文献里的power

回答 您好，请问是书籍标注符号吗？如果是的话，用书名号《》这个标注呢。 提问 我的意思是我的论文脚注问题，如果我引用教育知识与能力这本书该如何标注 人呢 回答 引用书籍时，该列出的信息有些与期刊论文相似，包括作者名称和出版年份。另一方面，每本书籍都是独立不附卷号的印刷本，因此参考文献中要表示书籍的引用时，必须列出的信息有书名、出版商、出版地点、总页数和版本（初版除外）。如果书中没有版本信息，表示它是初版。 一、引用书籍时的典型格式如下 Klein G Sources of power: how people make Cambridge, Massachusetts: the MIT P 330 二、对应信息的顺序为 Klein G（作者名称）1998（出版年份） Sources of power: how people make decisions（书名） Cambridge, Massachusetts（出版地点）: the MIT Press（出版商） 330 pp（总页数） 三、虽然具体的格式可能会有一些细节差异，但要注意以下几点 书名应以斜体字表示，书名里每个单字的开头字母需要大写，副标题只需把第一个字的首字母大写即可，并用分号将其与主标分开。 先列出出版地点，然后才是出版商名称，两者之间使用冒号分开。 注明书籍的总页数。 提问 中文的格式呢？ 回答 您好，上面内容括号里面写了噢 更多12条 

回答 您好，您的问题我已经了解。正在打字回复您，请给我五分钟的时间，一定回复您～ 您好，亲爱的-- 一、参考文献（即引文出处）的类型以单字母方式标识，具体如下： M——专著? C——论文集? N——报纸文章 J——期刊文章? D——学位论文 R——报告 对于不属于上述的文献类型，采用字母“Z”标识。 二、对于英文参考文献，还应注意以下两点： ①作者姓名采用“姓在前名在后”原则，具体格式是： 姓，名字的首字母 如： Malcolm Richard Cowley 应为：Cowley, MR，如果有两位作者，第一位作者方式不变，&之后第二位作者名字的首字母放在前面，姓放在后面，如：Frank Norris 与Irving Gordon应为：Norris, F & IG； ②书名、报刊名使用斜体字，如：Mastering English Literature，English Weekly。 【希望回答对您有帮助哦】\x09 更多12条 

毕业论文(设计)的内容结构规范(一)内容结构题目摘要及关键词(中英文)正文参考文献附录(二)内容结构要求题目：应简洁、明确、有概括性，字数不宜超过20个字。摘要及关键词(中英文)：中文摘要字数为200字左右，关键词3～5个。正文：本论应包括基本材料、研究内容与方法、实验结果与分析(讨论)等，结论是围绕本论所作的结束语。理工类的还应包括(1)设计方案论证;(2)计算部分;(3)结构设计部分;(4)样机或试件的各种实验及测试情况;(5)方案的校验。结论部分概括说明设计的情况和价值，分析其优点和特色、有何创新、性能达到何水平，并应指出其中存在的问题和今后改进的方向。参考文献：参考文献是作者写作论著时所参考的文献书目，一般集中列于文末。所列参考文献观点均应在毕业论文(设计)中反映出来，直接引用的观点须采用脚注，用数字加圆圈标注(如①、②„)。所列参考文献不少于15篇(部)，其中必须有一定数目的近三年的文献。理工类设计可依据专业特点由院(系)另设标准。参考文献的著录要求与格式见本《规范化要求》文末。附录：对于一些不宜放在正文中，但有参考价值的内容，可编入附录，如公式的推演、编写的算法、语言程序等。二、毕业论文(设计)的文本规范要求(一)字数要求:文科专业以6000～8000字为宜，理工科专业以8000～10000字为宜。(二)文字要求：文字通顺，语言流畅，无错别字。(三)图表要求：文中的附图应统一编排序号并赋予图名;除特殊情况，要求采用计算机制图。文中图表需在表的上方、图的下方排印表号、表名、表注或图号、图名、图注。文中的表格应统一编排序号并赋予表名。表内内容应对齐，表内数字、文字连续重复时不可使用“同上”等字样或符号代替。表内数字使用同一计量单位时，可将该单位从表中提出并置于圆括号内。表内有整段文字时，起行处空一格，回行顶格，最后不用标点符号。

What is Authority?Differentiating Authority, Power, and LegitimacyThe term “authority” refers to an abstract concept with both sociological and psychological As a child born of a myriad of different social situations which have some rough similarities, no easy definition Of particular concern throughout the literature on the topic is the entanglement of the concepts of authority, power, and This is a concern not only in the abstract (by which I mean that scholars discuss and disagree on how the three are entangled), but also in the concrete because scholars themselves are often guilty of entangling One is defined as a function of the other and vice-versa until the reader doesn’t know where to turn anymore for Power and LegitimacyPower is the ability, whether personal or social, to get things done — either to enforce one’s own will or to enforce the collective will of some group over Legitimacy is a socially constructed and psychologically accepted right to exercise A person can have legitimacy but no actual power (the legitimate king might reside in exile, destitute and forgotten) A person can have actual power but not legitimacy (the usurper who exiled the king and appropriates the symbols of office) Here, now, we begin to approach an understanding of what authority is because in all social situations a person is treated as an authority only when they have both power and We might consider, for example, the phrase uttered so often when someone intrudes into our business in order to give commands: “You have no authority ” What does that mean? It might mean that the person has no legitimate claim to be heard or It might mean that the person has no social power — he has not the ability to enforce his will over the objections of Or, it might be In any event, both must be present for authority to exist (socially) and be acknowledged (psychologically) Psychology of AuthorityThis is still not quite enough, however, because it defines authority a bit too closely to the concepts of legitimacy and When a person has authority over others, it means something a bit more than simply that they have a right to exercise existing The missing ingredient is psychological — the previously mentioned but not explicated issue of Both power and legitimacy are social in that they exist in the interplay between two or more Yet what goes on in the mind of person when he acknowledges the authority of another? It isn’t simply that he accepts the factual existence of power or legitimacy; rather, it’s also that he accepts that an authority figure is justified in making a decision without also explaining the reason for that decision and persuading others to accept that the decision was reached The importance of this is not too difficult to Exercising AuthorityIf I have authority over you, I can expect that when I make a decision you will go along with that decision, even if I don’t take the time to explain it to you and persuade you that it is indeed In turn, your acceptance of me as an authority implies that you have already agreed to be persuaded, implicitly, and won’t demand explicit explanations and Once I begin to explain my reasoning process and get you to agree that my conclusion was the proper one, then you have reached your own When you act, it won’t be because of me enforcing my will over you, nor will it have anything to do with the legitimacy of my Instead, it will simply be you exercising your will for your own Consider the appropriate example of a priest as a religious authority over a This priest has the legitimate social power to see that his will and that of and his superiors is enforced over the membership of the More than this, however, we must understand that those members have implicitly accepted that the priest does not need to patiently reason with each one of them in turn in order to get them to independently agree to the decisions in Why doesn’t the priest explain everything? There can be many reasons — perhaps members of the congregation lack the sophisticated training necessary in order to understand them, or maybe there just isn’t enough What’s important is that the priest could explain things, but doesn’t — authority means not having to explain everything but being able to wield legitimate power Only in a community of infinitely rational individuals with an infinite amount of time would it be possible for everything to be fully explained all of the In the real world, however, we must rely upon authority figures to make decisions for As a part of this, we invest them with the power and legitimacy necessary to cause those decisions to be meaningful and

Learning capacity