工商管理论文英文文献

China’s accession into the WTO has triggered extensive discussions on the part of macroeconomists, both domestic and international, concerning China’s macroeconomic performance in the future. As a would-be senior enterprise manager, I have also been gravely concerned about the possible impacts that this historical event would produce on enterprise management. During my prospective studies at NYU, I plan to work on an individual project which will be entitled Designing the Optimum Management Mode for China’s Medium- and Small-Sized Enterprises After China’s Accession into the WTO. In China, the medium- and small-sized enterprises have been playing an increasingly important role in the country’s whole economy. Yet, the management of those enterprises is far from being effective. They cannot make effective use of their resources to realize their potential profits, or they have failed to properly estimate their long-term profit-making capacity. Their survival seems to be ensured when only faced with domestic competition because their competitors are equally incompetent in their management. However, their competitors after China’s entry into WTO are those international enterprises with professional management expertise. If those Chinese enterprises cannot fully utilize their resources or make strategic adjustments, their existence and profit-making ability would be seriously jeopardized. The objective of my project is to evolve a system of optimum management mode, together with its methodology and concepts, which fits the special characteristics of Chinese enterprises. In addition, I will propose some specific feasibility models. The research findings of this project would provide valuable information for those enterprises to help them achieve that they actually deserve by means of effective management.My project will proceed in this way. First, as China’s current economic system is rather unique in the entire world, a system that combines free market system with the so-called socialist system, I will conduct an analysis of both the macro and the micro economic circumstances of those enterprises. The research may lead to the following results, that the optimum management mode of China’s enterprises might differ fundamentally from that of their foreign counterparts in terms of its form of expression, although the purpose of designing the management mode is essentially the same --- the realization of profits. At the same time, I will endeavor to know the existing conditions of management in those enterprises and discover the inherent problems in their management and their potential resources. It is precisely those potential resources that are their potential profit margins. The aim of doing so is to compare and contrast the management in those enterprises with that of excellent enterprises. Those procedures will be completed before I leave China to pursue studies at your university. At least I will have to collect all the necessary materials before I proceed onto further studies during my program at your university.In the second stage of my project, I will attempt at a study of all the requisite elements that characterize optimum management mode as described by management theories. I will try to trace the process how these elements evolved and their present form of expression by studying the management cases of successful international enterprises. This step will be crucial as what I discover will be the most precious experience for Chinese enterprises. As for the choice of the cases, I will concentrate on those foreign enterprises that are analogous to their Chinese counterparts both in the scale and in the nature of business operation. Based on my understanding of the existing condition of Chinese medium- and small-sized enterprises, I will lay emphasis on the construction of corporate culture and the design of management strategies.All successful international enterprises have their correspondingly excellent corporate cultures which serve as the foundation for their constant creation of ever-increasing profits, sustained growth, and triumphs over their competitors. Most enterprise administrators in China are inheritors of the conventional mentality of the planned economy who absolutely fail in the cultivation of their corporate cultures. The successful cultivation of corporate culture requires the top management to be equipped with knowledge in administration science, psychology, organizational behavior and in other sciences, a process which demands tremendous creativity. To complete this project satisfactorily, I need to immerse myself in the coursework that your university will offer me. I also need to summarize the characteristics of corporate culture that many successful international enterprises share and the process whereby the successful corporate cultures developed. Those characteristics can be important lessons that Chinese enterprises can assimilate because China’s membership in the WTO forces its enterprises to be confronted with the similar business environment to that faced by their foreign counterparts long operating under the market economy system. Meanwhile, by combining my research findings with the actual circumstances of the Chinese enterprises, I can come up with some creative ideas as to the proper mode of corporate culture development in keeping with the characteristics of those enterprises. Moreover, the design of management strategies is something that Chinese enterprises lack. For Chinese enterprises that switch from a relatively self-enclosed market to the liberal international market, it is necessary to effect a transformation in their management strategies and this transformation will be vital for the successful transition from domestic to international markets. In terms of research methodology, I will adopt those approaches similar to those for my studies on the corporate culture.I believe that this envisioned project will contribute importantly to the enterprise management of China and it will be much more fruitful if I can secure assistance from the seasoned faculty members of your prestigious university.

Enterprise culture is the enterprise software, is the enterprise the soft strength. Enterprise culture on ascension staff quality and enhance competitiveness, improve internal competitiveness have important role. This article through to the enterprise culture analysis, further expounds enterprise soft power plays in enterprise development unique role. And points out how to cultivate enterprise soft strength enterprise competitiveness 关键词 企业软实力（Enterprise soft power） 企业文化（Enterprise culture ） 企业团队（Enterprise team ）

工商管理毕业论文参考文献

充实的大学生活即将结束，我们都知道毕业生要通过最后的毕业论文，毕业论文是一种比较重要的检验学生学习成果的形式，优秀的毕业论文都具备一些什么特点呢？以下是我收集整理的工商管理毕业论文参考文献，仅供参考，大家一起来看看吧。

[1]L.D.彻纳东尼,M.麦克唐纳.创建强有力的品牌.北京：中信出版社,2001.

[2]王新新.新竞争力.长春：长春出版社,2000.

[3]余鑫炎.品牌战略与决策.大连：东北财经大学出版社，2002.

[4]陈放，谢宏.品牌策划.北京：时事出版社，2000,1.

[5]艾丰.中国品牌价值报告.北京：经济科学出版社,1997.

[6]刘佳，从可口可乐看企业品牌塑造.黑龙江对外贸易，经营之道.2006.6：144.

[7]许喜林，吴文国.品牌之道：品牌建设9S模式及其应用.北京：北京交通大学出版社，2007.

[8]何心展，俞丽敏.我国企业品牌建设存在的问题及对策.天津市经理学院学报.2007.2：15～16.

[9]康晓光.中国企业品牌建设的困境与突破方向.深圳大学学报.2006.5：03～05.

[10]相晓冬.品牌核心：自主知识产权.品牌视点.2006.6：22～25.

[11]何忠保，何飞云.民营企业品牌塑造探析.商场现代化.2007.3：136～138.

[12]郑昭，丁轩.民企成长与品牌战略.上海:上海三联书店,2005.

[13]李月华.论中小企业品牌建设的区域化策略.科技信息(学术研究)，2007.

[14]徐丽瑛，李正良.中小企业品牌塑造误区与对策.企业管理.2006.10：1～3.

[15]谢付亮.品牌策划的五大关键点.中国质量与品牌.2007.6：53～55.

[16]田双全，陈永丽.我国民营企业品牌塑造之战略选择.ENTERPRISEVITALITY.2002.12：43～45.

[17]刘峻松.品牌三藏：中国本土化的品牌观.中华工商联合出版社.

[18]苏勇，林展圣.中小企业品牌战略.当代财经.2006.6：63～65.

[1]史建锋.现代钢铁物流发展和盈利模式探讨.中国外资,2013,(13):78-79.

[2]李琪.探索金融阴霾下的钢铁物流新出路.企业导报,2012,(02):99-100.

[3]包立军,王业军.我国中小型传统物资企业向现代物流企业转型的策略分析.中国市场物流与采购研究,2007,(5):9.

[4]史建锋.探究钢铁物流的电子商务战略.中国商贸,2013,(15):82.

[5]李庆华,项保华,王翔.共同演化视角下的企业战略更新引擎机理研究.科技进步与对策,2008,(11):85-88.

[6]李敬,陈收.企业战略管理.长沙:湖南大学出版社,2011:12-13.

[7]李拥军.钢铁供大于求渠道怎么做—2012年会员钢铁企业钢材流通渠道情况分析.中国冶金报,2013-06-18:6.

[8]田涛.对发展钢铁物流的浅析.物流工程与管理,2012,(02):9-10.

[9]梁劲.钢铁物流企业的绩效管理[D].南京大学物流工程硕士论文,2012,(02):34-35.

[10]包斯文.转型:钢铁物流企业的出路——从一家大型物流企业转型看我国钢铁物流业面临的问题和发展方向.中国冶金报,2012-11-20:9.

[11]张慧芝.浅谈供应链管理下的钢铁物流[J].世界海运,2010,(05):64-65.

[12]司方来,王永贵,贾鹤.战略柔性体系:调和反应型市场导向与先动型市场导向.现代管理科学,2009,(02):56-59.

[1]刘超.企业员工不安全行为影响因素分析及控制对策研究.北京：中国地质大学(北京市)，2010.

[2]卞军.安全管理中安全标志及其设计要素的感知机理研究.浙江大学，2014.

[3]樊建平.创新安全标识管理有效发挥应有作用[EB/OL].

[4]胡祎程，周晓宏，王亮.工程项目现场安全标志有效性评价[J].中国安全科学学报，2012,(08)：37-42.

[5]蔡秋塘，黄星.浅谈标识行业术语(一)[J].广告大观(标识版)，2006,(02)：38-41.

[6]吴穹，许开立.安全管理学[M].北京：煤炭工业出版社，2003.

[7]张倩.铁路车站旅客导向标识人因工程分析及优化.上海：华东交通大学，2012.

[8]鲍诗度，王淮梁，葛荣.环境标识导向系统设计[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2007.

[9]安全标志及使用导则实施指南.中国标准出版社：北京，1996.

[10]向帆.导向标识系统设计[M].南昌：江西美术出版社，2009.

[11]赵云川.公共环境标识设计[M].北京：中国纺织出版社，2004.

[12]朱兆华，郭振龙.安全色与安全标志的.由来[J].现代职业安全，2004,(10)：64.

[13]袁京鹏.安全标志有效性影响因素实证研究[博士].杭州：浙江大学，2009.

[14]傅贵，陆柏，陈秀珍.基于行为科学的组织安全管理方案模型[J].中国安全科学学报，2005,15(9)：21-27.

[15]胡祎程，周晓宏，王亮.安全标志识别性研究：标志特性及用户因素[J].中国安全科学学报，2013,(3)：16-21.

[1]徐春玲.ERP技术在电力企业中的应用与分析.安徽电力[J],2005,2(3)：74-81.

[2]孙滨丽.ERP原理与应用[M],北京：电子工业出版社，2008,155.

[3]王要武.管理信息系统(第2版)[M],北京：电子工业出版社，2008,81.

[4]黄卫东.管理信息系统[M],北京：人民邮电出版社，2009,126.

[5]李西平、刘芙蓉.我国电力企业ERP应用分析[J],科技创新导报，2009(34)，63-65.

[6]林勇.ERP理论与实践[M],合肥：中国科学技术大学出版社，2007,199.

[7]黄小原、卢震、赵晓煜.ERP理论与构建[M],北京：科学出版社，2006,42.

[8]张海全、王英豪、韩玉辉.做好电力企业ERP的实施[J],电力信息化，2005,3(7)：57-58.

[9]陈广宇.管理信息系统[M],北京：清华大学出版社，2010,351.

[10]颜安.企业ERP应用研究[M],成都：西南财经大学，2006,74-76.

[11]黄晓英，赵海燕.管理信息系统[M],北京：科学出版社，2009,155.

[12]诺顿·佩里着.战略营销[M],北京：机械工业出版社，2002.4.

[13](美)迈克尔.A.希特，R·杜安.爱尔兰，罗伯特.E·霍斯基森等着.战略管理[M],北京：中国人民大学出版社，2009.6.

[14]斯莱沃斯基，韦伯等着.战略风险管理[M],北京：中信出版社，2007.

[15]金达仁.金融危机对中国制造业的影响[J],信息系统工程，2009,2.

[16](美)小阿瑟.A·汤普森，A·J·斯特里克兰，约翰.E·甘布尔等着.战略管理概念与案例[M],本经：北京大学出版社，2009.8.

[17]李森，杨锡怀，戚桂清.相同企业竞争与合作策略的受益与风险分析[J].沈阳东北大学学报，2005.6.

[18]王方华，吕巍.企业战略管理[M],上海：复旦大学出版社，2003.

[1]王国法.液压支架控制技术[M].煤炭工业出版社，2010.

[2]翟培祥译.采煤机械参数选择[M].煤炭工业出版社，1979.

[3]中华人民共和国国家国务院.《关于促进煤炭工业健康发展的若干意见》[Z].国发〔2005〕18号.

[4]乔红兵，吴淼.我国薄煤层采煤机的发展与前景[J].中国煤炭，2005(10)：29-31.

[5]中华人民共和国国家国务院.《国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要(2006-2020)》[Z].国发〔2006〕6号.

[6]王国法.高端液压支架及先进制造技术[M].煤炭工业出版社，2010.

[7]国内外薄煤层开采及薄煤层采煤机械设备[R].调研报告，1988.

[8]芮冰.我国采煤机30年发展回顾和展望[J].煤矿机电，2000(5)：36-40.

[9]袁亮.薄煤层开采技术与装备[J].煤炭开采，2011(3)：15-18.

[10]靳立红，刘春生，孙剑锋.采煤机截割部双电机机械串接驱动的同步性研究[J].煤矿机械，2011(07)：42-44.

[11]李桂云，杨战标，周国友.河南省薄煤层开采技术及综合配套支撑体系探讨[J].煤炭开采，2011(5)：5-7.

[12]李蒙，魏巍.液压支架电液控制器设计与实现[J].煤炭科学技术，2011(4)：110-113.

[13]舒凤翔，闫海峰;张幸福.液压支架立柱试验台液压系统的设计及仿真[J].煤矿机械，2009(12)：29-31.

[14]毛德兵，蓝航，徐刚.我国薄煤层综合机械化开采技术现状及其新进展[J].煤炭开采，2011(3)：11-14.

[15]耿兆瑞.八十年代国外滚筒式采煤机技术发展评价[C].中国煤炭学会煤矿机械化专业委员会成立十周年纪念论文集，1991(4).78-82.

[1] 雷蒙德,A 诺伊,约翰.霍伦拜克,拜雷、格哈特,帕特雷克、莱特.人力资源管理赢得竞争优势[M].第三版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001: 136-200.

[2] 加里,得斯勒.人力资源管理(人力资源管理论文)[M].第七版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999: 200一400.

[3] K.韦恩,蒙迪,罗伯特.诺埃.人力资源管理[M].第一版.北京:经济科学出版社,1998: 331一343.

[4] 劳埃德 .拜厄斯,莱斯利,鲁.人力资源管理[M].第六版.北京:华夏出版社,2002: 213一264.

[5] 麦克纳,比奇.人力资源管理[M].第一版.北京:中信出版社,1998: 17-211.

[6] 亚瑟小舍曼,乔治,勃兰德,斯科特.斯奈尔.人力资源管理[M].第二版.大连:东北财经大学出版社,2001: 233-343.

[7] 王琪延.企业人力资源管理[M].第一版.北京:中国物价出版社,2002: 222-245.

[8] 关淑润.人力资源管理[M].第一版.北京:对外经济贸易大学出版社,2001: 186一204.

[9] 冯虹.现代企业人力资源管理[M].第一版.北京:经济管理出版社,1999: 181一184

[10]中国企业国际化管理课题组.企业人力资源国际化管理制度[M].第一版.北京:中国财政经济出版社,2002: 139.

[11] 刘扬.上海浦东发展银行战略人力资源管理变革研究[D].天津大学专业硕士论文2009: 13-50.

[12] 毛国英.基于平衡计分卡的招商银行战略管理体系研究[D].天津大学硕士学位2009: 11-30.

[13] 李艳丽.A银行员工离职原因分析及对策研究[D].兰州大学MBA学位论文.2010:16-30.

[14] 时肠.农业银行培训机制与队伍建设研究[J}.中国农业银行武汉培训学院学报.2011. 35:66.

[16] 雷虹.关于饭店员工流失问题的探讨[J].温州职业技术学院学报.2005. 6: 16-17.

[17] 邹韬.银行金融激励机制存在的问题及对策.商业时代[J] .2008. 11:23.

[18] 倪凤明.我国商业银行激励约束机制探析.河北金融[J] .2008. : 45.

[19] 习邹韬.商业银行的激励约束机制:博弈论视角.统计与决策[J] .2006.11:26.

[20] 张建国.健全和完善我国商业银行的激励约束机制.新金融[J] .2006. 5.

[1](美)丹尼斯.洛克著姚冀贺广勋张维红译,项目管理,桂林,广西师范大学出版社,2002一12,217一223

[2](美)罗伯特.K.威索基拉德.麦加里著费琳李盛萍等译,有效的项目管理,第3版,北京,电子工业出版社,2004一08,78一86

[3]陈凡,德国职业教育与企业发展间的制约与平衡,职教论坛,2006一04一10

[4]南开大学职业技术学院曹莉王明杨捷,国外职业教育发展现状及对我国的启示,中国职业教育网,2005一03一10

[5]陈晓,法国式的职业教育,中国新闻周刊,2006一06

[6]彭秉莹,美国职业教育的发展趋势,职教论坛,2003年第3期

[1] 刘建朝,我国高等学校基本建设问题研究,北京师范大学,2005.

[2] 刘金存,高校基建项目实施过程中的成本控制,扬州大学学报,2002

[3] 戚安邦,项目成本管理,南开大学出版社,2006

[4] 周希祥、薛乐群主编,中国高等学校基建管理,北京:科学出版社,1996

[5] 高雁,高等院校基本建设管理研究,天津大学硕士论文.2004

[6] 赵东,关于高校基建合同管理问题的思考,决策探索,2006

[7] 陶居福,工程变更对成本控制的影响,西部煤矿工程,2006

[8] 闰光太,浅谈施工企业项目成本控制施工企业管理,2001(12)

[9] 刘秋常,建筑项目投资控制,中国水利水电出版社,2001

[10]徐大图、王雪青、易涛等,工程建设投资控制,北京:中国建筑工业出版社.1999

[11] 方俊、任宏,建设工程施工合同履约中的变更控制,重庆大学学报,200427(6)137-139

[12] 高志强.建设项目全寿命周期之实施阶段成本管理,建筑管理现代化,2007

[13] 韦敏.浅谈工程项目合同管理[J}.企业家天地,2007

[14] 孙忿,肖艳.项目成本管理,机械工业出版社,2002

[15] 曲修山,黄文杰,何佰州等,《工程建设合同管理》,中国建设监理协会,1999

Enterprise Management IncentivesA guide for employees, employers and advisersThis guidance aims to take you through the qualifying requirements for Enterprise Management Incentives (EMIs). It is divided into sections which explain each part of the legislation contained in Schedule 5 Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003. Detailed points are covered in a question and answer context. It also explains some key terms used.Unless otherwise stated, the statutory references in this guidance are to the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003, and the abbreviations ITEPA 2003 and Sch 5 have been used throughout.Remember that if you grant EMI options you may also have to consider other laws and rules. For example, there may be company law and regulatory requirements to comply with. Such matters are not covered in this guide so you should consider whether you need to take relevant professional advice.The information contained here is for guidance only. EMI options must at all times comply with the provisions of Schedule 5 ITEPA 2003.What’s in this guidance * What are Enterprise Management Incentives (EMIs)? * How EMIs work * Qualifying companies * What makes an employee eligible? * About the options * Notification of grants of options * Income tax and National Insurance contributions * Capital gains tax * What happens when a company reorganises? * Useful contacts * EMI terms explainedWhat are Enterprise Management Incentives (EMIs)?EMIs are tax advantaged share options. They are designed to help small, higher risk companies recruit and retain employees who have the skills to help them grow and succeed. They are also a way of rewarding employees for taking a risk by investing their time and skills to help small companies achieve their potential.How EMIs workTax advantaged share options with a market value of up to £100,000 may be granted to a qualifying employee of a qualifying company, subject to a total share value of £3 million under EMI options to all employees.The shares must be in an independent trading company that has gross assets of no more than £30 million.The grant of the option is tax-free and there will normally be no tax or National Insurance contributions (NICs) for the employee to pay when the option is exercised. There will normally be no NICs charge for the employer.If the shares are sold at a gain, any capital gains tax (CGT) charge may be reduced because taper relief will normally start from the date that the option is granted.The employer must notify HMRC of an award of EMI options within 92 days of the grant of the option.Throughout this guidance all references to employer are to the employing company.How companies qualify for EMIFor companies to qualify they must have maximum gross assets of no more than £30 million; for groups, this applies to the assets of the group as a whole. The company whose shares are the subject of the option must be independent, and the company or group must be trading. Companies carrying on certain trades will not qualify.There is more detail on qualifying companies.How options qualify for tax relief under EMIIf an option is to qualify for tax relief: * the option has to be notified to HMRC in time and as required * the company whose shares are under option has to be a qualifying company * the type of share under option has to qualify * the employee has to be eligible * the terms of the option have to qualify.What makes an employee eligibleTo qualify for EMI an employee has to be employed by the company whose shares are the subject of the option, or by a subsidiary. An employee must spend at least 25 hours a week working for the company or the group. If his hours are shorter, he must spend at least 75% of his working time working as an employee for the company or group.There are more details on employee eligibility.How EMIs workThis section outlines the main requirements for options to qualify under EMI, they are: * the purpose of the option * the maximum entitlement of the employee and * the overall limit on options to be granted by the company.The purpose of the optionThe options must be granted for commercial reasons to recruit or retain employees in a company, and not as part of an arrangement one of the main purposes of which is to avoid tax. (Para 4 Sch 5).Can a company cancel existing options and replace them with EMI options?If the option is granted to recruit or retain employees the purpose test is met. This will depend on the facts and all the circumstances.Maximum entitlementNo employee may hold unexercised qualifying EMI options with a market value of more than £100,000. The market value is taken at the date of grant. The value to be used is the unrestricted market value, that is, the value of shares under option without taking into account any restrictions or the risk of forfeitureIf an option granted to an employee causes the £100,000 limit to be exceeded, the excess will not qualify as an EMI option.Are there limits on the number of qualifying options that an employee may be Granted within a particular period?Yes. Once an employee has been granted EMI, or EMI and Company Share Option Plan (CSOP) options up to the £100,000 limit, he must wait until 3 years after the last of these options was granted before he can be granted any more EMI qualifying options, even if he has exercised or released some of the options. He can then be granted further EMI options to the extent that any other EMI or CSOP options then held by him are below the £100,000 limit. (Para 6 Sch 5).How are shares valued for the purposes of the £100,000 limit?The market value of any shares for this purpose is the price they might reasonably be expected to fetch on the open market, free from any restrictions or risk of forfeiture to which they may be subject.If the shares under option are quoted on the London Stock Exchange, the market value is based on the prices on the Stock Exchange’s Daily Official List. If shares are not quoted on the London Stock Exchange, the company may offer its own valuation. In that case, HMRC may enquire into the valuation.Alternatively, the company can ask HMRC Shares and Assets Valuation (SAV) to agree a valuation with them before the option is granted or whenever a valuation is required. Companies, or advisers, may find this helpful.If the exercise of the option is subject to performance conditions will this affect the determination of market value?No. Performance conditions are not taken into account when determining the market value of the shares under option.Is there a limit on the number of employees who may hold EMI options?No. Any number of employees may hold EMI options in a company or group, subject to a maximum of £3 million as the total value of shares under EMI option in a company.Qualifying CompaniesThis section sets out the conditions a company has to meet to qualify for EMI, they are: * independence * having only qualifying subsidiaries (including qualifying property managing subsidiaries after 17 March 2004) * gross assets * trading activities.The requirements that companies have to meet for options to qualify under EMI are similar to the requirements for the Enterprise Investment Scheme, the Corporate Venturing Scheme and Venture Capital Trusts. However, both quoted and unquoted companies can qualify for EMI.IndependenceA company whose shares are subject to EMI options must not be: * a 51% subsidiary (more than 50% of its ordinary share capital owned by another company), or * controlled by another company (or another company and persons connected with it).Arrangements must not exist which could result in the company becoming a 51% subsidiary or otherwise being controlled. (Para 9 Sch 5)Control in this context means the power of one company to ensure that the affairs of another company whose shares are subject to EMI option are conducted in accordance with that company’s wishes. This may be through share ownership, voting power, or because of any powers conferred by Articles of Association or other document.Qualifying subsidiaries (before 17 March 2004)For options granted before 17 March 2004, all of a company’s subsidiaries must be qualifying subsidiaries. That is, the company whose shares are subject to EMI options must: * possess, directly or indirectly, at least 75% of the share capital and the voting power of the subsidiary * be entitled to receive at least 75% of the assets of the subsidiary, in the event of a winding up or in any other circumstances, if they were all distributed * be entitled to at least 75% of profits of the subsidiary available for distribution to shareholders.No other person must be able to control the subsidiary (control having the same meaning as it has for the independence requirement.)There must be no arrangements in existence by virtue of which any of these conditions would cease to be met.If a subsidiary company itself has subsidiaries, shares will not qualify to be used in an EMI option unless all these subsidiaries are also qualifying subsidiaries, as defined above.Example 1Company A has a 75% shareholding in subsidiary company B, and the same % rights to votes, assets and income. Company B is therefore a qualifying subsidiary.Company B has a 75% shareholding in subsidiary company C, and the same % rights to votes, assets and income. Company C it also therefore a qualifying subsidiary.Company A meets the EMI requirements in relation to its subsidiaries.Example 2Company X has a 75% shareholding in subsidiary company Y, and the same % rights to votes, assets and income. Company Y is therefore a qualifying subsidiary.Company X also has a 60% shareholding in subsidiary company Z, and the same % rights to votes, assets and income. Company Z is not a qualifying subsidiary.Company X therefore fails to meets the EMI requirements, as not all of its subsidiaries are qualifying subsidiaries.Qualifying subsidiaries (after 17 March 2004)For options granted on or after 17 March 2004 all of a company’s subsidiaries must be qualifying subsidiaries. That is, the company whose shares are subject to EMI options must hold, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the share capital of the subsidiary. (Para 11(2) Sch 5).No other person must be able to control the subsidiary (control having the same meaning as it has for the independence requirement.)There must be no arrangements in existence by virtue of which any of these conditions would cease to be met.There is a further requirement if the company has subsidiaries that manage property.Qualifying property managing subsidiariesFor options granted on or after 17 March 2004, a company will not qualify if it has a property managing subsidiary which is not a 90% subsidiary of the company. (Para 11A(1) Sch 5).A property managing company is one whose business consists wholly or mainly in the holding of managing of land, buildings or interest in land.To be a qualifying property managing subsidiary, the company whose shares are subject to EMI options must: * possess, directly, at least 90% of the issued share capital and the voting power in the subsidiary * be entitled to receive at least 90% of the assets of the subsidiary, in the event of a winding up or in any other circumstances, if they were all distributed * be entitled to at least 90% of profits of the subsidiary available for distribution to shareholders.No other person must be able to control the subsidiary (control having the same meaning as it has for the independence requirement.)There must be no arrangements in existence by virtue of which any of these conditions would cease to be met.Gross assetsThe value of the company’s gross assets must not exceed £30 million at the date the EMI option is granted. If the company is a member of a group of companies, the limits are applied to the gross assets of the group as a whole.由于篇幅有限，网址在这里，你可以在那里看到完整。这是一篇关于企业管理的学术性文章。