发布时间：
送去复核期刊中,可能是指在2007年8月6日送去试读
reviews send back to author意思是：评论发回作者。指期刊把评论发回给作者。
重点词汇：author。
英［＇ɔ：θə（r）］
释义：
n.作者，著者；作家；发起者，创始人；作品。
v.撰写，写作；发起，创造。
［复数：authors；第三人称单数：authors；现在分词：authoring；过去式：authored；过去分词：authored］
短语：
implied author隐含作者；隐藏作者；隐指作者。
词语使用变化：author
n.（名词）
1、author的意思是“作者”，专指从事文学作品创作的人；特指男性作家；与之相对的阴性名词为authoress，但此词现已很少使用；引申可作“策划者，造成…的人”解。
2、author意为“作者”，“作家”，常指文章或书的创作者，要注意同“校订者”，以及“翻译”和“编辑”区分开来。author作为“文学家”的统称时，往往单独使用。
这个状态很正常，但并不代表reviewer已经接受稿件了，很多杂志社分发到AE后，状态就改成under review如果你投ACS和RSC的期刊的话，投稿后直接就是Under Review，并且在你收到审稿结果之前，一直都是如果你的研究方向是这个期刊的主要方向，找审稿人比较容易，under review就比较快！有些杂志只有under review这一个状态，没有with editor这个状态，所以under review并不一定代表已经送出去审了，可能还在编辑手里。这和等车一样，有时一到车站，车就来了，有时等了很久，还没有车（当然一般就是等等，不知是否有人打电话去催，或怀疑这个路线的车取消了）。
review期刊意思是：综述期刊。
期刊，定期出版的刊物。如周刊、旬刊、半月刊、月刊、季刊、半年刊、年刊等。由依法设立的期刊出版单位出版刊物。期刊出版单位出版期刊，必须经新闻出版总署批准，持有国内统一连续出版物号，领取《期刊出版许可证》。
从广义上来讲，期刊的分类，可以分为非正式期刊和正式期刊两种。非正式期刊是指通过行政部门审核领取“内部报刊准印证”作为行业内部交流的期刊(一般只限行业内交流不公开发行)，但也是合法期刊的一种，一般正式期刊都经历过非正式期刊过程。
正式期刊是由国家新闻出版署与国家科委在商定的数额内审批，并编入“国内统一刊号”，办刊申请比较严格，要有一定的办刊实力，正式期刊有独立的办刊方针。
“国内统一刊号”是“国内统一连续出版物号”的简称，即“CN号”，它是新闻出版行政部门分配给连续出版物的代号。“国际刊号”是“国际标准连续出版物号”的简称，即“ISSN号”，我国大部分期刊都配有“ISSN号”。
是非常不错的一本期刊，属于科研出版社旗下的，也被知网收录了。可以投！
今天给各位分享review是什么意思的知识，其中也会对revision是什么意思进行讲解，请看下面内容！本文目录一览：1、review是什么意思中文2、Review 中文是什么意思3、review是什么意思4、review有什么意思5、review翻译成中文是什么意思啊？6、review的中文是什么意思？review是什么意思中文我们在英语的学习中，理解单词意思和记忆单词是非常重要的，因为只有理解单词才可以更好地运用它，知道review是什么意思吗？下面是我给大家带来的review是什么意思中文_review的英语例句，以供大家参考，我们一起来看看吧!review是什么意思作名词：回顾;复习作动词：评论;复习;复查;检验英语音标：英 [ri?vju:] 美 [r??vju]review的时态现在分词： reviewing过去式： reviewed过去分词： reviewedreview的英语例句1. The White House quickly announced that the policy is under review.白宫很快宣布该项政策正在审核中。2. The president ordered a review of US economic aid to Jordan.总统下令对美国向约旦提供的经济援助进行审查。3. We've never had a good review in the music press.我们从未在音乐媒体获得过好评。4. The bill provides for the automatic review of all death sentences.该法案规定所有死刑判决都要自动接受审核。5. The company should put its claims up for review by an arbitrator.公司应该将其要求交由仲裁者审核。6. The review body has produced a truncated version of its annual report.该评论机构出版了其年报的删节版本。7. You won't catch me giving him a bad review!我绝不会说他坏话的。8. This review is being conducted as speedily as possible.本次审查正在尽可能快地进行。9. The aid allocation for Pakistan was still under review.拨给巴基斯坦的援助物资仍在审核当中。10. She's the literary editor of the "Sunday Review".她是《星期天评论》的文学编辑。11. Chomsky's review is entitled "Psychology and Ideology".乔姆斯基的这篇评论题为《心理学与意识形态》。12. The critic's review of the play was just a paragraph of bile.那位批评家对这部戏剧的评论不过是在发泄怒气。13. the government's review of its education policy政府对其 教育 政策的检讨14. The soldiers were in full uniform for the review.士兵们身着全套军礼服准备接受检阅.15. The critic padded out the review with quotation from the author.这个评论家引用那个作家的话添凑了这篇评论.review过去式reviewed的英语例句1. The Prime Minister reviewed the situation with his Cabinet yesterday.昨天，首相和他的内阁对局势进行了审度。2. His book about Afghanistan is reviewed here by Anthony Hyman.安东尼·海曼在此就他那本关于阿富汗的书写了书评。3. We have reviewed the data that we hold for the area.我们已经审核过为该地区保存的数据了。4. Pay is reviewed on a yearly basis.工资每年审查一次。5. They were understood to have reviewed all major foreign policy issues.据了解,他们讨论了所有重大的外交政策问题.6. Have you reviewed what we covered in class yesterday?昨天我们课堂上讲的东西你们复习了 吗 ?7. The book was kindly and favourably reviewed in the principal papers.这本书得到几家主要报纸的赞许和好评.8. Their services were reviewed favourably.他们的服务得到了好评.9. Have you reviewed for this newly published novel?你给这本新出版的小说写书评了 吗 ?10. Before falling asleep, Helen reviewed the day's happenings.海伦在入睡以前回想了当天发生的事情.11. We have reviewed the whole text.课文全复习完了.12. When he reviewed the troops they cheered him as he smiled and raised his hat.他检阅军队时微笑着举起帽子，人们与此同时都向他欢呼。13. The next day we reviewed the previous day's work.第二天，我们仔细检查了头一天的工作。14. Lord placed the report on a pile of others previously reviewed.洛德把这份 报告 同已经审查过的放到一起.15. The drawing procedure is reviewed before interpreting this figure.在解释这个图以前,先复习一下画图的 方法 .review意思相关 文章 ：★ review是什么意思中文翻译★ review是什么意思★ review的用法和短语例句翻译是什么★ review有什么意思★ 怎么学习英语★ review data是什么意思★ review是什么意思中文翻译★ TED演讲:如何掌控你的空闲时间★ 对学术论文规范的看法★ TED英语演讲:一个人的成长离不开反馈var _hmt = _hmt || []; (function() { var hm = ("script"); = ""; var s = ("script")[0]; (hm, s); })();review是什么意思Review 中文是什么意思review：英?[r?'vju?]??美?[r?'vju]释义：n. 回顾；复习；评论；检讨；检阅vt. 回顾；检查；复审vi. 回顾；复习功课；写评论常用短语：Physical Review ——物理评论 ; 物理学评论 ; 物理评论B ; 物理评论DPartisan Review ——党派评论 ; 党人评论 ; 宗派评论Sociological Review ——社会学评论 ; 社会问题评论review是什么意思review 报错 英[r?'vju?] 美[r?'vju]n. 回顾；复习；评论；检讨；检阅vt. 回顾；检查；复审vi. 回顾；复习功课；写评论网络释义专业释义英英释义复习背诵(Recite)与复习(Review)：背诵是复习的另一形式，其不同点是，背诵是在没有文章的呈现之下，试图回忆文章内容。基于1057个网页-相关网页评论...超过 3 个页面； 编辑资讯 Editorial Mteril） 是由编辑剪辑选登的一些科研信 息， 篇幅不确定， 通常较短； 评论 (Review) 是对已有研究的述评， 并指出未来研究的方向； 书评 Book Review） 是对已出版的书籍的评论； 新闻事件 News Item） 是对一...基于780个网页- 相关网页回顾站在今天(Today)的立场上回顾(Review)一下，我们不免会感到意外：两雄的实力原本是不相上下，这场争棋原本应该(Should)是优劣难断的死斗，何以胜负的天平会早早倾斜?基于743个网页- 相关网页评审技术评审（Review）是开发组、测试组和相关人员（QA、 产品经理等1联合进行的，采用讲解、提问并使用编码模板进行的查找错误的活动。基于481个网页- 相关网页短语Physical Review物理评论；物理学评论Partisan Review党派评论；党人评论；宗派评论Sociological Review社会学评论；社会问题评论BEIJING REVIEW北京周报；北京周刊；北京周报社；北京评论Review Meeting工作总结会；审核会；评审会；审核会议Annual Review年评；年度复查；年度审查；综述性期刊audit review帐目审查；审计复核；审复核military review阅兵式；阅兵大典；阅兵；军事评论Initial review先期审查；初步审查? 更多收起网络短语专业: 经济学|法学|医药科学|文学|计算机科学技术|管理学|历史学|机械工程|农业科学|哲学|军事学|心理学|地球科学回顾 - 引用次数：2395Second part, review of VBM development.第二部分，有关VBM的历史回顾。参考来源 - 基于价值的管理研究综述 - 引用次数：1248Part II:“Literature Review”.第二部分为“文献综述”。参考来源 - 现阶段农民工市民化问题研究现状 - 引用次数：833First of all, the significance and review of product reliability assessment were described.首先阐述了产品可靠性评估的意义,总结和归纳了产品可靠性评估的研究现状。参考来源 - 基于贝叶斯方法的可靠性评估研究 （研究生论文）评论回顾 - 引用次数：446First part, Reeducation through Labor Review and Development.一、劳动教养制度的回顾和发展。参考来源 - 劳动教养制度的现状和完善（研究生论文）评述 - 引用次数：21The author will review near-sighted epidemiological studies, shortsighted risk factors and control methods of myopia.笔者将对近视眼的流行病学研究、近视眼的危险因素及近视的防治方法作一评述。参考来源 - 近视眼的防治探讨检讨 - 引用次数：44The first part of this paper analyzes the cause of review.在第一章,本文分析了“检讨”之所以产生的原因。参考来源 - 建国初期文学界“检讨”研究回眸 - 引用次数：6参考来源 - 马华文学的问题意识和价值判断探蠡—《华文文学》—2009年第2期—龙源期刊网评审 - 引用次数：36project management; distributed product development; program evaluation and review technique; work breakdown structure; workflow; fuzzy technique.项目管理; 分布式产品开发; 计划评审技术; 工作分解结构; 工作流; 模糊技术。参考来源 - 基于分布式产品开发的项目管理系统的研究与实现查核评析 - 引用次数：4The fourth part, Yun Daiying thinking of the Education Review.第四部分,对恽代英教育思想的评析。参考来源 - 恽代英教育思想及其哲学基础商榷 - 引用次数：3参考来源 - 《每周评论》与五四新文化运动检测方法 - 引用次数：3参考来源 - 紫外光照射下胆固醇及食品中胆固醇氧化物气相色谱分析考察 - 引用次数：10In order to know what is humus acid and humus acid fertilizer,It is important to review the history of humus acid research and supply references to define of humus acid.考察有关腐殖酸的研究历史,更好地认识腐殖酸和腐殖酸类肥料,为规范腐殖酸的有关概念提供参考。参考来源 - 腐殖酸及腐殖酸类肥料研究历史述评审视 - 引用次数：11This paper is divided into six chapters to review the modern moral example.本文分六章来对道德榜样进行现代审视。参考来源 - 道德榜样的现代审视阅兵（式）复习述评·以上统计来源于2,447,534篇论文数据，部分数据来源于NoteExpressreview [ri'vju:]. a new appraisal or evaluation2. an essay or article that gives a critical evaluation (as of a book or play)3. a subsequent examination of a patient for the purpose of monitoring earlier treatment4. (accounting) a service (less exhaustive than an audit) that provides some assurance to interested parties as to the reliability of financial data5. a variety show with topical sketches and songs and dancing and comedians6. a periodical that publishes critical essays on current affairs or literature or art7. a summary at the end that repeats the substance of a longer discussion8. (law) a judicial reexamination of the proceedings of a court (especially by an appellate court)9. practice intended to polish performance or refresh the memory10. a formal or official examinationthe platoon stood ready for . look at again; examine againlet's review your situation2. appraise criticallyShe reviews books for the New York Times3. hold a review (of troops)4. refresh one's memoryI reviewed the material before the test5. look back upon (a period of time, sequence of events); remembershe reviewed her achievements with pride以上来源于: WordNet柯林斯英汉双解大词典21世纪大英汉词典review /r??vju?/ CET4 TEM4(reviewing, reviewed, reviews) review of a situation or system is its formal examination by people in authority. This is usually done in order to see whether it can be improved or corrected. (上级的) 审查[oft N 'of' n, also prep N]例： The president ordered a review of . economic aid to Jordan.总统下令对美国向约旦提供的经济援助进行一次审查。
是“复习”的意思
简单来说就是用自己的话，把前人相关研究的观点，结论等paraphrase一下。所以，1.你首先要确定好自己的研究方向2.然后，找出这个研究领域相关的研究资料，最好是权威人士的文章，论文等。阅读资料，摘选经典的，突出的，有利于你展开论文的论点，写下来，同一论点的归一类，并记录出处（以便以后写bibliography）3.接下来就是paraphrase别人的话了，记住，这不是抄袭，因为这些是我们的论点所在，前人的研究结果。但是如果你全部照抄，没有用自己的话复述就是抄袭了。原则上允许一两句是可以直接引用。不能过多。4.最后，将写好的literaturereview再看一遍，看看是否符合逻辑。或者某些论点过少，可以再去相应地找资料。大家都是这么过来的，祝你早日完成论文。fighting！
既然都说是literaturereview了，肯定是之前有给过文献让读吧。INTRO不用人教了吧。BODY段有N个论点就写N+1段。BODYPARA1引入所有文献，然后写一下KEYTHEORY。然后之后的每个PARA都写一个论点，如果给了超过一篇的文章就交替比较，比如，XXX说了什么whereasYYY说了什么。注意，因为是review，所以reportingverb前面要加具有导向意义的副词，比如rightfully什么的，来表示你支持他的观点与否。每段结尾的时候简单写几句evaluation。结尾的时候以转折性的语句讨论一下，“虽然XXX和YYY都说了什么，并且很有价值”等等的P话都写上。然后写他们都遗漏的地方，然后写你的看法。反正其实格式就是这么档子事，真正写的时候你会发现难住你的不是格式，而是没好好看书，没有理解文献里的意思，哪怕是抄都不知道上哪段抄去。
How do you write a review article?Here are eight key things to consider when writing a review article:1. Check the journal’s aims and scopeMake sure you have read the aims and scope for the journal you are submitting to and follow them closely. Different journals accept different types of articles and not all will accept review articles, so it’s important to check this before you start . Define your scopeDefine the scope of your review article and the research question you’ll be answering, making sure your article contributes something new to the award-winning author Angus Crake told us, you’ll also need to “define the scope of your review so that it is manageable, not too large or small; it may be necessary to focus on recent advances if the field is well established.”3. Finding sources to evaluateWhen finding sources to evaluate, Angus Crake says it’s critical that you “use multiple search engines/databases so you don’t miss any important ones.”For finding studies for a systematic review in medical sciences, read advice from . Writing your title, abstract and keywordsSpend time writing an effective title, abstract and keywords. This will help maximize the visibility of your article online, ensuring the right readers find your research. Your title and abstract should be clear, concise, accurate, and more information and guidance on getting these right, read our guide to writing a good abstract and title and our researcher’s guide to search engine . Introduce the topicStart with an overview of the topic and give some context, explaining why a review of the topic is necessary. Gather research to inform your introduction and make it broad enough to reach out to a large audience of non-specialists. This will help maximize its wider relevance and ’t make your introduction too long. Divide the review into sections of a suitable length to allow key points to be identified more . Include critical discussionMake sure you present a critical discussion, not just a descriptive summary of the topic. If there is contradictory research in your area of focus, make sure to include an element of debate and present both sides of the argument. You can also use your review paper to resolve conflict between contradictory studies.“Once you have the core review section written, take a step back and look for common trends that emerge. Highlight key advances that have been made and areas where more focused research may lead to high impact. These are crucial to show where the field is heading, and any common pitfalls people have struggled with.” – Angus Crake, researcher7. Sum it upThis can include making suggestions for future research on the topic as part of your conclusion.“You should aim to write a review that leaves a clear impression of what is ‘well understood’, and what still remains a ‘mystery’ to be solved.” – Diptak Bhattacharya, researcher8. Use a critical friendOne last check. Always perform a final spell and grammar check of your article before may want to ask a critical friend or colleague to give their feedback before you submit. If English is not your first language, think about using a language-polishing service. Find out more about the Taylor & Francis Editing get the latest news, insights, tips and more straight to your inbox, sign up for the Taylor & Francis Insights newsletter.
下面是关于学术论文英文摘要模板，希望对你们有帮助。
Abstract
Since Dewey developed the concept of “critical thinking”, many scholars abroadhave carried out a series of studies about improving students' critical thinking skills ineducation field. In the 1980s,critical thinking became the target of higher educationprograms in such foreign countries as the US and Canada. It has gained its widespreadattention in China only in recent years. But there are only few studies about it ineducation field. Our traditional English teaching method pays much attention to thetraining of students' linguistic knowledge and language skills but ignores thecultivation of students' critical thinking abilities. In the process of skill practice,teachers often stress the importance of memorizing vocabulary and imitating skillsrigidly,but neglect the students' abilities in analyzing problems and putting forwardinnovative solutions. Therefore, English writing teaching is affected by this andmerely attaches emphasis to train students' reading and writing skills. There are fewstudies which aim at systematically cultivating students' analysis, synthesis, summary,comparison and reasoning skills while they are writing. Therefore,this study aims atdesigning some writings tasks and teaching strategies which can be used to fostercollege students' critical thinking awareness and promote students' all-rounddevelopment.
According to six critical thinking skills,this study was carried out by requiringstudents to hand in an argumentation. All participants in this study are non-Englishmajor college freshmen from a 211 key university. The revised version of Rubric forQualitative Critical Thinking Skills Instrument was used in this study. Withquantitative and qualitative analysis,writing experiment is conducted within a wholesemester to collect data concerning students' learning behavior. Reading-to-write isused in experimental class while traditional method is adopted in control class. Thewriting scores by the experimental and control class were statistically processed bysoftware SPSS . And also the interview was launched in some of students inexperimental class to assess students' critical thinking abilities reflected in theirwritings-The final analysis indicated that EGAP writing model exerted a significantlypositive influence in improving students' critical thinking skills, especially in arousingstudents' writing enthusiasm and critical thinking awareness. Compared with controlclass, students in experimental class made big progress in writing competence. Inaddition, this study put forward some reform proposals to the teaching of Englishwriting. The study is of great value to instruct students to employ critical thinkingskills in their writing.
Abstract
A large body of research has been conducted on the effects of technology-enhancedEnglish vocabulary learning since the 1960s (Marty, 1981)。 However, no consensus hasbeen reached yet (Choo, Lin, & Pandian,2012; Mohsen & Balakumarohsen, 2011)。
Despite the fact that some narrative reviews have evaluated and explored thesecontradictory results, this study aims at quantifying the overall effectiveness oftechnology-enhanced English vocabulary learning with a different approach to review:meta-analysis and performing in-depth moderator analyses of learning method and testtype further.
Totally, twenty effect sizes from thirteen pieces of primary research are obtainedafter collecting related literature published or unpublished in recent ten years via fourchannels and selecting through three filters. Later, all the primary research is coded anddata are computed in random-effects model with software ComprehensiveMeta-Analysis.
Results show that: (1) Technology has a positively large effect on Englishvocabulary learning according to Cohen's standards as proposed in 1992 (g = 95% confidential interval of [, ])。 (2) Learning methods (intentional learning,incidental learning, and integrated learning) have impacts on the overall effectiveness.
Heterogeneity exists in the three learning methods (g = = 0,01 < )，Effectiveness of intentional learning, incidental learning and integrated learning is ^ =, g 二 , g = respectively. Incidental learning under technology-enhancedenvironment yields the largest effectiveness on English vocabulary learning. (3) Testtypes (recognition tests, recall tests,recognition + recall tests) also have impacts on theoverall effectiveness. The three test types are heterogeneous as well {Q = , p = < )。 Recognition tests, recall tests, and recognition + recall tests have effectsizes of and respectively. Technology-enhanced English vocabularylearning achieves the largest effectiveness in recognition tests.
Abstract
The present study, which is based on the Competing Values Framework (. CVF:a framework to identify the organizational effectiveness and to define organizationalculture)， aims to investigate English teachers, teaching motivation at universities, theirperception of the organizational culture in the target university,their professionalaspiration and how they affect each other. The research questions to be addressed are asfollows: (1) How do the English teachers perceive the organizational culture at theirworkplace? (2) How much effort will the teachers pay for their professionalengagement and aspiration? (3) What kinds of motivation do the English teachers in thetarget university appear to have? (4) How will the organizational culture and theprevious experience affect teachers' motivation?
This study employed four different questionnaires as the research instruments,including one demographic questionnaire and three research questionnaires, . thedemographic questionnaire, the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (. theOCAI) (Cameron & Quinn, 1999)，the Professional Engagement and CareerDevelopment Aspiration-scale (. the PECDA-scale) (Watt & Richardson, 2008b)，andthe Work Tasks Motivation Scale for Teachers Teaching (. the WTMST) (Fernet et al.,2008)，to investigate the above mentioned research questions. The whole investigationtook roughly 12 weeks and involved three stages: the preparation stage,the pilot study,and the main study.
The findings of the present study show that most of the teachers are intrinsicallymotivated and with identified regulation influenced by the performance culture and theclan culture which are the dominant culture types of the target research site. Results alsoindicate that the overseas experience and length of teaching experience affect teachers'perception of tixe organizational culture and motivation. The participants who haveoverseas experience tend to be more with the sense of professionalism, moreintrinsically motivated and be more confident with their competence in the academicarea; and the ones who have longer years of teaching experience are with moreidentified regulation and introjected motivation and are more committed and moreassured of staying in the education field. The participants in the target universitybasically belong to the highly engaged persisters,and the male teachers expect to be theleadership.
Abstract
Owing to the economic, social and academic needs as well as the advantages of EGAP(General Academic Purpose in Chinese College English) itself, there exist 这 great deal ofnecessity and feasibility for applying English for EGAP class. It is our understanding thatwriting plays an extremely important role in the course of EGAP and genre is a quiteinfluential factor in improving students5 writing competency. However,the investigation ofstudents' current writing situation shows that being deeply influenced by traditional writingteaching methods which emphasize grammar and vocabulary; the students have littleknowledge about genre approach theoretically or systematically and lack the awareness ofgenre. Because of this,it becomes necessary to put forward an English writing teachingapproach which is effective as well as applicable to the situation in China so as to enhancetheir writing competence.
This paper firstly gives a brief introduction to the developing trend of EGAP bydiscussing its necessity and applicability in China and the main views of two schools of genretheory, the tiieoretical foundation and genre-based approaches of three main schools of genrestudy and practice. And also,their characteristics are compared and the adaptability inChinese College EGAP class is analyzed, based on which it puts forward a modifiedGenre-based approach in EGAP writing class in order to enhance students' genre awarenessand improve their writing skills.
To achieve this, two non-English major classes of freshmen in East China University ofScience and Technology (ECUST) have been selected as the experimental class andcontrolled class, and the research lasts one semester. The Genre-based approach is applied inthe experimental class following a modified Genre-based approach. And a comparison hasbeen made on the same subject at the beginning and the end of the semester and thecomparison and contrast between the experimental class and controlled class have also beenmade. Owing to various factors,such as learning motivation, different students show variedextent of acceptance to certain teaching approaches. Therefore, emphasis has not only beenput on the overall changes,but also on the individual differences.
There are three hypotheses:
1. Can Genre-based approach enhance students' genre awareness? 2. Can “genreawareness” really improve students' writing ability in EGAP? If the students can get overallimprovement, is there any difference in gender and the students with diverse learningaptitudes because of the individual difference? If some students fail to improve, what's thepossible reason behind it? 3. Will Chinese students accept and adapt to Genre-basedApproach?
Three sets of data from six writing assignments, writing in final-term examination andquestionnaires are collected and analyzed with the help of the software SPSS . And thestudy indicates that: (1) Genre-based approach has a significant effect in sensitizing students'genre awareness, improving holistic writing competence; (2) during the whole experimentalprocess, girls have a stable superiority over boys, however, boys' improvement fluctuation iscomparatively obvious; (3) students of medium efficiency have the greatest potential to makebig improvement; (4) Unavoidably, in this research there are some students who fail to gainimprovement in terms of writing ability or get changed in terms of writing notions, andthrough analysis it has been found that the main objective reasons are: the difficulty ofwriting itself,the differences of culture and ways of thinking between east and west,thelimited teaching period, etc.; and subjective reasons mainly come from: the limitedcompetence of students themselves, the lack of interest in English writing, etc(5) aoverwhelming majority of students are liable to accept this approach and able to adapt to itpretty well, yet acceptation is not absolutely accompanied by adaptation; (6) feedback is adispensable part in English writing teaching, and more specific feedback will bring strongermotivation in students' self-correcting and developing;In the end,the author presents some limitations in her research and hopes that this cangive some hints and tips to further research in EFL writing classes.
Abstract
In college English listening & speaking classrooms, language and other semioticsystems cooperate together to help students construct meaning. It can be reflected inthe design of textbooks and the use of audios, videos and images, etc. Thus, in thisthesis, the theoretical foundation is the theory of multimodal discourse analysis (MDA)derived from Systemic Functional Linguistics and Social Semiotics. The essence ofMDA is that other semiotic resources such as: images, audios, etc. are as important aslanguage in the meaning-making system. Visual Grammar, Acoustical Grammar andthe integrated frameworks of MDA are the main analysis approaches in this thesis.
Meanwhile, the results of the teaching investigation and the MDA for textbooksare the practical foundation for the multimodal teaching design, providing feasibleand effective suggestions in this thesis. According to the results, it can be concludedthat students have more or less realized multimodality in this course and argue thatmultimodality should be used in moderation; multimodal classroom activities, socialcontent, etc. should be brought into the class; teachers should remind students to payattention to images, fonts change and other multimodal factors in textbooks.
Therefore, when conducting the multimodal teaching design, attention should bepaid to: (1) Modalities influence each other with clear priorities in this course. (2)Words modality and acoustical modality are the primary modalities, while othermodalities are just used as tools to provide supplementary information and to improveteaching efficiency. (3) The chosen modalities should provide supplementaryinformation to make the learning material more easily understood and help studentsconcentrate. Then, on the basis of the above principles and the writer's teachingexperience, a sample teaching design has been worked out, then its' feasibility andeffectiveness have been verified by an empirical study with the method of interview.
Abstract
Degree adverbs play a crucial role in daily language communication. However,owing to their wide varieties and similar meanings, it is hard for language learners toreally master their meanings and usages.
With the aid of AntConc and based on the corpora of FROWN (TheFreiburg-Brown Corpus of American English)，FLOB (The Freiburg-LOB Corpus ofBritish English) and CLEC (Chinese Learner English Corpus)， the study aims tocompare the actual use of common English degree adverbs in terms of semanticprosody between Chinese EFL learners and native English speakers. The researchprocedures consist of two steps. First, AntConc is launched to extractconcordance lines of the target node words in each corpus and the semantic featuresof the node words' collocates are analyzed; then, the semantic prosodies of these nodewords are summarized and comparisons are made between the two corpora.
The results indicate that there are differences as well as similarities betweennative English speakers and Chinese learners in their use of semantic prosody.
Chinese EFL learners tend to underuse the negative semantic prosodies of fairly,highly, and totally?,overuse the negative semantic prosodies of extremely; and misusethe semantic prosody of terribly. The results also show that some problems exist inChinese learners' use of semantic prosodies of degree adverbs, and the reasons mayinclude their first language transfer, intralingual transfer, and the lack of informationabout the semantic prosody in dictionaries and textbooks.
13个状态。1、ManuscriptSubmitted（Submittedtojournal）：表示论文已经投稿成功。接下来由期刊工作人员检查论文格式排版、重复率是否符合要求，符合要求的文章会分配给期刊编辑进行处理。2、Awaitingadminprocessing：意为等待负责的编辑处理。在编辑审稿前，助手负责审查稿件是否齐全，不齐全的话则立即要求作者按要求补充相关材料。许多期刊会在系统显示ManuscriptSubmitted时完成该步骤。3、EditorInvited：这个阶段不是所有的期刊都有，这个状态是表示论文已经转给编辑，正在等待编辑接受。4、WithEditor：这个状态表示编辑已经接受负责处理论文，这个时候，编辑已经初步看过论文，如果他认为论文适合期刊，就会送交同行评审；如果论文与期刊的范畴不相符或是没有达到期刊的标准，就有可能在外审前退回给作者，这种时候，状态就有可能变成「DecisioninProcess」。在这种情况下，作者都会在几天之内收到拒绝通知。在这一过程中还可能会出现「Editorassigned」，表示稿件已经分配给某位主编或副主编负责。此外，还有可能会出现「EditorDeclinedInvitation」，表示该编辑拒绝邀请，此时编辑会重新分派给其他编辑处理。5、ReviewerInvited：编辑已经送出审稿邀请，等待审稿人接受中。有时候，这个状态可能会维持好一段时间后又变回「WithEditor」，这有可能是审稿人拒绝审稿，编辑需要再另外找审稿人。6、UnderReview（Peerreview）：审稿人正在审稿。此时论文是由同行评审进行外审，因为审稿是无偿的工作加上需要付出许多精力，这个过程需要持续较长时间，一般为1-2个月。如果被邀请审稿人取消审稿，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。同行评审是SCI论文审稿中耗时最久，也是影响杂志社决定最关键的环节。7、RequiredReviewsComplete：表示审稿意见已经返回给编辑，等编辑处理。有时候，编辑在看完审稿报告后可能会觉得需要邀请其他审稿人进行审稿。此时，系统的状态就有可能再度变成「UnderReview」。8、DecisioninProcess：表示编辑正在根据审稿意见文章进行决策。必要的时候，编辑会在此阶段与编辑部的其他成员商讨，一旦出现这个状态，作者一般会在几天之内收到通知。9、Reject：审稿人看过内容或者审稿意见后作出的决定，表示拒绝这篇论文。这种是最常见的状态，著名杂志拒稿率可达90%。10、Majorrevision：需要进行大量修改，不一定意味着接受。提示审稿人评价较好，有机会被接受。一定要认真、严格按照意见修改，审稿人稍不满意稿件也会被拒绝。现在因为「论文工厂」以及学术造假等事件，退稿比例越来越高。11、Minorrevision：需要进行少量修改，原则上确定接受稿件，仍需虚心接受审稿人的意见，进行一对一的修改。12、RevisedManuscriptSubmitted：意味着作者已经递交修改稿，现等待期刊检查排版。13、Accept：意味着编辑对作者的修改很满意，决定接受稿件。
论文投稿期刊审核流程如下：
1、首先是初审环节，文章投稿后第一个审稿环节就是初审，初审几乎都是杂志社编辑来完成的，杂志社编辑会对文章进行大致浏览，这时的审核就是简单的浏览，并不会细致深入的阅读文章。
编辑主要看文章的基本写作上有没有问题，比如文章的结构、逻想、主要研究方向与期刊是否相符，是否涉及敏感话题或者字眼。这些没问题通过初审也就没问题。
2、而后是复审，复审也叫外审，是外部审稿专家来完成的，外审主要看文章的研究内容了，因为涉及到专业领域的东西，因此必须由本专业的专家来完成本审稿环节。
需要注意的是，有些刊物需要作者自己推荐审稿专家，一般审稿专家会有3—4位，所有专家审稿意见一致就可以通过外审。
3、最后是终审，终审是杂志社主编对文章的最终审核，这一环节相对于外审通过概率要大得多，主编会对文章进行全面的审核。
这一环节并不意味着没有退稿几率，只不过相对于外审要低一些，以上三个审稿环节是投稿之后文章要经过的三审三校，流程并不算复杂，但通过需要一定时间，因此发表论文务必尽早准备。
真的。学术期刊发表论文是要收取一定的版面费，但请你先确认杂志的正规性和汇款给谁，防止。如果你采用的是地址汇款的话直接汇款到杂志社应该是没有什么问题的。如果是汇款到个人账号上的话你可要小心。
论文投稿期刊审核流程通常会有三审：初审-复审-终审。
初审、收到文章后一般会有征稿/执行编辑（managing editor）对论文进行格式与材料等初审。初审主要简单审核稿件是否符合本刊要求，审核作者资历和单位信息，然后看作者的信息是否完整，文章格式是否符合要求。
复审、初审通过后会发给主编，主编看过后会进行评估，如果认为文章达到本社的基本要求就再把稿子递给领域相近的编委。编委会根据论文主题来邀请审稿人（同行评审），一般审稿人国内就2-3人左右，SCI期刊也就最多5人左右（质量越高的刊，审稿人越多且专业权威）。
审稿专家返回审稿意见后，编委会给主编作出建议（主编一个人是看不完所有文章的，所以一般都会采纳编委的意见）。总体来说，越好的期刊审稿人数越多，也越容易被拒稿。
审稿速度缓慢可能有种种因素：期刊编辑指导不够清晰；同行评审速度慢；来稿量增多；每篇论文的数据量增加等等。复审时，如果遇到社内有提出审稿意见，会将稿件退给作者修改，修改达到要求后进行录取，修改达不到要求就做退稿处理了。
终审、一般到了这一步，没有什么大问题的话基本不会退稿的。总编对标题、版式、内容审核后提出修改意见或批清，投稿者就按照杂志社的要求最后改改就好了。要求一般是将文章内的图片，表格等源文件发送给编辑，便于排版等等。
会的。letter会送外审。 只有符合期刊的投稿要求,才送外审。一般外审会在一个一个星期左右出结果，要有创新或者某一重大领域上的突破同时符合期刊要求才具备送外审的条件。
回审稿信的时候言语的语气一定要诚恳谦和。注意礼貌用语，尤其不要因为审稿人一些问题觉得对方不专业就直接态度很差地回复审稿人，要记住，我们的唯一目的就是使文章成功发表；身边有好多学长学姐们都是找北京译顶科技做的，听说也做的很不错
问题一：硕士毕业论文外审主要审查哪些方面 论文外审一般是学校间的论文互相送审，一般采取匿名的方式，主要看看论文的工作量，论文的内容是否符合毕业学位要求，只要内容不太夸张离谱，一般问题都不大。 盲审相对来说比较难，这是由学校统一往出送，多送到外省，隐去姓名和导师姓名，你不知道你的论文被送到哪里，那边老师也不知道这论文来自哪里是谁的学生，所以盲审相对比较客观，大约需一个半月左右。外审多是由院系自己往出送，虽然也是隐去学生姓名和导师姓名的，但多送到省内关系较好的兄弟院校，所以相对来说没有盲审那么严的，这个大约需一个月到一个半月左右吧。 问题二：论文盲审和外审什么意思 什么是 盲审？ 是今年新开始的组织专家组评审的那个制度：就是匿名送审，意味着评阅导师不知道论文作者是谁。 什么叫论文外审? 这是研究生教育改革的一项措施，论文外审是把论文匿名发给业内有名的专家请他们审读并提出意见，很多时候会碰到很挑剔的专家，他们会提很多的问题。 是否盲审或者外审并不是可以确定的，这是随机的。 问题三：论文外审！结果是论文需要进一步修改处理！是什么意思？ 外校专家认为论文还不能给通过 问题四：文章外审回来之后，再次送审，这是什么情况 一篇小文章，给了两个审稿人，两个外审意见回来了，一个是修改后录用，另一个没有给结论，但是给出了几条修改意见，可是状态还是外审中，都好几天了状态还没有变，不知道出版社的意见是修改还是拒稿， ... 耐心等等吧，不要太急visitor958(站内联系TA)什么杂志？编辑没有做决定，作者就知道审稿意见了？编辑没有做决定，一般是还在等一个答应审稿的审稿人。ygm868(站内联系TA)建议等等，作为作者知道审稿人意见回来本来就不正常home3163(站内联系TA)Originally posted by yensh at 2011-04-25 20:02:41: 问题五：论文外审通过之后录用概率大吗 学术论文是某一学术课题在实验性、理论性、预测性上具有的新的科学研究成果、创新见解和知识的科学记录。学术论文也是某种已知原理应用于实际上取得新进展的科学总结，用以提供学术会议上宣读、交流、讨论或学术刊物上发表，或用作其他用途的书面文件。学术论文就是用系统的、专门的知识来讨论或研究某种问题或研究成果的学理性文章，具有学术性、科学性、创造性、学理性。按写作目的，学术论文可分为交流性论文和考核性论文。 学术论文是对某个科学领域中的学术问题进行研究后表述科学研究成果的理论文章。 学术论文的写作是非常重要的，它是衡量一个人学术水平和科研能力的重要标志。在学术论文撰写中，选题与选材是头等重要的问题。一篇学术论文的价值关键并不只在写作的技巧，也要注意研究工作本身。在于你选择了什么课题，并在这个特定主题下选择了什么典型材料来表述研究成果。科学研究的实践证明，只有选择了有意义的课题，才有可能收到较好的研究成果，写出较有价值的学术论文。所以学术论文的选题和选材，是研究工作开展前具有重大意义的一步，是必不可少的准备工作。 学术论文，就是用系统的、专门的知识来讨论或研究某种问题或研究成果的学理性文章。具有学术性、科学性、创造性、学理性。 基本类别 按研究的学科，可将学术论文分为自然科学论文和社会科学论文。每类又可按各自的门类分下去。如社会科学论文，又可细分为文学、历史、哲学、教育、政治等学科论文。 按研究的内容，可将学术论文分为理论研究论文和应用研究论文。理论研究，重在对各学科的基本概念和基本原理的研究；应用研究，侧重于如何将各学科的知识转化为专业技术和生产技术，直接服务于社会。 按写作目的，可将学术论文分为交流性论文和考核性论文。交流性论文，目的只在于专业工作者进行学术探讨，发表各家之言，以显示各们学科发展的新态势；考核性论文，目的在于检验学术水平，成为有关专业人员升迁晋级的重要依据。 国家标准 技术报告 科学技术报告是描述一项科学技术研究的结果或进展或一项技术研制试验和评价的结果；或是论述某项科学技术问题的现状和发展的文件。 科学技术报告是为了呈送科学技术工作主管机构或科学基金会等组织或主持研究的人等。科学技术报告中一般应该提供系统的或按工作进程的充分信息，可以包括正反两方面的结果和经验，以便有关人员和读者判断和评价，以及对报告中的结论和建议提出修正意见。 学位论文 学位论文是表明作者从事科学研究取得创造性的结果或有了新的见解，并以此为内容撰写而成、作为提出申请授予相应的学位时评审用的学术论文。 学士论文应能表明作者确已较好地掌握了本门学科的基础理论、专门知识和基本技能，并具有从事科学研究工作或担负专门技术工作的初步能力。 问题六：硕士论文外审的等级什么才是通过 不知道别的学校什么样。。。我们学校就是这个时候送出去 盲审。。。 问题七：硕士论文外审审什么 外审就是由其他院校的老师审核你的毕业论文，审核要点和内审应该是一样的，只是变数多一些。 问题八：你好，请问我有一篇论文已经向期刊投稿了，现在已是外审状态 你如果中了的话，肯定会给你发邮件的！ 你的论文不可能这么快就审完事的！ 一般来说是半个月！ ==================论文写作方法=========================== 论文网上没有免费的，与其花人民币，还不如自己写，万一碰到人的，就不上算了。 写作论文的简单方法，首先大概确定自己的选题，然后在网上查找几份类似的文章，通读一遍，对这方面的内容有个大概的了解！ 参照论文的格式，列出提纲，补充内容，实在不会，把这几份论文综合一下，从每篇论文上复制一部分，组成一篇新的文章！ 然后把按自己的语言把每一部分换下句式或词，经过换词不换意的办法处理后,网上就查不到了,祝你顺利完成论文! 问题九：硕士论文外审严格吗 一般不会因为数据出问题而导致外审不通过的。放心！
投稿杂志已送外审意味着，外审专家会对文章的核心内容进行审核，这一环节相对于初审和终审来说挑战更大。外审专家都是本专业内的专家学者或者教授，对本专业本选题有过深入的研究，有很深的积累，所以可能外审专家更能看出一篇文章的真实水平。
盲审相对来说比较难，这是由学校统一往出送，多送到外省，隐去姓名和导师姓名，你不知道你的论文被送到哪里，那边老师也不知道这论文来自哪里是谁的学生，所以盲审相对比较客观，大约需一个半月左右。
外审多是由院系自己往出送，虽然也是隐去学生姓名和导师姓名的，但多送到省内关系较好的兄弟院校，所以相对来说没有盲审那么严的，这个大约需一个月到一个半月左右吧
论文盲审和外审什么意思 什么是 盲审？是今年新开始的组织专家组评审的那个制度：就是匿名送审，意味着评阅导师不知道论文作者是谁。
什么叫论文外审?这是研究生教育改革的一项措施，论文外审是把论文匿名发给业内有名的专家请他们审读并提出意见，很多时候会碰到很挑剔的专家，他们会提很多的问题。是否盲审或者外审并不是可以确定的，这是随机的。