国际贸易英文论文文献

Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary CreditsThis article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; suggestions are available. (October 2009)The Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (UCP) is a set of rules on the issuance and use of letters of credit. The UCP is utilised by bankers and commercial parties in more than 175 countries in trade finance. Some 11-15% of international trade utilises letters of credit, totalling over a trillion dollars (US) each , the commercial parties, particularly banks, have developed the techniques and methods for handling letters of credit in international trade finance. This practice has been standardized by the ICC (International Chamber of Commerce) by publishing the UCP in 1933 and subsequently updating it throughout the years. The ICC has developed and moulded the UCP by regular revisions, the current version being the UCP600. The result is the most successful international attempt at unifying rules ever, as the UCP has substantially universal effect. The latest revision was approved by the Banking Commission of the ICC at its meeting in Paris on 25 October 2006. This latest version, called the UCP600, formally commenced on 1 July and the UCPA significant function of the ICC is the preparation and promotion of its uniform rules of practice. The ICC’s aim is to provide a codification of international practice occasionally selecting the best practice after ample debate and consideration. The ICC rules of practice are designed by bankers and merchants and not by legislatures with political and local considerations. The rules accordingly demonstrate the needs, customs and practices of business. Because the rules are incorporated voluntarily into contracts, the rules are flexible while providing a stable base for international review, including judicial scrutiny. International revision is thus facilitated permitting the incorporation of the changing practices of the commercial parties. ICC, which was established in 1919, had as its primary objective facilitating the flow of international trade at a time when nationalism and protectionism threatened the easing of world trade. It was in that spirit that the UCP were first introduced – to alleviate the confusion caused by individual countries’ promoting their own national rules on letter of credit practice. The aim was to create a set of contractual rules that would establish uniformity in practice, so that there would be less need to cope with often conflicting national regulations. The universal acceptance of the UCP by practitioners in countries with widely divergent economic and judicial systems is a testament to the rules’ latest revision of UCP is the sixth revision of the rules since they were first promulgated in 1933. It is the fruit of more than three years of work by the ICC's Commission on Banking Technique and UCP remain the most successful set of private rules for trade ever developed. A range of individuals and groups contributed to the current revision including: the UCP Drafting Group, which waded through more than 5000 individual comments before arriving at this final text; the UCP Consulting Group, consisting of members from more than 25 countries, which served as the advisory body; the more than 400 members of the ICC Commission on Banking Technique and Practice who made pertinent suggestions for changes in the text; and 130 ICC National Committees worldwide which took an active role in consolidating comments from their the revision process, notice was taken of the considerable work that had been completed in creating the International Standard Banking Practice for the Examination of Documents under Documentary Credits (ISBP), ICC Publication 645. This publication has evolved into a necessary companion to the UCP for determining compliance of documents with the terms of letters of credit. It is the expectation of the Drafting Group and the Banking Commission that the application of the principles contained in the ISBP, including subsequent revisions thereof, will continue during the time UCP 600 is in force. At the time UCP 600 is implemented, there will be an updated version of the ISBP to bring its contents in line with the substance and style of the new that UCP600 does not automatically apply to a credit if the credit is silent as to which set of rules it is subject to. A credit issued by SWIFT MT700 is no longer subject by default to the current UCP – it has to be indicated in field 40E, which is designated for specifying the "applicable rules".Where a credit is issued subject to UCP600, the credit will be interpreted in accordance with the entire set of 39 articles contained in UCP600. However, exception to the rules can be made by express modification or exclusion. For example, the parties to a credit may agree that the rest of the credit shall remain valid despite the beneficiary's failure to deliver an instalment. In such case, the credit has to nullify the effect of article 32 of UCP600, such as by wording the credit as: "The credit will continue to be available for the remaining instalments notwithstanding the beneficiary's failure to present complied documents of an instalment in accordance with the instalment schedule."eUCPThe eUCP was developed as a supplement to UCP due to the strong sense at the time that banks and corporates together with the transport and insurance industries were ready to utilise electronic commerce. The hope and expectation that surrounded the development of eUCP has failed to materialise into day to day transactions and its usage has been, to put it mildly, minimal. Owing to this lack of usage, it was felt that this was not the right time to incorporate the eUCP into the UCP600 and it will remain as a supplement albeit slightly amended to identify its relationship with updated version of the eUCP came into effect on 1 July 2007 to coincide the commencement of the UCP600. There are no substantive changes to the eUCP, merely references to the Certified Documentary Credit Specialist is a qualification awarded by IFSA US and IFS UK and endorsed by ICC Paris as the only International qualification for Trade Finance Professionals, recognising the competence, and ensuring best practice. It requires Re-Certification every Three years. UCP 600 rules will be included from April 2008 examinations only. CDCS requires some 4–6 months of independent study and a pass in 3 hour examination of 120 multiple choice questions as well as 3 in basket exercises with questions which demonstrate skill in real-world applications of UCP.

国际贸易毕业论文参考文献

大学生活又即将即将结束，众所周知毕业前要通过最后的毕业论文，毕业论文是一种有计划的、比较正规的检验大学学习成果的形式，那么应当如何写毕业论文呢？以下是我帮大家整理的国际贸易毕业论文参考文献，希望对大家有所帮助。

[1]陈策.外国直接投资的国际贸易效应:基于我国行业数据的分析[J].国际贸易问题，2007(3):28-33

[2]陈丽珍，王术文.技术扩散及其相关概念辨析[J].现代管理科学，2005(2):56

[3]黄晓玲. 我国中西部区位优势与吸收外国直接投资类型定位[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2003,(01) .

[4]姚利民 ,唐春宇. 独资与合资方式的技术溢出效果比较[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2005,(10) .

[5]崔到陵,任志成. 外国直接投资与中国人力资本成长的实证分析——以“长三角”为例[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2006,(03) .

[6]平新乔等.外国直接投资对中国企业的溢出效应分析:来自中国第一次全国经济普查数据闭.世界经济，2007(8):3-13

[7]秦晓钟，胡志宝.外商对华直接投资技术外溢效应的实证分析[J].江苏经济探讨，1998(4):47-50

[8]饶燕.知识产权保护对国际技术扩散途径的门槛回归分析[D]].硕士学位论文，浙江工业大学，2007

[9]Cheung, ., Lin P. Spillover effect s of FDI on innovation in China: Evidence from province vincial data [J] .China Economic Review, 2004, 15 (1):25-441.

[10]Hejazi,Walid,Sufarian, Spillovers[J] .Journal of International Economics, 1999, 30 (3) :491-511 .

[11]Kokko, . Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers [J] .Journal of Development Studies, 1994, 42 (2) :279-293 .

[12]熊晶晶,史本山. 外商直接投资的技术溢出机理研究[J]. 商业研究, 2006,(22) .

[13]陈涛涛，宋爽.影响外商直接投资行业内溢出效应的政策要素研究[J].金融研究，2005(5):56-66

[14]崔到陵，任志成.外国，[J].国际贸易问题，2006(3):87-93

[15]代谦，别朝霞.外国直接投资、人力资本与经济增长:来自中国的.数据[J].经济论坛，2006(4):59-65

[1]李丽.低碳经济对国际贸易规则的影响及中国的对策[J].财贸经济,2014.

[2]郭璟坤.论低碳经济对国际贸易规则的影响及中国的对策[J].中国管理信息化,2015.

[3]王舒.低碳经济对国际贸易的影响及中国的对策[J].当代经济,2011.

[4]龙宁曲.低碳经济对国际贸易规则的影响及中国的对策[J].现代经济信息,2015.

[5]郑欢.探讨低碳经济对国际贸易规则的影响及中国的对策[J].现代经济信息,2016.

[6]刘琦.低碳经济环境下的国际贸易发展态势探讨[J].湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版),2014(12).

[7]王杰.低碳经济对国际贸易发展的影响[J].北方经贸,2014(03).

[8]谢守红,薛红芳,徐西原.低碳经济与国际贸易结构转型研究综述[J].世界地理研究,2013(02).

[9]龙宁曲.低碳经济对国际贸易规则的影响及中国的对策[J].现代经济信息,2015,(23)

[10]丁黎.低碳背景下我国国际贸易与环境保护协同发展研究[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,02:67-72+92-93.

[11]郭璟坤.论低碳经济对国际贸易规则的影响及中国的对策[J].中国管理信息化,2015,(22)

[12]孙丹,谭芹兰.低碳经济背景下我国国际物流发展的问题及策略研究[J].中国商论,2015,07:88-90.

[13]郑峥.国际贸易规则视角下低碳经济对我国对外贸易的影响[J].商业经济研究,2016,06:145-146.

[14]王旭坤.基于低碳经济国际贸易规则重塑下的我国对策分析[J].现代商业,2016,11:57-58.

[15]刘佳佳.试分析低碳经济对国际贸易规则的影响及我国的策略[J].商场现代化,2016,15:1-2.

感觉相关的就行吧,这是我今天刚交老师的Solidarity tradeThe current fair trade movement was shaped in Europe in the 1960s. Fair trade during that period was often seen as a political gesture against neo-imperialism: radical student movements began targeting multinational corporations and concerns that traditional business models were fundamentally flawed started to emerge. The slogan at the time, “Trade not Aid”, gained international recognition in 1968 when it was adopted by the UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) to put the emphasis on the establishment of fair trade relations with the developing world. The year 1965 saw the creation of the first Alternative Trading Organization (ATO): that year, British NGO Oxfam launched "Helping-by-Selling", a program which sold imported handicrafts in Oxfam stores in the UK and from mail-order catalogues. In 1969, the first Worldshop opened its doors in the Netherlands. The initiative aimed at bringing the principles of fair trade to the retail sector by selling almost exclusively goods produced under fair trade terms in “underdeveloped regions”. The first shop was run by volunteers and was so successful that dozens of similar shops soon went into business in the Benelux countries, Germany, and in other Western European the 1960s and 1970s, important segments of the fair trade movement worked to find markets for products from countries that were excluded from the mainstream trading channels for political reasons. Thousands of volunteers sold coffee from Angola and Nicaragua in Worldshops, in the back of churches, from their homes, and from stands in public places, using the products as a vehicle to deliver their message: give disadvantaged producers in developing countries a fair chance on the world’s market, and support their self-determined sustainable development. The alternative trade movement blossomed, if not in sales, then at least in terms of dozens of ATOs being established on both sides of the Atlantic, of scores of Worldshops being set up, and of well-organized actions and campaigns attacking exploitation and foreign domination, and promoting the ideals of Nelson Mandela, Julius Nyerere, and the Nicaraguan Sandinistas: the right to independence and self-determination, to equitable access to the world’s markets and consumers. 团结贸易现今公平贸易运动形塑于1960年代的欧洲，公平贸易于这时期通常被视为一种反抗新帝国主义的政治姿态，基进的学生运动开始关注跨国公司，并出现了一种认为传统商业模式基本上是有缺陷的共识，那时的口号“贸易，而非援助”(Trade not Aid)，被1968年所召开的联合国贸易及发展会议（United Nations Conference on Trade and Development，简称UNCTAD）所采用，并得到国际认同，会议中强调与发展中世界建立公平的贸易关系。1965年诞生了第一个另类贸易组织（Alternative Trading Organization，简称ATD）：那年，英国的非政府组织乐施会(Oxfam)发起了”以销售来帮忙”(Helping-by-Selling)的活动，一个以邮购及在乐施会商店销售进口手工艺品的计划。1969年，第一个“世界商店”在荷兰开张，这个开创性的构想，是以销售符合公平贸易规则的“发展中区域”的产品，将公平贸易的法则带入零售部门，第一个商店由志工营运，非常成功，之后数十个类似的商店开始在比利时、荷兰、卢森堡及德国等其他西欧国家开始营业。在1960和1970年代，公平贸易运动里很重要的部份是，为那些因为政治因素而被排斥于主流贸易管道的国家，协助他们的产品寻找市场。数千名志工在教会后面和世界商店销售来自安哥拉及尼加拉瓜的咖啡豆，以这些产品从家里和公共场所的摊位传达一个讯息：给那些来自发展中国家的弱势生产者一个公平的机会，就是支持他们自主的永续发展。另类贸易活动的盛行，若不从贸易量来说，至少以在数量上，有数十个另类贸易组织（ATO）在大西洋两岸成立，同时随着世界商店的扩张，有许多计划性的行动与专案，抨击国际间的剥削与支配的现象，宣扬著曼德拉、朱利叶斯•尼雷尔及尼加拉瓜桑定政权的理念：自主及独立的权利，与接触全球市场及消费者的公平管道。