傲慢与偏见论文文献

哈哈，我的论文也是《傲慢与偏见》，下面是我的一些参考文献，你可以看下 Austen. Pride and Prejudice. Shanghai World Books Press, 2007. Jiayong. Today’s Most Popular Study Guides: Pride and Prejudice. Tianjin:Tianjin Technology Translation Press, Weiping. A History of the Artistic Development of the English Novel. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, . Black Cat有声名著阶梯阅读: Pride and Prejudice. Huadong Normal University Press, 2004.

傲慢与偏见论文范本

《傲慢与偏见》是英国女小说家简·奥斯汀的创作的长篇小说，小说讲述了乡绅之女伊丽莎白·班内特的爱情故事。本文是我为大家整理的傲慢与偏见论文，仅供参考。

【摘要】 美国著名文艺评论家埃德蒙――威尔逊认为：最近一百多年以来，英国文学史上出现过几次趣味革命，文学口味的翻新影响了几乎所有作家的声誉，唯独莎士比亚和简奥斯丁经久不衰。

【关键词】 奥斯丁；文学；婚姻

简奥斯丁，生于斯蒂文顿乡一教区牧师家庭，收到较好的家庭教育，主要教材就是父亲的文学藏书，奥斯丁一家爱都流行小说，多半是庸俗的消遣品，她少女时期的习作就是对这类流行小说的滑稽模仿，这就形成了她作品中的嘲讽的基调。她的六部小说《理智与感伤》（1811）、《傲慢与偏见》（1813）、《曼斯菲尔德花园》（1814）、《艾玛》（1815）以及作者逝世后出版的《诺桑觉修道院》（1818）和《劝导》（1818），大半以乡镇上的中产阶级日常生活为题材，小说中充满了各式人物，男人和女人，老人和青年――其中一些是孩子，但为数不多――令读者难忘而栩栩如生，就像他/她自己的家人和朋友。简奥斯丁没有走出强加给自己的有限空间。她没有写豪门望族的故事――尽管她对北汉普街角的贵族家庭有所了解。通过描写爱情婚姻等方面的.矛盾冲突反映了十八世纪末十九世纪初英国社会的风貌，作品中往往通过喜剧性的场面嘲讽人们的愚蠢、自私、势力和盲目自信等可鄙可笑的弱点。奥斯丁的小说出现在十九世纪初叶，一扫风行一时的假浪漫主义潮流，继承和发展了英国十八世纪优秀现实主义传统，为十九世纪现实主义小说的高潮做了准备，起到了承上启下的重要作用。

其中，《傲慢与偏见》实属世界文库中不可多得的珍品，被毛姆列入世界十大小说名著之一。它以男女青年的恋爱婚姻为题材，以男女主人公的爱情纠葛为主线，共计描述了四起姻缘，成为作者最富于喜剧色彩，最引人入胜的一部作品。

奥斯丁明确划定了婚姻的“好坏”标准，不幸的婚姻大致有两种：一像夏洛特和柯林斯那样，完全建立在经济基础上；二像莉迪亚和威科姆那样，纯粹建立在美貌和情欲的基础上。与她们相反，伊丽莎白与达西、简与宾利，他们的婚事是建立在爱情的基础上，这是真正的美满姻缘。尤其是伊丽莎白，她对达西先拒绝后接受，充分说明：“没有爱情可千万不能结婚。”

其次，恋爱婚姻既然是关系到终身幸福的大事，那就一定要严肃谨慎，切不可让表面现象蒙住眼睛。伊丽莎白因为受到达西的怠慢，便对他产生了偏见，而当“风度翩翩”的威科姆向她献殷勤时，她便对他萌发了好感，直至听信他的无耻谰言，进一步加深了她对达西的偏见和憎恶，后来她自责说，之所以会做出这种蠢事，完全是虚荣心在作祟。事实证明：“初次印象”是不可靠的，而偏见又比无知更可怕。

另外，婚姻不仅是个人问题，而且是个社会问题。莉迪亚的私奔引起了全家人乃至所有亲友的惊恐，因为大家都明白，这件丑事假若酿成了丑闻，不但会害得莉迪亚身败名裂，还会连累亲友们，特别是她的借个姐姐，将因此而很难找到体面地归宿。后来因为达西挽救，莉迪亚才没有“一失足成千古恨”。与此相反，伊丽莎白和简圆满出嫁之后，自然给另外两个妹妹带来了希望和机会。作者这是告诉我们：人们考虑婚姻大事，不能光顾自己，还要对亲友负责，对社会负责。虽然现在是思想解放的社会，但是在中国，受到传统思想的影响，婚姻幸福与否，这些还是相当重要的因素。

英国学者H沃尔波尔：“这个世界，凭理智来领会是个喜剧，凭感情来领会是个悲剧。”奥斯丁凭借理智来领会世界，创作了一部描述世态人情的喜剧作品。书中有两个滑稽人物，贝内特太太是个“智力贫乏，孤陋寡闻，喜怒无常”的女人，因为嫁女心切，完全生活在一厢情愿的幻觉中，每遇到一个“有钱单身汉”就将其视为自己某位女儿的“合法财产”。而柯林斯牧师是个集自负和谦卑于一身的蠢汉，他一方面对贵族德布尔夫人自卑自贱，另一方面又对他人自命不凡，经常生活在妄自尊大的幻觉中。奥斯丁的讽刺艺术，不仅表现在某些人物的喜剧性格上，也不仅表现在众多情节的喜剧性处理上，而且还融汇在整个故事的反讽构思中，让现实对人们的主观臆想进行嘲讽。

对话，是文学创作塑造人物形象的基本资料和基本手段。奥斯丁在创作人物对话时，一方面注意运用对话来刻画人物形象，另一方面又善于利用说话人、听话人、读者在动机和理解上的差异，制造多层次语调，致使她的对话具有既鲜明生动、富有个性，又含义丰富、耐人寻味两大特色。例如：达西趁宾利小姐弹起一只苏格兰小曲时，邀请伊丽莎白跳舞：“贝内特小姐，你是不是很想抓住这个机会跳一曲里尔舞？”打死这话说得虽然有些傲慢，但是他主观上还是想讨好伊丽莎白，可是伊丽莎白听起来却不以为然。她认为里尔舞是一种乡土舞，达西邀请她跳这种舞，是想蔑视她的“低级趣味”，于是正颜厉色的回道：“我压根儿不想跳里尔舞--现在，你是好样的就蔑视我吧。”达西回答：“实在不敢。”这句话可能做出多层解释：伊丽莎白仅仅看作对方是在献殷勤，宾利小姐可能理解成想结“良缘”的表示，而读者可能会发现，达西心里可能在想，“这位迷人的小姐着实厉害，我这次只能认输，以后可得谨慎从事。”类似这些微妙的对话，让人回味无穷。

总而言之，在《傲慢与偏见》中，简奥斯丁运用最精湛的语言，展现了她对人性的最透彻的理解，四处洋溢着机智幽默，令人感到光彩夺目，情趣盎然。

Austen，Jane．Jane Austen’s letters．ed．Deirdre Le Faye．Oxford and NewYork：Ox~rd UniversityPress．1995． [7]Austen，Jane．Pride andPrejudice．1813．Bantam Classic Edition． 1981 [8]Copeland，E．＆ Mcmaster，J．The CambridgeCompanion to Jane Austen．Cambridge：CambridgeUniversity Press．1998.[9]William J Fitzpatrick，Jane Austin’s PRIDE ANDPREJUDICE，Simon & Schuster，1964.[10]Nark Schorer. Pride and Prejudice，Riverside Edition—B1，Boston，1956. [11]R. W.. Chapman，Jane Austen:A CriticalBibliography，22nd Edition，London，Annotated，1955. [12]David Daiches，Introductionto Pride and Prejudice. Modern Library，New York，1950

《傲慢与偏见》(Pride and prejudice)是简·奥斯汀最早完成的作品，她在1796年开始动笔，取名为《最初的印象》，1797年8月完成。她父亲看后很感动，特意拿给汤玛·卡士德尔，请他出版，但对方一口回绝，使得他们十分失望。后来，她重写了《最初的印象》 并改名为“傲慢与偏见”于1813年1月出版。你干吗不去百度一下该作者和这部书呢,这个是名著呢,很容易找到的

First published in 1813, Pride and Prejudice has consistently been Jane Austen's most popular novel. It portrays life in the genteel rural society of the day, and tells of the initial misunderstandings and later mutual enlightenment between Elizabeth Bennet (whose liveliness and quick wit have often attracted readers) and the haughty Darcy. The title Pride and Prejudice refers (among other things) to the ways in which Elizabeth and Darcy first view each other. The original version of the novel was written in 1796-1797 under the title First Impressions, and was probably in the form of an exchange of Austen's own tongue-in-cheek opinion of her work, in a letter to her sister Cassandra immediately after its publication, was: "Upon the whole... I am well satisfied enough. The work is rather too light, and bright, and sparkling; it wants [. needs] shade; it wants to be stretched out here and there with a long chapter of sense, if it could be had; if not, of solemn specious nonsense, about something unconnected with the story: an essay on writing, a critique on Walter Scott, or the history of Buonaparté, or anything that would form a contrast and bring the reader with increased delight to the playfulness and general epigrammatism of the general style".Jump to the Pride and Prejudice table of contents. Document structure:This Pride and Prejudice e-text is fairly thoroughly hypertexted, but there are no cross references from one part of the main body of the text to another part. Instead, links go into or out of the main text, either to or from one of five indexes: The list of characters, the list of events in chronological order, the comments on random topics, the index to the motifs of "pride" and "prejudice", or the list of important places (with a map).It has been pointed out that since Chapter 1 is marked up pretty much the same way as any other chapter, those who have never read Pride and Prejudice before may find a confusing plethora of links in the first few chapters -- don't feel you have to click on to use this DocumentIf you have a graphics browser, then you will see little mini-icons preceding links in some menus in the Pride and Prejudice hypertext (and elsewhere in the Jane Austen pages):A down-arrow indicates a link to the next subdocument in a series (or to a later point, often the end, in the current subdocument). An up-arrow indicates a link to the preceding subdocument in a series (or to an earlier point, often the beginning, in the current subdocument). A curvy back-arrow indicates a jump back to a superordinate document (often a higher-level table of contents). A rightwards-pointing arrow indicates all other links (. links to a subdocument subordinate to the current one, or random "sideways" links). One practical point is that when web browsers follow a link, they tend to put the text referenced by the link at the extreme top of the screen or window, which can be a little awkward for a document which includes many links which go to the middle of a paragraph, as this one does. When you have followed a link, and the promised topic of the link doesn't seem to immediately leap into prominence, look near or at the top of the window, and then scroll back a few lines if necessary to get the immediate context of the reference. On the other hand, when there is a reference to a location near the end of an HTML file, some browsers (including the most frequently used graphic browsers!) will put the end of the file at the bottom of the window, with no indication of where in the window the target location is. (Complain to the software companies about these annoying browser peculiarities.)