学位论文（D），报告（R），标准（S），专利（P），其他未说明文章（Z）参考文献如为专著，项目包括：作者姓名. 书名. 版本. 出版地：出版者， 出版年；参考文献如为期刊，项目包括：作者姓名. 版本. 年. 月. 卷(期)～ 年. 月. 卷(期). 出版地： 出版者， 出版年；参考文献如为电子文献， 项目包括： 作者姓名. 电子文献题名. 文献出处或网址，发表或更新日期.4、作者信息包括作者简介（100 字以内）出生年月 性别 毕业院校 学历 主要研究方向。作者联系方式，包括： 地址， 邮编，电话， （含手机）E-mail 等。03三、期刊发表论文发表渠道将论文直投杂志社是作者的首选途径。但由于发表档期安排、论文需要修改和编辑部稿件堆积如山的现状， 作者要想成功及时发表往往需要借助一些发表平台。国内比较可靠的发表渠道有期刊云，发表论文写作经验丰富。特别提示论文发表格式要求虽多，但如果在平时写作中有所注意，在发表时就会有事半功倍的效果不同的期刊可能还有不同的格式要去，应具体问题具体分析
打开模板，把你文章的内容都拷过来，然后调格式。比如把题目都选中，点“title”，把一级目录选中，点“H1”，就自动设为相应的格式了，依次类推。
必须选。__pdi期刊投稿时，投稿系统必须要选special issue”这样才有可能被投入。?
mdpi三轮修改。
一、在初审阶段
1、论文方向与期刊不相符
一本mdpi期刊可刊登的专业方向是有限的，若投稿的论文超出了期刊的刊登范围，必定是会被拒稿的。
2、论文格式混乱
每本期刊对论文格式都有要求，且不同的刊物对论文格式要求会有一些差异，当论文格式比较乱，论文格式不符合要求，也是会被拒稿的。
3、论文重复率过高
期刊都会对论文的重复率有要求，重复率高说明文章的原创度不够，存在抄袭的行为，这是非常忌讳的。
二、在外审阶段
1、文章缺乏创新性
目前无论是什么期刊对论文的最基本要求就是创新性，若是文章的选题比较老套，在方法、结果等方面都没有创新，可能会被拒稿。
2、论文水平不符合期刊要求
Mdpi的期刊虽然有很多，不同的期刊对论文水平要求是不同，如果论文的质量达不到期刊要求的话，并且通过修改也没有办法到达要求就会被拒稿。
3、实验数据有问题
审稿人在审核论文时肯定会检验论文中的实验和数据，他们也会按照实验去进行验证，一是看实验是否合理，二是看作者给出的结果是否真实有效。对于实验不合理、数据不真实的可能会被拒稿。
4、找不到审稿人
遇到这种情况的会比较少，它主要是出现在一些比较冷门的行业中。
最近 长篇连载 专栏收到了很多投稿，鉴于长篇小说的特殊性，特整理一篇投稿模板给各位参考。 长篇连载小说的作者需要将相关作品放入同一个文集或连载，然后新建一篇文章写上作品简介，并附上文集或连载的链接，以此篇简介文来投稿，而不要使用小说正文。 我会从文集链接进行审稿，符合收录要求的，根据质量给予贝奖励，并以长篇连载月刊的形式集中推荐。 （1）文集或连载的设置（已有文集或连载的作者，这一步可以忽略） ①点击 我的文章，长按 需要放入文集的作品，在跳出来的对话框里选择 文集设置， 选择 新建， 创建一个文集 ，例如《遗失的年华》， 创建完成后 ，选中该文集， 这篇文章就会加入《遗失的年华》这个文集。 用同样的方法，把所有的相关作品放到同一个文集里。注：文集创建完成之后可以升级为连载（升级连载需要贝，升级连载后可以设置连载封面，带有连载目录）。 本专栏投稿作品使用文集或连载均可。 ②文集或连载的链接地址哪里找？文集： 点击右上角三个点的图标，选择 分享文集——>复制文集链 ，链接地址就会自动粘贴到剪贴板。连载： 点击右上角的分享图标，选择 复制连载链， 链接地址就会自动粘贴到剪贴板。（2）链接添加方法 投稿模板中有两处需要添加链接，分别为 作者 和 文集链接。 ① 作者链接的添加： 进入自己的主页，点击右上角三个点，选择 分享用户——>复制用户链。 进入投稿文章编辑界面，点击导航栏中的三点按钮，选择 添加链接。 可以看到刚才复制的用户链接已经自动填入了，我们只需要在“请输入链接名称”一栏填入用户名。最后点击确定。作者一栏就变成了可以跳转链接的蓝字。②文集链接的添加：刚才已经在“文集或连载的链接地址哪里找”中介绍了文集或连载的链接地址复制方法，复制完成后，进入投稿文章编辑界面，点击导航栏中的三点按钮，选择 添加链接， 可以看到刚才复制的文集或连载链接已经自动填入，我们只需要在“请输入链接名称”一栏填入合集或链接的名称即可。最后点击确定。文集链接一栏就变成了可以跳转链接的蓝字。（3） 在投稿文章中写上两百字内的简介，即可用此投稿文章向 长篇连载 专栏投稿。
SCI投稿信件模板 一、投稿信 1. Dear Dr. XXX I am sending a manuscript entitled “XXXX” by XXXX, which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of XXXX. Yours sincerely 2. Dear Dr. XXX Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “XXX” by XXX, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of XXX. We have chosen this journal because it deals with XXX. We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.3. Dear Dr. XXX Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “XXX” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source. We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. 二、询问有无收到稿件 Dear Editor, We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help. 三、询问论文审查回音 Dear Editor, It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciate your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible. 四、关于论文的总体审查意见 1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below. 2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below. 3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as XXX. 4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added. 5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of XXX. 6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory. 7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker. 8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined. 9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays. 10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used? 五、给编辑的回信 1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that XXX One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result. 2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission. 3. Thank you for your letter of XXX and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “XXX”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval. 4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed. 5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red. 6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript. 7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence. 8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision. 9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account. 10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper. 11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 results from a misinterpretation of the data. 12. We would have included a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available. 13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.
01一、期刊发表论文的标准格式为：文章标题 作者姓名 作者单位： （包括单位全称、邮政编码）[摘 要]（以摘录或缩编方式复述文章的主要内容）50～300 字[关键词]（选用可表达文章主要内容的词或词组）3～8 个关键词正文参考文献：[1] [2] [3]…… （有的期刊还要求英文摘要和英文关键词）作者简介与作者联系方式02二、针对以上格式组成还须注意的是：1、标题期刊发表论文题目是一篇论文给出的涉及论文范围与水平的第一个重要信息， 也是必须考虑到有助于选定关键词和编制题录、索引等二次文献可以提供检索的特定实用信息。 论文题目十分重要，必须用心斟酌选定。有人描述其重要性，用了下面的一 句话："论文题目是文章的一半"。（1） 准确得体要求论文题目能准确表达论文内容，恰当反映所研究的范围和深度。（2） 简短精炼力求题目的字数要少，用词需要精选。至于多少字算是合乎要求， 并无统一的"硬性"规定，一般希望一篇论文题目不要超出 20 个字.（3） 外延和内涵要恰如其分外延和内涵属于形式逻辑中的概念。 所谓外延，是指一个概念所反映的每一个对象；而所谓内涵，则是指对每一个概 念对象特有属性的反映。2、正文期刊发表论文格式要求正文篇幅一般在 2000--8000 字不等， 包括简短引言、 论述分析、 结果和结论等内容。 文中出现的外文缩写除公知公用的首次出现一律应标有中文翻译或外文全称。 文中图、表应有自明性，且随文出现，并要有相应的英文名。文中图的数量一般不超过 6 幅。图中文字、符号、坐标中的标值和标值线必须写清，所有出现的数值都应标有明确的量与单位。文中表格一律采用"三线表"。文中有关量与单位必须符合国家标准和国际标准。 用单个斜体外文字母表示 （国家标准中专门规定的有关特征值除外；如要表示量的状态、序位、条件等， 可对该单个字母加上下角标、阿拉伯数字以及"′""＾"等） ，避免用中文表示。 正文章节编号采用三级标题顶格排序。一级标题形如 1，2，3，…排序；二级标题形如 1.1，1.2，1.3，…排序；三级标题形如 1.1.1，1.1.2，1.1.3，… 排序；引言不排序。3、参考文献期刊发表论文格式要求有专著（M），论文集（C），报纸文集（N），期刊文章 （J） ，学位论文（D），报告（R），标准（S），专利（P），其他未说明文章（Z）参考文献如为专著，项目包括：作者姓名. 书名. 版本. 出版地：出版者， 出版年；参考文献如为期刊，项目包括：作者姓名. 版本. 年. 月. 卷(期)～ 年. 月. 卷(期). 出版地： 出版者， 出版年；参考文献如为电子文献， 项目包括： 作者姓名. 电子文献题名. 文献出处或网址，发表或更新日期.4、作者信息包括作者简介（100 字以内）出生年月 性别 毕业院校 学历 主要研究方向。作者联系方式，包括： 地址， 邮编，电话， （含手机）E-mail 等。03三、期刊发表论文发表渠道将论文直投杂志社是作者的首选途径。但由于发表档期安排、论文需要修改和编辑部稿件堆积如山的现状， 作者要想成功及时发表往往需要借助一些发表平台。国内比较可靠的发表渠道有期刊云，发表论文写作经验丰富。特别提示论文发表格式要求虽多，但如果在平时写作中有所注意，在发表时就会有事半功倍的效果不同的期刊可能还有不同的格式要去，应具体问题具体分析
通常国际会议都设定了投稿模版和格式,以为标准化审稿和出版确立规范。建议您按照官方的投稿模版和格式来撰写论文，这可以保证您的论文符合会议的要求，避免投稿不成功的风险。如果您有自己的模版或其他格式的文章，也可以进行参考，但最好还是以官方模版为准，然后根据实际情况稍作调整。这可以提高您的投稿成功率，并且可以更好地展现您的学术研究实力和专业水平。如果您对于官方模版和格式有任何疑问，建议您可以联系会议主办方或者相关的会议机构，咨询和确认相关要求。
通常投稿格式与发表格式有很大区别，按照所投会议的模板写就行，一般都会有模板的，印刷的格式是确定录用了，经过编辑部重新编辑的。
在投稿可持续与可再生能源国际会议稿件时，需要根据会议要求提交相应的论文格式和模板。一般情况下，会议组委会会发布官方的投稿模板和格式要求，这些要求需要严格遵守。否则，文章可能无法满足审稿标准，进而影响文章的发表和交流。如果您有关于可持续与可再生能源国际会议稿件的具体投稿问题，请查看会议组委会发布的官方网站和相关文件，查看和下载提交稿件的详细指南。如果您需要订制特定的稿件格式，建议联系会议组织方的工作人员进行沟通并获得确认。从根本上讲，依据官方定为的格式，以_
投稿不需要自己排版。 投稿稿件只需要内容，排版有专门的编辑人员的。 稿件要符合文档的格式。 文档格式要求 一、页面材料格式模板 1. 页边距：上下边距为2.54cm；左右边距为2.8cm 2. 页眉、页脚：页眉为1.5cm；页脚为1.75cm 3. 行间距：20p行距...