这段内容请审阅,我觉得意思还是很清楚的,不会有什么问题。Strategic Inventory in Capacitated Supply Chain Procurement 在能力受限的供应链采购中的战略存货 We study the strategic role of inventory in a sequential two-period procurement setting, where the supplier’s capacity in the first period is limited and the retailer has the option to hold inventory. 我们研究存货在两阶段顺序采购背景下的战略作用,在这种情况下,供应商在第一阶段的能力有限制,而零售商可以选择拥有存货,We compare the equilibrium under a dynamic contract, where the decisions are made at the beginning of each period, and a commitment contract, where the decisions for both periods are made at the beginning of the first period.我们比较了在动态合同和承约合同下的平衡,在动态合同情况下,决定在每个阶段的开始时做出,而在承约合同的情况下两个合同的决定则都在第一阶段开始时做出。 We show that there is a critical capacity level below which the outcomes under both types of contracts are identical. 我们证明了,存在一个临界的能力水平,低于它,两种合同下的结果是一样的。When the first period capacity is above the critical level, the retailer holds inventory in equilibrium and the inventory is carried due to purely strategic reasons; as capacity increases, so does the strategic role of inventory. 当第一阶段的能力超过临界水平时,零售商在平衡中就拥有存货,而这样的存货纯粹是因战略的考虑而进行的;随着能力的增加,存货的战略作用也增大。The supplier always prefers lower capacity than the retailer, and the difference between supplier-optimal and supply-chain optimal capacities, and the corresponding profits, can be significant. 供应商总是宁愿比零售商保持较低的能力,而供应商最佳能力和供应链最佳能力之间的差别,以及相应的效益可以相当明显。Finally, we find that the retailer’s flexibility to hold inventory is not always good for the participants or for the channel. 最后,我们发现,零售商拥有存货的灵活性对于参与者,或对于(销售)渠道来说并不总是很好的and the retailer determines the quantity to purchase from the supplier and the retail price to零售商决定从供应商那里购买的数量和价格