请想象一下:你正在为你的谋杀罪接受审判,尽管你是无辜的,但你还是被判刑了.你将被给予死刑的处罚,你的生命将被夺去.那是一切的结束--包括你的家庭生活,你的朋友,你的目标,你的未来.谁又会支持这一切的发生呢?死刑是不人道的,它残害的不仅是有罪之人,还包括那些无辜的生命.它也增加了谋杀率,而这种结果和其初衷背道而驰,同样也是违法的.
死刑是不道德而又野蛮的.它用谋杀的手段惩罚了谋杀者,推动了暴力的蔓延.无论处决方式是致命毒药的注射还是典型,它都是残忍的,是一级的蓄意谋杀罪。你会因小孩踢人而责备他吗？我们学到的是两个错误并不会指向正确，更多的谋杀并非合适的解决方法。
死刑违背了美国人的道德观和价值观。《独立宣言》指出每一个都有不可剥夺的生存权。同时，政府的责任也在于保护公民的生命，但是，死刑带走了这一切。《人权法案》禁止残酷和不寻常的惩戒手段。那么，谋杀难道不残忍吗？我们都是声称用谋杀抗争谋杀的虚伪者，而死刑传递的信息正是：在美国，谋杀能被接受，甚至连政府都在杀人。
死刑不能解决任何问题，而仅仅是制造了更多的痛苦和悲剧。死刑犯的家属不仅仅要面对罪犯应承担的赔偿和审判，更需要接受爱人死亡的惨痛事实。这对于那些被无辜处死的人是尤其悲痛欲绝的。有研究表明死刑不是如同其初衷那样，作为谋杀的推迟，而只是把我们推向了比起初的情况更为糟糕的深渊。
许多美国的道德准则源于基督教的信仰。《圣经》内含大量反对死刑的篇章。上帝为我们的生活方式树立了典范，只要你恳求原谅，他将宽恕所有的事情，并请求你“宽恕所有触犯了我们的人”。《圣经》还提到我们不应复仇，但当我们处决了某些人是，这恰恰是我们所做不到的。没有人应是第一个被杀的对象，把杀人作为惩罚方式也是同样不合理的。
其中，死刑带来的最坏后果是无辜的生命必定会被剥夺。最近，在伊利诺伊州，13个被列在死亡名单上的人直到他们被处决的那一天才被证明是无辜的。他们承受的莫大痛苦是难以言喻的。想象一下，当你没犯罪却被政府判以死刑的情景吧！终结他人的生命是没有任何挽回的余地的。
死刑不会带来积极的结果。我们为何要杜绝谋杀？因为我们想采取行动废除死亡的惩罚。剥夺生命永远是不正当的。
Different countries have different guidelines for the use of death penalty.
There are a great deal of arguments for and against death-penalty.
There might be some people oppose the death penalty on moral grounds. They strongly believe in forgiveness. Yes, there are some things we can easily forgive the offenders, but there are some flagitious crimes that just call out for the death penalty. A jail sentence is fair for a thief but certainly is not good enough for a child molestor who is very likely to convict similar crimes again.
Another argument against the death penalty is that the death penalty goes against human right-the right to live. Well, if someone murders someone else, he has deprived someone else of his right to live, and hence death penalty is the best option for the murderer. He who kills should be killed, it's a very fair deal.
In short, I support death penalty as I trust that death penalty is an effective deterrent to heinous crimes since it permanently removes the most bloodthirsty criminals from the society.
随打随想，希望能帮到楼主。 :)
你是大学水平还是高中啊？你是赞成取消死刑还是同意啊？我对300分很感兴趣哦，只是中文翻译我懒得写，不过保证你能看懂，而且读的通顺。你回答了我的2个问题，我就替你捉刀~
那你耐心等哦，我不喜欢非原创，相信楼主也是吧。
My Idea about capital punishment
In the modern global community, the ideas of liberalism and democracy are widely accepted. People embrace freedom to an extent that has never been achieved throughout history. However, some countries go a little bit too far. The abolishment of capital punishment is just one example. These counties argue that no authority is entitled to deprive individuals of their right to live. Even those who commit felonies such as murder, rape and arson should be put in prison rather than on a guillotine. They believe their practice embodies humanism which goes well beyond the tit-for-tat juridical tradition that is passed down for generations. In my mind, however, death penalty should not be abolished, as long as there is a possibility of grave crimes in the world.
In the Chinese language, there is a proverb that goes like this: A merciful angel frightens no devil.(门神善了鬼不怕). The capital punishment is the last weapon that awes potential criminals. If there were no nuclear bombs, would China have felt at least apparently at ease at the militaristic menace posed by the USSR in early 1960s? Perhaps this is not an appropriate analogue, but China is a country which holds one fourths of the world population. Now our country is still not safe enough partly due to lack of policing. If the penalties are loosen, China will be in a mess, with so acute confrontational sentiments between the rich and poor and so uneven distribution of properties. Not only won’t our goals of a better-off society be achieved, but stability, our basis of national development will also be threatened.
I will have to mention the case of Singapore as well. We all know that a year ago an young Australian was executed there for carrying drugs. Singapore was thus widely criticized for its despotism by European and Australian presses. Given that the independence of justice of one nation should be respected if it does not defy international laws, we must know that Singapore is a key port. If the law is not strict enough, will this tiny country enjoy its peace and stability as we constantly admire?
You may say that both China and Singapore are oriental countries whose rulers are descendants of thousand-year-long feudal monarchies. We just shift our focus to the most liberal country, the United States. Do Americans say goodbye to death penalty? We safely come to a conclusion that it death penalty is not a case of tradition, but an earthy need indeed.
You may also argue that despite the abolishment of capital punishment the EU is still well-organized with no significant rise in crime rate. That is correct. I never deny that EU is safer than the US and China. But I would like to remind you of Milocevic’s death in Hague. Yes, even if he is convicted won’t he be killed at once, but he was left in a small room with no access to basic medical care. He died of heart attack. What a good death. The Europeans remove a pain in the ass without using a knife. Europeans treasure human rights. They tried Milocevic for his genocide of Croats. But note the Rwanda genocide.Which Tony Blair or Jacque Chirac grieved for the victims of Rwanda genocide? Where was the EU then? I find sheer dual standards. I find typical hypocrisy.
To accomplish humanity we have too many things to do, except the consideration of the abolishment of death penalty. Perhaps this is done one day in the future when China is more democratic and liberal. But now, we must stick to death penalty for the good of the majority of the citizens, not of the criminals.
