《工程地质学报》是我国工程地质学科综合性的高级学术期刊。1993年批准创刊发行。现为双月刊,大16开本,每期112页,国内外公开发行。 《工程地质学报》办刊宗旨是加强学术交流,促进工程地质科学的了理论、应用和技术的发展,使工程地质学科更好地为国民经济建设服务。 《工程地质学报》着重于理论研究和工程实践的结合。学报主要介绍当前规划、设计和在建国家重点工程的工程地质和地质环境实例及其论证;讨论理论进展和方法创新;讨论在土木、水电、铁路、公路及矿山建设、城乡规划、地质环境和灾害治理,以及能源和工业采掘等方面的新技术和经验。适用于科研工作者、高校师生和专业工程技术人员参阅。 《工程地质学报》由中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所主办,由中国科学院工程地质力学重点研究实验室、协同中国地质学会工程地质专业委员会及国际工程地质学会中国国家小组编辑。中国工程院院士,国际工程地质与环境协会前主席王思敬研究员任本刊主编。编辑委员会由国内外知名的工程地质学家和工程师构成 。
1、《工程地质学报》杂志社要求来稿请注明以下信息:作者姓名、职称/职务、工作单位、联系电话、电子邮箱、邮政编码。来稿文章字数以6000-8000为宜,摘要字数控制在300-500字左右,英文摘要控制在300 words左右。关键词3-5个。 2、 图/表格:图最好为黑白色,表用三线表。图内、表内汉字为六号宋体,数字、字母为六号新罗马体。通栏图、表宽不超过15cm,半栏图、表不超过7.5cm。图、表的中英文题目齐全,小五号字。坐标轴上的刻度线朝内。如: 3、单位:有关记号的使用应符合国家标准,例如:sin-1应为arcsin, ctg应为cot, tg应为tan, ppm等表示法已要求停止使用;除特征数外,变量应使用单个字母表示(或带下标的单字母,否则由多个字母表示单个变量,易被误解为多个变量相乘)。 4、《工程地质学报》编辑部提示注释主要用于对文章篇名、作者及文内某一特定内容作进一步的解释或说明,文中以注号(例①、②)表示。 5、参考文献应按文中出现的先后顺序排列,并在文中相应处用上角标注明,未公开发表的文献请勿引用。
[1]陈肖柏.土的冻结作用与地基[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.
[2]刘巍然,高江平.压实黄土路基中水分迁移的数值模拟[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2006,26(4):5–7.
[3]景宏君,张斌.黄土路基强度规律[J].交通运输工程学报,2006,4(2):14–18.
[4]刘保健,支喜兰,谢永利,等.公路工程中黄土湿陷性问题分析[J].中国公路学报,2005,18(4):27–31.
[5]俞祁浩,刘永智,童长江.青藏公路路基变形分析[J].冰川冻土,2002,24(5):623–627.
[6]吴青柏,童长江.冻土变化与青藏公路的稳定性问题[J].冰川冻土,1995,17(4):350–355.
[7]高彦斌,汪中为.应变速率对黏土不排水抗剪强度的影响[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(增2):2 779–2 783.
[8]扈胜霞,周云东,陈正汉.非饱和原状黄土强度特性的试验研究[J].岩土力学,2005,26(4):660–663.
[9]张茂花,谢永利,刘保健.增湿时黄土的抗剪强度特性分析[J].岩土力学,2006,27(7):1 195–1 200.
[10]益群,沈锋,胡向东,等.上海地区冻融后暗绿色粉质黏土动本构关系与微结构研究[J].岩土工程学报,2005,27(11):1 249–1 252.
[11]陈炜韬,王鹰,王明年,等.冻融循环对盐渍土黏聚力影响的试验研究[J].岩土力学,2007,28(11):2 343–2 347.
[12]梁波,张贵生,刘德仁.冻融循环条件下土的融沉性质试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(10):1 213–1 217.
[13]苏谦,唐第甲,刘深.青藏斜坡黏土冻融循环物理力学性质试验[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(增1):4 313–4 319.
[14]杨更社,周春华,田应国,等.软岩类材料冻融过程水热迁移的实验研究初探[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(9):566–570.
[15]齐吉琳,程国栋,PIETER P A.冻融作用对土工程性质影响的研究现状分析[J].地球科学进展,2005,20(8):887–894.
[16]王大雁,马巍,常小晓,等.冻融循环作用对青藏黏土物理力学性质的影响[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(23):4 313–4 319.
[17]邓学均,黄晓明.路面设计原理与方法[M].人民交通出版社,2007.
[18]Van Bochove,Eric,Effects of freeze-thaw and soil structure on nitrous oxide
produced in a clay soil,Soil Science Society of America Journal,v 64,n 5,
Sep,2000,p 1638-1643
[19]T.E.Sveistrup,Impact of land use and seasonal freezing on morphological and
physical properties of silty Norwegian soils,Soil&Tillage Research 81(2005)
39–56
[20]Podgorney,RobertK.;Bennett,J.E.Evaluating the long-term performance of
geosynthetic clay liners exposed to freeze-thaw,Journal of Geotechnical and
Geoenvironmental Engineering.,v 132,n 2,February 2006,p 265-268
[21]Hooper,Fred P.Freeze-thaw effects and gas permeability of utility line backfill
ASTM Special Technical Publication,n 1459,2004,p 127-139
[22]Parsons,Robert L.Use of cement kiln dust for the stabilization of soils,
Geotechnical Special Publication,n 126 I,Geotechnical Engineering for
Transportation Projects:Proceedings of Geo-Trans 2004,2004,p 1124-1131
[23]Arora,Sunil,Class F fly-ash-amended soils as highway base materials,Journal
of Materials in Civil Engineering,v 17,n 6,November/December,2005,p
640-649
[24]Tikalsky,PaulJ.A method for assessment of the freeze一thaw resistance of
Preformed foam cellular concrete,Cement and Concrete Researeh,v34,n5,May
2004,P889一893.
[25]Zhang,Peng,ExPerimental research on eombined action of freeze一thaw cycles and carbonation for concrete structures,Jian-zhu Jiegou Xuebao/JoumalofBuilding
StructUres,v27,nSUPPL.,October,2006,P717一721.
[26]Green,Mark .F .Effect of freeze一thaw cycles on the bond durability between fibre reinforced Polynler Plate reinforcement and conerete,Canadian Journal of CivilEngineering,v27,n5,Oct,2000,P949一959
[27]Maria Hohmann-Porebska Microfabric effects in frozen clays in relation to
geotechnical parameters Applied Clay Science 21(2002)77–87
[28]simonesn E,Isacsson U.soil behavior during freezing and thawing using variable
and confining pressure triaxial tests[J].Canadian geotechnical joumal,2001,38
(4):863-875.
[29]Simonsen,E.,Ja noo,VC.,1999.Resilient properties of unbound road m aterials
during seasonal frost conditions.ASCEJ.Cold Regions Eng.,submitted.
[30]Berg,L.,Bigl,S.R.,Stark,JA.,Durel,GD.,1996.Resilient modulus testing of
materials from Mn/ROAD,Phase 1.USA Cold Regions Research and
Engineering Laboratory,CRREL Report.96-19.
[31]Yong R N Boonsinsuk P. Yin CW P. Altermation of soil behaviour after cyclic freezing and thawing[A]. In Proceedingsof4th in-ternational Symposium on Ground Freezing[C]. Rotterdam the NetherlandsA.A. Balkema 1985. 187-195.
[32]ChuilinYcM. YazyninOM. Frozen soilmacro and mierostructure formation [A]. In 5th International Conference on Pemafrost[C].Trondheim TapirPublishers 1988. 320-323.
[33]AoyamaKOgawa S. FukudaM. Temperature dependencies of mechanical properties ofsoils subjected to freezing and thawing [A].In Proceedings of the 4th international Symposium on Ground Freezing [C]. Rottedam Netherlands A A. Balkema Publishers
1985. 217-222.
[34]邴文山译.道路冻害与防治[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社,1991.
[35]吴紫汪,马巍.冻土强度与蠕变[M].甘肃:兰州大学出版社,1993.
[36]吴紫汪,张家鼓,朱元林.冻土强度与破坏特征[C].第二届全国冻土学术会议论文选集.北京:人民出版社,1983.
[37]吴紫汪.基础与冻土间冻结强度实验研究[J].中国科学院兰州冰川冻土研究所集刊,1981(2).
[38]罗小刚,陈湘生.冻融对土工参数影响的试验研究[J].建井技术,2000(02),
24-27.
[39]杨平,张婷.人工冻融土物理力学性能研究[J].南京林业大学学报,2002,05,0665一03.
[40]马巍,徐学祖等.冻融循环对石灰粉土剪切强度特性的影响[J].岩土工程学报,1999,21(2):158一160.
[41]程红强,张雷顺等.冻融对混凝土强度的影响[J].河南科学,2003,02,0214-03
[42]魏海斌,刘寒冰,高一平等.冻融循环对粉煤灰土动强度的影响[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2007,37(2).
[43]武红娟,徐伟,王选仓.土基模量随季节变化规律及其数值的确定[J].工程地质学报,2008,16(01).
[44]付丽红,曹海利.黄土路基强度控制指标试验研究[J].路基工程,2008(02).
[45]凌建明,陈声凯,曹长伟.路基土回弹模量影响因素分析[J].建筑材料学报,2007,(4):446一45.
[46]霍明,丁小军,台电仓等.高速公路既有路基湿状态及稳定性评价研究[R].中国,2009.
[47]覃绮平.土基回弹模量影响因素及其相关关系研究[D].长安大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[48]吉林省交通厅.公路工程抗冻设计与施工技术指南[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2006.
[49]林世文,包俊超,兰荣旺.冻融试验研究[J].岩土工程技术.2001,3:161一164
[50]Konrad J.M.Physieal proeess during freeze一thaw Cycles in clayey silts[J].ColdRegions Science and Technology,1989,16(3):291一303
[51]Yong R N,Roonsinsuk P .Alteration of soil behaviour after cyclic freezing and
thawing[C].In:Proe.of Fourth International Symposium on Ground
Freezing.Sapparo:[s.n],1985
[52]齐吉琳,张建明,朱元林.冻融作用对土结构性的影响的土力学意义[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(增2):2690一2694
[53]齐吉琳,马巍.冻融作用对超固结上强度的影响[J].岩土工程学报.2006,28(12):
2082一2086.
[54]侯恩创.冻融循环对路基土物理力学性质影响的研究[D].东北林业大学硕士学位论文,2009.
[55] 中华人民共和国行业标准,公路土工试验规程(JTG E40—2007),人民交通出版社,2007
[56] 中华人民共和国行业标准,公路路基路面现场测试规程(JTG E60—2008),
人民交通出版社,2008
[57] 交通部.公路土工试验规程(JTJ E40—2007)[S]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2007.
[58] 交通部.公路路基施工技术规范(TG F10-2006)[S]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2006.
[59] 邓学钧.路基路面工程[M].人民交通出版社,2005.
[60] 交通部.公路桥涵地基与基础设计规范(JTG D63-2007) [S]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2007.
[61] 交通部第二公路勘察设计院.公路设计手册•路基[M].北京:人民交通出版社,1995.
[1] 胡二帮,彭理通,陆雍森等 . 环境风险评价实用技术和方法 [M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社,2006
[2] 黄崇福 . 自然灾害风险评价 - 理论与实践 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社,2005
[3] 陆雍森 . 环境评价 [M]. 同济大学出版社,1999
[4] Frank A. Swartjes. Risk-based Assessment of Soil and Groundwater Quality in the Netherlands: Standards and Remediation Urgency. Risk Analysis,19 (6): 1235 - 1247,1999
[5] Imran Maqsood, Jianbing Li, Guohe Huang, yuefei Huang. Simulation-based risk assessment of contaminated sites under remediation scenarios,planning periods,and land-use patterns-a Canadian case study. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess (2005)19: 146 - 157
[6] NRC. Science and Judgment in Risk assessment [M]. National academy press,Washington,DC. ,1994.
[7] NAS (1983): Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. NationalAcademy Press, Washington. DC
[8] USEPA (1986): Guidelines for carcinogen risK assessment. Fed. Regist,51: 3992 - 4003
[9] USEPA (1986): Guidelines for mutagenicity risk assessment. Fed. Regist. 51: 3400 - 4021
[10] 192. USEPA (1986): Guidelines for the Health risk assessment of chemical mixturse. Fed. Regist51: 3401 -4025
[11] USEPA (1986): Guidelines for developmental toxicity risk assessment. Fed. Regist. 51: 3402 - 4040
[12] V. N. Zhukinskii,Environmental Risk and Environmental Damage to Surface Water Quality: Topicality,Terminology, Quantitative Estimates, Water Resources, Publisher: MAIK Nauka / Interperiodica co-published with Springer Science Business Media,Inc. ISSN: 0097 - 8078 (Paper)1608 - 344X (Online),DOI: 10. 1023 / A: 1022970122076,Issue: Volume 30,Number 2,Date: March 2003,Pages: 191 - 198
[13] Belluck D A, Hull R N, Benjamin S L, Alcorn J, Linkov I, Environmental security, critical infrastructure and risk assessment: Definitions and current trends,nato Security through Science Series,Publisher: Springer Netherlands, Volume 5 /2006, Title: Environmental Security and Environmental Management: The Role of Risk Assessment,Editors: BenoitMorel,Igor Linkov,ISBN: 1 - 4020 - 3891- 7,DOI: 10. 1007 /1 - 4020 - 3893 - 3,Chapter: pp. 1 - 16
[14] DAVID LEWIS FELDMAN,RUTH ANNE HANAHAN,RALPH PERHA. RESEARCH: Environmental Priority-Setting Through Comparative Risk Assessment,Environmental Management,Publisher: Springer New York, ISSN: 0364 - 152X (Paper )1432 - 1009 (Online ), DOI: 10. 1007 / s002679900203,Issue: Volume 23,Number 4,Date: May 1999,Pages: 483 - 493
[15] 毛小苓,刘阳生 . 国内外环境风险评价研究进展 . 应用基础与工程科学学报,200 (3)266 -272,2003
[16]Anon (1994a)Commission regulation (EC)No. 1488 /94 of 28 June 1994 laying down the principles for the assessment of risks to man and the environment of existing substances in accor-dance with Council regulation (EEC)No. 793 /93 (Text with EEA relevance). Official journal No L (161),29 June 1994:0003 - 0011
[17] 刘小琴,朱坦 . 城市化进程中环境风险评价的一些问题探讨 . 中国安全科学学报,14 (3)92 - 95,2004
[18] Ho K, Leroi E, Roberds B (2000 )Quantitative risk assessment-application, myths and future204. directions. Keynote Paper. In: Proc Geo-Eng Conf,Nov,Melbourne,Australia,Publ 1,pp. 269 - 312
[19] 205. Anon (1994b )Resolution of the Slovak Agricultural Ministry No. 531 /1994 - 540 on upper permissible values of hazardous substances in soils. Official publication. Vol. XXVI,part 1
[20]Anon (1998a)Methodological directive of 22 October 1998 No. 623 /98 - 2 of the Slovak Environmental Ministry concerning guidelines for risk assessment and management. In: Stand-points, reports and information of MZP SR,pp. 51 - 71
[21] 中国地质调查局 . 《城市环境地质调查评价规范》(DD2008 - 03),2008
[22] 刘长礼,张云,叶浩,董华,侯宏冰,张明,姜建梅,裴丽欣 . 包气带土层的防污性能试验研究及其对地下水脆弱性评价的影响,地球学报,2006 年 8 月,第 27 卷第 4 期,总 96 期,27 (4):289 - 296
[23] 王秀艳,刘长礼等 . 废物处置场地下水污染地质控制方法新探索,农业环境科学学报,2004 第6 期
[24] 刘长礼,王秀艳等 . 低渗透介质孔隙水渗透规律,工程地质学报,2004 年 12 卷,增刊
[25] 刘长礼,王秀艳,张云等 . 城市垃圾卫生填埋场粘性土衬垫的截污容量及其研究意义,地质论评,2000 年 1 月第 1 期
[26] Gogu RC,Dassargues A (2000 )Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods. Environ Geol 39: 549 - 559
[27] 142. Gogu RC, Hallet V, Dassargues A (2003 )Comparison of aquifer vulnerability assessment techniques. Application to the Neblon river basin (Belgium). Environ Geol 44: 881 - 892
[28] Greek Ministry of Environment,Physical Planning and Public Works (1986)Law 1650 for the Protection of the Environment. Official Gazette 160 / A /1986
[29]National Research Council (1993)Ground water vulnerability assessment: predicting relative contamination potential under conditions of uncertainty. Common Techniques for Assessing Ground Water Vulnerability,Water Science Technology Board, Committee for Geosciences and Environmental Resources, National Academy of Sciences,pp. 204
[30] 刘长礼,张云等 . 北京市垃圾处置的地质 - 生态环境评价 [R],地质调查项目成果报告,2001 年12 月
[31] George Tchobanoglous, T. , Theisen, H. , and Vigil, S. , (1993 )” Integrated Soild Waste Management,Engineering Principles and Management Issues,”McGraw-Hill,Inc
[32] Clayey barriers: compaction/hydraulic conductivity and clay mineralogy. Clay-leachate compatibility by Measurement of hydraulic conductivity
[33] Abdel M. O. Mohamed. etc. ,Contaminant migration in engineered clay barriers duet,to heat and moisture Redistribution under freezing conditions,ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERING (1 - 7)
[34] Walsh,J. J. and Kinman,R. N. , (1979)“leachate and Gas Production under Controlled Moisture Conditions,” Land Disposal: Municipal Soild Waste, D. W. Shultz ed. ,5thAnnu. Res Symp. , U. S.Environmetnal Protection Agency,Cincinnati,Ohio,EPA - 600 /9 - 79 /023,pp. 41 - 57
[35] Atmaca E (2004)Examination and replanning of solid waste management of Sivas City Center. PhD Thesis,Cumhuriyet University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences,Sivas,pp. 137
[36] U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,“Environmental Radiction Protection Standards for Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel,High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes; Final Rule,”40 CFR Part 191,Fed. Reg. 58,66398 - 66416 (1993)
[37] U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, “40 CFR Part 194: Criteria for the Certilication and Re-Certilication of the Write Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance with the 40 CFR Part Disposal Regulations; Final Rule,”Fed. Reg. 61,5224 - 5245 (1996)
[38] U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. “Criteria for the Certilication and Re-Certilication of the ante Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance With the Disposal Regulations: Certilicalion Decision: Final Rule'Fed. Reg. 63,27353 - 27406 (1998)
[39]Sandia National Laboratories,Preliminary Comparison with 40 CFR 191,Subpart Br the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, December 1991, SAND 91 - 0893 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico,1991)
[40] Michael Angelo B. Promentilla· Genandrialine L. Peralta,An evaluation of landfill disposal of asbestos-containing waste and geothermal residues within a risk-assessment framework,Integrated Management for Hazardous Waste [J],Mater Cycles Waste Manage (2003)5: 13 - 21
[41] MAIKE SCHAEFER,THE LANDFILL OF TBT CONTAMINATED HARBOUR SLUDGE ON RINSING FIELDS-A HAZARD FOR THE SOIL FAUNA-RISK ASSESSMENT WITH EARTHWORMS: 266 - 279
[42] E. Bocanegra · H. M assone · D. Martinez · C. Civit · M. Farenga,Groundwater contamination: risk management and assessment for landfills in Mar del Plata,Argentina,Environmental Geology 40 (6 )March 2001·⑥Springer-erlag: 732 - 741
[43] William B. Mills,Christine S. Lew,land Cheng Y. Hung,Sensitivity Presto Technique of Concentration and Risk Predictions in the and MMSOILS Multimedia Models: Regression Assessment,Risk Anaysis,Vol. 19,No. 3,1999: 511 - 526
[44 ] E. Bocanegra, H. Massone, D. Martinez, E. civit, M. Farenga. Groundwater contamination: risk management and assessment for landfills in Mar del Plata, Argentina. Environmental Geology, 40(6),2001
[45]Michael Angelo B. Promentilla · Genandrialine L. Peralta,An evaluation of landfill disposal of asbestos-containing waste and geothermal residues within a risk-assessment framework,J Mater Cycles Waste Manag(2003)5: 13 - 21, Springer-Verlag 2003
[46] 刘长礼,张云,殷密英等 . 城市垃圾地质环境影响评价方法 [M]. 北京: 地质出版社,2006
[47] 朱发庆等 . 东湖水污染经济损失研究,环境科学学报 1993 年第二期
[48] 刘希林,莫多闻,王小丹 . 区域泥石流易损性评价 . 中国地质灾害与防治学报,第 12 卷第 2 期,2001 年 6 月
[49] 赵源,刘希林 . 泥石流灾害损失评价 . 中国地质灾害与防治学报,第 16 卷第 3 期 2005 年 9 月
[50] 刘长礼 . 城市地质环境风险经济学评价 . 北京: 地质出版社,2010
Li, X.Z., Luo, G.Y., Jiang, H., Urban geoenvironmental variation issues caused by geotechnical engineering disturbances. Proc. of Int. Symp. High Altitude and Sensitive Ecological Environmental Geotechnology. Nanjing University Press, 2001, 23-29.Luo, G.Y., Yan, C.H., Li, X.Z., Jiang, J.P., Exploration of water resources and multiple model for water resource development in Karst areas with the theory of Preferred Plane in Karst areas.ACTA GEOLOGICA SINICA, 2003, 77(1): 129-135.Li, X.Z., Luo, G.Y., Liu, Y.D., Zhang, D., Yan, S.B., Geological and geotechnical investigation in a metro project. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology (Elsevier), 2004, 19(3/4).Li, X.Z., Hua, A.Z., Prediction and prevention of sandstone-gas outburst. International J. of Rock Mechanics and Minning Science(Elsevier), 2006, 43(1):2-18.Li, X.Z., Zhao, X.B. The impact of rock tunneling on groundwater in Epi-Fracture-Karst- Zone and the ecological conditions. Proc. of 4th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, Singapore, 2006.Li, X.-Z., Zhao, X.-B., Wang Z.S. The Changes of Ecological Conditions Induced by Rock Tunnelling in Laoshan Mountainous Area. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China (Springer), 2008,2(4):366-370.Zhang,Y.S., Li, X.-Z., Strength-reduction Finite Element Analysis forStabilityof Surrounding Rock Mass with Primary Shotcrete and Rock Bolts. Science Technology and Engineering, 2008, 8:6513-6519.Hu, Z.-H., Li, X.-Z., Zhao, Xiao Lin, Wu Wei. Numerical analysis of factors affecting the range of heat transfer in earth surrounding three subways. J. China Univ. Mining & Technol. (Elsevier), 2008, 18(1):67-71.Li, X.Z. et al. Determination method of rock mass hydraulic conductivity tensor based on back-analysis of fracture transmissivity and fracture network model. Proc. of 9 Int. conference on Analysis of Discontinuous Deformation, Singapore: Research Publishing, 2009, 513-520.Zhang,Y.S., Li, X.Z., Finite Element Analysis of the Stability of Tunnel Surrounding Rock with Weak Rock Layer. Modern Applied Science, 2009, 3(12): 22-27.L.Cao, W.B. liu, X.Z. Li, X.B.Zhao and H. Zhang. Micro Mechanics study of granular soil based on the confined compression tests. Geomechanics and Geotechnics: From Micro to Macro. Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2010, 421-425.Xiaozhao Li, Liang Cao, Lin Xiao, Gaofeng Zhao, The Experimental Study of the Soil Thermal Conductivity Based on the Analysis of Actual Internal Fabric. Advanced Materials Research, 2011,261-263:1826-1830.L. CAO, H.Q. LI, X.Z. LI, R. YANG, W. WU, Y.Y. ZHOU. Analysis on Geological and Economy Influence Factors of Beijing Underground Space Exploration and Development. Journal of Grado, 2011(2):98-101 (The article is invited by the editor of the Russian journal)Li H.Q., Parriaux A. Li X.Z. The Way to Plan a Viable Deep City: from Economic and Institutional Aspects. Proceedings of the Joint HKIE-HKIP Conference on Planning and Development of Underground Space. Hong Kong, 2011, 53-60.Kai Wang, Xiancai Lu, Meng Chen, Yemu Ma, Kuiyuan Liu, Lianqi Liu,Xiaozhao Li and Wenxuan Hu. Numericalmodelling of the hydrocarbon generation of Tertiary source rocks intruded by doleritic sills in the Zhanhua depression,Bohai Bay Basin,China. Basin Research, 2011, 23:1–14.Wenbai Liu, Liang Cao, Xiaozhao Li, Yexun Li, Peng Wang. Experimental Study of Silty Clay's Deformation Fields Based on the Principles of Oedometer Tests. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 261-263: 1539-1543.Xiaozhao Li, Liang Cao, Xiaobao Zhao. Assessment of potential impact of tunnelling on the groundwater in Epi-Fissure-Karst-Zone and ecological environment. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2012, 66(3):967-976.Liang CAO, Xiaozhao LI, L.Tacher, Rong Yang. Three-Dimensional Geological Modeling Based on Division of Engineering Geological Strata Units [J]. Advanced Science Letters, 2012, 5(2):510-514.Xiaozhao Li, LiangCao, Zhiyong Xiong, Rong Yang, Juan Ma. Experimental and Quantitative Study on Micro-structure of Soft Soil in Suzhou. In: L.Laloui and A.Ferrari (Eds.): Multiphysical Testing of Soils and Shales, Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 2012, 207-212.Xiaozhao LI, Wenbo WU, Liang CAO, Huanqing LI, Zhongxing ZHANG. Evaluation of Geo-environmental Suitability for the Development of Underground Space in Suzhou. Proceedings of the ACUSS 2012 conference. Published by Research Publishing. Singapore, 2012, 332-340.Yangsong Zhang, Xiaozhao LI, Jin Fan. Estimation of peak strength of jointed rock massed using GSI system. Proceedings of the ACUSS 2012 conference. Published by Research Publishing. Singapore, 2012, 325-331.Huan-Qing Li, Aurèle Parriaux, Philippe Thalmann, Xiao-Zhao Li. An integrated planning concept for the emerging underground urbanism: Deep City Method Part 1 concept, process and application. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013,38(6):559–568.Li HuanQing, Li XiaoZhao, Parriaux Aurèle, Thalmann Philippe. An integrated planning concept for the emerging underground urbanism: Deep City Method Part 2 case study for resource supply and project valuation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013,38(6):569–580.李晓昭,罗国煜,陈忠胜. 地下工程突水的断裂变形活化导水机制.岩土工程学报, 2002, 24(6):695-700.李晓昭,华安增. 含油气砂岩突出的宏微观预测.岩土工程学报,1998,20(5):22-26.李晓昭,张国永,罗国煜. 地下工程中由控稳到控水的断裂屏障机制.岩土力学, 2003, 24(2): 220-224.李晓昭,罗国煜,龚洪祥,严三保,张迪. 土体工程地质层组的划分. 岩土力学, 2003, 25(5):759-763.李晓昭,周扬一,汪志涛,章杨松,郭亮,王益壮. 测量统计范围大小对结构面迹长估计的影响.岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(10):2049-2056.李晓昭,安英杰等. 岩芯卸荷扰动的声学反应与卸荷敏感岩体.岩石力学与工程学报, 2003,22,(12): 2086-2092.李晓昭,肖琳,程建军,刘琦. 润扬大桥花岗岩风化特征及其影响因素研究. 岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23,(10):1681-1688.李晓昭,乔恒君,熊志勇,赵晓豹,车平,马娟. 地铁隧道围岩传热规律的监测分析.地下空间与工程学报,2012,8(1):105-110.李晓昭,罗国煜,庄乾城,张伯文,刘广才,张申雄. 地铁工程勘察监理的探索. 铁道工程学报, 2004,(1):11-16.李晓昭,汪青葆,罗国煜.玄武湖水底交通隧道环境地质条件的分析与工程方案的评价. 工程地质学报,1999,7(2):118-124.李晓昭,张迪,华安增. 钻孔和巷硐周围流体压力变化对围岩变形及应力状态的影响.高校地质学报,2002,8(1):92-98.李晓昭,罗国煜,苏天明. 地下工程突水的富水优势断裂.中国地质灾害与防治学报,2003,14(1):36-41.李晓昭,罗国煜,张迪,余缙. 地下工程突水的变形失稳机制与控稳优势层.湘潭矿业学院学报, 2002,17(4):50-55.李晓昭,罗国煜,苏天明,余缙. 岩石地下工程突水的优势含水层水利水电科技进展,2001,21(sup.1):84-86.李晓昭,陈鹏. 地质工程专业基础工程课程内容改革的思考.高教研究与探索,2003, (1):39-42.李晓昭,罗国煜,闫长虹,刘雅东,姚志祥,刘军西. 济南城市环境岩土工程问题及其成因机制分析.地质与勘探,2003,39(5):28-33.李晓昭,蒋晃,由胜武,陈明雄. 城市地下工程应用人工地层冻结法的探讨.见:地下铁道文集.深圳:海天出版社,1999,373-379.李晓昭,赵文政,俞宏.老山隧道工程区构造裂隙控水规律与工程分类.见:大跨径隧道建设技术学术研讨会论文集.北京:人民交通出版社,2006.肖琳,李晓昭,胡增辉等. 土体内在结构对热导率计算模型的影响研究. 地质论评, 2009, 55(4):598-605.郭亮, 李晓昭, 王益壮, 等. 岩体结构均质区划分法的适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(010): 2928-2937.曹亮,李晓昭,赵晓豹,刘文白,李家奇,侯晓亮. 苏州软弱敏感层的土体微观结构定量分析[J].工程地质学报,2012,20(3):419-426.