英国媒体最新调查结果论文模板

英国论文report参考文献格式参考。英国论文report写作-原文链接： 1.结构方面：Report一般由Table of Contents, Executive Summary, Introduction, Body, Conclusion/Recommendation, Reference六部分组成。 2. 语言方面：Report中，如果题目是假如你是某公司CEO或其他某个角色，可以使用第一人称；如果没有这样主人翁的假设，还是不能用第1，2人称。请注意这点和Essay的区别。 3. 内容方面： 1) Report实践性更重一点，少写理论，多结合实际情况分析。 2) 数据和图表的使用很重要。如果用到某公司几年内的某一项数据的变化，可以先列数据表格，再用柱状图、馅饼图或曲线图进行直观反映。 4. 特别注意问题： 1) Table of Contents，一定要用Word自动生成格式。 2）Executive Summary，一般要出现 “The main purpose of this report is to……”这样的标志性语句。一般来说，这部分主要介绍 这篇Report的研究内容、研究对象、研究目的、研究意义等等一些概括性的东西。 3) Introduction，在一篇Report中，Introduction部分相当于是一个Background，而不是概括Report的内容。请注意与Essay的区别。Report中的Introduction不概括文章内容；不介绍文 章结构（因为目录里已经有结构介绍了）；只介绍Background。 4) Body，总原则“少写理论，多结合实际情况分析”，不要空谈。根据要求具体分析，用证据支撑、用事实说话。列出标题、次级标题、有必要时列出下一级标题。每段内容用简洁的语言 提炼出要点关键词，然后进行解释和阐述。 5) Conclusion / Recommendation, 根据论文要求具体把握。 6) Reference: Reference 是导师最看重的，所以请一定特别注意！绝对不能出现编造的情况，一定要真实。国外对这个问题查得很严。一旦查出有作假或抄袭情况,会直接挂科，甚至开除学籍。一般来说，Reference包含两个部分，一种是in-text reference 也就是在文章里的reference，一种是在文章最后出现的reference, 也就是reference list。一篇论文须要包含文中的in-textreference和文末的reference list。论文有明确要求几个Reference的，根据要求来把握；没有明确说明个数的，一般按照每千字3-4个来操作。 Reference格式标注办法，一般论文要求中会明确提到。常用的Reference格式有： Harvard referencing system 哈佛文献标记系统 CMS: Chicago Manua芝加哥写作和文献标注系统： APA Style：American Psychological Association. 美国心理学会写作和文献标记办法 AMA：American Medical Association 美国医学会文献标注系统 MLA: 现代语言学会写作和文献标注系统 代写英国essay CSE: Council of Science科技编辑理事会文献标记和写作办法） 7) 字体格式：论文有明确要求字体格式、大小等时，根据要求来操作；论文没有明确要求字体大小等时，一般用用times new roman字体；12（小四）；1.5倍行距；Word默认页边距；标题字体可加粗；每段落之间空一行；每段直接写，无需空格；在每页的右下角插入页数。

正文供你参考：The BBC is in the middle of not one but two huge sex scandals, with the BBC's top boss forced to resign over the weekend.First, it a former BBC star was posthumously accused of a long history of sexual abuse, and the BBC was accused of refusing investigate its own star. Then, just as the first scandal was dying down, the BBC mistakenly aired accusations that a senior politician was a pedophile.That both these scandals involved accusations of child abuse was perhaps what made the situation spin so wildly out of control. But there is another key factor that cannot be overlooked in any scandal about the BBC: Socialism.Since 1946 the BBC has largely been funded by a license fee paid by every Brit with a TV set. In 2012 the fee was £145.50 ($231) for color and £49.00 ($77) for black and white. This amounts to 70 percent of its income, according to Businessweek. This license fee system was set up by Clement Atlee's post-war Labour government — the same government that began to create a "state socialism" system by nationalizing heavy industry and creating the National Health Service.For decades, this state-run news organization ran with little controversy, even when the government slowly allowed commercial competitors on television and radio. This was partly because of what many felt were the BBC's high-standards (the broadcaster is affectionately referred to as "Auntie" in the British media). The resources at its disposal gave the BBC scope and a mandate that leaned towards quality — even today, it is the largest broadcaster in the world (with 23,000 employees), and one of the largest journalism entities.There has been a growing backlash against the BBC in recent years, however, coinciding with the rise of cable news and the internet, which makes the license fee in particular feel antiquated. Leading the charge against the BBC is the UK's print press, long angered by the unfair access to resources they believe the BBC has, and the belief that the corporation has a a liberal (or, even socialist) bias. The UK's tabloids (notably, those owned by Rupert Murdoch) have most recently been riled by the tough stance the BBC took on the phone-hacking scandal.The most serious complaints against the BBC are leveled at the quality of its news-gathering — a point of pride for those who work at the organization. The biggest scandal before this year was probably the series of events that led to the Hutton Inquiry in 2004 (in that case, a BBC journalist quoted a source who reportedly said Tony Blair's government had "sexed up" the case for war in Iraq. After claims became public, the source killed himself). The Hutton Inquiry led to the resignation of a number of senior BBC employees, including then-director general Greg Dyke.What's striking about the current scandals surrounding the BBC is that they both really revolve around the quality of the BBC's reporting. The allegations that a BBC star abused children appear to be less important to critics than the BBC's decision to cancel an investigation into the subject. When other news agencies make mistakes, the scandal dies quickly. For the BBC, it's an existential crisis.This existential crisis exists because there's no longer any ideological reason to keep the BBC around, so every argument about its power has to focus on its practical ability to do good. If the BBC can't keep to the extraordinarily high standards the British public has for it, it may be beginning a slow and painful journey to privatization like other nationalized British industries before it.

正文供你参考：The BBC is in the middle of not one but two huge sex scandals, with the BBC's top boss forced to resign over the weekend.First, it a former BBC star was posthumously accused of a long history of sexual abuse, and the BBC was accused of refusing investigate its own star. Then, just as the first scandal was dying down, the BBC mistakenly aired accusations that a senior politician was a pedophile.That both these scandals involved accusations of child abuse was perhaps what made the situation spin so wildly out of control. But there is another key factor that cannot be overlooked in any scandal about the BBC: Socialism.Since 1946 the BBC has largely been funded by a license fee paid by every Brit with a TV set. In 2012 the fee was £145.50 ($231) for color and £49.00 ($77) for black and white. This amounts to 70 percent of its income, according to Businessweek. This license fee system was set up by Clement Atlee's post-war Labour government — the same government that began to create a "state socialism" system by nationalizing heavy industry and creating the National Health Service.For decades, this state-run news organization ran with little controversy, even when the government slowly allowed commercial competitors on television and radio. This was partly because of what many felt were the BBC's high-standards (the broadcaster is affectionately referred to as "Auntie" in the British media). The resources at its disposal gave the BBC scope and a mandate that leaned towards quality — even today, it is the largest broadcaster in the world (with 23,000 employees), and one of the largest journalism entities.There has been a growing backlash against the BBC in recent years, however, coinciding with the rise of cable news and the internet, which makes the license fee in particular feel antiquated. Leading the charge against the BBC is the UK's print press, long angered by the unfair access to resources they believe the BBC has, and the belief that the corporation has a a liberal (or, even socialist) bias. The UK's tabloids (notably, those owned by Rupert Murdoch) have most recently been riled by the tough stance the BBC took on the phone-hacking scandal.The most serious complaints against the BBC are leveled at the quality of its news-gathering — a point of pride for those who work at the organization. The biggest scandal before this year was probably the series of events that led to the Hutton Inquiry in 2004 (in that case, a BBC journalist quoted a source who reportedly said Tony Blair's government had "sexed up" the case for war in Iraq. After claims became public, the source killed himself). The Hutton Inquiry led to the resignation of a number of senior BBC employees, including then-director general Greg Dyke.What's striking about the current scandals surrounding the BBC is that they both really revolve around the quality of the BBC's reporting. The allegations that a BBC star abused children appear to be less important to critics than the BBC's decision to cancel an investigation into the subject. When other news agencies make mistakes, the scandal dies quickly. For the BBC, it's an existential crisis.This existential crisis exists because there's no longer any ideological reason to keep the BBC around, so every argument about its power has to focus on its practical ability to do good. If the BBC can't keep to the extraordinarily high standards the British public has for it, it may be beginning a slow and painful journey to privatization like other nationalized British industries before it. Read more: