教育 是雅思写作非常爱考的话题了,话不多说,看看我给大家分享的关于教育的雅思 作文 及分析。
雅思大作文教育类话题
1. 教育应该包括哪些内容
母题:It is generally believed that education is of vital importance to the development of individuals and the well-being of societies. What should education consist of to fulfil both these functions?
提示:本题围绕教育的两大功能来展开(个人与社会),准备好这篇 文章 ,即可应付教育类话题中的最大分支—教育的功能,做到以不变应万变。对于社会角度,可以从促进经济发展、增加社会流动性(social mobility)、维护社会稳定这几个方面来展开,对于个人,可以写改变思维模式、有利于就业和便利生活来写。
子题:大学应当教授理论知识还是实践技能?大学的是应当把学生培养成合格的公民还是让他们自己得益?准备未来职业最好的 方法 是上大学还是尽快离校积累工作 经验 ?大学要不要扩招?中学阶段应当提供通才教育还是专才教育?要不要延长义务教育年限?要不要让农村地区的学生更容易上学?老师要教学生如何判断是非吗?
2. 学校的科目谁来选择
母题:Some people think that the government should decide which subjects students should study at the university, while others think that students should be allowed to apply for the subject they prefer. Discuss the two views and give your opinion.
提示:这类题目采取的策略就是“双批判”,因为题目中提供的两种选择往往都是错误的。
子题1:政府选课or 老师选课?学生选择所有的科目or根据兴趣自行选择?
子题2:只有学术科目重要,体育和音乐这样的课不重要,你同意吗?要不要学国际新闻?要不要学历史?要不要中学阶段就学习外语?要不要学数学哲学这类的科目?
提示:子题2与母题联系不大,需要准备这些科目各自的优点。
3. 什么样的教学方式最好
母题:Many people use distance-learning programmes (study material post, TV, Internet, etc.) to study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the benefit as much as attending college or university. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
提示:远程教育最大的好处,就在于三个any:anybody, anywhere, any time. 缺点是缺乏师生之间以及学生之间的interaction, 缺乏教师的moral guidance, 因为没有体育课且久坐电脑前,会引发健康问题。
子题:私立学校好不好? 留学 好不好?要不要分快慢班?小组学习还是单独学习好?
4. 谁来为学费买单
母题:Some people believe that university students should pay all the cost of studies because university education only benefit the students themselves not the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
提示:这些话题都有一个共同的特征:高等教育只对学生自己有好处,因此学生应当自行为高等教育买单。这类题目的写法非常有规律,先驳斥这种理由,再交代学生自己支付学费的后果就可以了。
子题:政府要为学生买单吗?(缺点是给政府带来经济负担,这类话题写法和 其它 政府类话题一样)
5. 家庭教育
母题:Some people say that children should obey the rules of their parents and teachers, while other people think children will not be well-prepared for their adult life if they are given too much control. Discuss in both sides and give your opinion.
提示:写一下各自的好处就可以了,最后的结论是早年的时候要教授他们明辨是非,对于做错的事情要惩罚,但是也要适可而止让其 兴趣 爱好 得到自由发展。
子题:穷人家的孩子是否早当家?家长是否应该为五岁小孩的犯罪负责?要不要把小孩趁早送到学校去?老师对 儿童 的智力和社会发展所起的作用大于家长吗?同龄人压力(peer pressure)的利弊?
雅思写作教育类话题思路讲解
题目分析:students in school or university learn more from classes of teachers than other resources( or TV) do you agree or disagree?
这类题目又多次改头换面地出现在考场中,所以大家对于这种频繁光顾的话题一定要认真复习。没准你就可以通过通过再现练习或者课堂的方式在考场上斩获作文的高分。
文章结构第一段:开头段,引出自己的观点,即可以从老师身上学到更多的知识。
第二段:第一个分论点,认为学习不仅仅是学习知识的简单传递,而且还是师生间的互动。
第三段:第二个分论点,认为从老师身上不仅可以学到知识,而且老师可以为学生提供监管。第四段:驳论段,说明在学生也可以从其它方面资源地方学习。第五段: 自然结尾,重申主题。
范文 :
The updated understanding of study and the cutting-edge technology(尖端科技) usher in an era when the students can have a variety of ways to acquire knowledge(学习知识). Although there are other forms to obtain knowledge and information, I am still the proponent(支持者) of the belief that students can learn more from their teachers than other , to some degrees, is not a one-way input of knowledge, while it is the procedure of mutual interaction between teachers and students. In theconventional teaching and learning mode(传统的教学和学习模式), teachers and students co-exist in an environment where they can have timely interaction. This means teachers can have a more comprehensive and directly understanding of their students’ shortcomings and strong points, which guarantees that students can learn more from the courses that are tailored(量体裁衣的,有针对性的)to their is apparent that students can obtain more knowledge from their teachers because teachers do not only function as craftsmen(匠人,工匠) who only impart knowledge(传递知识) but also serve as a supervisor or a guardian.
This is especially true in the case where students are less self-disciplined (自律的)and are inclined to go astray (误入歧途)without the supervision and guidance of teachers. By comparison, others resources of learning such as Internet and TV sometimes are likely to make the students distracted due to a host of irrelevant information,(不相关信息) which will undermine (一点点削弱)their learning efficiency and make students learn is also true that students are likely to learn more from other resources. Internet and TV are two media where there are a wealth of (很多)knowledge and information ranging from science and humanity.
They are also the easily accessible platforms for the students who are in the remote places(偏远地区)where the teaching resources are not so abundant (充足的)as that in more developed regions. However, other learning resources can hardly challenge the dominant role (主导地位)played by sum up, teachers are still the primary resource from whom the student can gain knowledge, although the influence of other learning resources cannot be underestimated.
雅思大作文教育类话题范文
题目:Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every what extent do you agree or disagree?
范文:
Although the idea of gender equality in society, is a laudable concept, I believe a more modest adjustment of severely gender-imbalanced courses would be more practical than a draconian imposition of a 50/50 balance in all university courses.
Some people feel that females are underrepresented and do not have equal opportunities in certain professions such as upper management and engineering while others believe society would be better served if more males worked in some professions such as nursing, translating and primary school teaching. Both groups feel that not only competition for university places but also social stereotyping plays a role here; that is, if a more gender-balanced workforce were visible, then more young people would feel that it would be socially acceptable for them to follow suit and enter professions that are traditionally associated with the opposite sex.
I agree with these arguments but the correction of gender inequality and imbalance in the workplace cannot take place in the universities only — changes should also be made in society as a whole, including education at the pre-university level. Furthermore, the sudden imposition of a rigid 50/50 gender balance in university classes, where there is usually, say, an 80/20 male/female ratio, would probably result in many highly qualified and highly motivated males losing out to some females who were not very academically qualified for those courses and possibly not very interested in pursuing those professions.
On the other hand, if the last of class allotments in heavily imbalanced classes were reserved for the 'minority’ sex, and if academic standards were not drastically compromised in the process, then I believe society would benefit.