In the government should not manage the problem of network public opinion, there are two basic opposing views. Some people think that the Internet should not be managed, the content itself is difficult to control who publish information, who receive information, the implementation of the specific object is very vague, can not be managed; from the network development, management is in a booming stage, control is to limit the normal development of the network, some basic content classification, filtering and so on. For many reasons, some people will be the government of the network public opinion management as "manufacturing network world of the village fool", the network is the lack of basic understanding of technical characteristics. But as a government, for the protection of children's network security, stop terrorist activities, control of racial hatred, restrictions on commercial unfair competition and so on a variety of reasons, on control and management of the network public opinion regarded as their bounden responsibility and obligation. The most popular way of the government is: have modified the existing regulations to include the management of network public opinion, or simply introduce new network regulations.
The most dramatic color rich, United States in 1996 issued new "telecommunication law" communication Decency Act (CDA). The bill requires Internet information provider to ensure that pornography is not received by the children, and offenders sentenced to 25 million -- $50 million in fines and 2 years in prison. The result was the "Civil Liberties Union American," an unconstitutional prosecution. Court although to porn not protected by the constitution, punishment is defend against the crime punishment and other reasons, but in the end the court still on constitutional finalized the new regulation of the network failure. Two years later, the United States and the introduction of the Online Protection Act Child (COPA), and also suffered the same fate with the.
Whether the government should intervene in the network public opinion, the problem in the theoretical circle has been due to the different conditions of the country, but in practice, but in practice, the government did not give up on the network public opinion management, different just in the management, or more direct management, or more indirect management.
双语对照
[1] 尚琼琼. SNS与网络时代大学生媒介素养教育探析[J]. 青年记者. 2010(11)
[2] 李园园. 校内网对大学生的影响[J]. 青年记者. 2009(17) [3] 梁世敏,孙理,张丽伟. 基于校园SNS网络的大学生思想教育初探[J]. 长春工程学院学报(社会科学版). 2009(02)
[4] 朱峰,吕伟. 校园SNS时代青年网络社会人际交往行为透视——以校内网现象为例[J]. 青少年研究(山东省团校学报). 2009(03) [5] 刘文娟,袁文芳. 校内网的SNS人际传播特征分析[J]. 东南传播. 2009(05)
[6] 陈卉. 社会性网络服务(SNS)流行原因分析[J]. 新闻世界. 2009(05) [7] 汪阳. 大学生校内网上交友状况调查——以兰州地区为例[J]. 青年记者. 2009(11)
[8] 张楠,钱艳丽. SNS网络社区的出现及走红——以校内网为代表[J]. 今日南国(理论创新版). 2009(03) [9] 张丹. 利用校园SNS网络开辟高校学生思想政治教育工作新方式[J]. 才智. 2009(08)
[10] 郝若琦. 浅析基于Web2.0时代的校园SNS网站的盛行原因[J]. 东南传播. 2008(12)
[1] 刘蕾. 试论网络交际对大学生心理发展的负面影响及对策[J]. 教育与职业. 2009(12)
[2] 阮敏尔. 大学生虚拟生存的影响及对策[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版). 2007(03) [3] 伍安春,张新福,余惠琼. 网络对大学生道德的冲击及对策思考[J]. 重庆邮电学院学报(社会科学版). 2004(03)
[1] 田卉,柯惠新. 网络环境下的舆论形成模式及调控分析[J]. 现代传播(中国传媒大学学报). 2010(01)
[2] 杜骏飞,魏娟. 网络集群的政治社会学:本质、类型与效用[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2010(01)
[3] 葛晨光. 高校网络论坛舆论形成及引导刍议[J]. 南阳师范学院学报. 2009(11)
[4] 刘建. 高校网络舆论对大学生的影响及其引导[J]. 南阳理工学院学报. 2009(05)
[5] 王一春. 试论当代大学生网络愤青现象[J]. 上海青年管理干部学院学报. 2009(03)
[6] 周千贺. 传统媒体和网络的舆论监督及其互动[J]. 青年记者. 2009(23)
[7] 任海. 高校校园网络舆论的形成、特点及引导策略[J]. 燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2009(02)
[8] 陶晓华,高健. 高校校园网络舆论的现状、影响因素和引导策略[J]. 南方论刊. 2009(05)
[9] 李雪莹,邓飞. 从传播学视角看高校网络舆论及其引导[J]. 黑龙江科技信息. 2009(14)
[10] 倪晓莉,陈思路,颜虹. 网络依赖行为研究及其干预模型的理论构建[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版). 2007(02)
The discussion in this paper began by tracing the origins of the definition of marketing, schools of marketing and the market orientation construct, research on a market orientation was the characterized into one of three groups: (1) research revisiting scale properties; (2)research applying original scales to different contexts; and (3) research examining the antecedents and consequences of following a market orientation. The discussion them moved on to provide reasons why existing market orientation scales are deficient in explaining the behavior of firms operating in today’s environment.
A conclusion of this paper is to encourage researchers to revisit what it means to be market oriented using the 2004 AMA definition of marketing and the emerging stakeholder school of marketing thought to develop scales accordingly. One advantage of developing a new scale or scales is that we will be better placed to understand the antecedents and consequences of market driven and driving market firms operating in macro environment where the importance of stakeholders has become paramount.
Stakes Rising In Cyber Manhunt
CBS/AP) If he were still around, Wild West outlaw Jesse James might feel like small fry by comparison.
The creators of the LovSan/Blaster worm and the SoBig virus have large bounties out for their arrest - rewards to be posted Wednesday at an unusual joint news conference being held in Washington by the FBI, the Secret Service, Interpol and Microsoft Corporation.
CBS News has confirmed that Microsoft will be providing the reward money for information leading to the apprehension and conviction of the still unidentified creators of the LovSan/Blaster worm and the SoBig virus: reportedly $250,000 in each case.
There was an arrest last August in a related case - Jeffrey Parson, 18, of Hopkins, Minn. - but he is not accused of being the original creator of Blaster, which is also known as LovSan and MSBlast. Parson, whose trial is scheduled to begin Nov. 17 in Seattle, has pleaded not guilty to crippling over 7,000 computers by modifying Blaster and then unleashing it into cyberspace.
If convicted, Parson could be sentenced to as much as ten years in prison, plus fines.
In September, federal authorities in Seattle revealed they had made a second arrest - of an individual whose name is being withheld because the suspect is a juvenile. The crime is the same as Parson: making a variant of Blaster, called "RPCSDBOT," and then distributing it along with its harmful effects.
Various versions of the Blaster worm snarled computer networks around the world beginning last August, affecting over a million computers.
Just as computer users were recovering from Blaster, they got hit only days later by the equally hated SoBig virus, which clogged e-mail in-boxes with a ferocity that caused trouble for both networks and individuals.
The rewards being posted by Microsoft represent a new tactic by the software giant, which was specifically targeted by the creator of Blaster. The computer worm exploited a security flaw in Microsoft Windows - which was subsequently repaired, with a patch available for download, although many computer users and networks got zapped regardless when they failed to download the patch.
The worm came with two messages: "I just want to say LOVE YOU SAN" and "Billy Gates, why do you make this possible? Stop making money and fix your software!"
Even before 2003's many worms and viruses were unleashed on millions worldwide - Microsoft had begun a new campaign to improve computer security, to protect its flagship product, Windows, and convince consumers that it is safe.
"New security risks have emerged on a scale that few in our industry fully anticipated," said Gates, Microsoft chairman, in a January e-mail launching the company's campaign, pointing to estimates that hackers and other electronic attacks caused $455 million in damage to various companies in the year 2001.
At that time, Gates pointed to passwords as the weak link, and said Microsoft will increase its support for their replacement by smart cards, which employ other methods including random numbers to identify authorized users.
This year's harvest of cyber crime has not gone unnoticed in Washington.
Amit Yoran, a vice president from the anti-virus company Symantec, was chosen in mid-September to be the cyber security chief at the Department of Homeland Security.
His mission is strengthening computer networks and convincing Americans to improve their defenses against hackers, disgruntled employees, commercial rivals and foreign governments.
At the same time, the Department announced plans to establish a new Computer Emergency Response Center for Cyber Security. The Center, working with experts at Carnegie Mello University, is charged with protecting against, and responding to, cyber attacks.
It's hoped that by the end of the year, the Center will be able to reduce response time to cyber attacks to just 30 minutes.
