您当前的位置:首页 > 发表论文>论文发表

湖南工程学院学报征稿

2023-12-06 21:05 来源:学术参考网 作者:未知

湖南工程学院学报征稿

这本学报最好联系杂志社直接投稿,有人冒充是杂志社编辑,书已经出刊了确一直没收到期刊 电话问编辑那边根本没我的文章 可笑的是冒充谁内编辑的这个人还发了份电子版清样给我,已经与杂志社核实 是骗人的,谨慎等不退款给我再曝光他的QQ号姓名 银行账号,并提交证据到公安机关

帮忙找一篇文章!

Sensorless torque control scheme of
induction motor for hybrid electric vehicle
Yan LIU 1,2, Cheng SHAO1
(1.Research Institute of Advanced Control Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian Liaoning 116024, China;
2.School of Information Engineering of Dalian University, Dalian Liaoning 116622, China)
Abstract: In this paper, the sensorless torque robust tracking problem of the induction motor for hybrid electric vehicle
(HEV) applications is addressed. Because motor parameter variations in HEV applications are larger than in industrial
drive system, the conventional field-oriented control (FOC) provides poor performance. Therefore, a new robust PI-based
extension of the FOC controller and a speed-flux observer based on sliding mode and Lyapunov theory are developed in
order to improve the overall performance. Simulation results show that the proposed sensorless torque control scheme is
robust with respect to motor parameter variations and loading disturbances. In addition, the operating flux of the motor is
chosen optimally to minimize the consumption of electric energy, which results in a significant reduction in energy losses
shown by simulations.
Keywords: Hybrid electric vehicle; Induction motor; Torque tracking; Sliding mode
1 Introduction
Being confronted by the lack of energy and the increasingly
serious pollution, the automobile industry is seeking
cleaner and more energy-efficient vehicles.A Hybrid Electric
Vehicle (HEV) is one of the solutions. A HEV comprises
both a Combustion Engine (CE) and an Electric Motor
(EM). The coupling of these two components can be in
parallel or in series. The most common type of HEV is the
parallel type, in which both CE and EM contribute to the
traction force that moves the vehicle. Fig1 presents a diagram
of the propulsion system of a parallel HEV [1].
Fig. 1 Parallel HEV automobile propulsion system.
In order to have lower energy consumption and lower pollutant
emissions, in a parallel HEV the CE is commonly
employed at the state (n > 40 km/h or an emergency speed
up), while the electric motor is operated at various operating
conditions and transient to supply the difference in torque
between the torque command and the torque supplied by
the CE. Therefore fast and precise torque tracking of an EM
over a wide range of speed is crucial for the overall performance
of a HEV.
The induction motor is well suited for the HEV application
because of its robustness, low maintenance and low
price. However, the development of a drive system based
on the induction motor is not straightforward because of the
complexity of the control problem involved in the IM. Furthermore,
motor parameter variations in HEV applications
are larger than in industrial drive system during operation
[2]. The conventional control technique ranging from the
inexpensive constant voltage/frequency ratio strategy to the
sophisticated sensorless control schemes are mostly ineffective
where accurate torque tracking is required due to their
drawbacks, which are sensitive to change of the parameters
of the motors.
In general, a HEV operation can be continuing smoothly
for the case of sensor failure, it is of significant to develop
sensorless control algorithms. In this paper, the development
of a sensorless robust torque control system for HEV
applications is proposed. The field oriented control of the induction
motor is commonly employed in HEV applications
due to its relative good dynamic response. However the classical
(PI-based) field oriented control (CFOC) is sensitive to
parameter variations and needs tuning of at least six control
parameters (a minimum of 3 PI controller gains). An improved
robust PI-based controller is designed in this paper,
Received 5 January 2005; revised 20 September 2006.
This work was supported in part by State Science and Technology Pursuing Project of China (No. 2001BA204B01).
Y. LIU et al. / Journal of Control Theory and Applications 2007 5 (1) 42–46 43
which has less controller parameters to be tuned, and is robust
to parameter variation.The variable parameters model
of the motor is considered and its parameters are continuously
updated while the motor is operating. Speed and
flux observers are needed for the schemes. In this paper,
the speed-flux observer is based on the sliding mode technique
due to its superior robustness properties. The sliding
mode observer structure allows for the simultaneous observation
of rotor fluxes and rotor speed. Minimization of the
consumed energy is also considered by optimizing operating
flux of the IM.
2 The control problem in a HEV case
The performance of electric drive system is one of the
key problems in a HEV application. Although the requirements
of various HEV drive system are different, all these
drive systems are kinds of torque control systems. For an
ideal HEV, the torque requested by the supervisor controller
must be accurate and efficient. Another requirement is to
make the rotor flux track a certain reference λref . The reference
is commonly set to a value that generates maximum
torque and avoids magnetic saturation, and is weakened to
limit stator currents and voltages as rotor speed increases.
In HEV applications, however, the flux reference is selected
to minimize the consumption of electrical energy as it is one
of the primary objectives in HEV applications. The control
problem can therefore be stated as the following torque and
flux tracking problems:
min
ids,iqs,we Te(t) − Teref (t), (1)
min
ids,iqs,we λdr(t) − λref (t), (2)
min
ids,iqs,we λqr(t), (3)
where λref is selected to minimize the consumption of electrical
energy. Teref is the torque command issued by the
supervisory controller while Te is the actual motor torque.
Equation (3) reflects the constraint of field orientation commonly
encountered in the literature. In addition, for a HEV
application the operating conditions will vary continuously.
The changes of parameters of the IM model need to be accounted
for in control due to they will considerably change
as the motor changes operating conditions.
3 A variable parameters model of induction
motor for HEV applications
To reduce the elements of storage (inductances), the induction
motor model used in this research in stationary reference
frame is the Γ-model. Fig. 2 shows its q-axis (d-axis
are similar). As noted in [3], the model is identical (without
any loss of information) to the more common T-model in
which the leakage inductance is separated in stator and rotor
leakage [3]. With respect to the classical model, the new
parameters are:
Lm = L2
m
Lr
= γLm, Ll = Lls + γLlr,
Rr = γ2Rr.
Fig. 2 Induction motor model in stationary reference frame (q-axis).
The following basic w−λr−is equations in synchronously
rotating reference frame (d - q) can be derived from the
above model.
⎧⎪
⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎨⎪
⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎩
dλdr
dt
= −ηλdr + (we − wr)λqr + ηLmids,
dλqr
dt
= −(we − wr)λdr − ηλqr + ηLmiqs,
dids
dt
= ηβλdr+βwrλqr−γids+weiqs+
1
σLs
Vds,
diqs
dt
=−βwrλdr+ηβλqr−weids−γiqs+
1
σLs
Vqs,
dwr
dt
= μ(λdriqs − λqrids) −
TL
J
,

dt
= wr + ηLm
iqs
λdr
= we,
Te = μ(λdriqs − λqrids)
(4)
with constants defined as follows:
μ = np
J
, η = Rr
Lm
, σ = 1−
Lm
Ls
, β =
1
Ll
,
γ = Rs + Rr
Ll
, Ls = Ll + Lm,
where np is the number of poles pairs, J is the inertia of the
rotor. The motor parameters Lm, Ll, Rs, Rr were estimated
offline [4]. Equation (5) shows the mappings between the
parameters of the motor and the operating conditions (ids,
iqs).
Lm = a1i2
ds + a2ids + a3, Ll = b1Is + b2,
Rr = c1iqs + c2.
(5)
4 Sensorless torque control system design
A simplified block diagram of the control diagram is
shown in Fig. 3.
44 Y. LIU et al. / Journal of Control Theory and Applications 2007 5 (1) 42–46
Fig. 3 Control structure.
4.1 PI controller based FOC design
The PI controller is based on the Field Oriented Controller
(FOC) scheme. When Te = Teref, λdr = λref , and
λqr = 0 in synchronously rotating reference frame (d − q),
the following FOC equations can be derived from the equations
(4).
⎧⎪
⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎨⎪
⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎩
ids = λref
Lm
+ λref
Rr
,
iqs = Teref
npλref
,
we = wr + ηLm
iqs
λref
.
(6)
From the Equation (6), the FOC controller has lower performance
in the presence of parameter uncertainties, especially
in a HEV application due to its inherent open loop
design. Since the rotor flux dynamics in synchronous reference
frame (λq = 0) are linear and only dependent on the
d-current input, the controller can be improved by adding
two PI regulators on error signals λref − λdr and λqr − 0 as
follow
ids = λref
Lm
+ λref
Rr
+ KPd(λref − λdr)
+KId (λref − λdr)dt, (7)
iqs = Teref
npλref
, (8)
we = wr + ηLm
iqs
λref
+ KPqλqr + KIq λqrdt. (9)
The Equation (7) and (9) show that current (ids) can control
the rotor flux magnitude and the speed of the d − q rotating
reference frame (we) can control its orientation correctly
with less sensitivity to motor parameter variations because
of the two PI regulators.
4.2 Stator voltage decoupling design
Based on scalar decoupling theory [5], the stator voltages
commands are given in the form:
⎧⎪
⎪⎪⎨⎪⎪⎪⎩
Uds = Rsids − weσLsiqs = Rsids − weLliqs,
Uqs = Rsiqs + weσLsids + Lm
Lr
weλref
= Rsiqs + weσLsids + weλref .
(10)
Because of fast and good flux tracking, poor dynamics decoupling
performance exerts less effect on the control system.
4.3 Speed-flux observer design
Based on the theory of negative feedback, the design of
speed-flux observer must be robust to motor parameter variations.
The speed-flux observer here is based on the sliding
mode technique described in [6∼8]. The observer equations
are based on the induction motor current and flux equations
in stationary reference frame.
⎧⎪
⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎨⎪
⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎩
d˜ids
dt
= ηβ˜λdr + β ˜ wr˜λqr − γ˜ids +
1
Ll
Vds,
d˜iqs
dt
= −β ˜ wr˜λdr + ηβ˜λqr − γ˜iqs +
1
Ll
Vqs,
d˜λdr
dt
= −η˜λdr − ˜ wr˜λqr + ηLm
˜i
ds,
d˜λqr
dt
= ˜wr˜λ dr − η˜λqr + ηLm
˜i
qs.
(11)
Define a sliding surface as:
s = (˜iqs − iqs)˜λdr − (˜ids − ids)˜λqr. (12)
Let a Lyapunov function be
V = 0.5s2. (13)
After some algebraic derivation, it can be found that when
˜ wr = w0sgn(s) with w0 chosen large enough at all time,
then ˙V = ˙s · s 0. This shows that s will converge to
zero in a finite time, implying the stator current estimates
and rotor flux estimates will converge to their real values
in a finite time [8]. To find the equivalent value of estimate
wr (the smoothed estimate of speed, since estimate wr is a
switching function), the equation must be solved [8]. This
yields:
˜ weq = wr
˜λ
qrλqr + λdr˜λdr
˜λ
2q
r +˜λ2
dr −
η
np
˜λ
qrλdr − λqr˜λdr
˜λ
2q
r +˜λ2
dr
. (14)
The equation implies that if the flux estimates converge to
their real values, the equivalent speed will be equal to the
real speed. But the Equation (14) for equivalent speed cannot
be used as given in the observer since it contains unknown
terms. A low pass filter is used instead,
˜ weq =
1
1 + s · τ
˜ wr. (15)
Y. LIU et al. / Journal of Control Theory and Applications 2007 5 (1) 42–46 45
The same low pass filter is also introduced to the system
input,which guarantees that the input matches the feedback
in time.
The selection of the speed gain w0 has two major constraints:
1) The gain has to be large enough to insure that sliding
mode can be enforced.
2) A very large gain can yield to instability of the observer.
Through simulations, an adaptive gain of the sliding
mode observer to the equivalent speed is proposed.
w0 = k1 ˜ weq + k2. (16)
From Equation (11), the sliding mode observer structure
allows for the simultaneous observation of rotor fluxes.
4.4 Flux reference optimal design
The flux reference can either be left constant or modified
to accomplish certain requirements (minimum current,
maximum efficiency, field weakening) [9,10]. In this paper,
the flux reference is chosen to maximum efficiency at steady
state and is weaken for speeds above rated. The optimal efficiency
flux can be calculated as a function of the torque
reference [9].
λdr−opt = |Teref| · 4Rs · L2r
/L2
m + Rr. (17)
Equation (17) states that if the torque request Teref is
zero, Equation (8) presents a singularity. Moreover, the
analysis of Equation (17) does not consider the flux saturation.
In fact, for speeds above rated, it is necessary to
weaken the flux so that the supply voltage limits are not exceeded.
The improved optimum flux reference is then calculated
as:
⎧⎪
⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎨⎪
⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎩
λref = λdr-opt,
if λmin λdr-opt λdr-rated ·
wrated
wr-actual
,
λref = λmin, if λdr-opt λmin,
λref = λdr-rated ·
wrated
wr-actual
,
if λdr-opt λdr-rated ·
wrated
wr-actual
.
(18)
where λmin is a minimum value to avoid the division by
zero.
4.5 Simulations
The rated parameters of the motor used in the simulations
are given by
Rs = 0.014 Ω, Rr = 0.009 Ω, Lls = 75 H,
Llr = 105 H, Lm = 2.2 mH, Ls = Lls + Lm,
Lr = Llr + Lm, P = 4, Jmot = 0.045 kgm2,
J = Jmot +MR2
tire/Rf, ρair = 1.29, Cd = 0.446,
Af = 3.169 m2, Rf = 8.32, Cr = 0.015,
Rtire = 0.3683 m, M = 3000 kg, wbase = 5400 rpm,
λdr−rated = 0.47 Wb.
Fig.4 shows the torque reference curve that represents
typical operating behaviors in a hybrid electric vehicle.
Fig. 4 The torque reference curve.
Load torque is modeled by considering the aerodynamic,
rolling resistance and road grade forces. Its expression is
given by
TL = Rtire
Rf
(
1
2ρairCdAfv2 +MCr cos αg +M sin αg).
Figures in [5∼8] show the simulation results of the
system of Fig.3 (considering variable motor parameters).
Though a small estimation error can be noticed on the observed
fluxes and speed, the torque tracking is still achieved
at an acceptable level as shown in Figs. [5, 6, 8]. The torque
control over a wide range of speed presents less sensitivity
to motor parameters uncertainty.
Fig.5 presents the d and q components of the rotor flux.
Rotor flux λr is precisely orientated to d-axis because of the
improved PI controllers.
Fig.8 shows clearly the real and observed speed in the
different phases of acceleration, constant and deceleration
speed with the motor control torque of Fig.4. The variable
model parameters exert less influence on speed estimation.
Fig.7 shows the power loss when the rotor flux keeps constant
or optimal state. A significant improvement in power
losses is noticed due to reducing the flux reference during
the periods of low torque requests.
Fig. 5 Motor rotor flux λr.
46 Y. LIU et al. / Journal of Control Theory and Applications 2007 5 (1) 42–46
Fig. 6 Motor torque.
Fig. 7 Power Losses.
Fig. 8 Motor speed.
5 Conclusions
This paper has described a sensorless torque control system
for a high-performance induction motor drive for a
HEV case. The system allows for fast and good torque
tracking over a wide range of speed even in the presence of
motor parameters uncertainty. In this paper, the improved
PI-based FOC controllers show a good performance in the
rotor flux λdr magnitude and its orientation tracking. The
speed-flux observer described here is based on the sliding
mode technique, making it independent of the motor parameters.
Gain adaptation of the speed -flux observer is used to
stabilize the observer when integration errors are present.

罗文波的论著

[ 专著 ] 杨挺青,罗文波,徐平等. 黏弹性理论与应用. 科学出版社, 2004年9月, ISBN:7-03-013938-0. . [ 简介 ][ 教材章节 ] 罗文波 编. 第12章 高分子材料力学性能. 见: 周益春, 郑学军编著, 材料的宏微观力学性能. 高等教育出版社, 2009年11月, ISBN:978-7-04-028036-4.王智超, 罗迎社, 罗文波, 邓旭华. 路基压实土流变变形的力学表征与参数识别. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010(录用).尹素仙, 肖世武, 黄友剑, 卜继玲, 罗文波. 预压缩对橡胶球铰疲劳寿命的影响. 机械强度, 2010(录用).王智超, 罗迎社, 罗文波, 邓旭华, 马千里. 高填方路基压实土流变实验方法研究. 湘潭大学自然科学学报, 2010,32(3):48-54.周雄, 肖世武, 胡小玲, 罗文波. 填充硫化橡胶动态力学性能的分数阶微分流变模型. 第十届全国流变学学术会议, 杭州, 2010年11月.罗文波, 李其抚, 唐欣. 物理老化对PMMA准静态力学性能的影响. 高分子材料科学与工程, 2009,25(1):90-93.罗文波, 唐欣, 李其抚. 物理老化对玻璃态高聚物非线性蠕变行为的影响. 固体力学学报, 2008,29(1):104-108.罗文波, 谭江华. 橡胶弹性材料的一种混合本构模型. 固体力学学报, 2008,29(3):277-281.谭江华, 罗文波. 橡胶材料分子链网络本构模型的研究进展. 材料导报, 2008,22(7):31-34.肖华明, 吴国忠 , 罗文波. g射线辐照对PA6/PTFE合金吸水与力学性能的影响. 材料科学与工艺, 2008,16(6):759-762.王初红, 罗文波, 赵荣国, 唐欣. 非线性粘弹性高分子材料长期蠕变行为的加速测试技术. 高分子材料科学与工程, 2007,23(2):218-221,226.肖华明, 罗文波, 吴国忠, 赵荣国. PTFE/PA6和PTFE/PA66共混物吸水性及流变行为实验研究. 高分子材料科学与工程, 2007,23(2):179-182.罗文波,唐欣,谭江华,赵荣国.流变材料长期力学性能加速表征的若干进展. 材料导报,2007,21(7): 8-10,19.王初红, 罗文波, 赵荣国, 唐欣. 应力对聚丙烯蠕变行为的时间-温度等效性的影响. 湘潭大学自然科学学报, 2006,28(4):31-34.肖华明, 罗文波. PA6/PTFE和PA66/PTFE的力学性能和熔融行为的实验研究. 湖南工程学院学报, 2006,16(3):38-41.贺广零,罗文波,卢晋福,桂海林. 宽板弯曲成形过程中的板厚变化规律. 北京联合大学学报, 2006,20(1):27-30.江荧, 罗文波, 等. 关于理想塑性板材弯曲变薄理论解的矛盾及原因分析. 塑性工程学报, 2006,13(1):26-28.余敏, 罗迎社, 罗文波, 彭相华 等. PVC非线性粘弹性行为的研究. 湖南工程学院学报. 2006,16(2):32-34.罗文波,杨挺青,等. 高聚物自由体积与温度和应力水平的相关性. 高分子材料科学与工程, 2005,21(3):11-15.胡成武,罗文波,彭炎荣.锥形凹模缩口力的理论计算与试验验证.中国工程科学,2005,7(6):54-56.罗文波,刘文娴,杨挺青,王霞瑜. 一种高聚物银纹损伤演化的实验研究. 固体力学学报, 2004,25(2):171-175.罗文波,杨挺青. 扩展裂纹尖端的塑性热耗散与温度场. 应用力学学报2004,21(1): 129-133.罗文波. 宽板塑性弯曲成形过程中的板厚变化规律. 力学与实践, 2004,26(3):46-47.胡成武, 罗文波, 彭炎荣. 变薄拉深力的两种理论解及其比较. 塑性工程学报,2004, 11(1):36-38.江荧,罗文波,彭定,等. 关于宽板塑性弯曲变薄理论解的讨论. 金属成形工艺, 2004,22(3):30-32.彭炎荣,罗文波,李名望,江荧,彭定. V形件弯曲凹模最小深度的确定. 模具技术, 2004(4): 33-35,58.李名望,彭炎荣,罗文波. V形件弯曲变形过程分析及弯曲凹模深度的计算. 塑性工程学报,2004,11(3): 73-76.罗文波,杨挺青. 受载高聚物裂尖的损伤和银纹化. 力学学报2003,35(5):553-560.彭炎荣,江荧,段继承,李兆飞,罗文波. 理想塑性及线性硬化板材弯曲成形的变薄规律. 塑性工程学报, 2003,10(3): 22-25.罗文波. 一类弹塑性损伤材料的切线模量. 湘潭大学自然科学学报, 2003, 25(4):41-44.罗文波, 杨挺青. 固态高聚物的应力松弛行为. 高分子材料科学与工程, 2002,18(2): 97-99.罗文波, 杨挺青. 脆性高聚物的银纹化增韧设计. 材料科学与工程, 2002,20(3):422- 424.颜志军, 罗文波, 张平. 高聚物银纹断裂的研究现状. 高分子材料科学与工程, 2002, 18(5):41-44.罗文波, 杨挺青, 安群力. 非线性粘弹体的时间-温度-应力等效原理. 固体力学学报, 2001,22(3):219-224.罗文波,杨挺青,张平.高聚物细观损伤演化的研究进展.力学进展,2001,31(2):264-275.罗文波,杨挺青,张平. 高聚物银纹化的研究进展. 材料导报. 2001(3):46-48.罗文波. 关于“平面纯剪切大变形等效应变分析”一文的讨论. 塑性工程学报,2001,8(1): 8,12.郭艳伶,罗文波,李应明,彭炎荣. 拉延-翻孔复合变形规律及其控制. 锻压技术,2001,26(3):22-25.赵荣国,罗文波,张淳源. 聚合物应力松弛行为的过应力模型. 湘潭大学自然科学学报, 2001,23(1):37-40.罗文波,胡云贵,胡自化等. 圆柱体平板间镦粗的热力耦合分析.塑性工程学报,2000,7(1): 64-69.罗文波,喻青松.含孔洞聚合物材料破坏过程中的热量生成. 高分子材料科学与工程,15(6),1999:138-141.罗文波,罗中华,彭炎荣. Mises圆形屈服轨迹图及其在板料成形中的应用. 锻压技术, 1999(6): 23-27.罗中华,罗文波,彭炎荣. 一种高精度有心扇形滑移线场的近似解析解. 锻压技术24(1),1999:43-45.胡自化,罗文波,等. 塑性有限元网格重分系统基于AutoCAD的二次开发. 金属成形工艺,17(5),1999:44-46.胡自化,罗文波,彭炎荣. 基于Visual Basic数控蓝图编程系统的研制. 机械与电子,1999(2):45-48.胡自化,罗文波,等. 基于AutoCAD数控图形自动编程系统. 组合机床与自动化加工技术1999(2):35-37,45.郭燕伶,罗文波,罗中华等. 圆孔变薄翻边力的计算. 锻压技术, 1998,23(3): 23-25.郭燕伶,罗文波. 变薄翻边力的主应力解法. 湘潭大学自然科学学报, 1998,20(1):115-117.郭燕伶,罗文波,彭炎荣. 正挤凹模理想轮廓设计. 模具工业, 1998(3):29-32.罗文波. 含缺陷物体形变过程中的能量耗散及其分形分析. 湘潭大学自然科学学报, 1997,19(4):26-30.彭炎荣,罗文波,林启权. 塑性成形中的切向加载及其功率计算. 锻压技术,1996,21(3): 28-31.

营销策划论文参考文献

营销策划论文参考文献

导语:营销策划论文的参考文献有哪些呢?营销策划有助于企业的可持续的发展。下面是我分享的营销策划论文的参考文献,欢迎阅读!

[1] 段小明,胡波,郑兴华,解晋东. 化妆品市场现状及发展趋势分析[J]. 日用化学品科学. 2013(11)

[2] 董维维,庄贵军. 中国营销渠道中关系营销导向对企业关系型治理的影响[J]. 管理学报. 2013(10)

[3] 杨惠. 国外品牌轴承在中国市场的渠道管理浅析[J]. 市场周刊(理论研究). 2013(05)

[4] 李杨. 营销渠道理论综述[J]. 经营管理者. 2013(06)

[5] 石凯鸣. 内外超市企业竞争力差异的比较分析[J]. 现代营销(学苑版). 2012(10)

[6] 刘小莲. 我国企业品牌国际化经营战略策略探索[J]. 长春教育学院学报. 2012(06)

[7] 瞿莉娜. 现代企业营销渠道体系的整合与创新途径[J]. 现代营销(学苑版). 2012(05)

[8] 郭华山,赵毅. 国内外化妆品市场观察[J]. 日用化学品科学. 2012(04)

[9] 杨柏超. 我国化妆品行业网络营销问题和对策探析[J]. 现代商贸工业. 2012(03)

[10] 赵陈婷,岳彩周,陈岳峰. 本土化妆品连锁路在何方[J]. 中国连锁. 2011(10)

[11] 闫欣洁. 浅析国内化妆品市场的'消费现状与趋势[J]. 经营管理者. 2011(09)

[12] 陈强. 国内外化妆品市场分析[J]. 日用化学品科学. 2011(01)

[13] 陆鹏,文华. 中国高端百货与高端化妆品对弈中的华丽转身[J]. 中国化妆品(行业). 2010(03)

[14] 陆文. 基于供应链管理的营销渠道研究[J]. 现代经济信息. 2010(02)

[15] Tony. 大卖场超市逼宫化妆品专营店[J]. 医学美学美容(财智). 2009(11)

[16] 刘伟,金远平. 基于J2EE的渠道信息管理系统的设计与实现[J]. 科技资讯. 2009(10)

[17] 本刊编辑部,张萍,郭俊. 2007,中国化妆品法规年--年度化妆品行业法规大事记[J]. 中国化妆品(行业). 2008(01)

[18] 龚振,陆巍,钟爱群. 基于渠道权力的营销渠道结构整合[J]. 商业时代. 2006(11)

[19] 范小军,陈洁,陆芝青. 营销渠道变革与模式选择研究理论述评[J]. 企业经济. 2006(03)

[20] 杨晶,江红红. Super Mario勇闯第一关:怎么管理经销商?[J]. 现代营销(学苑版). 2005(11)

[21] 朱桂平. 客户关系管理与分销渠道整合[J]. 商业时代. 2005(24)

[22] 赵晓飞. 营销渠道的选择及评价标准研究[J]. 市场研究. 2005(08)

[23] 张继明. 从药店到俱乐部--畅谈化妆品营销模式最新走向[J]. 日用化学品科学. 2005(05)

[24] 贺艳春,张志海. 营销渠道结构演变的理性分析[J]. 湖南工程学院学报(社会科学版). 2002(03)

[25] 冯赳善. 我国化妆品监督管理问题分析及对策研究[D]. 华东师范大学 2011

[26] 李南. 我国化妆品安全监管体制的现状与对策研究[D]. 广州中医药大学 2011

[27] 王佳蕾. 上海莱姿化妆品有限公司营销战略研究[D]. 厦门大学 2006

[28] 吴丹青. 泉州市化妆品安全问题及其治理研究[D]. 华侨大学 2014

[29] 董冰心. 特殊用途化妆品现状及监管研究[D]. 北京中医药大学 2011

[30] 袁铮. 化妆品营销渠道研究[D]. 四川大学 2003

[31] 苗丹. 化妆品购买行为偏好研究[D]. 渤海大学 2013

[1] 弗雷德·R·戴维着. 战略管理[M]. 北京. 经济科学出版社, 2006.

[2] 斯蒂芬. P. 罗宾斯着. 管理学. 中国人民出版社, 2002.

[3] 邓胜梁, 许绍李, 张庚森着. 市场营销管理: 理论与策略. 上海人民出版社, 1997: 270-271.

[4] Louise. Boone, David. Kurtz. 当代市场营销学. 机械工业出版社, 2005.

[5] 李睿. 我国市场营销渠道管理创新研究. 现代商业, 2009, (6): 96-97.

[6] 段玉英. 市场营销调研探讨[J]. 前沿, 2005(9): 97.

[7] 杨淑红. 浅析我国市场营销的现状及发展趋势. 科技资讯, 2007. 12.

[8] 王国栋. 营销理论的历史和未来, 江苏商论, 2005, (11): 60-61.

[9] 肖凤桢, 韦秀长. 4P 真的过时了吗. 经济师, 2003,(6): 267.

[10] 杨涛, 葛松林. 企业营销渠道系统创新动因分析. 商业研究, 2000, (5):91-93.

[11] 伯特·罗森布罗姆着. 营销渠道管理. 李乃和, 莫俊芳等译. 第 6 版, 机械工业出版社, 2003: 140-214.

[12] 菲利普 科特勒等着. 营销渠道管理. 李乃和, 奚俊芳等译. 第 11 版.华夏出版社, 2004.

[13] 臧良运. 关系营销的发展及其实施策略[J]. 商业时代, 2008, (9): 20.

[14] 刘辉. 基于关系营销的销售策略研究[J]. 经济论坛, 2008, (8): 15.

相关文章
学术参考网 · 手机版
https://m.lw881.com/
首页