关于法学生的英文论文题目

确定选题是撰写论文的首要工作，好比冲锋陷阵的先头部队，俗话说“题好一半文”，就是把选题看作论文写作成功的一半。下面我给大家带来2022优秀英语 毕业 论文题目参考，希望能帮助到大家!

↓↓↓点击获取更多"论文"相关内容↓↓↓

★ 英语专业毕业论文题目 ★

★ 英语教学法论文题目 ★

★ 毕业论文答辩发言稿 ★

★ 大学毕业论文评语 ★

优秀英语毕业论文题目

1、输出驱动假设在大学英语教学中的应用:思考与建议

2、坚持科学的大学英语教学改革观

3、外语课堂教学中的问题与若干研究课题

4、跨 文化 交际能力在外语教学中如何定位

5、我国大学英语教学的未来发展方向研究

6、基于微课的“翻转课堂”模式在大学英语教学中应用的可行性分析

7、英语类专业实践多元人才观面临的挑战与对策

8、论大学英语教学思辨能力培养模式构建

9、英语类专业创新发展探索

10、国际MOOCs对我国大学英语课程的冲击与重构

11、我国 商务英语 研究十年现状分析

12、基于MOOC的大学英语翻转课堂教学模式研究

13、翻译研究中的概念混淆

14、试论我国英语专业人才的培养:回顾与展望

15、大数据时代的慕课与外语教学研究

16、关于学术英语教学的几点思考

17、内容要创造语言要模仿

18、多元语境下英语研究的语用关注

19、一个具有颠覆性的外语教学理念和 方法

20、翻转课堂及其在大学英语教学中的应用

21、外语教学多模态选择框架探索

22、以人才培养为中心,全面推进外语类专业教学改革与发展

23、我国高等 教育 内涵式发展背景下英语专业的建设思路

24、英语介词学习与概念迁移

25、大学英语有效课堂环境构建及评价的理论框架

26、高校大学外语教学定位思考

27、基于三维构念的大学生英语自主学习能力量表编制与检验

28、商务英语专业人才需求和培养模式调查与启示

29、活动理论框架下的大学 英语学习 动机自我系统模型构建

30、大学 英语写作 反馈方式的对比研究

31、直面挑战“翻转”自我——新教育范式下大学外语教师的机遇与挑战

32、非英语专业大学生英语学习焦虑多维度研究

33、论英语的时间性特质与汉语的空间性特质

34、关于我国外语教育规划与布局的思考

35、高职院校英语教学EOP转向及其影响因素探究

36、基于电子学档的项目式翻转课堂 教学方法 研究

37、关于《英语专业本科教学质量国家标准》制订的几点思考

38、翻转课堂的学习者满意度影响因子分析

39、莫言英译者葛浩文翻译中的“忠实”与“伪忠实”

40、商务英语专业本科教学质量国家标准要点解读

41、中外作者科技论文英文摘要多维度语步对比研究

42、教育生态视域下的外语教学设计

43、MOOC之于外语教育场域的思考

44、构建师生协同发展的大学英语课堂有效教学理论模式

45、MOOC 热点 研究问题探析

46、台湾成功大学从EGP向ESP转型的启示

47、大学英语面临的挑战与对策:课程论视角

48、读后续写——提高外语学习效率的一种有效方法

49、美国21世纪初外语教育政策述评

50、基于微信的非英语专业大学生英语听说学习诉求的调查研究

51、中国英语专业学生英语 议论文 句法复杂性研究

52、再论外语专业学生的思辨能力:“缺席”还是“在场”

53、论外语教师PCK发展路径

54、外宣翻译的名与实——张健教授访谈录

55、高等教育国际化背景下的专门用途英语需求分析

56、英语教师的语言基本功:一个亟待引起重视的问题

57、美国国家外语能力建设模式分析

58、大学英语跨文化教学的模式构建

59、成就目标定向对英语自主学习能力的影响及自我效能感的中介作用

60、大学英语课堂危机引发的思考及对策研究

英语教育硕士毕业论文题目

1、基础教育国际化进程中混班就读外籍学生的教育图景

2、从“能力本位”到“表现标准本位”

3、大学英语教师个人通识教育信念研究

4、基础教育英语教师教学能力及其发展研究

5、中国聋校英语教育：教学体系的构建

6、多元互动英语教师校本教育模式：理论与实践

7、蒙汉双语教育背景下蒙古族学生英语学习研究

8、大学外语教育的理论与实践探索

9、继续教育英语专业学生听说能力培养行动研究

10、面向文化理解的英语专业教育

11、引导智慧生成的大学英语教育研究

12、美国关键语言教育政策的战略演变

13、教育隐喻的文化认知研究

14、教育实习对英语教育硕士教师信念的影响研究

15、英语教育硕士实习生教师自我效能感研究

16、乌鲁木齐市中学少数民族双语班英语教育现状调查研究

17、中学生英语 学习态度 与情感教育研究

18、高中英语教学中人文素养教育现状调查与改进策略

19、英语教育硕士项目的实效及改进策略研究

20、国外MOOC视频在 专业英语 视听教学中的应用研究

21、英语浸入式环境下学前 儿童 家庭英语教育的实践研究

22、《K-12STEM教育通用评估体系》翻译 报告

23、教育实习对新手教师身份认同的影响

24、初中英语教师对英语教育工具性与人文性双重属性的理解

25、基于岗位导向的英语教学改革研究

26、教育游戏软件在小学英语教学中的应用研究

27、初中英语教学中的审美教育

28、初中英语课堂上落实情感教育目标状况的调查研究

29、赏识教育在中等职业学校英语教学中的应用

30、小学英语教育游戏的设计与应用

31、探析能力本位教育在高职英语教学改革中的应用

32、中小学英语教学中的文化教育研究

33、英语国际化形势下中国英语教育发展史研究

34、在英语师范教育课程中培养学科教学知识

35、我国大学英语教育功能定位 反思

36、小学英语教育专业英语语音教学个案研究

37、教育游戏在小学英语教学中的应用研究

38、通识教育视野下我国大学外语课程改革研究

39、大学英语教学中情感教育的有效性研究

40、教育游戏在英语教学中的应用研究

41、新教传教士与晚清英语教育

42、以合作学习为途径在英语教学中实施国际理解教育的行动研究

43、英美职前教师教育实习之比较研究

44、教育游戏在小学英语教学中的应用研究

45、论汉英翻译中的“中式英语”及翻译对策

46、情感教育理论在小学英语教学中的应用研究

47、贵州农村地区中学英语教育观察

48、大学英语通识教育化探索

49、从批评话语分析视角分析中美媒体对中国基础教育改革的报道

50、养成教育中学习习惯的培养对英语学习的影响

英语教育毕业论文题目

1、英语教育与区域经济发展耦合关系分析

2、谈如何有效做好中小学英语教育衔接

3、浅谈高职公共英语现状及基于通识教育理念的对策

4、中小学英文教育方法浅析

5、传统茶文化在我国英语教育中的应用研究

6、茶文化交流对英语教育的影响

7、基于自主学习的外语信息资源优化整合方案探析

8、试论高校英语教育与区域经济发展

9、基于经济发展为导向的高校英语教育人才培养探究

10、基础教育改革中城乡课程公平问题及对策--基于中小学英语课程改革的视角

11、高校英语教师培训的内容设计与特色研究

12、网络课程视角下的高校英语教育考核机制新探

13、略论大学英语教育的通识化

14、“一带一路”背景下英语教育面临的新问题与解决途径

15、新建本科院校英语教育专业师资队伍建设的制约因素

16、英语教育中的跨文化交际能力培养策略--评《跨文化视角下的大学英语教育探索》

17、小学英语课堂中的生命化教育

18、解析高职学生的英语实践能力：构成，特征及教育建议

19、语块 记忆方法 对 英语听力 能力发展的有效性分析

20、浅谈大学英语教学在素质教育中的作用

21、从英语的经济价值看我国高校英语跨文化教育

22、中西方远程网络教育下大学生英语自主学习能力研究

23、慕课视阈下大学生英语自主学习能力的培养

24、“互联网+”下高校英语专业教育与人才培养的思路探析

25、语言经济学视角下民族地区英语教育发展研究

26、大学英语教育中国文化失语现象研究

27、在生活中收获知识--浅谈小学英语教育生活化

28、学前教育专业英语学习现状及解决策略

29、创新创业教育背景下的大学英语自主学习

30、幼小英语教育衔接的现状及问题

31、语料库语言学视阈下的大学英语教材词汇研究

32、基础英语教育的学科育人价值探究

33、试论大学英语教育要着眼于学生英语综合应用能力的培养

34、论高校英语教育实用功能的强化--以资源优化理论为视角

35、新形势下我国大学英语教育之困境及改革发展之路

36、核心素养视野下的小学英语绘本阅读教育

37、“一带一路”背景下高职院校外语教育策略

38、高校英语教育中文化意识培养策略与实践

39、大学英语教育教学改革实践路径分析--以河北经贸大学为例

40、大学英语教育在传媒信息时代发展的新策略

41、谈以爱国主义文化认同教育为宗旨的英语教育文化导入

42、大学英语教育改革之我见

43、大数据对英语教育的影响分析--论在英语教学中大数据的运用

44、传媒信息时代下的大学英语教育创新探究

45、生成观视域下的英语教育分析

46、从文化变迁看高校英语教育的“中国文化失语”

47、日本小学英语教育研究及启示

48、对我国幼儿英语教育可行性及开展策略的思考

49、大学英语教育中母语文化缺失问题与回归方式探索

50、我国英语教育中的母语安全研究

51、基于微课堂的英语教育改革方法探析

52、分类卓越--新形势下大学英语教育的发展策略

53、DBAE理论视域下的高职英语教育研究

54、语言经济学视角下的一个中国式家庭英语教育的投入与产出--以安徽省为例

55、语言经济学视域下的我国英语教育产业化

56、21世纪日本小学英语教育研究

57、五年一贯制高职英语教育现状及教学方法探讨

58、核心素养课改下的基础英语教育回顾与展望

59、内蒙古自治区牧区小学英语教育改进策略探究

60、论大学英语教育中本土文化的缺乏及其对策

优秀英语毕业论文题目参考相关 文章 ：

★ 优秀英语毕业论文题目参考

★ 英语专业优秀论文题目

★ 英语教学论文题目选题参考整理

★ 本科英语专业毕业论文题目

★ 英语语言学毕业论文题目参考选题大全

★ 英语专业毕业论文选题文化

★ 本科英语专业毕业论文题目选题

★ 英语专业不同方向的毕业论文题目

★ 英语专业文化类方面毕业论文题目选题

★ 最新英语教学法论文题目免费参考

The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding errors1. irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or misunderstandings. Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or punishment. Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually occurs.（1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately elements. Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have understanding. Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui reason." Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig".2）Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility theory. Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective stance. 3）That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding illegality. While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already meaningless. Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is harm. Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social consciousness. Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society values. Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and observe. Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already know. With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are unified. Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately discretion. （2） Misunderstandings treatment principle. PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence performance. If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider disclaimer. Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not inexcusable. Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in shake. Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of humanity. In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement actor. The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but intentionally.2. The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong understanding. From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error object. It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime object. The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects different. Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not consistent. Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the crime. For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was wounded. A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the object. Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing together. This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted belongs.1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object irrtumslehre. These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre irrtumslehre. In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same situation. This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal responsibility. As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a rap. This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the mistake.2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature irrtumslehre. That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary defense. Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect crime. Second, the behavior tools (methods) irrtumslehre. That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to succeed. And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party and. Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu itself. The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide accomplishment. The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, accomplished. Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of problems.3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between errors. Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened actor. This generally constitute a crime. Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime accomplishment. Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime accomplishment. In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a crime. In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the sack.3.Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency errors.These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into our. 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory category. 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to law. Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the mistake. From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often difficult. If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the problem.In some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to prove. Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to handle. Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is established. From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the law.

1、TPR教学法在小学英语教学中的实际使用情况 ——以XX学校为例2、词块理论在高中英语写作教学中的应用研究3、初中生英语写作中常见的错误分析及对策研究4、针对“00后”学生特点的初中英语个性化教学研究5、母语负迁移对高中英语写作教学的启示——以XX中学为例6、学习者个体差异对初中生英语听力的影响——以XX中学为例