有关大数据英文论文参考文献

《大数据技术原理与应用—概念、存储、处理、分析与应用》。hadoop参考文献有《大数据技术原理与应用—概念、存储、处理、分析与应用》，Hadoop是一个开源的框架，可编写和运行分布式应用处理大规模数据。

Big data refers to the huge volume of data that cannotbe stored and processed with in a time frame intraditional file next question comes in mind is how big this dataneeds to be in order to classify as a big data. There is alot of misconception in referring a term big data. Weusually refer a data to be big if its size is in gigabyte,terabyte, Petabyte or Exabyte or anything larger thanthis size. This does not define a big data a small amount of file can be referred to as a bigdata depending upon the content is being ’s just take an example to make it clear. If we attacha 100 MB file to an email, we cannot be able to do a email does not support an attachment of this with respect to an email, this 100mb filecan be referred to as a big data. Similarly if we want toprocess 1 TB of data in a given time frame, we cannotdo this with a traditional system since the resourcewith it is not sufficient to accomplish this you are aware of various social sites such asFacebook, twitter, Google+, LinkedIn or YouTubecontains data in huge amount. But as the users aregrowing on these social sites, the storing and processingthe enormous data is becoming a challenging this data is important for various firms togenerate huge revenue which is not possible with atraditional file system. Here is what Hadoop comes inthe Data simply means that huge amountof structured, unstructured and semi-structureddata that has the ability to be processed for information. Now a days massive amount of dataproduced because of growth in technology,digitalization and by a variety of sources, includingbusiness application transactions, videos, picture ,electronic mails, social media, and so on. So to processthese data the big data concept is data: a data that does have a proper formatassociated to it known as structured data. For examplethe data stored in database files or data stored in Data: A data that does not have aproper format associated to it known as structured example the data stored in mail files or in data: a data that does not have any formatassociated to it known as structured data. For examplean image files, audio files and video data is categorized into 3 v’s associated with it thatare as follows:[1]Volume: It is the amount of data to be generated a huge : It is the speed at which the data : It refers to the different kind data which . Challenges Faced by Big DataThere are two main challenges faced by big data [2]i. How to store and manage huge volume of . How do we process and extract valuableinformation from huge volume data within a giventime main challenges lead to the development ofhadoop is an open source framework developed byduck cutting in 2006 and managed by the apachesoftware foundation. Hadoop was named after yellowtoy was designed to store and process dataefficiently. Hadoop framework comprises of two maincomponents that are:i. HDFS: It stands for Hadoop distributed filesystem which takes care of storage of data withinhadoop . MAPREDUCE: it takes care of a processing of adata that is present in the let’s just have a look on Hadoop cluster:Here in this there are two nodes that are Master Nodeand slave node is responsible for Name node and JobTracker demon. Here node is technical term used todenote machine present in the cluster and demon isthe technical term used to show the backgroundprocesses running on a Linux slave node on the other hand is responsible forrunning the data node and the task tracker name node and data node are responsible forstoring and managing the data and commonly referredto as storage node. Whereas the job tracker and tasktracker is responsible for processing and computing adata and commonly known as Compute the name node and job tracker runs on asingle machine whereas a data node and task trackerruns on different . Features Of Hadoop:[3]i. Cost effective system: It does not require anyspecial hardware. It simply can be implementedin a common machine technically known ascommodity . Large cluster of nodes: A hadoop system cansupport a large number of nodes which providesa huge storage and processing . Parallel processing: a hadoop cluster provide theaccessibility to access and manage data parallelwhich saves a lot of . Distributed data: it takes care of splinting anddistributing of data across all nodes within a also replicates the data over the entire . Automatic failover management: once and AFMis configured on a cluster, the admin needs not toworry about the failed machine. Hadoop replicatesthe configuration Here one copy of each data iscopied or replicated to the node in the same rackand the hadoop take care of the internetworkingbetween two . Data locality optimization: This is the mostpowerful thing of hadoop which make it the mostefficient feature. Here if a person requests for ahuge data which relies in some other place, themachine will sends the code of that data and thenother person compiles it and use it in particularas it saves a log to bandwidthvii. Heterogeneous cluster: node or machine can beof different vendor and can be working ondifferent flavor of operating . Scalability: in hadoop adding a machine orremoving a machine does not effect on a the adding or removing the component ofmachine does . Hadoop ArchitectureHadoop comprises of two componentsi. HDFSii. MAPREDUCEHadoop distributes big data in several chunks and storedata in several nodes within a cluster whichsignificantly reduces the replicates each part of data into each machinethat are present within the no. of copies replicated depends on the replicationfactor. By default the replication factor is 3. Thereforein this case there are 3 copies to each data on 3 differentmachines。reference:Mahajan, P., Gaba, G., & Chauhan, N. S. (2016). Big Data Security. IITM Journal of Management and IT, 7(1), 89-94.自己拿去翻译网站翻吧，不懂可以问

英文论文写作参考文献

参考文献是文章或著作等写作过程中参考过的文献，文后参考文献是指为撰写或编辑论文和著作而引用的有关文献信息资源。

[1]AgranoflF, R. and Michael,M., 2003,“Collaborative Public Management; New Stiategies for Local Governments”, Geo^etown University Press,Washington,D. C.

[2]Aguinis, H. and Glavas, A., 2012, “What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda”,Journal of Management, 38(4)，pp. 932-968.

[3]Altman, E.,1998' “Financial Ratio,Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Banlruptcy”? Journal of Finance, 23(4)，pp. 589-609.

[4]Arenas, D.,Lozano,J. M. and Albareda,L.,2009,“The role ofNGOs in CSR:Mutual Perceptions Among Stakeholders”, Journal of Business Ethics,88,pp. 175-197.

[5]Aupperie, K., Carroll, A. and Hatfield,J.,1985,“An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability”,Academy of Management Journal, 28(2)， pp. 446-463.

[6]Austin, J. E.,2000,“Strategic collaboration between nonprofits between businesses”, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1)， pp. 69-97.

[7]Baron,D. R, 1997,Integrated strategy* trade Policy, and global competition'California Management Review? 39(2)， pp. 145-169.

[8]Baron,R. A., 2006, “Opportunity Recognition as the Detection of Meaningful Patterns: Evidence from Comparisons of Novice and Experienced Entrepreneurs”?Management Science, 9,pp. 1331-1344.

[9]Baiy, A. D?,1879,: “Die Erscheinung der Symbiose”, Strasbourg.

[10] Kotha, B. ., 1999,“Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Performance”. Academy ofManagement Jounal, 42,pp. 488-506.

[11]Binghamf C. B. and Davis,J. P.,2012, “Learning Sequences: Their Emeigence? Evolution and Effect”. Academy of Management Journal 55(3)， pp. 611-641.

[12]Blumer, H. , 1980, “Mead and Blumer : The Convei^ent Methodological Perspectives of Social Behaviorism and Symbolic Interactionism”,AmericanSociological Review, 45,pp. 409-419.

[13]Bondy,K.,2008,“The Paradox of Power in CSR : A Case Study on Implementation”. Journal of Business Ethics? 82(2)，pp. 307-323.

[14]Bowen, F.,Aloysius. N. K. and Herremans,I.,2010,“When Suits Meet Roots:The Antecedents and Consequences of Community Engagement Strategy”, Journal of Business Ethics, 95,pp. 297-318 ?

[15]Brammer,S, and Millington,A., 2003, “The Effect of Stakeholder Preferences >Organizational Structure and Industry Type on Corporate Community Involvement”,Journal of Business Ethics,45(3)? pp. 213-226.

[16]Bridoux, F. and Stoelhorst, J. W.,2014, “Microfoundations for Stakeholder Theoiy : Managing Stakeholders with Heterogeneous Motives” , Strategic Management Joumah 35, pp. 107-125

[17]Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C, and Stone? M. M.,2006, “The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature”,Public Administration Review, 66(sl)。

[18]Carey, J. M.,Beilin, R., Boxshall,A.,Burgman M. A. and Flander , “Risk-Based Approaches to Deal with Uncertainty in a Data-Poor System:Stakeholder Involvement in Hazard Identification for Marine National Parks and Marine Sanctuaries in Victoria,Australia”, Risk Analysis: An International Journal,27(1)，pp. 271-281,

[19]Carroll> A. B., 1979, “A TTiree-Dimensional conceptual Model of Corporate Performance”. Academy of Management Review, 4(4)， pp. 497-505.

[20] Carroll, A. B?,1991,“The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders”. Business Horizons,34(4)，pp. 39-48.

[1] Zhixin W, Chuanwen J, Qian A, et al. The key technology of offshore wind farm and its new development in China[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(1)：216-222.

[2] Shahir H, Pak A. Estimating liquefaction-induced settlement of shallow foundations by numerical approach[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2010, 37(3)： 267-279.

[3] Hausler EA. Influence of ground improvement on settlement and liquefaction:a study based on field case history evidence and dynamic geotechnicalcentrifuge tests. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley; 2002.

[4] Kemal Hac efendio lu. Stochastic seismic response analysis of offshore wind turbine including fluid‐structure‐soil interaction[J]. Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build.,2010,

[5] Arablouei A, Gharabaghi A R M, Ghalandarzadeh A, et al. Effects of seawater–structure–soil interaction on seismic performance of caisson-type quay wall[J]. Computers &Structures, 2011, 89(23)： 2439-2459.

[6] Zafeirakos A, Gerolymos N. On the seismic response of under-designed caisson foundations[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2013: 1-36.

[7] Snyder B, Kaiser M J. Ecological and economic cost-benefit analysis of offshore wind energy[J]. Renewable Energy, 2009, 34(6)： 1567-1578.

[8] Ding H, Qi L, Du X. Estimating soil liquefaction in ice-induced vibration of bucket foundation[J]. Journal of cold regions engineering, 2003, 17(2)： 60-67.

[9] Shooshpasha I, Bagheri M. The effects of surcharge on liquefaction resistance of silty sand[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2012: 1-7.

[10] Bhattacharya S, Adhikari S. Experimental validation of soil–structure interaction of offshore wind turbines[J]. Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, 2011, 31(5)： 805-816.

[11] H. Bolton Seed, Izzat M. Idriss. Simplified procedure for evaluating soilliquafaction potential. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division. 1971,97(9)： 1249-1273

[12] W. D. Liam Finn, Geoffrey , Kwok . An effective stress model for liquefaction. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1977, 103(6)：517-533

[13] liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility Evolution for Level Ground During Earthquakes, J of the Geotechnical Engineering Division ASCE , 1979,

[14] and Cyclic Deformation of Sands-A Critical Review,Proceedings of the Fifth Pan American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering,Buenos Aires,Argentina,1975.

[1] T. Paulay and J. R. Binney. Diagonally Reinforced coupling beams of shear Walls[S].ACI Special Publication 42, Detroit, 1974, 2: 579-598

[2] Lam WY, Su R K L, Pam H J. Experimental study of plate-reinforced composite deep coupling beams[J]. Structural Design Tall Special Building, 2009(18)： 235-257

[3] ACI 318-02: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, ACI318R-02:Commentary, An ACI Standard, reported by ACI Com-mittee318, American Concete Institute, 2002

[4] Siu W H, Su R K L. Effects of plastic hinges on partial interaction behaviour of bolted side-plated beams[J]. Journal of Construction Steel Research, 2010, 66(5)：622-633

[5] Xie Q. State of the art of buckling-restrained braces inAsia[J]. Journal of Construction Steel Research, 2005, 61(6)：727-748

[6] Kim J,Chou H. Behavior and design of structures with buckling-restrained braces[J].Structural Engineering, 2004,26(6)：693-706

[7] Tsai K C, Lai J W. A study of buckling restrained seismic braced frame[J].Structural Engineering, Chinese Society of Structural Engineering, 2002, 17(2)：3-32

[8] Patrick J. Fortney, Bahrem M. Shahrooz, Gian A. Rassati. Large-Scale Testing of a Replaceable “Fuse” Steel Coupling Beam[J]. Journal of Structural 2007:1801-1807

[9] Qihong Zhao. Cyclic Behavior of traditional and Innovative Composite Shear Walls[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, Feb. 2004:271-284