一点点研究论文

很多人会问幸福到底是什么？很人说是足够的金钱，很人说是至高的荣誉，还有人说是顶尖的成绩。我说幸福是改变，就是靠自己的努力去改变自己的不足，突破自己。这样的人生才有滋味，有动力。我们就像是一只蝉，一次一次的蜕皮，一次改变一点点，最后才能翱翔于天空。都说生活是一面镜子，我们对它笑，它就也会对我们笑。这就是面对生活的心态。每天我们都是生活在同一个世界，每天都会有不同的困难，这就是生活。虽然我们无法去改变这个世界，但是我们可以改变自己的心态，用乐观、积极向上的心态去面对，说不定那时我们会发现，路边的小草是那么绿的，花是那么鲜艳的，所有的一切都是那么顺眼，什么困难都是不值得烦恼的。很多人在患病时，就消极至极，这是十分不利于病情的恢复的，有些癌症患者，在知道病情后，依然乐观面对，积极配合治疗，最后大部分都是可以治好的。所以说在面对苦难时，改变一点点心态也是十分重要的。都说成功是要付出很多的，我说不是，只要我们每天改变一点点，每天进步一点点，那我们就离成功更近一点点了。每天进步一点点，听起来好像没有冲天的气魄，没有诱人的硕果，没有轰动的声势，可细细琢磨一下：每天进步一点点，那简直又是在默默地创造一个料想不到的奇迹，在不动声色中酝酿一个真实感人的神话。我为自己定过学习的目标，每次进步几分，想不到，这每天的改变，却改变了我对学习的看法。对学习更自信、敢去拼搏了。我们不能因恐惧失败，而选择安于现状、甘于平庸，年轻的心就应学会去创造、敢于去改变，即使失败了，还可以再变一次。

WHEN TERRORISM hit home on Sept. 11, there was nothing "cyberterrorist" about it. Yet, the House is now considering a bill that would reclassify computer hacking as a terrorist offense if it is done to influence government action by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct. The proposal, the PATRIOT (Provide Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism) Act of 2001, increases the statute of limitations for hacking from five to 15 years. Those convicted could be sentenced to life in prison, and the federal system does not have parole. Another amendment would make those who give "expert advice" into terrorists themselves if they advised knowing that it may be used in the preparation or commission of computer hacking. The spirit of national unity and the aching fear of terrorism foretell that some form of this bill or the Senate version will pass into law. The House is expected to vote on its version tomorrow. With that vote, I could become a terrorist, depending on how judges interpret the prohibition against giving "expert advice" to hackers. I am a criminal defense lawyer who represents people charged with computer-hacking offenses. I also teach at Stanford Law School, examining how laws affect computer security, freedom of speech, privacy and scientific progress. Legally speaking, hacking offenses are defined like trespass or burglary, an instance where the perpetrator illegally enters someone else's computer and intentionally causes damage. Technologically, there may be no walls, no passwords, no definitions, no clear boundaries. Disgruntled ex-employees have been found guilty of computer trespass for sending unwanted e-mails complaining about the boss to their former co-workers, and companies have been held liable for using a software program to scan a public Web site for online auction prices. Before these rulings, many people would not have thought these things were crimes. The proposed anti-terrorism law adds another layer of uncertainty to the already vague definition of criminal hacking. The bill singles out hacking "calculated to influence the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct." I agree that coercing government action through fear is a terrible crime that subverts the very essence of democracy. But there have been hackers who have defaced Web pages to protest Indonesia's occupation of East Timor, or altered the New York Times Web site to protest a government decision to prosecute Kevin Mitnick. The public Web sites of the Department of Justice, the FBI and the CIA have all been hacked and vandalized in the name of online protest, in varying degrees of eloquence. No important government functions were threatened, but the new terrorism law and its penalties would apply, since these acts were in retaliation to government policy. Whether you view "hacktivism" as criminal behavior or political protest, these offenders are, at most, digital vandals. By focusing solely on the motivation of the hacker, and not on the capability of the hack to threaten health, safety or welfare and thereby to create fear, the proposed law fails to strike at the heart of terrorism, which is to cause terror. And once hacking is terrorism, one who harbors or provides expert advice or material assistance to these people is also a terrorist. Since most computer- security tools can be used to both safeguard and crack a system, vendors should beware -- as should lawyers. Hard as it is to believe that a lawyer could be investigated for providing advice to hackers, I believe it is possible. Before one presentation I gave a few years ago at a hacker conference in Las Vegas, the San Francisco FBI called me to warn me not to advise the attendees how to escape capture or to encourage them to break the law. And that was then. . . I've been very critical of the current law against computer hacking because it doesn't distinguish between digital vandalism and something more serious, like breaking into the 911 system or taking over nuclear power plant computers. The new law compounds the problem. Americans, myself included, fear future terrorist attacks. But if we make terrorists out of Web vandals, "hacktivists" or security-tool vendors, we will not be safer. In fact, security will suffer, and we will find the lesser criminals among us treated with an unearned harshness. There is no bargain here. We all would lose. Jennifer S. Granick is the director of the Stanford Law School's Law and Technology Clinic.

怎么样才能够写好论文？

论文写作注意:

1、论文里面不可以出现“我”这个词，用笔者、或者本研究都可以。

2、论文不要有感叹号。

应该以陈述句为主，问句主要在写文章的结构和结论的时候使用，其他的地方能少就少。

3、论文杜绝排比句，排比句很没有学术逻辑。

4、直接引用不超过文章全文的百分之十五到二十，间接引用不超过百分之三十。避免直接引用，一个小技巧就是把直接引用放在注解里面。

5、一定要有页脚

6、全文的结构，题目，摘要，前言，第一节，第二节，第三节，结论。

7、对别人的结论表示否定的时候，一定要文明。你心里觉得别人观点不通，也要文明地表示，某某的观点或许有错误。

8、标点符号要规范，逗号，句号，分号，冒号，引号，书名号。

9、论文要重复，不断重复你最中心的思想。

一、题目

题目中要有限定语，不然写到头晕也也不完，保命策略。

标题不要超过两行。

题目中的名词小于四个，同时要体现关键词。

要有一个偏动词的词语。

举例，《明清时期眼镜诗歌和文人文化研究》名词:明清时期，限定词;名词，眼睛诗歌，文人文化动词，研究。

名词很关键，因为要在之后进行名词解释。

二、摘要，摘要一般写3句半

第一句，点出研究对象，研究的方法轻微地点一下，之后再展开。

第二句，研究的背景

第三句，你的研究成果(写得模糊一点点，不然没有人看，但是也不要太模糊。

最后半句，轻微地点一下文章的意义，高度概括即可。

关键词，不要超过五个

三、前言

1、定义，这个问题主要是为了要扣题针对文章题目中德每一个名词，一个名词定义一下。

拿前面的题目作例子，《唐朝时期xx诗歌和文人文化研究》解释，什么是xx诗歌，什么是文人文化等这个部分主要是为了限定，限定!!定义好了，之后才好写，也比较不会被人挑刺。

2、前人的研究成果，两个部分

一个是，先摆放前人的研究成果，这部分就是为了显示你读了书。之后的参考文献的罗列也要根据这个部分来，不可以看了什么就写什么。

展示自己的研究角度，想要表达的是，之前说得很对，但是都忽略了一个重要的问题。他们都是从一个角度看问题，我是从另一个角度看问题。然后是解释你的研究方法，借鉴了谁的方法，融合了谁的方法，总之瞬间提高了论文质量。

完毕！