洛丽塔毕业论文

LOLI是出自《lolita》电影。正太则是出自日本用词。标准的正太是指12岁的短发东方男孩，因此，严格来说西方男孩子不能称之为正太。

古代文学是传播我国古代辉煌 文化 的一条重要的途径，而论文的选题则是写作古代文学的首要任务，题目有一半文的作用。下面是我带来的关于古代文学论文选题的内容，欢迎阅读参考! 古代文学论文选题方向一：欧美文学史 1. 希腊神话的思想艺术特色哈姆莱特形象 2. 《威尼斯商人》的结构特点 3. 伪善性格的集大成者(达尔丢夫形象谈) 4. 《吝啬鬼》主人公性格谈 歌德《浮士德》对18世纪德国现实的反映 5. 《巴黎圣母院》中的“大自然” 6. 赋予人物以极端欲念——巴尔扎克人物性格塑造艺术谈 7. 《红与黑》的心理描写特征 8. 于连——英雄还是野心家 “心灵的辩证法”——托尔斯泰的心理描写艺术 9. 陀思妥也夫斯基的心理描写特征 10. 雨果创作的人道主义主题综述 11. 《人间喜剧》对大革命后法国社会的反映 12. 一个野心家的成长——拉斯蒂涅形象谈 13. 平面与极端——雨果人物性格特征谈 14. 《新爱洛伊丝》热爱大自然问题 15. 《罪与罚》对“超人”思想的批判 16. 陀思妥也夫斯基作品的宗教倾向 17. 欧洲现代长篇小说奠基作——《堂吉诃德》的流浪汉小说结构与严肃主题 18. 《约翰·克里斯朵夫》主人公形象分析 19. 劳伦斯长篇小说的思想主题 20. 《静静的顿河》的史诗性质 21. 高尔基《母亲》的文学史地位 22. 《母亲》中母亲形象 23. 《母亲》中巴威尔形象 《安娜·卡列尼娜》安娜形象谈 24. 《玩偶之家》娜拉形象谈 古代文学论文选题方向二：比较文学 1. 希腊神话与中国神话特性比较 2. 希腊戏剧的早生与中国戏曲的晚熟 3. 欧美浪漫主义文学与中国“五四”文学 4. 哈姆莱特与于连形象比较 《红与黑》于连、《高老 5. 头》拉斯蒂涅、《罪与罚》拉斯柯尔尼柯夫形象比 6. 英国文学中的堂吉诃德 娜拉与安娜形象比较 7. 娜拉与中国“五四”文学女性形象比较 8. 巴比塞《火线》与海明威《永别了，武器》比较 9. 雷马克《西线无战事》与海明威反战长篇比较 10. 伏脱冷形象与靡非斯特形象比较 11. 俄国文学“多余人”形象与中国现代文学“多余人”形象比较 12. 《源氏物语》与《红楼梦》比较 13. 朝鲜《春香传》与中国《西厢记》比较 14. 鲁迅《狂人 日记 》与果戈理《狂人日记》比较 15. 俄国奥斯特洛夫斯基《大雷雨》与中国曹禺《雷雨》比较 16. 左拉创作与茅盾创作中的自然主义比较 古代文学论文选题方向三：文艺理论部分 1、唐代笔记小说中的亲属称谓语研究 2、魏晋南北朝时期公文写作理论述论 3、明代《水浒传》传播初探 4、《文艺复兴》研究 5、女性文学史的书写立场及策略 6、论《洛丽塔》的后现代主义特征 7、“80后”文学现象研究 8、西方现代主义小说的空间化追求 9、袁枚“性灵”美学思想研究 10、20世纪小说叙事时间与生命体验 11、薛家将 故事 的演变及其文化解读 12、卡彭铁尔小说时间的“返源旅行” 13、从中国文学翻译策略选择看多元系统理论的局限性 14、从鲁迅作品对 儿童 形象的塑造中看其 教育 观 15、抗战文学中的重庆主题 16、五四新文学缘起的政治文化再考 17、重写文学史的理论与实践 18、现实主义的困惑与探索 19、在文学与政策之间 20、《左传》故事“经典化”探研 21、从西方科幻小说看中国同类作品的困境与发展 22、“五四”小说的叙事 猜你喜欢： 1. 最全古代文学论文题目参考 2. 古代文学毕业论文题目大全 3. 有关古代文学毕业论文选题 4. 2017最新古代文学论文选题 5. 古代文学论文题目

论《洛丽塔》中纳博科夫的现代意识 (文化冲突)The Dispiriting Incompatibility of European and American CulturesThroughout Lolita, the interactions between European and American cultures result in perpetual misunderstandings and conflict. Charlotte Haze, an American, is drawn to the sophistication and worldliness of Humbert, a European. She eagerly accepts Humbert not so much because of who he is, but because she is charmed by what she sees as the glamour and intellect of Humbert’s background. Humbert has no such reverence for Charlotte. He openly mocks the superficiality and transience of American culture, and he views Charlotte as nothing but a simple-minded housewife. However, he adores every one of Lolita’s vulgarities and chronicles every detail of his tour of America—he enjoys the possibilities for freedom along the open American road. He eventually admits that he has defiled the country rather than the other way around. Though Humbert and Lolita develop their own version of peace as they travel together, their union is clearly not based on understanding or acceptance. Lolita cannot comprehend the depth of Humbert’s devotion, which he overtly links to art, history, and culture, and Humbert will never truly recognize Lolita’s unwillingness to let him sophisticate her. Eventually, Lolita leaves Humbert for the American Quilty, who does not bore her with high culture or grand passions.偶然和无常纳博科夫的《洛丽塔》中的混沌 (心里和心理学方面的混乱)The Inadequacy of PsychiatryHumbert’s passion for Lolita defies easy psychological analysis, and throughout Lolita Humbert mocks psychiatry’s tendency toward simplistic, logical explanations. In the foreword to Lolita, John Ray, Jr., ., claims that Humbert’s tale will be of great interest to psychiatry, but throughout his memoir Humbert does his best to discredit the entire field of study, heaping the most scorn on Freudian psychology. For example, he enjoys lying to the psychiatrists at the sanitarium. He reports mockingly that Pratt, the headmistress of Lolita’s school, diagnoses Lolita as sexually immature, wholly unaware that she actually has an overly active sex life with her stepfather. By undermining the authority and logic of the psychiatric field, Nabokov demands that readers view Humbert as a unique and deeply flawed human being, but not an insane one. Humbert further thwarts efforts of scientific categorization by constantly describing his feelings for Lolita as an enchantment or spell, closer to magic than to science. He tries to prove that his love is not a mental disease but an enormous, strange, and uncontrollable emotion that resists easy classification. Nabokov himself was deeply critical of psychiatry, and Lolita is, in a way, an attack on the field.以《洛丽塔》为例分析文学内在价值与社会道德规范的冲突解析《洛丽塔》中主人公的悲剧命运论《洛丽塔》的悲剧意义(这段3个主题都有相关,但是不详细)Humbert and Lolita are both exiles, and, alienated from the societies with which they are familiar, they find themselves in ambiguous moral territory where the old rules seem not to apply. Humbert chooses exile and comes willingly from Europe to America, while Lolita is forced into exile when Charlotte dies. She becomes detached from her familiar community of Ramsdale and goes on the road with Humbert. Together, they move constantly and belong to no single fixed place. The tourists Humbert and Lolita meet on the road are similarly transient, belonging to a generic America rather than to a specific place. In open, unfamiliar territory, Humbert and Lolita form their own set of rules, where normal sexual and familial relationships become twisted and corrupt. Both Humbert and Lolita have become so disconnected from ordinary society that neither can fully recognize how morally depraved their actions are. Humbert cannot see his own monstrosity, and Lolita shows only occasional awareness of herself of a Humbert sweeps Lolita away so that they can find a measure of freedom, their exile ultimately traps them. Lolita is bound to Humbert because she has nowhere else to go, and though Humbert dreams of leaving America with Lolita, he eventually accepts that he will stay in America until he dies. Though each of them undergoes one final exile, Lolita to Dick Schiller and Humbert to prison, it is clear that they are first and foremost exiled from their own selves, an exile so total that they could never return to their original places in the worlds they once left. Exile in Lolita.

写一下，你研究的课题的背景介绍，比如国内外的研究现状，还有你毕设的主要内容。