简爱性格分析论文文献综述

[1]刘丽. 追求平等、幸福、自由的女性典范——谈《简·爱》中的典型人物简爱[J]. 辽宁高职学报,1999,(1). [2]龚明德. 李霁野译《简爱》与鲁迅有关吗?[J]. 鲁迅研究月刊,1999,(3). [3]李国源. 《简爱》“妇女解放”主题浅探[J]. 安徽广播电视大学学报,1999,(1). [4]杜焱. 试论《简爱》中伯莎形象[J]. 丹东师专学报,1999,(3). [5]陈姝波. 论《简爱》中的性别意识形态[J]. 外国文学研究,2002,(4). [6]潘红. 夹缝里的风景——谈黄源深先生《简爱》译本的审美特点[J]. 福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,(2). [7]芦雪瑾. 试论《简爱》与《藻海无边》中的两位梅森[J]. 杭州教育学院学报,2002,(2). [8]陈小兆,萧好章. 从“失乐园”到“复乐园”——《简爱》故事情节的“圣经”原型意象[J]. 井冈山师范学院学报,2002,(4). [9]宋燕. 简爱:自强与自爱[J]. 当代电视,1999,(8). [10]毛梅兰,胡宜兰. 论典型形象——简爱(英文)[J]. 抚州师专学报,2001,(1). [11]毛竹生. 简爱的出走与自我实现[J]. 济南教育学院学报,2001,(6). [12]马海英. 金丝鸟、菟丝和简爱——试论南朝艳情诗与“五四”爱情诗[J]. 绵阳师范高等专科学校学报,2001,(1). [13]毛竹生. 简爱的成长之路及其心理机制[J]. 邯郸师专学报,2001,(2). [14]赵敏. 心灵的传承——试论《简爱》对《蝴蝶梦》的影响[J]. 文山师范高等专科学校学报,2001,(2). [15]赵莉. 从杜十娘和简爱的形象塑造比较东西方妇女的女性意识[J]. 新余高专学报,2001,(3). [16]张艳. 走不出困惑——论夏绿蒂在《简爱》中对妇女出路问题的探索[J]. 阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版),2001,(3). [17]王一平. 《简爱》对《圣经》的恪守与反叛[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,(5). [18]本报记者 戴永明. 简爱之困[N]. 贵州民族报,2010-04-09(A04). [19]简i7到简爱7 以爱之名 海尔简爱7全面升级[J]. 办公自动化,2009,(23). [20]孙伟民. 自卑情结造就了简爱鲜明的人格魅力——解析《简爱》[J]. 传奇.传记文学选刊(理论研究),2009,(1). [21]陈淑婷. 献给简爱的一朵玫瑰——简爱和苔丝的人物对比[J]. 文学界(理论版),2010,(7). [22]黄兴军. 《简爱》中的永恒魅力——解析小说《简爱》中女性反抗性格的形成[J]. 牡丹江大学学报,2009,(4). [23]王筠. 再读《简爱》：经典语言与简爱的女性形象塑造[J]. 时代文学(理论学术版),2007,(6). [24]李颖娟. 从英雄、非英雄到反英雄[D]. 兰州大学: 兰州大学,2010. [25]王康英. 论《简·爱》中女主人公简爱对真爱的追求[J]. 科技信息(科学教研),2008,(23). [26]刘丽. 一个时代的女性呐喊与追求——谈《简·爱》中的典型人物简爱[J]. 时代文学(下半月),2009,(5). [27]梁晨. 宿命的选择——对《简爱》中爱与女性独立意识的重读[J]. 安徽文学(下半月),2011,(5). [28]侯静. 浅析简爱与爱德娜的婚姻、爱情、自由观[J]. 安徽文学(下半月),2008,(11). [29]田恩波. 知识决定命运——论简爱作为罗彻斯特爱人的命运(英文)[J]. 中国科技信息,2005,(14). [30]薛瑞东. 挣扎于传统与现代之间的女性——简论简爱[J]. 江苏教育学院学报(社会科学版),2005,(5). [31]时玉珍. 简爱 人见人爱[J]. 电影评介,1996,(2). [32]赵华. 有关李霁野与祝庆英《简爱》节选译文的评述[J]. 湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版),2010,(5). [33]易文琴. 《傲慢与偏见》和《简爱》中婚姻观之比较[J]. 北方文学(下半月),2010,(3). [34]胡彦霞. 女性的力量:简爱和郝思嘉[J]. 社会科学战线,2011,(6). [35]赵竹轩. 《简爱》的叙述语言与主人公的个性发展[J]. 安徽文学(下半月),2011,(8). [36]张慧莹. 一场不同寻常的大火——原型批评视角下《简爱》中的火灾[J]. 宜宾学院学报,2011,(7). [37]张默. 商务新标杆——海尔简爱7D笔记本[J]. 消费电子,2010,(12). [38]海尔简爱7G、7D双获“红棉奖”[J]. 消费电子,2010,(12). [39]林丹. 夏洛蒂·勃朗特《简爱》与托马斯·哈代《德伯家的苔丝》之比较[J]. 黑龙江教育学院学报,2010,(12). [40]劲薄新商务——海尔简爱7D笔记本电脑[J]. 微电脑世界,2011,(1). [41]王秀娟. 《简爱》中译本语言风格比较[J]. 科学大众(科学教育),2011,(2). [42]麻秦华. 简爱性格浅析[J]. 科教导刊(中旬刊),2010,(12). [43]薛梦茹. 《简爱》与女性尊严[J]. 才智,2011,(3). [44]海尔简爱7D树立商务轻薄本新标杆[J]. 消费电子,2010,(6). [45]海尔简爱三剑客寒促回馈消费者[J]. 消费电子,2011,(2). [46]尹诗文. 从自卑到自信——解析简爱性格的两个极端[J]. 赤峰学院学报(汉文哲学社会科学版),2011,(3). [47]董睿. 生活在平凡之间——浅析简爱的独立性格及依附心理[J]. 大舞台,2011,(4). [48]吴蒙,贠哲. 我看简爱性格中的自卑心理[J]. 才智,2011,(8). [49]顾国林. 薄而不贵——海尔简爱7哥笔记本电脑测试[J]. 微电脑世界,2011,(5). [50]王若水. 叛逆者简爱[J]. 科技信息,2011,(12).

Edward Rochester called Jane his "faerie," his "elf," and accused her of "waiting for her people.... The men in green" the night she first encountered him. Indeed, in his adaptation of Jane Eyre he was not mistaken, for the entire production has a quality of magic about it.If any actor or actress could be said to be born to play a certain character, that adage must apply to Timothy Dalton and Zelah Clarke. The chemistry between them as the two stars of this lavish BBC production is nothing short of magical: their relationship is alive with passion and the fiery conflict of two tormented souls imprisoned by Fate and the morals of their time.The story is a classic one: Jane Eyre, an unloved orphan is sent to school, where she is educated in a strict, cruel manner, there growing to adulthood learning little of life in the world. When her only friend marries, Jane advertises, and is accepted as governess to the ward of rich, enigmatic Edward Fairfax Rochester. From their first meeting in Hay Lane, where Jane "bewitches" his horse, there is between them an unspoken bond of kinship that slowly blossoms into true love and devotion.After what appeared to be a brief engagement to the Honourable Miss Blanche Ingram, whom all the county expects him to marry, Rochester mysteriously calls off his marriage plans, and proposes to Jane, the only woman who is his equal - who could be his best earthly companion. At the altar, however, it is tragically revealed that Rochester already has a wife, still living: he is forced by this revelation to lead Jane, and those who would judge him harshly, back to Thornfield Hall, where he unhesitatingly and bitterly shows them the lunatic his father, without Edward's prior knowledge, arranged for him to marry.Realizing her position is now untenable, Jane flees, nearly dying of hunger and lack of shelter, before she is befriended by a clergyman and his two sisters. It is subsequently found that Jane is related to this family, as their mother was Jane's father's sister. When their uncle dies, leaving Jane his entire fortune, she divides it equally among the four of them, and prepares to lead a close and affectionate life within the small family unit.It is St. John Rivers, the clergyman, who unsettles Jane, by offering her marriage, and requesting her to accompany him to India, where he has decided to make a new life for himself as a missionary. Believing Mr. Rochester lost to her forever, Jane finally and reluctantly accepts his proposal, only to psychically hear Rochester's voice calling to her.Abandoning St. John, Jane rushes back to Thornfield Hall, where she discovers, to her great horror, it had burned nearly to the ground. The innkeeper, a former butler at the house, informs her that Rochester was nearly killed in the fire while unsuccessfully attempting to save the life of his lunatic wife, who, it was later learned, had set the blaze. While he did not die, Rochester lost his left hand and eye, the right eye being so badly inflamed as to render him almost totally blind.Jane hurries to Rochester, at a remote piece of property, where she discovers him broken down and dispirited, believing Jane to be forever lost to him, and suffering from the physical punishments God has inflicted upon him for trying to fly in the face of morality. They are reunited, and after he proposes again - now a man free to do so - they are married.This 239-minute production is incredibly faithful to the novel, differing in but few, minor points: it is practically stated in the movie that Rochester is the father of Adele, whom he refers to as his ward, while in the text, the question of fatherhood is left open; Adele's mother, a French opera dancer, is alluded to be his only mistress, while Bronte lists three; the passage in the Bible St. John reads before Jane tentatively accepts his proposal of marriage is different (and quite improved); then, most significantly, is Jane's end narration. Here she states, "Edward regained the sight of one eye just before our first child was born." In Charlotte Bronte's novel, the line is, "just before our first son was born." This sensitive change from "son" to "child" completes the love story, becoming the finishing touch which makes this production truly immortal, and all-inclusive.The supporting cast is excellent: the locations capture the feel of the early 1800's, drawing the viewer into the bleak, grim world of Lowood Institution, then into the splendor of Thornfield Hall. But the uniqueness of this Jane Eyre, that which sets it apart from any adaptation that went before or came after, are the performances of Dalton and Clarke. Despite the fact that she is not "plain," and he is handsome, the two actors lend their bodies and voices to the characters, making them real beyond a shadow of a doubt. Every moment they are on screen together is arresting, from their initial contact, to the end credits.Several scenes that stand out come to mind: Jane has just saved Rochester from being badly burned, most likely fatally, and tells him she must return to her room. He holds onto her hands; every time she attempts to pull away, he makes as though to let her, then reneges, finally compelling her to use the ploy of saying she hears the housekeeper stirring. One can readily imagine the resolve of Zelah Clarke's Jane melting, and Rochester never letting her go.There is a beautiful, poignant moment when Rochester first proposes to Jane by baring his soul to her, allowing her to look, not into his eyes, but into his soul, where he reveals not the worldly exterior and the miseries with which life has saddled him, but the true, pure being beneath. When she accepts him, they embrace: their magic and love are palpable. Here, indeed, are two kindred souls uniting. It is a moment of beauty rarely captured by any two actors, and causes the events that follow almost too tragic to bear.There is the delightful scene after Jane must ask for a leave of absence, and Dalton "gets the giggles" twice, the second time after accusing Jane of being "niggardly." It is a professional and magical moment, watching Clarke struggle to maintain a straight face as they continue, with Dalton grinning mischievously for most of the remainder of the scene. Again, when Rochester must confront Jane after his previous marriage has been exposed, the deep, abiding sadness of his youth, the moral depths to which he has fallen are heart-rending. Jane's refusal to go away with him (specifically chronicled in the book to emphasize the correctness of this decision) just barely holds up here, for you cannot believe Dalton's Rochester would eventually fall out of love with Jane for becoming his mistress, rather than his wife.Throughout the entire production, the viewer identifies with both the main characters, feeling their hopes, aspirations, confusion, jealousy, and eventually, their love. Had the movie not provided us with a happy ending (despite the Gothic penalty Rochester is forced to pay for attempting to break the rules of morality), viewers would be compelled to demand Dalton and Clarke reprise their roles for a re-shoot. Never were two characters meant more for each other; never have two actors captured these sentiments so beautifully and so sincerely.Thus, Jane Eyre is a classic story, enduring both as a novel, and as a film adaptation (or, in this case, video), presenting a rare instance of allowing the reader to lay down the novel and move from the printed word to vivid, arresting performances, or, in reverse, to go from this exquisite production to the book with no disappointments in either interpretation or content. If anything, the novel becomes more "visible," moving and unique, for now the reader will irrevocably see and hear Zelah Clarke and Timothy Dalton in their masterful and passionate living and breathing characters of Jane Eyre and Edward Rochester.读过＜简爱＞的人都知道，简其实是一个自卑感非常强的女子。她既无财又无色，从小还在一个缺乏爱的环境中孤独地长大。立身于那样势力的社会环境中，渺小如草芥。唯一属于简的是知识和独立的个性。但知识只不过为她换来糊口的面包，能让她最后摆脱心理困境的仍是她得到的那份遗产。当她终于用自已的倔强．骄傲和残忍把爱情逼入绝境，当罗彻斯特先生终于变得面目伤残，一贫如洗，她才能够用一种正常的心态来爱他。男人最大的财富是金钱，女人最大的财富是容貌，因此，自古以来，款哥泡小蜜，靓妞傍大款乃天经地义、顺理成章、门当户对、顺天而行，但是如果哪个武大郎偏要不自量力非要吃天鹅肉，那轻则家庭不和，重则真向武大郎一样被老婆和第三者合谋送上极乐世界，也是活该；同理，哪个丑女以为自己真的是灰姑娘，而要非王子不嫁，那么等待她的也多半是老姑娘的命运。因此，水晶鞋的故事只是个童话，谁都不会当真，但是，另一个灰姑娘的故事却不但被人当了真，甚至还成了妇女解放的典型，这个灰姑娘就是简爱。一个最没有财富的女人要找一个最有财富的男人，其困难可想而知，于是，为了达到自己伟大的爱情目标，简爱很聪明地在自己的上帝――夏洛特小姐的帮助下，对自己和自己的目标进行了一番改造，其内容基本如下：一， 首先，要征服男人的心。罗老板也许是山珍海味吃多了，简爱干脆以另一种面目出现，也许她并不是故意的：“我要让你离不开我，就象我离不开你”，这话攻守兼备，柔中带刚，这番铿锵有力的爱情宣言不仅打动了罗老板，甚至还打动了以后无数的小资女人，成为女性解放的传统表演项目，二， 其次，搞掉他的财产。你那么NB，不是就有点钱吗？很好，一场天知道怎么回事的大火，烧掉你几乎所有的财产，弄得你比我也强不了多少，至少你再不能凭你的几个臭钱在我面前摆谱，好了，现在比较平衡（注意：不是平等）了；三， 弄光你的钱还不够，你不是嫌俺丑吗？于是罗老板在大火中很不幸地加入了残联，成功地成为二等公民。弄瞎眼睛真的是个最好的结果，反正未来老婆长得不怎么漂亮，少看几眼也没什么损失，而且从此爱情还平添了几分浪漫，至少比断腿少胳膊要好得多。四， 你没几个钱了，可俺却有钱了。“三十年河东，三十年河西”，夏小姐让简爱突然钻出来一有钱的亲戚，留给她一笔不大不小的遗产，现在俺也是属于资产阶级了，简爱小姐在金钱的武装下底气足了不少，于是可以光明正大地衣锦荣归了。五， 你不要俺，有的是好男人要俺。夏小姐聪明地给简爱安排了一个立志献身上帝的表哥――圣约翰。维多利亚时代的英国人经常分不清爱情与宗教的区别，就象几十年前的中国人分不清爱情与政治的区别，连情书里都必以语录开头一样，这个选择在当时人的眼里比你那NB的罗老板好多了，你要不识货，自然有竞争者排着队在后面等着，看你着急不着急！六， 俺可不想回来，这都是上帝叫俺回来的。简爱离开罗老板一段时间后，她听到了来自远方深情的呼唤：“简、简、简！”据说同时罗老板也听到了回应：“俺来也、俺来也、俺来也！”这可是给足了简小姐面子：神灵在上，天作之合，违天不祥，机不可失，时不再来，简爱小姐于是顺理成章地荣归故里，得到爱情。其实我并没有调侃或者讥讽简爱或者夏洛特的意思，我只是觉得，简爱有限的挣扎实际上并不能是所谓的妇女解放，如果真是这样的话，女同胞早就解放了。简爱与罗切斯特最后的结合，实际上是建立在双方地位的改变（一方上升，一方下降）而带来的平衡上。所谓人格的平等，在人类社会永远是一个可望而不可及的梦。原来，在爱情上，平等是那么难

《简.爱》【作者】夏洛特•勃朗蒂【国别】英国【主要人物性格】简•爱：坚强。她可能微不足道，但却是自己命运的主宰。【主要情节】简•爱不幸但又坚强的人生。【写作特色】充满激情与想象。【点评】

罗切斯特是小说《简·爱》的男主人公，为桑菲尔德庄园主，拥有财富和强健的体魄。年轻时他娶了疯女人伯莎·梅森。后来认识了家庭女教师简·爱，爱上了她，并向她求婚，但已婚的事实被揭发。由于疯子妻子的疯狂放火而失去一条胳膊和一只眼睛，另一只眼睛也失明了，最后成为简·爱的丈夫。

十九世纪英国社会中家境殷实，早年，中年屡次，后来找到真爱，心地善良，但喜怒无常，性格阴郁的庄园主形象。

心地善良，表面上看起来有些冷漠，有点顽固，起初在简爱眼中，他性格阴郁而又喜怒无常，有一种男子汉气概。他身体强健，不算很英俊，但面孔十分坚毅，有一头浓密的黑卷发和一双又大又亮的黑眼睛。

贫穷没能使简自卑；寄人篱下没能使简变成一个见风使舵的谄媚女子。她从没放弃自出生就有的人格珍宝，在困境中不放弃自己，汲取丰富的营养，充实、扩张自己的心灵容量。这个独立、坚强、不容忽视的女子。一颗粗糙的沙子孤独地呆在牡蛎中，于黑暗等待着，感受不到阳光的触摸，听不到疾风的呼啸，在那漫长的孤寂中不沉沦，不放弃，终于当它再次见到阳光时，人们惊叹它的美丽，因为从前微不足道丑陋的它已化蛹为蝶，变成一颗绽放出灿烂光芒的珍珠，透明的是心，绽放的是美丽……很多美丽的生命出自于垃圾堆，同样的，很多丑陋不堪的生命来自于宫殿。我惊叹于简于罗切斯特的爱情。世上有如此的爱情，除去社会等级的外衣，无视财富年龄过去的差异。是的，他们，有着很多很多的不配，但真正的心灵相吸可以冲破这一切，世俗的枷锁在他们眼中一文不直。简，是美丽的，散发着人格魅力；罗切斯特，是善良的，在熊熊大火中没有光顾着自己逃生，而是一个一个地将仆人们扶出，甚至于不顾生命危险去救那疯女人……冷酷的外表下是一颗火般温柔善良的心。是简，一个成功的射手于不经意中射中了罗切斯特的骄傲冷酷的心，真挚的爱情唤醒了他眼中的温情，温柔爬上他那讥讽的面孔。简的爱抚平了罗先生心中的创伤，十多年前那次不堪回首的婚姻让他极其渴望真爱，十几年他跑遍了欧洲甚至更多的地方，只不过想找到一个可以读懂他的女子。可是一次又一次的欺，一次又一次的虚情假意如同冰块般冻结了他原本温柔善良的心，他带着满身伤痛回到这个让他痛苦的地方。却不期然的，他苦苦寻觅数十年的“真命天女”却已经在那个痛苦发源地等着他。似乎在冥冥之中，一条无形的线早已绑在他们手上，看的只是时间和地点罢。这是一个爱情神话。罗切斯特不是英俊的王子，简也不是幸运的灰姑娘，他们是平等的一对，有着独立的人格，有着各自的缺陷……但不用怀疑的是，他们是天生的一对，适合的就是最好的。