与昆虫是什么有关论文参考文献

研究昆虫控制的文章Athenix and Monsanto Announce Collaboration on Research for Insect ControlRESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N.C. and ST. LOUIS, June 20 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Athenix Corp. and Monsanto Company today announced they have entered into a three-year research collaboration for insect control on a key class of insects that affects a number of Monsanto's major crops of interest. Financial terms of the agreement were not disclosed. "We are pleased to work with the market leader in crop genetics to bring our technical capabilities to commercialization," said Mike Koziel, chief executive officer for Athenix. "Working with Monsanto to discover novel genes for controlling insect pests increases options for farmers and allows Athenix to demonstrate the power of its integrated discovery platforms for new biotech traits," said Nick Duck, vice president of research at Athenix. Athenix will apply its expertise in microbial screening and genomics to facilitate gene discovery intended to help protect crops such as cotton, soybeans and corn against a common class of insects known as Hemipterans. Hemipteran insects include Lygus, a pest of cotton, and stinkbug, a pest of soybean. "This collaboration will work to offer an essential benefit to our farmer customers by providing insect protection in crops such as corn, cotton and soybeans against the piercing and sucking insects. Insect tolerant crops allow growers to spray less pesticide, making their operations more efficient and at the same time stewarding the environment," said Robert T. Fraley, Ph.D., Monsanto executive vice president and chief technology officer. "We're excited to collaborate with Athenix to help broaden grower's options for insect control." About Athenix: Athenix is a leading biotechnology company that develops novel products and technologies for agricultural and industrial applications, including biofuels and bioconversions. Athenix has established an outstanding intellectual property portfolio and market access ability around enhanced plants, microbes, genes, enzymes, and processes with emphasis on two major markets: 1) novel agricultural traits for growers such as insect resistance, nematode resistance, herbicide tolerance, and their use for the crop production industry; and 2) the discovery of genes and proteins for use in the sustainable chemical industry with a focus on biofuels like ethanol and other natural products.Biological control of locusts New weapons for old enemiesDuring the 1988 desert locust plague, swarms crossed the Atlantic from Mauritania to the Caribbean, flying 5 000 kilometres in 10 days.Scientists were stumped because migrating swarms normally come down to rest every night. But locusts can’t swim, so how could it be? It turned out that the swarms were coming down at sea – on any ships they could find, but also in the water itself. The first ones in all drowned but their corpses made rafts for the other ones to rest on. Since the dawn of agriculture more than 10 000 years ago mankind has had to deal with a resourceful and fearless enemy, Schistocerca gregaria, the desert locust. Normally loners, every so often these natives of the deserts from West Africa to India turn into vast, voracious swarms that leave hunger and poverty behind them wherever they go. Throughout history, farmers and governments have made attempts to repel the bands and swarms of locusts by collecting insects, creating noise, making smoke and burying and burning the insects. But all of this had little effect. With swarms sometimes extending for hundreds of kilometres, and containing billions of individuals, they conquered by sheer force of numbers. Health concernsIt has long puzzled humans where these animals came from and where they survived. Only in the mid-20th century was it realized that the light brown solitary desert-dwelling insect was the same species as the red and yellow locusts of the plagues. Only when its biology was understood and chemical pesticides and aerial spraying became available a few decades ago, could efforts be made to control the insect. But large-scale pesticide use also raised real concerns for human health and the environment. On the seventh-floor Emergency Centre for Locust Operations (ECLO) at FAO Headquarters in Rome, Keith Cressman, FAO's locust forecaster, checks current environmental conditions and locust population data from the three computer screens on his desk. The last big locust upsurge ended early in 2005 and the current alert level is green or calm. The experts at FAO’s ECLO are readying to fight the next round in the age-old battle against locusts – wherever and whenever that may be. “The next time,” says Cressman, “we’ll fight with new tools”. New bio-control agents Recent advances in biological control research, coupled with improved surveillance and intelligence, could make a big difference when the next round in the battle is fought. Such products could make it possible to sharply reduce the amount of chemical pesticides used. One promising avenue is research currently under way at the International Centre for Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE) in Nairobi. An ICIPE team headed by a Zanzibar-born chemical ecologist, Ahmed Hassanali, has identified and synthesized a specific locust pheromone, or chemical signal, that can be used against young locusts with devastating effect.Phenylacetonitrile, or PAN for short, normally governs swarming behaviour in adult males who also use it to warn other males to leave them in peace while they mate. But, Hassanali found it has startlingly different results on juvenile wingless locusts, known as hoppers. Hopper bandsJust as adult locusts form swarms, hoppers will, given the right conditions, stop behaving as individuals and line up in marauding bands up to 5 kilometres wide. They are only slightly less voracious than adults, who eat their own weight of food every day. In three separate field trials – the most recent in Sudan last year – Hassanali’s team showed that even minute doses of PAN could stop hopper bands dead in their tracks and make them break ranks.PAN caused the insects to resume solitary behaviour. Confused and disoriented, some lost their appetite altogether, while others turned cannibal and ate one other. Any survivors were easy prey for predators. What makes PAN particularly attractive is that the dose needed is only a fraction – typically less than 10 millilitres per hectare – of the quantities of chemical or biological pesticides. This translates into substantially lower costs – 50 cents per hectare as opposed to US$12 for chemical pesticides and $15-20 for other bio-control agents.That is clearly a major consideration in the countries in the front line – many of them among the world’s poorest. Green Muscle A different, but also highly effective biological approach is Green Muscle ®, a bio-pesticide developed by the International Institute for Tropical Agriculture’s biological control centre in Cotonou, Benin, and manufactured in South Africa. Green Muscle ® contains spores of the naturally occurring fungus Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum, which germinate on the skin of locusts and penetrate through their exoskeletons. The fungus then destroys the locust's tissues from the inside. This is definitely not good news for locusts, but the fungus has no effect on other life forms. A product similar to Green Muscle ® is already successfully used in Australia, but the latter's introduction in Africa and Asia is being slowed by several factors. These include a need for further large-scale trials, official approval of the product in several countries, and a relatively short shelf-life in its normal ready-to-spray liquid form. One drawback is that it takes days to kill the locusts. It is also relatively expensive and large-scale production would need to be organized. A solution would be to store the product in powder form and dilute it just before use. Hassanali’s team has also shown that, if used in combination with a small amount of PAN, only a quarter of the normal dose of Green Muscle ® is needed.Insect Growth RegulatorsAlso being readied for the modern locust fighter’s armoury is a class of products known as Insect Growth Regulators, or IGRs, which influence the ability of hoppers to moult and grow properly. They have no direct toxic effects on vertebrates. IGRs are effective for several weeks after application and can be used in so-called barrier treatments. In this method only narrow swathes of the product are applied, perpendicular to the direction of the marching hopper bands. Only 10 percent of the amount used in blanket treatment is needed. After marching over one or two barriers the hoppers absorb enough product to die while moulting. As with PAN and Green Muscle ®, however, IGRs need to be aimed at locusts at an early stage in their lives, before they take to the air. That, in turn, requires an advanced level of surveillance and intelligence-gathering to make sure that any locust concentrations are nipped in the bud. eLocust2Although back at ECLO Keith Cressman has satellites, computers and mathematical models at his disposal, the weak link in the chain has been the time it takes to get good information from the field.The mobile ground teams whose job it is to keep tabs on locust populations have to work in some of the world’s remotest, hottest and sometimes (for environmental and security reasons) most hostile places. A week or more might go by before a report from, say, the central Sahara, reached Cressman’s desk. By that time the locusts – “They don’t need visas,” he says – would quite likely have moved to another country or continent altogether. This will soon change however. Field teams are now being issued with special hand-held devices to record vital locust and environmental data and relay them back to their own headquarters and on to Rome in real time. Developed by the French Space Agency CNES, the eLocust2 device is able to bounce the information off communications satellites and have the data arrive in the National Locust Control Centre in the affected country a few minutes later, from where they are passed on to Cressman for analysis. In case of unusually heavy hopper concentrations, immediate action can be taken to make sure that the locusts never grow old enough to swarm. Back to the fieldWriting in Science magazine, locust expert Martin Enserink gave the following graphic description of a locust population gone out of control:“On a beautiful November morning (in Morocco) it’s clear, even from afar, that something’s terribly wrong with the trees around this tiny village. They are covered with a pinkish-red gloss, as if their leaves were changing colour... "As you get closer, the hue becomes a wriggling mass; a giant cap of insects on every tree, devouring the tiny leaves. Get closer still and you’ll hear a soft drizzle: the steady stream of locust droppings falling to the ground.” Such nightmare visions, and locust plagues with them, may one day be a thing of the past.

1/96【题名】苹果病虫害非化学防治技术【作者】周俊英【刊名】果农之友.2007(8).-33-332/96【题名】套袋苹果病虫害的发生与防治【作者】梁翠玲【刊名】河北果树.2007(4).-42-423/96【题名】无公害苹果病虫害防治技术初探【作者】孙凤珍[1] 马利红[1] 徐丽娜[1] 李珊珊[2] 田杰[2]【刊名】中国食物与营养.2007(6).-63-644/96【题名】渭北黄土高原无公害苹果病虫害周年优化控制历【作者】张立功[1] 李丙智[2]【刊名】果农之友.2007(4).-31-325/96【题名】苹果病虫害IPM药剂示范园技术方案【作者】无【刊名】农药市场信息.2007(2).-33-336/96【题名】基于GIS的苹果病虫害管理信息系统【作者】赵朋 刘刚 李民赞 李道亮【刊名】农业工程学报.2006,22(12).-150-1547/96【题名】苹果休眠期病虫害发生特点及无害化防治技术【作者】高九思【刊名】果农之友.2006(12).-25-258/96【题名】西北地区苹果病虫害周年优化管理历【作者】张立功【刊名】果农之友.2006(11).-26-279/96【题名】苹果病虫害越冬状态及场所【作者】张立功[1] 李丙智[2]【刊名】烟台果树.2006(4).-31-3210/96【题名】苹果园病虫害系统管理规范刍议【作者】刘俊生 张战利【刊名】中国植保导刊.2006,26(10).-27-2911/96【题名】苹果病虫害智能诊断系统的构建【作者】王媛【刊名】农业图书情报学刊.2006,18(9).-10-12,1512/96【题名】苹果病虫害综合防治技术【作者】无【刊名】果农之友.2006(10).-51-5213/96【题名】苹果套袋后病虫害的综合防治【作者】张建芳 铁春晓【刊名】果农之友.2006(9).-30-3014/96【题名】黄土高坡草果病虫害发生危害特点及综合治理策略【作者】高九思[1] 张继敏[2] 李卫东[3] 王永臻[4] 王洁[4] 曲海亮[5]【刊名】现代种业.2006(4).-41-4415/96【题名】苹果病虫害综合防治技术示范实施与成效【作者】陈战锋[1] 吕国强[1] 史跃强[2] 刘发科[3]【刊名】中国植保导刊.2006,26(8).-23-2416/96【题名】成熟期苹果病虫害发生特点及无害化治理技术【作者】高九思【刊名】果农之友.2006(8).-27-2717/96【题名】苹果病虫害无公害防治技术【作者】杨阳 陈战锋【刊名】河南农业.2006(7).-52-5218/96【题名】套袋红富士苹果病虫害防治措施【作者】崔永恩 郝宪智【刊名】河北果树.2006(4).-41-4219/96【题名】2006年陕西苹果病虫害发生趋势【作者】无【刊名】西北园艺：果树.2006(2).-5-520/96【题名】苹果病虫害综合防治技术【作者】王信祥【刊名】农村实用科技.2006(2).-20-2121/96【题名】当前陕西苹果病虫害发生特点【作者】史大卫 高建国【刊名】西北园艺：果树.2006(1).-21-2222/96【题名】苹果病虫害综合防治与管理【作者】王秋丰 马淑玲【刊名】林业实用技术.2006(1).-26-2723/96【题名】2006年无公害套袋苹果病虫害防治历【作者】孙庆田 张福兴 刘美英 刘万好【刊名】烟台果树.2006(1).-34-3524/96【题名】嵩明县苹果病虫害发生状况及其防治【作者】潘秀娟【刊名】中国南方果树.2005,34(6).-69-7225/96【题名】套袋红富士苹果病虫害防治关键技术【作者】赵伟【刊名】农村科技开发.2005(11).-26-2626/96【题名】绿色无公害苹果病虫害综合防治技术【作者】李素荣【刊名】河北农业科技.2005(9).-17-1727/96【题名】套袋苹果病虫害的防治【作者】高华君[1] 李俊霞[2]【刊名】农业知识：瓜果菜.2005(5).-20-2028/96【题名】无公害苹果病虫害防治关键技术【作者】牛玉堂【刊名】河北果树.2005(4).-38-3829/96【题名】苹果病虫害无公害防治技术【作者】张子维 林静【刊名】中国果树.2005(2).-45-47,i00230/96【题名】无公害苹果病虫害综合防治【作者】桑伟巍【刊名】河北果树.2005(2).-37-3831/96【题名】苹果病虫害绿色管理体系的组建【作者】杜志辉【刊名】中国植保导刊.2005,25(1).-34-3532/96【题名】2004年苹果病虫害发生特点及对策【作者】房道亮[1] 姜丽芝[1] 王忠跃[2] 刘景顺[3] 闫永勃[4]【刊名】烟台果树.2005(1).-21-2233/96【题名】苹果病虫害无公害综合治理技术【作者】高九思[1] 许创照[2] 史跃强[2] 韩立新[1] 王婕[1] 赵双锁[1]【刊名】河北果树.2005(1).-18-19,2234/96【题名】苹果病虫害综合防治技术规程（草案）【作者】李东鸿[1] 赵政阳[2] 赵惠燕[1] 李鑫[1] 梁俊[2] 胡想顺[1]【刊名】西北林学院学报.2004,19(4).-113-11535/96【题名】豫西地区苹果病虫害无公害综合治理技术规程【作者】高九思[1] 韩立新[1] 万素香[1] 上官建宗[2]【刊名】河北果树.2004(5).-13-1536/96【题名】寒地苹果病虫害及防治【作者】龙兆春 郭春华 魏达【刊名】北方园艺.2004(4).-87-8737/96【题名】三门峡地区苹果病虫害发生种类及种群演变【作者】陈玮[1] 代彦满[1] 高九思[2] 王婕[1]【刊名】河南农业.2004(1).-21-2238/96【题名】《新编苹果病虫害诊断与防治》【作者】无【刊名】果树学报.2004,21(2).-112-11239/96【题名】《新编苹果病虫害诊断与防治》【作者】谌有光【刊名】果农之友.2004(2).-42-4240/96【题名】2004年无公害套袋苹果病虫害防治历（供参考）【作者】无【刊名】烟台果树.2004(1).-36-3741/96【题名】《新编苹果病虫害诊断与防治》【作者】王春华【刊名】昆虫知识.2003,40(3).-272-27242/96【题名】2003年优质高档苹果病虫害防治历（供参考）【作者】无【刊名】烟台果树.2003(1).-37-3843/96【题名】套袋苹果病虫害综合防治措施【作者】刘志坚【刊名】农村科技开发.2003(4).-8-844/96【题名】《新编苹果病虫害诊断与防治》书评【作者】陈策【刊名】中国果树.2003(4).-60-6045/96【题名】苹果病虫害无公害防治技术研究【作者】田瑞冬【刊名】北方果树.2003(3).-25-2546/96【题名】无公害苹果病虫害综合防治要点【作者】孙宗明[1] 郑红民[2]【刊名】农业新技术.2003(1).-10-1047/96【题名】套袋苹果病虫害周年防治历【作者】郝淑英【刊名】果农之友.2003(7).-32-3248/96【题名】按物候期防治苹果病虫害益处多【作者】郭学军【刊名】农药市场信息.2003(6).-33-3349/96【题名】苹果病虫害的物候期防治措施【作者】郭学军【刊名】农友.2002(10).-16-1650/96【题名】套袋红富士苹果病虫害防治关键技术【作者】房道亮[1] 宫冰[2] 等【刊名】烟台果树.2002(2).-43-4351/96【题名】2002年优质高档苹果病虫害防治历（供参考）【作者】杨奉才【刊名】烟台果树.2002(1).-37-3852/96【题名】全套袋苹果病虫害综合防治措施【作者】无【刊名】北京农业.2002(5).-19-1953/96【题名】苹果病虫害防治月历【作者】薛勇【刊名】西南园艺.2002,30(3).-16-1654/96【题名】生产优质苹果病虫害综合防治历【作者】刘欣 李俊霞 等【刊名】邯郸农业高等专科学校学报.2002,19(3).-26-27,2955/96【题名】夏季苹果病虫害的防治【作者】柴玉花【刊名】农药市场信息.2002(13).-24-24,2756/96【题名】苹果病虫害综合防治历【作者】董建新[1] 王江柱[2]【刊名】河北果树.2001(2).-54-5557/96【题名】2001年苹果病虫害发生特点及原因【作者】王高民[1] 郜朝峰[2]【刊名】山西农业.2001(7).-25-2558/96【题名】苹果病虫害的综合防治技术【作者】孟彦合【刊名】农业科技与信息.2001(6).-27-2759/96【题名】辽宁省苹果病虫害发生动态及防治对策【作者】孟威[1] 翁永军[2] 等【刊名】辽宁农业科学.2001(4).-38-3960/96【题名】豫东地区苹果病虫害发生动态及防治【作者】金新富[1] 聂合乡[2] 等【刊名】中国果树.2001(2).-33-3561/96【题名】河南省苹果病虫害发生危害及防治现状【作者】王海燕 孔建 等【刊名】河南农业科学.2001(4).-25-2662/96【题名】鲁北地区苹果病虫害发生特点及防治措施【作者】刘春杰 曾现春【刊名】林业科技通讯.2001(8).-38-3863/96【题名】套袋苹果病虫害的发生及防治（一）【作者】路绍杰【刊名】农村百事通.2001(4).-28-2964/96【题名】苹果病虫害的综合防治技术【作者】无【刊名】农药通讯.2001(12).-24-2565/96【题名】套袋红富士苹果病虫害防治技术【作者】王少敏 高华君 等【刊名】果农之友.2001(5).-32-3366/96【题名】烟台苹果病虫害的演变与防治【作者】孙庆田 张福兴【刊名】烟台果树.2000(2).-12-1267/96【题名】全套袋无公害苹果病虫害综合防治历【作者】刘志坚【刊名】北京农业.2000(3).-21-2168/96【题名】陕西渭北苹果病虫害综合治理政策和研究的建议【作者】杨玲环[1] Stew.,M[2]【刊名】干旱地区农业研究.2000,18(2).-47-5769/96【题名】2000年全套袋苹果病虫害综合防治措施【作者】无【刊名】农药市场信息.2000(5).-24-2470/96【题名】几种重要苹果病虫害大发生原因初探【作者】顾耘 张迎春【刊名】烟台果树.1999(1).-3-571/96【题名】根据物候期防治苹果病虫害【作者】柴全喜 张彦武【刊名】烟台果树.1999(1).-44-4472/96【题名】苹困无主要病虫害发生动态及防治对策【作者】杨奉才 毛学明 等【刊名】植保技术与推广.1999,19(3).-24-2673/96【题名】无公害苹果病虫害防治技术研究【作者】冯建国 陶训【刊名】山东农业科学.1999(4).-8-1274/96【题名】全套袋苹果病虫害综合防治措施【作者】刘志坚【刊名】中国果菜.1999(3).-23-2375/96【题名】防治苹果病虫害传统方法十改进【作者】塔玛拉【刊名】新疆林业.1998(3).-34-3476/96【题名】1998年无公害苹果病虫害综合防治历【作者】刘志坚【刊名】河北果树.1998(2).-34-3577/96【题名】1998年无公害苹果病虫害综合防治历【作者】刘志坚【刊名】果树实用技术与信息.1998(5).-16-1778/96【题名】防治苹果病虫害传统方法十改进【作者】梁俊民【刊名】西北园艺：果树.1998(1).-39-4079/96【题名】1998年无公害苹果病虫害综合防治历【作者】刘志坚【刊名】农村科技开发.1998(4).-19-1980/96【题名】根据年生长发育动态防治苹果病虫害【作者】柴全喜 张彦武【刊名】果树实用技术与信息.1997(7).-34-3581/96【题名】1997年无公害优质苹果病虫害综合防治历【作者】刘志坚【刊名】果树实用技术与信息.1997(5).-8-1082/96【题名】1997年无公害优质苹果病虫害综合防治历【作者】无【刊名】烟台果树.1997(1).-3-483/96【题名】1997年无公害优质苹果病虫害综合防治历【作者】刘志坚【刊名】农村科技开发.1997(4).-21-2184/96【题名】防治苹果病虫害的常用药剂【作者】柴全喜【刊名】农家参谋.1997(7).-28-2885/96【题名】八种苹果病虫害的防治【作者】刘静堂 米建仓【刊名】陕西农业.1997(5).-12-1286/96【题名】浅议苹果病虫害及其综合治理【作者】钟宁【刊名】四川林业科技.1997,18(4).-66-6687/96【题名】苹果病虫害发生动态及防治【作者】刘玉华【刊名】河南科技.1997(9).-10-1188/96【题名】加强秋季苹果病虫害的防治【作者】王金友【刊名】果树实用技术与信息.1996(8).-27-2889/96【题名】西北地区苹果病虫害发生情况及综合防治技术【作者】谌有光 王春华【刊名】西北园艺：果树.1996(2).-42-4390/96【题名】休眠期苹果病虫害的综合防治【作者】张海【刊名】农技服务.1996(1).-37-3891/96【题名】苹果病虫害诊治专家系统【作者】李会宁 马永【刊名】计算机农业应用.1995(2).-19-20,3392/96【题名】黄河故道地区苹果病虫害发生特点及综合防治对策【作者】赵忠仁 刘建业【刊名】落叶果树.1994,26(4).-26-2793/96【题名】苹果病虫害防治要点【作者】无【刊名】林业调查规划参考资料.1993(4).-65-6794/96【题名】河南省苹果病虫害发生情况及防治对策【作者】郭艳春 王志民【刊名】河南科技.1992(1).-13-1495/96【题名】苹果病虫害综合防治技术【作者】姚桂兰 郭艳春【刊名】河南农业科学.1990(2).-18-1996/96【题名】苹果病虫害综合防治技术研究与应用【作者】张慈仁 李腾友【刊名】植物保护学报.1990,17(1).-59-66

昆虫的营养价值：昆虫是人类向自然界摄取蛋白质的途径之一，据记载：从古时，在人民生活困难的时候，就主要使用昆虫。目前在世界贫穷的国家：如非洲，尼泊尔，埃塞俄比亚等均以昆虫和草根为生，昆虫已成为他们的重要摄取脂肪，蛋白质的途径。从营养价值来看，昆虫含有丰富的蛋白质，干虫体的含量高达百分之30～百分之70而且由20多种重要氨基酸组成，含有人体与动物无法合成的8种必需氨基酸和儿童必须的2种氨基酸，干的蝉含有百分之72，蚂蚁含百分之42，黄蜂含百分之81蟋蟀含百分之65，并且昆虫还含有丰富的脂肪，糖类，矿物质，维生素，水。其脂肪中百分之85为软脂肪和不饱和脂肪酸，所以易被人体所吸收。 丰富的食用昆虫资源：由于昆虫数量多，繁殖多，可以在残酷的环境下生存，所以即使大量捕捉也很难造成生态破坏，并且很多国家的养虫业很发达。我国蚕业，蝗虫资源都很丰富，并且有些地方也有使用它们的习惯。我国曾多次向外国出口蝗虫，蚕蛹等～～～～国外也以开办：苍蝇工厂，蚯蚓工厂等，利用其产卵多，生命力强等特点向大众提供大量蛋白质。全世界约有3000种昆虫可以食用，我国约有800种。由于昆虫的食物转换率高，食用3kg植物蛋白可以换1kg昆虫蛋白，而牛需要8kg植物蛋白才可以换1kg动物蛋白，羊则10kg植物蛋白才可以换1kg动物蛋白.所以因为昆虫繁殖快，数量多，生命力强等特点，昆虫业有很好的发展前景。 使用昆虫的利用情况：在现实社会中，昆虫不仅还可以用作食物，还可以用做医药，许多药如：僵蚕，九香虫，蝉蜕，龙凤，冬虫夏草等既是可以治疗某些疾病，还可以对人生体进行滋补。在古代，昆虫就在人们的食谱上曾有过重要的地位，至今，很多国家还保留着这些习惯。墨西哥的外号叫“昆虫之乡”，有370多种昆虫可以作为佳肴，列入品牌的有60多种，所以墨西哥每年因这个原因吸引了世界很多游客。 利用昆虫或其他产品为原料作为饮料：蜂蜜在很多人群众多很流行，老人小孩都很爱喝，在爱喝的同时还可以对胃和其他器官进行护理。我国在3000多年前就有养蜂的习惯，并且一直流传到现在，蜜蜂也是授粉昆虫，所以对农业也有很好的促进。我国不仅是养蜂，食用蜂蜜最多的国家，也是饲养蜂蜜最多的国家，大约拥有600多万箱蜂群。而且在国内外也有很多人提取蜂毒来治疗人体的风湿等疾病。所以，发展昆虫业是很好的一项事业。

catchinginsects(现在进行时)catchinsects(一般形态)