发布时间：
通常英语专业毕业从事法律工作的，一般都是做法律文件的翻译，如果同时有法律背景的，一般就是做法律文件英文版本的起草。所以，如果你没有法律教育背景，建议还是从“如何做好法律文件的翻译”的某一个题目去写。比如，法律文件翻译和一般文件翻译的不同之处什么的。。希望对你有帮助。
有以上几个选题可选，不知道选哪个好？大家帮我看看，并说下理由 5． 完善个人所得税（企业所得税）的思考因为比较好写.
英语教学法类比较好把握,结构明了,资料也好找,答辩也比起其它的来说更容易自圆其说,我写的就是教学法方向的,我的题目是性别差异在高中生英语学习中的体现,还不错,可以参考
学术堂整理了十五个英语专业毕业论文选题供大家参考:1.试从家庭视角探析《最蓝的眼睛》中女主人公皮克拉的悲剧 英语2.浅析《雾都孤儿》中的善及其对恶的影响 英语3.悲观与迷茫心理------浅析海明威小说《永别了武器》 英语4.探析<<远大前程>>中郝维香的悲惨命运 英语5.浅析《双城记》中的人道主义思想 英语6.简爱与苔丝性格及命运的对比研究 英语7.试论《飘》中女性主义的悲剧色彩 英语8.浅析《献给艾米丽的玫瑰》中艾米丽的悲剧 英语9.《威尼斯商人》中安东尼奥的人物特点分析 英语10.从《哈克贝利o费恩历险记》看马克o吐温的写作特色 英语11.麦琪悲剧的成因--《弗洛斯河上的磨坊》 英语12.《蝇王》的主题分析 英语13.迷失的灵魂--论奥尼尔晚期剧作《长日人夜行》 英语14.青少年的烦恼--对《麦田里的守望者》中霍尔顿的心理分析 英语15.勃朗特姐妹的爱情观解析 英语
一个好的英语专业论文题目既是指定一个研究的方向，也是一个新的学习领域。你会像一叶小舟，尽情游弋在知识的海洋中。下面我给大家带来2022英语专业各方向论文题目参考，希望能帮助到大家!
↓↓↓点击获取更多"论文"相关内容↓↓↓
★ 英语专业毕业论文题目 ★
★ 英语教学法论文题目 ★
★ 毕业论文答辩发言稿 ★
★ 大学毕业论文评语 ★
中学英语论文题目参考
1、中学英语课堂互动教学的策略研究
2、论中学英语课堂有效教学目标的设置
3、浅谈中学英语词汇教学
4、中学英语教学中“跨 文化 意识”的缺失及对策
5、浅谈中学英语课堂中的母语文化教学
6、农村初中英语教师专业能力调查研究--以福建漳州某农村中学为例
7、论中学英语教学中学生的口语表达能力
8、中学英语课堂有效提问的基本原则
9、中学英语教学中运用现代信息技术的原则探析
10、角色换位法在中学英语课堂教学中的实施
11、能力导向的中学英语课堂教学模式及策略探究
12、中学英语教学与交互式电子白板整合应用研究
13、农村初中学困生英语厌学心理初探
14、浅谈中学英语 教育 学科目标
15、浅析中学英语教学中语言学习策略的训练
16、中学英语教学跨文化意识培养分析
17、中学英语教师必备素质研究
18、口语能力提升与中学英语教学
19、优化中学 英语阅读 教学的实践研究
20、从传播学角度看中学英语教育对实用 英语学习 的影响
21、中学 英语口语 教学 方法 探索
22、浅谈如何提高中学英语阅读水平
23、浅议如何提高农村中学“学困生”英语学习兴趣
24、浅谈中学英语语法填空的解题技巧
25、论高效中学英语教学模式的构建
26、中学英语校本课程的开发与探索
27、中学 英语写作 教学的动态评估体系建构
28、中学英语课堂教学中要体现人文关怀
29、基于语料库的中学英语学习者写作句法复杂性变化研究
30、中学英语课堂中发散性思维的培养与应用
31、文化生态视域下英语教师学历与能力应和谐统一--基于海南民族地区中学英语师资结构的调查 报告
32、探究中学英语有效阅读的教法
33、关于中学英语阅读教学维度的思考
34、农村中学英语课堂评价策略
35、中学英语教学中文化因素的作用
36、朝鲜族中学英语教学情境创设探究
37、生态教学环境下农村中学英语教师专业化发展的思考
38、浅谈中学英语中常见的修辞方法
39、河南省中学英语教师职前阶段专业知识的建构
40、提高中学 英语单词 教学有效性的策略探析
41、小说素材在中学英语教学中的有效教学途径探究
42、基于交互模式的中学英语语法教学研究
43、谈中学英语教学中的“生态课堂”
44、浅谈多媒体应用在中学英语教学中的优越性
45、基于概念整合理论的中学英语中介语整合模式研究
46、中学英语教学中教具的恰当选择
47、浅谈中学英语翻译的技巧
48、走出中学英语教学中多媒体运用的误区
49、中学英语兴趣教学的新途径分析
50、试论中学英语课堂教学评价的有效构建
前沿学术英语论文题目参考
1、浅议系统功能语言学理论指导下的英语专业学术论文摘要的翻译
2、“教学学术”视角下开放大学英语教师专业发展的思考
3、课程生态需求分析模式下的“学术英语”课程定位
4、CBI理论视域下学术英语读写教学研究
5、基于微课的通用学术英语写作课翻转课堂教学模式设计与实践
6、基于课堂读写任务的学术英语写作引用特征研究
7、基于语类的英语学术论文写作教学路径研究--以“文献综述”写作教学为例
8、基于需求分析学术英语教学模式
9、学术英语阅读能力的界定与培养
10、学术英语的词块教学法研究
11、英语专业本科 毕业 论文学术失范现象的成因与对策
12、浅析批判性思维下大学学术英语课程模块的构建
13、关于中文学术期刊使用英语的规范性问题
14、医学学术英语口语课程构建的探索
15、学术英语写作中词汇衔接探究
16、学习者学术英语写作中的引用行为研究
17、浅探理工院校学术英语改革实践
18、学术论文写作中的英语负迁移现象研究
19、学术英语写作教学体系的构建与实践
20、学术英语口头报告对批判性思维的影响探究
21、“学术读写素养”范式与学术英语写作课程设计
22、中国高校学术英语存在理论依据探索
23、学术英语教育对大学生就业的影响研究
24、学术道德教育和学术英语能力一体化培养
25、非英语专业研究生学术英语交际能力现状与对策研究--以延安大学为例
26、关于研究生学术英语教学定位研究
27、理工科学术英语视野下的批判性思维能力培植
28、面向学术英语的实验平台建构与探索
29、学术英语有效教学
30、学术英语写作课程环境下的写前计划效应探究
31、元话语视角下英语学术论文中的转述动词与语类结构研究
32、基于自建语料库的学术英语中语块结构的研究
33、以学术英语为新定位的大学英语教学转型问题的对策研究
34、跨文化背景下的中西方英语学术论文写作差异
35、学术英语背景下的大学英语听说教学
36、农学 专业英语 学术词汇概念的区别及释义
37、专门用途英语学术词表创建研究--以航海英语为例
38、基于语料库的学术英语写作教学研究
39、英语专业本科生学术诚信教育的实现路径
40、谈从通用英语向学术英语转型的必要性
41、面向学术英语教改的大学英语教师专业发展方向与路径研究
42、以学术英语为新定位的大学英语教学转型--问题和对策研究
43、学术英语写作的语言风格探究
44、学术英语写作的专属性
45、大学英语转型背景下“学术英语”课程模块的构建
46、从中外合作大学学术英语教学看大学英语教学改革--以西交利物浦大学为例
47、理工科研究生英语学术写作困难研究
48、医学本科生英语学习中学术阅读的质性调查研究
49、学术论文中英语本族语者与非本族语者的元话语比较分析
50、整合研究生英语能力和学术能力的项目式教学模式
金融英语 论文题目
1、金融英语课程教学改革探析
2、金融英语词汇的语义变迁探析
3、浅析微课在金融英语口语教学中的应用
4、金融英语的语言特点及翻译策略
5、高职院校金融英语教学现状分析及对策研究
6、刍议应用型本科院校金融英语教学改革研究
7、转型期高职英语应用型人才培养模式研究--以辽宁金融职业学院为例
8、金融英语与金融全球化竞争
9、高职专科类金融专业英语教学研究
10、概念整合理论视角下的金融英语词汇学习-以金融术语为例
11、基于语料库的英语经济语篇中隐喻的研究--以金融危机报道为例
12、高职高专金融英语教学现状及对策探究
13、 商务英语 专业学生的词块学习与教学策略研究--以辽宁金融职业学院为例
14、基于福建绿色经济的发展研发金融英语校本课程探究
15、金融英语词汇的特点及其翻译
16、金融转型背景下从业人员岗位英语能力强化路径探索
17、金融英语的词性转换研究
18、浅析以多模态理论为基础的金融英语教学
19、金融英语教学策略创新与金融双语教学共生性研究
20、翻译生态环境视角下金融英语新闻的汉译研究
21、高职院校中外合作办学项目英语教学探究--以长春金融高等专科学校为例
22、高职 英语文化 教育提升学生人文素质的策略探究--以辽宁金融职业学院为例
23、金融英语术语汉英翻译研究
24、专业人才培养视阈下的金融英语教学探究
25、国际化就业环境下的金融英语应用模式研究
26、对等理论观照下金融英语隐喻翻译的喻体形象取舍策略
27、基于ESP理论的金融英语教学改革初探
28、浅谈金融英语翻译基本特点
29、基于平行双语语料库金融英语翻译课程教学模式探索
30、多媒体网络环境下金融英语教学模式探析
31、语境在金融英语词汇教学中的应用探析
32、形成性评价在大学英语拓展课程中的应用初探--以金融英语视听说为例
33、金融学专业金融英语教学实践的探索
34、金融英语词汇特征浅析
35、金融英语汉译技巧探究
36、独立学院大学英语教学模式与策略探究--以某大学商学院为例
37、 财经 英语新闻语料库的建设构想与教学应用
38、大数据时代商务英语人才培养模式分析
39、互联网金融环境下高职金融专业课程体系构建
40、目的论视角下的金融术语翻译研究
41、商务英语专业学生学习动机及学习策略相关性研究
42、独立学院商务英语专业“双师型”师资队伍建设研究
43、释意理论下提高商务英语口译质量的应对策略研究
44、基于学生需求分析的商务英语课程设置研究
45、金融专业英语听说课程3S行动导向教学探索
46、基于自贸区需求的国际贸易双语人才培养模式探讨
47、提升商务英语实践教学质量研究
48、商务英语的语言特征及其翻译技巧
49、学业用途英语中MOOC的效能研究
50、大数据时代金融人才培养方式探析
51、基于需求分析的商务英语CBI课程实证研究
52、全球化背景下财经类院校学生英语学习环境研究--以上海金融学院为例
53、国家战略视域下的法律英语人才培养
54、培养高校综合型金融人才
55、基于航海院校商务英语人才培养的思考
56、金融学专业双语教学探析
57、金融翻译的英汉对比研究
58、试论如何把握商务英语的语言特点及翻译技巧
59、从财经新闻英译汉看财经英语长句的翻译策略
60、改写理论视角下英语硬新闻编译研究
2022英语专业各方向论文题目相关 文章 ：
★ 2022毕业论文题目来源
★ 2022法学专业毕业论文题目
★ 2022最新数学方向毕业论文题目
★ 2022英语教研组计划最新大全10篇
★ 2022行政管理毕业论文选题题目
★ 2022年终总结(50篇)
★ 2022教学年终总结50篇
★ 2022教师教学工作总结报告(通用10篇)
★ 2022教学科研工作总结
★ 2022教师学期教学总结模板五篇
法律英语即法律领域使用的英语,我国在处理国际法律事务中,需要借助法律英语,法律英语不同于其他英语,它需要注重逻辑性、缜密性、专业性,在具体使用过程中有许多注意事项.下面学术堂整理了二十个法律英语论文选题,供大家进行参考:1、影响法律英语翻译的因素分析2、我国法律英语教材编撰与出版探析3、法律英语的冗余性及其翻译策略4、法律英语术语误译5、浅议法律法规绘本制作对高职旅游英语专业学生素质能力的培养6、法律英语文本中的后修饰语歧义分析7、英语法律语篇中的言语行为研究8、法律英语教学中的自我效能感研究9、大陆法系与英美法系的法律差异对法律英语翻译的影响10、法律英语教学面临的问题11、超学科视野下的法律英语教学研究12、浅谈法律英语的词汇特征13、结合理论浅谈法律英语的翻译14、法律英语两个译名的译法商榷15、高校法律英语教学的现状和对策16、基于生态翻译学的法律英语翻译误译研究17、法律英语中的隐喻研究及其汉译18、浅析法律英语翻译的精确性与模糊性--以法律语言为视角19、法美学何以为人学--从话语分析角度看法美学与法律英语翻译的关联20、法律英语翻译中原文风格的再现--UCP600两个汉译本的对比研究
The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding errors1. irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or misunderstandings. Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or punishment. Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually occurs.（1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately elements. Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have understanding. Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui reason." Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig".2）Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility theory. Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective stance. 3）That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding illegality. While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already meaningless. Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is harm. Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social consciousness. Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society values. Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and observe. Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already know. With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are unified. Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately discretion. （2） Misunderstandings treatment principle. PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence performance. If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider disclaimer. Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not inexcusable. Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in shake. Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of humanity. In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement actor. The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but . The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong understanding. From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error object. It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime object. The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects different. Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not consistent. Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the crime. For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was wounded. A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the object. Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing together. This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted ）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object irrtumslehre. These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre irrtumslehre. In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same situation. This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal responsibility. As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a rap. This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the ） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature irrtumslehre. That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary defense. Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect crime. Second, the behavior tools (methods) irrtumslehre. That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to succeed. And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party and. Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu itself. The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide accomplishment. The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, accomplished. Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of )Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between errors. Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened actor. This generally constitute a crime. Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime accomplishment. Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime accomplishment. In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a crime. In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into our. 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory category. 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to law. Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the mistake. From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often difficult. If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to prove. Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to handle. Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is established. From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the law.
英语语言学论文题目 13论国际商务谈判中的语言交际技巧 33成人世界的童话——从文体学角度解析现今童话再度流行的现象 49论文化差异与英汉商标互译 55浅谈英汉句子结构差异 59诗意的美和喜剧性幽默 62试论广告英语的语言特点 65统觉团对英语初学者词汇学习的影响 67外语学习中应该重视中介语的作用 69新闻报道中的转述动词研究 73英汉禁忌语、委婉语的对比研究 74英汉数字习语的对比研究 76英译汉中词序的变动 78英语广告的语言特征 80英语双关语汉译的可译性限度 101词义演变的原因与方式 137从汉语中英语借词的翻译看文化交流 138从价值观转换看斯佳丽的角色特征 142从礼貌准则看中英文化的异同 146从习语看英汉民族的文化差异 149从英语人名中看性别歧视 157动词过程类型的选择和话语隐性态度的表达 161对母语在英语写作中词汇负迁移现象的思考 162对严复译作中“信”的质疑 167法律英语用词特征分析 168法律语言翻译与法律文体 177副词EVER的句法环境和语义特征 180功能语法视角下的英语报纸新闻标题的功能 183广告口号语的语言特点 189国际商务文化之对比研究 204汉语中双关语的翻译 213基于概念隐喻的诗歌解读 228论广告英语中的幽 默 265论广告英语的语言特点 268论汉英谚语的语言特征 280论清教理念与美国西进运动 282论莎士比亚十四行诗中的时间 300论英语广告中几种常用修辞格及其汉译 310论尤金?奥尼尔的表现主义手法 324名词化的语篇功能 330诺曼时期法语对英语词汇的影响 339浅谈英语虚拟语气的语用功能 340浅谈英语虚拟语气及其语用功能 345浅析二十世纪计算机英语词汇的构成特点
题目：
1、中西人名文化对比：Comparison of Chinese and Western name culture
2、近代英美关系及其文化基础：Modern Anglo-American relations and their cultural foundation
3、中学生英语学习策略研究：Research on English learning strategies of middle school students
4、中英非语言交际的文化差异及对比： Cultural differences and contrast between Chinese and English non-verbal communication
5、中英恭维语对比研究：A comparative study of Chinese and English compliments
6、中英广告中语言使用对比研究：A comparative study of language use in Chinese and English advertisements
7、中英两种语言中的颜色词及其象征意义：Color words and their symbolic meanings in English and Chinese
8、中英亲属词的文化内涵分析：Cultural connotation analysis of Chinese and English kinship words
9、中英请求言语行为策略选择之比较：A comparison of speech act strategy choice between Chinese and English requests
法律英语即法律领域使用的英语,我国在处理国际法律事务中,需要借助法律英语,法律英语不同于其他英语,它需要注重逻辑性、缜密性、专业性,在具体使用过程中有许多注意事项.下面学术堂整理了二十个法律英语论文选题,供大家进行参考:1、影响法律英语翻译的因素分析2、我国法律英语教材编撰与出版探析3、法律英语的冗余性及其翻译策略4、法律英语术语误译5、浅议法律法规绘本制作对高职旅游英语专业学生素质能力的培养6、法律英语文本中的后修饰语歧义分析7、英语法律语篇中的言语行为研究8、法律英语教学中的自我效能感研究9、大陆法系与英美法系的法律差异对法律英语翻译的影响10、法律英语教学面临的问题11、超学科视野下的法律英语教学研究12、浅谈法律英语的词汇特征13、结合理论浅谈法律英语的翻译14、法律英语两个译名的译法商榷15、高校法律英语教学的现状和对策16、基于生态翻译学的法律英语翻译误译研究17、法律英语中的隐喻研究及其汉译18、浅析法律英语翻译的精确性与模糊性--以法律语言为视角19、法美学何以为人学--从话语分析角度看法美学与法律英语翻译的关联20、法律英语翻译中原文风格的再现--UCP600两个汉译本的对比研究
通常英语专业毕业从事法律工作的，一般都是做法律文件的翻译，如果同时有法律背景的，一般就是做法律文件英文版本的起草。所以，如果你没有法律教育背景，建议还是从“如何做好法律文件的翻译”的某一个题目去写。比如，法律文件翻译和一般文件翻译的不同之处什么的。。希望对你有帮助。
保险 论文的题目是论文的要件之首，它不同于一般 文章 的题目，有特定的构成要素、结构模式。你是不是在因为保险论文的题目头疼?为此我给大家收集了一些关于保险专业的题目材料，欢迎大家阅读。 保险论文题目(一) 1. 基于物流经济的快递商品保险现状与对策分析 2. 大病保险能否终结因病致贫 3. 浅析职工工伤保险存在的问题与对策 4. 构建我国海外投资保险制度的思考 5. 农户育肥猪保险支付意愿研究 6. 中银保险车险理赔系统设计与实现 7. 死亡率下降对商业保险和社会保险的影响 8. 信诚“安诊无忧”住院费用补偿医疗险介绍 9. 保险保障基金的道德风险分析 10. 基因测试在重大疾病保险中应用的可行性分析 11. 我国科技保险发展问题探讨 12. 投保人失踪后谁可退保取决于该合同的继承权归属 13. 保险市场行为变异及原因探析 14. 美国失业保险:特点绩效与问题 15. “.”保险宣传咨询活动 16. 中国平安回归A股成功上市 17. 论海上旅客人身伤亡责任保障机制的构建 18. 论金融化趋势下再保险发展新模式的构建 19. 对寿险公司直接开办责任保险的质疑 20. 对我国“全民医保”制度建设的初步构想 保险论文题目(二) 1. 中外国家保险业效率比较研究 2. 我国保险网络营销 渠道 策略研究 3. 中国平安人寿理赔服务满意度提升方案 4. 保险人代位求偿权问题分析 5. 我国银行保险发展问题探析 6. 关于团险渠道业务发展困境的思考 7. 从政府机构的视角构建我国海洋与渔业灾害风险防范体系 8. 中国财产保险公司经营效率实证研究 9. 互联网保险的前景分析及模式预测 10. 我国淡水养殖保险发展制约因素及对策分析 11. 中国保险业成熟度的测量与实证 12. 人寿保险信托及其在我国推行的意义 13. 我国西部民族地区巨灾保险立法探析 14. 基层农机保险现状及对策建议 15. 大学生纳入城镇居民医疗保险存在的问题与对策 16. 《社会保险法》实施中的问题及对策研究 17. 我国老年护理保险的法律探析 18. 我国保险监管模式的现实思考 19. 浅析我国电子商务保险发展 20. 我国保险业中若干问题的统计分析 保险论文题目(三) 1. 农村养老保险政策的完善问题 2. 事业单位参加养老保险的政策建议 3. 养老保险政策的问题研究 4. 单位不愿意缴纳养老保险的原因分析 5. 养老保险缴纳过程中的规避行为(探讨故意不足额缴纳的行为) 6. 养老保险待遇给付的合理性 7. 养老保险金的缺口问题(基金紧张) 8. 参保人的养老保险观念问题研究 9. 养老保险与离退休人员的社会化管理 10. 养老保险对单位用人制度的影响 11. .做实个人帐户的必要性与合理性 12. 做实个人帐户对个人养老保险待遇的影响 13. 被单位做出自动 离职 处理人员参加养老保险的对策研究 14. 关于我国养老保险问题的探讨 15. 论养老保险的进一步改革 保险论文题目(四) 1. 车险创新销售模式 2. 我国保险营销现状及对策 3. 我国财险保险发展现状及影响因素分析 4. 农业互助保险制度的优势与创设构想 5. 保险市场消费行为心理因素分析 6. 基于 市场营销 P理论的保险营销策略 7. 大数据时代保险业的发展 8. 我国城市大学生医疗保险制度比较 9. 对我国养老保险制度公平性的思考 10. 电子商务环境下流通商品保险研究 12. 政府保险采购招投标存在的问题与难点分析 13. 谈谈紧急救援保险 14. 中外遏制保险犯罪立法之比较 15. 就农业保险谈点体会与看法 16. 我国区域保险发展研究 17. 普及保险知识的“草根”智慧 18. 如何选择最省钱的汇款方式 19. 生活中的最佳保健时间 20. 涉外追偿大有可为 猜你喜欢： 1. 保险风险管理论文题目 2. 金融保险论文题目 3. 关于保险论文范文 4. 保险毕业论文参考 5. 对目前保险市场的分析论文
市场经济的建设不断完善，发展速度不断加快 保险 业蓬勃增长，保险行业的价值和作用日益被人们重视，成为国民经济中不可或缺的组成部分。下面我给大家带来保险业论文选题方向题目参考，希望能帮助到大家!
金融与保险 毕业 论文题目
1、信用保险下银行供应链金融风险评价--以山西省煤炭企业为例
2、互联网金融时代吉林省保险业发展探析
3、互联网保险使消费金融更透明
4、基于溢出指数下的我国金融系统风险溢出效应研究
5、依托精准扶贫建立涉农信贷与涉农保险互动机制的对策
6、保险公司发展住房反向抵押养老保险的市场环境分析--以湖南省为例
7、我国金融控股集团治理结构研究
8、基于碳排放约束的金融支持、技术进步与能源效率分析
9、我国城镇家庭资产对其消费行为影响的 经验 研究
10、商业银行代理保险业务的法律规制探究
11、金融科技现状与发展趋势
12、保险产业政府规制的国际经验比较与借鉴
13、金融资本化与资本金融化亟需遏制--基于马克思主义产融关系理论的思考
14、偿付能力监管制度改革与保险公司成本效率--基于中国财险市场的经验数据
15、互联网金融模式下的保险营销
16、银行代理保险销售风险的法律规制研究
17、制约我国反向抵押贷款的瓶颈分析
18、保险在绿色金融体系建设中大有可为
19、我国存款保险制度的赔偿模式选择
20、基于金融消费者保护视角的存款保险制度研究
21、普惠金融时代的互联网保险走势
22、国外科技金融风险救助法律经验及借鉴
23、基于普惠金融视角下重庆农产品保险发展现状分析
24、金融精准扶贫对策研究
25、普惠金融体系下的互联网保险创新
26、银行业互联网金融服务“三农”的形势、挑战及策略
27、互联网金融发展现状及对保险企业经营的影响
28、国际大型保险金融集团战略演变及启示--基于AIG的分析研究
29、浅谈农村金融服务创新与支持地方经济发展
30、后危机时代的金融安全网
31、基于国外经验的中国农村金融发展路径与对策分析
32、我国农业保险立法模式重构困境及其突破路径
33、消费者权益保护视角下的互联网保险营商自由
34、关于商业银行进驻保险业务的思考
35、供给侧结构性改革的金融支持研究--基于居民金融资产配置的视角
36、我国互联网保险的发展基础、过程与逻辑
37、中国家庭商业人身保险需求现状及其影响因素--基于中国家庭金融调查的实证研究
38、保险业会计处理之革新
39、存款保险制度对商业银行的影响
40、试析交叉性金融业务存在的风险与对策
41、基于国际视角的中国存款保险制度探究
42、企业社保经办部门如何针对养老保险个人账户管理进行风险控制
43、京津冀协同发展背景下河北省金融结构优化研究
44、保险公司与商业银行资本管理比较分析
45、存款保险制度下大型商业银行应对之策
46、分数布朗环境下带随机利率的保险商偿债率模型研究
47、从存款保险评级谈地 方法 人银行业金融机构风险防范思路
48、金融保险行业廉洁风险隐患防控建议
49、我国存款保险制度中的道德风险及防范 措施
50、社会保险与家庭金融风险资产投资
51、营改增背景下我国保险业流转税改革研究
52、我国存款保险基金管理机构早期纠正权问题探析
53、金融包容框架下欠发达地区金融消费者权益保护分析--以商业银行理财业务为例
54、互联网金融与 文化 产业相结合模式的研究--以阿里“娱乐宝”为例
55、金融科技发展对保险行业的影响研究
56、以绿色金融手段治理生态环境问题
医疗保险毕业论文题目
[1]医保药品目录调整之退出机制的国际经验借鉴
[2]德国长期护理保险制度的缘起、运行、调整与改革
[3]美国长期照护评估系统最小数据集升级对我国老年护理评估的启示
[4]基于RE-AIM模型的城乡居民大病保险模式评估
[5]“十四五”期间提升老龄人口医养服务路径的思考
[6]人口流动对居民商业保险需求的影响研究——基于CGSS2017数据的实证分析
[7]浅谈中医“治未病”费用补偿机制
[8]政府财政精准施策,助力医疗卫生体制高效运行——以阜南县医改实践为例
[9]美国医疗保险与药物治疗管理
[10]美国药物治疗管理服务的计费模式
[11]东营地区农村医疗保险对农村居民消费的影响
[12]全民医保“十四五”规划发展方向与商业保险的发展建议
[13]“十四五”期间财险业发展前景预测
[14]“管理式医疗+保险科技”模式在健康保险发展中的应用
[15]现行医保结算方式下的医院 财务管理 探讨
[16]公立医院医保基金内部控制的问题与对策探讨
[17]大别山连片特困地区农户多维贫困测度及治理研究——以安徽省W县为例
[18]上海市质子重离子医院商业保险模式实践及思考
[19]医疗协作模式医联体激励相容制度分析
[20]资源配置视角下长期护理险15个城市服务供给模式分析
[21]我国社会保障体系对居民就业的影响研究
[22]“一带一路”背景下针灸推拿英语复合型人才国内外就业情况分析
[23]中国医保预算影响分析的研究范式
[24]中国医保预算影响分析的研究范式
[25]20x—20x年镇江地区烧伤流行病学特征分析
[26]城乡居民医疗保险征缴问题与对策——以镇巴县税务局观音税务分局征缴实践为例
[27]对“锦欣医疗”跨界合作的营销策略分析
[28]老年女性精神分裂症患者乳腺癌患病风险因素
[29]立足新阶段 坚持新理念 开启新征程——关于医疗保障体系现代化的几点思考
[30]社会保险基金财务和会计制度改革的探索与思考——从医疗保障制度改革视角探讨
[31]海南自贸港医疗保障与国际接轨的走向思考
[32]多维度多层次推进医疗保障 应保尽保的珠海实践
[33]宁夏城乡居民大病保险制度运行情况分析与思考
[34]定点医疗机构医保基金使用规范初探
[35]我国心脑血管疾病治疗费用与基本医疗保险支出核算与分析
[36]浅谈外伤与疾病的关联性鉴定在工伤认定中的运用
[37]基本医疗保险按病种分值付费比较研究
[38]某三级公立医院出入院服务时效和患者满意度现况分析
[39]新形势下生育保险费用精细化管理探索与实践——基于某三级综合性医疗机构视角
[40]国内外DRG病种支付应用与发展的探讨
[41]经济法视野下农民工社会保障制度分析
[42]我国互联网医院服务模式分析
[43]北京市16区患者基层医疗卫生机构就诊情况及影响因素研究
[44]经济新常态环境下社会保险与商业保险融合发展研究
[45]基于层次分析法研究门诊患者选择医疗机构的影响因素
[46]农民参加城乡居民基本医疗保险满意度及其影响因素——基于湖南省5市的实证分析
[47]用人单位未缴纳基本医疗保险的侵权损害赔偿——以保定金盛公司医保纠纷案为例
[48]西宁地区ICU老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴严重呼吸衰竭的危险因素分析
[49]老龄化背景下我国老年人长期照护社会性保险法制构建初探
[50]政研融合构建医保治理体系与现代化初探
[51]医院医保管理中PDCA循环管理模式的应用与效果评价
保险相关论文题目
1、西部地区新型农村合作医疗资金筹集和运作的优化措施分析
2、中外国家保险业效率比较研究
3、我国保险网络营销 渠道 策略研究
4、中国平安人寿理赔服务满意度提升方案
5、保险人代位求偿权问题分析
6、我国银行保险发展问题探析
7、关于团险渠道业务发展困境的思考
8、从政府机构的视角构建我国海洋与渔业灾害风险防范体系
9、中国财产保险公司经营效率实证研究
10、互联网保险的前景分析及模式预测
11、我国淡水养殖保险发展制约因素及对策分析
12、中国保险业成熟度的测量与实证
13、人寿保险信托及其在我国推行的意义
14、我国西部民族地区巨灾保险立法探析
15、基层农机保险现状及对策建议
16、关于中国邮政保险未来发展的思考
17、电商时代下邮政保险业务创新发展策略
18、我国保险销售渠道改革创新的方向与措施
19、大学生纳入城镇居民医疗保险存在的问题与对策
20、《社会保险法》实施中的问题及对策研究
21、我国老年护理保险的法律探析
22、我国保险监管模式的现实思考
23、浅析我国电子商务保险发展
24、我国保险业中若干问题的统计分析
25、车险创新销售模式
26、大学生参加城镇居民基本医疗保险意愿影响因素分析
27、陕西地区快递保险调查与分析
28、从保险学的角度探析近代哈尔滨保险业特点
29、我国保险的现状及发展趋势分析
30、移动保险渠道 市场营销 现状与发展趋势分析
31、养老保险双轨制的影响及未来路径探讨
32、基于洪水数值模拟的溃堤保险定价研究
33、论雇主责任保险
34、浅析新形势下我国保险欺诈现状和对策
35、浅谈货物运输保险及发生事故的赔偿责任
36、论保险合同格式条款被认定无效的情形、原因及对策
37、我国保险营销现状及对策
38、我国财险保险发展现状及影响因素分析
39、农业互助保险制度的优势与创设构想
40、保险市场消费行为心理因素分析
保险业论文选题方向题目相关 文章 ：
★ 保险论文题目
★ 优秀论文题目大全2021
★ 大学生论文题目大全2021
★ 2021交通运输方向的论文题目及选题
★ 管理学毕业论文题目与选题方向
★ 公司理财相关论文题目大全怎么选题
★ 教育方向专业毕业论文题目有哪些
★ 管理学专业各方向的论文题目
★ mba各方向的论文题目与选题推荐
★ 法学相关专业的论文题目与选题方向
1、论文题目：要求准确、简练、醒目、新颖。2、目录：目录是论文中主要段落的简表。（短篇论文不必列目录）3、提要：是文章主要内容的摘录，要求短、精、完整。字数少可几十字，多不超过三百字为宜。4、关键词或主题词：关键词是从论文的题名、提要和正文中选取出来的，是对表述论文的中心内容有实质意义的词汇。关键词是用作机系统标引论文内容特征的词语，便于信息系统汇集，以供读者检索。 每篇论文一般选取3-8个词汇作为关键词，另起一行，排在“提要”的左下方。主题词是经过规范化的词，在确定主题词时，要对论文进行主题，依照标引和组配规则转换成主题词表中的规范词语。5、论文正文：（1）引言：引言又称前言、序言和导言，用在论文的开头。 引言一般要概括地写出作者意图，说明选题的目的和意义, 并指出论文写作的范围。引言要短小精悍、紧扣主题。〈2）论文正文：正文是论文的主体，正文应包括论点、论据、 论证过程和结论。主体部分包括以下内容：a.提出-论点；b.分析问题-论据和论证；c.解决问题-论证与步骤；d.结论。6、一篇论文的参考文献是将论文在和写作中可参考或引证的主要文献资料，列于论文的末尾。参考文献应另起一页，标注方式按《GB7714-87文后参考文献著录规则》进行。中文：标题--作者--出版物信息（版地、版者、版期）：作者--标题--出版物信息所列参考文献的要求是：（1）所列参考文献应是正式出版物，以便读者考证。（2）所列举的参考文献要标明序号、著作或文章的标题、作者、出版物信息。是否可以解决您的问题？
ok ,俺棒吧。
The article second part carries on the profound analysis to our country present old population special rights and interests legislation protection present situation. Elaborated our country old population special rights and interests protection law structure system incomplete, the legal content and the potency system non-equalization as well as the laws and regulations distributed the question which sees here and there the natural three aspects to legislate to hit exists. Meanwhile elaborated our country old population legislation barrier from the old population legal awareness stratification plane and the legislative stratification plane two aspects. The third part through introduces and studies other national the old population rights and interests legislation protection policy and the advanced experience, mainly introduced country old population special rights and interests protection legislation's and so on Japan, Germany, Russia, US, Brazil experiences, make up for one's deficiency by learning from others' strong points, provides powerful model for our country senior citizen rights and interests legal protection, thus builds the rationale for the fourth chapter of research. the fourth chapter discussed the old population special rights and interests legislation in the first three chapter of fundamental research's foundation enhancement and consummates, proposed consummated our country old population special rights and interests legislation protection the suggestion. The legislative aspect, revises "Senior citizen
The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding errors1. irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or misunderstandings. Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or punishment. Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually occurs.（1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately elements. Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have understanding. Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui reason." Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig".2）Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility theory. Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective stance. 3）That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding illegality. While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already meaningless. Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is harm. Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social consciousness. Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society values. Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and observe. Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already know. With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are unified. Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately discretion. （2） Misunderstandings treatment principle. PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence performance. If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider disclaimer. Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not inexcusable. Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in shake. Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of humanity. In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement actor. The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but . The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong understanding. From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error object. It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime object. The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects different. Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not consistent. Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the crime. For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was wounded. A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the object. Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing together. This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted ）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object irrtumslehre. These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre irrtumslehre. In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same situation. This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal responsibility. As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a rap. This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the ） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature irrtumslehre. That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary defense. Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect crime. Second, the behavior tools (methods) irrtumslehre. That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to succeed. And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party and. Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu itself. The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide accomplishment. The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, accomplished. Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of )Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between errors. Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened actor. This generally constitute a crime. Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime accomplishment. Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime accomplishment. In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a crime. In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into our. 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory category. 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to law. Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the mistake. From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often difficult. If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to prove. Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to handle. Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is established. From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the law.
Concerning bankruptcy liquidation accounting elements reconstruction Abstract: the enterprise bankruptcy law (try out) "prescribed in paragraph 1 of article 3:" the enterprise due to poor management caused serious damage, unable to repay debts that are due, in accordance with the provisions of the bankruptcy ". The bankruptcy liquidation of law refers to economic ruin the liquidation of a debt to legal system, and duration of operation condition and different accounting elements. This article analyses current particularity of bankruptcy liquidation accounting subject setting, Accounting elements of the problems existing in the research, Then in bankruptcy liquidation accounting object changes under the condition of the accounting elements and its influence on the basis, to reconstruct the bankruptcy liquidation accounting elements on the system, bankruptcy liquidation of assets assessment are discussed. Will the ordinary liquidation and company bankruptcy liquidation, therefore, the difference of the bankruptcy liquidation accounting method is inevitable and conventional accounting is different, so in practice to do some analysis. Keywords: bankruptcy liquidation, The accounting elements, Settlement of assets and liabilities, Clearing the net profit or loss