发布时间：
In any academic area or professional field, it is just as important to recognize the limits of our knowledge and understanding as it is to acquire new facts and information.“Personally, I hold that knowledge knows no bounds, therefore, on realizing this awkwardness, the only thing man should do is to absorb as much new knowledge as he can for the sake of not lagging behind the pacing steps of our world. 但是作者完全是从另外一个角度去论证，且看下文。Does recognizing the limits of our knowledge and understanding serve us equally well as acquiring new facts and information, as the speaker asserts?注意这一句经典的反问式开头了，这是最引人注目的。While our everyday experience might lend credence to this assertion, further reflection reveals its fundamental inconsistency with our Western view of how we acquire knowledge. Nevertheless,虽然是原则上不尽同意但还是提出妥协的办法，从而显出作者是critical thinking的，这一点很重要，也是拿分的重头戏也。a careful and thoughtful definition of knowledge can serve to reconcile the two.让我们记一记一些好词好句：lend credence to this assertion (有足够的证据)证明这一观点的正确性;further reflection reveals its fundamental inconsistency with…;Nevertheless, a careful and thoughtful definition of knowledge can serve to reconcile the two.On the one hand, the speaker"s assertion accords with the everyday experience of working professionals. For example, the sort of "book”knowledge that medical, law, and business students acquire, no matter how extensive, is of little use unless these students also learn to accept the uncertainties and risks inherent in professional practice and in the business world.Any successful doctor, lawyer, or entrepreneur would undoubtedly agree that new precedents and challenges in their fields compel them to acknowledge the limitations of their knowledge, and that learning to accommodate these limitations is just as important in their professional success as knowledge itself.在驳论的第一段，作者就举例子说明知识的有限性并不一定意味着各行各业的人就必须汲取其他方面的知识，恰恰相反，对于医生、律师或企业家来说意识到了自我知识的有限，并且寻求方法去适应调和这一有限性反而是必要的。Moreover, the additional knowledge we gain by collecting more information often diminishes-sometimes to the point where marginal gains turn to marginal losses. Consider, for instance, the collection of financial- investment information. No amount of knowledge can eliminate the uncertainty and risk inherent in financial investing. Also, information overload can result in confusion, which in turn can diminish one"s ability to assimilate information and apply it usefully. Thus, by recognizing the limits of their knowledge, and by accounting for those limits when making decisions, investment advisors can more effectively serve their clients.作者进一步通过金融投资业信息的赘余的危害性来驳斥原文的观点。On the other hand, the speaker"s assertion seems self-contradictory, for how can we know the limits of our knowledge until we"ve thoroughly tested those limits through exhaustive empirical observation--that is, by acquiring facts and information. For example, it would be tempting to concede that we can never understand the basic forces that govern all matter in the universe. Yet due to increasingly precise and extensive fact- finding efforts of scientists, we might now be within striking distance of understanding the key laws by which all physical matter behaves. Put another way, the speaker"s assertion flies in the face of悍然不顾，公然违抗the scientific method, whose fundamental tenet is that we humans can truly know only that which we observe. Thus Francis Bacon, who first formulated the method, might assert that the speaker is fundamentally incorrect.说实话，我觉得这一段里，作者玩了一个诡辩的小伎俩：先是指出原文观点的自相矛盾性，然后引出自己的看法——认识论远重要于获取新的事实和信息，也就是要“先认识知识和理解力的局限然后才是摄取新知。”How can we reconcile our experience in everyday endeavors with the basic assumption underlying the scientific method? Perhaps the answer lies in a distinction between two types of knowledge--one which amounts to a mere collection of observations (i.e., facts and information), the other which is deeper and includes a realization of principles and truths underlying those observations. At this deeper level "knowledge" equals "under- standing": how we interpret, make sense of, and find meaning in the information we collect by way of observation.作者就上一段提出的问题推出自己的解决方法，即认识到“知识”分成两种：纯观察行为所得的信息;萃取之后的经过自己消化后的“理解”。但我觉得这里还有待发挥，估计是时间不够了，仓促间收笔吧。没有很好的说明白。In the final analysis, evaluating the speaker"s assertion requires that we define "knowledge,"which in turn requires that we address complex epistemological issues best left to philosophers and theologians. Yet perhaps this is the speaker"s point: that we can never truly know either ourselves or the world, and that by recognizing this limitation we set ourselves free to accomplish what no amount of mere information could ever permit.最后一句玩了复杂句的构句技巧，想搏ets一笑。但我觉得还是总结的不够好，没有说到点子上。其实，我们平实的写作大可不必如此玩弄文字，因为如果当别人都不知道你在说什么的话，一味专心于难句，无异于“喧宾夺主”了。个人认为，作者写得有点不知所云了。
议论文是以议论为主要表达方式，通过摆事实，讲道理，直接表达作者的观点和主张的常用文体。接下来给大家分享英语议论文模板及范文，供参考。
Recently we’ve had a discussion about whether we should... (导入话题) Our opinions are divided on this topic.(观点有分歧)
Most of the students are in favour of it.(正方观点) Here are the reasons. First... Second... Finally...(列出2-3个赞成的理由)
However, the others are strongly against it. (反方观点) Their reasons are as follows. In the first place... What’s more... In addition...(列出2-3个反对的理由)
Personally speaking, the advantages overweigh the disadvantages, for it will do us more harm than good, so I support it.(个人观点)
Nowadays,there is a widespread concern over (the issue that)___作文题目______. In fact, there are both advantages and disadvantages in __题目议题_____. Generally speaking, it is widely believed there are several positive
aspects as follows. Firstly, ___优点一______. And secondly ___优点二_____.
Just As a popular saying goes, "every coin has two sides", __讨论议题______ is no exception, and in another word, it still has negative aspects. To
begin with, ___缺点一______. In addition, ____缺点二______.
To sum up, we should try to bring the advantages of __讨论议题____ into full play, and reduce the disadvantages to the minimum at the same
time. In that case, we will definitely make a better use of the ____讨论议题___.
Shall we send children to study abroad?
With more and more people becoming rich in recent years, it is a new tendency for them to send their children to study abroad. But I don’t think it is a good idea. First of all, children are too young to look after themselves. Second, the language barrier is a serious problem. Many children are not proficient in the foreign language before going abroad. As a result, they have difficulty in understanding what the native speakers are talking about. Third, they may get into trouble when dealing with various situations for lack of knowledge of the customs in the strange land. Furthermore, the cost of living is much higher than that in our country, which might cause a heavy burden to the family. #p#分页标题#e#
In conclusion, there are more disadvantages in sending children to study abroad. So, we’d better not do it.
驳论文的结构：
驳论文大致分为两个部分，即“驳”与“立”，在驳斥对方错误观点的基础上，建立起自己正确的观点。“驳” 是“立”的前提,批驳对方的要点在于抓住“突破口”。寻找对方论点，论据或论证过程中的薄弱环节，揭示谬误，从而立论。“立”是“驳”水到渠成的结果，也是“驳”的必然要求，它也可以在驳论的过程中渐渐形成，但是立论的观点-定要鲜明。驳论文批驳对方观点的方式有三种: -是直接批驳对方的论点;二是通过批驳对方的论据来驳倒对方的论点;三是通过批驳对方的论证来驳倒对方的论点。所有批驳的方式的最终目的都是驳倒对方的论点。从正确的论点出发或者以正确的论点为指导揭露、驳斥错误的见解和主张的文章称为驳论性议论文。驳论性议论文中，批驳是文章的主体。
批驳对方的论点-般有三种方法:(1）驳论点。论点、论据、论证这三者中，论点的错误是要害,论据和论证是为错误的论点服务的。反驳错误的论点，是写驳论文的主要的一种反驳方法。(2) 驳论据。错误的论点总是依靠站不住脚的或荒谬的理论、虚假的事例作为论据来支撑的。只要把这些论据推翻驳倒，论点就失掉了它的支撑，也就会不攻自破了。(3) 驳论证。错误的论点不仅依靠荒谬不实的论据来支撑，而且常常利用论点与论据之间的错误论证、推理来作诡辩。驳论证就是要揭露错误论点和论据之间的不合理联系，指出两者之间的逻辑关系的混乱和荒谬。
驳论文的一般格式：①引论(提出问题)——②本论(分析问题)——③结论(解决问题)。
写作思路：1、列现象；2、示弊端；3、探根源；4、指出路。
1、列现象
对现实中不合道德、有碍社会健康发展的现象进行列举。事例选取的典型性，以求警醒人们；罗列的丰富性，以求引起读者共鸣；修辞的多样性，以求彰显行文文采，增强气势。
2、示弊端
每一种（类）丑陋的现象都会或多或少造成社会的损失。有些损失是明显的，人们不齿、唾弃；但一些损失在较长的时间段后才会出现，许多人看不到这种想象的危害，那就要揭示，这要求写作者既具有深邃的目光，透过现象看本质，又具有先知先觉的本领。
3、探根源
运用哲学的观点去看问题，从理论的高度看问题，显示思维的深度和思维的广度。
4、指出路
高瞻远瞩，高屋建瓴，为读者指出一条解决问题的思路。多从教育、政府规范和引导、法律严惩几个角度谈起。
扩展资料：
驳论文驳斥错误的、反动的论点有三种形式：
①直接驳斥对方的论点。先举出对方的荒谬论点，然后用正确的道理和确凿的事实直接加以驳斥，揭示出谎言同事实、谬论与真理之间的矛盾。有的文章，首先证明与论敌的论点相对立的论点是正确的，以此来证明论敌的论点是错误的。
②通过批驳对方的论据来驳倒对方的论点。论据是论点的根据，是证明论点的。错误和反动的论点，往往是建立在虚假的论据之上的，论据驳倒了，论点也就站不住脚了。
③通过批驳对方的论证过程的谬误（驳其论证）来驳倒对方的论点。驳倒了它的论证中关键问题，也就把谬论驳倒了。
反驳是证明的一种特殊形式。如果说，引用已知的真实判断去证明另一判断的真实性叫做证明；那么，引用已知的真实判断去证明另一判断的虚假性就叫做反驳。证明与反驳都是论证的方法。用反驳的方法去推翻对方的证明的议论文通常叫做驳论文。驳论文写作，一般是先指出对方错误的实质，或直接反驳（驳论点），或间接反驳（驳论据，驳论证），继而针锋相对地提出自己的观点并加以论证。写好驳论文，大体要掌握好三种常用的方法：1．先破后立对敌论先加以批判驳斥，然后在此基础上再表明自己的观点，这就是先破后立。常言说：“不破不立，不塞不流。”“破”“立”是论证中难以避免的环节，只有“破”“立”得当，才能观点清晰，旗帜鲜明。比如鲁迅先生的《拿来主义》就很典型地运用了先破后立的方法。文章先揭露批判“送去主义”的实质及其严重后果；接着阐明“拿来主义”的基本观点，批判在对待文化遗产问题上的错误倾向；最后总结全文，指出实行“拿来主义”的人应具有的胆识和品质，以及“拿来主义”对于创造民族新文化的重要意义。文章为什么前半部分要写“闭关主义”和“送去主义”？这是因为作者要“立”的是“拿来主义”，它是针对历史和现实存在的问题提出来的，所以就要先“破”“闭关主义”和“送去主义”。近代的“闭关主义”必然导致“现在”的“送去主义”，而“送去主义”是一种有往无来的卖国行径，必然导致国势日弱，被动挨打，从长远看，将造成亡国灭种。因此，采取与“送去主义”针锋相对的“拿来主义”就刻不容缓。“送去主义”和“拿来主义”是一个问题的两个方面，“破”正是为了“立”，“破”得彻底，“立”得才牢靠。2．以矛攻盾在论证过程中，努力捕捉敌论的漏洞、矛盾，适当加以分析引申，使敌论看一场用自己的“矛”去攻击自己的“盾”，自己打自己耳光的对台戏，从而陷入窘困的境地，暴露谬误的实质，这就是以矛攻盾。这种方法可以通过揭露敌论论据的谬误，及揭示论据中的自相矛盾之处来打开批驳的“缺口”，也可以通过揭露敌论中论点与论据间缺乏必然联系，来说明其论点的不可信。比如鲁迅先生的《此生与彼生》一文中就很典型地运用了以矛攻盾来反驳汪懋祖复兴文言的主张。1934年6月，汪在《申报》上发表《中小学文言运动》一文，提出中小学生应尊孔读经，课本改用文言。倡导文言的理由是，“在应用上省力”，节约文字”，并举例说：“‘这一个学生或者那一个学生’，文言只须‘此生或彼生’即已明了，其省力为何如。”鲁迅先生就抓住汪文中的这个论据予以反驳：“‘此生或彼生’至少还可以有其它两种解释：一，这个秀才或者那个秀才（生员）；二，这一世或是未来的别一世。”你说文言简练，但简练的文言让人难以理解，产生歧义。这是因为文言提倡者不懂白话与文言之间关系的缘故，所以鲁迅指出：文言比起白话来，有时的确字数少，然而那意义也比较的含胡。我们看文言文，往往不能不增益我们的知识，并且须仗我们已有的智识，给他注解，补足。待到翻成精密的白话之后，这才是懂得了。如果一经就用白话，即使多写了几个字，但对于读者，“其省力何如”？鲁迅先生用主张文言的汪懋祖先生所举的例子，证明了文言的不中用。这段文字就是非常典型的“以子之矛，攻子之盾”。3.引申归谬通过引申把对方论点中的错误加以合理地“放大”，合乎逻辑地“扩展“，将其推向极端，以彻底暴露其论述的谬误、荒唐，从而将对方逼入自相矛盾、破绽百出的境地，无法辩驳，难以解脱，只能不攻自破，束手认输，这就是引申归谬。恰当地运用引申归谬，能致敌论于死地。例如唐弢先生的《琐忆》就讲过这样一件事：有一次，国民党的一个地方官僚禁止男女同学，男女同泳，闹得满城风雨。鲁迅先生幽默地说：“同学同游，皮肉偶尔相碰，有碍男女大防。不过禁止以后，男女还是一同生活在天地中间，一同呼吸着天地中间的空气。空气从这个男人的鼻孔吸进去，淆乱乾坤，实在比皮肉相碰还要坏。要彻底划清界限，不如再下一道命令，规定男女老幼，诸色人等，一律戴上防毒面具，既禁空气流通，又防抛头露面……这段话中，鲁迅先生以欲擒故纵的方法，先假定对方的论点是对的，然后以其作为前提，引出一个显然是荒谬的结论，从而证明对方的论点是错误的。这段话中形象地运用了引申归谬，使国民党地方官僚禁止男女同泳的行为显得那么无聊、愚蠢，使文学青年们听了“笑不可抑”，引起“沉思”。引申归谬的这有效一击，十分有力，其论证的效果于此可见一斑。
写作思路：可以写一下语文在学习和生活中的重要性，以及在哪些地bai方都需要运用语文，人们的生活处处离不开语文，语言和文章、语言知识和文化知识的简约式统称等都离不开它。它是听、说、读、写、编等语言文字能力和知识，文化知识的统称。正文：语文在生活中，也是调剂生活、陶冶情操的重要手段，语文给人精神上的震撼是巨大的。一个人心浮气躁时，一篇优美的散文可以使他心如止水；一个人心情低落时， 一篇慷慨激昂的文章可以使他重燃信心。语文带给生活的影响是无法比拟的，生活处处有语文，生活中你所说的每一句话都是出自”语文” 这门功课，没有”语文”, 你根本不能与别人交流，说出的每一句话都会成为笑柄。从小到老，我们也都在学语文，但却永远也学不完，就在我们的现生活中，语文也无处不在。那么，生活与语文的联系到底在哪里呢？其实，语文就是语言文学，也就是文学的艺术。举个简单的例子来说吧，我们是学生，肯定就得听、说、读、写，那听说读写又是从哪来的呢？它们都是从语言那里来的，只是语文中的一部分。从此看来，语文有着很大的作用，说明了生活离不开语文的关键性。书籍也是语文最直观的表现。俗话说：“读万卷书，行万里路”。可见没有书籍、没有语文的人类是不可进步的；没有书籍、没有语文的社会是不能发展的。同样，“书中自有黄金屋 ，书中自有颜如玉”，也证明从古代开始，人们就对书籍非常重视。没有书籍，我们无法体会梁山好汉的英雄气概。没有书籍，我们无法倾听林黛玉与贾宝玉的真挚爱情；没有书籍，我们无法了解诸葛亮的聪明睿智；没有书籍，我们无法见识孙悟空的无边本领没有书籍，怎能体会更多的情感？没有书籍，怎能了解更多的知识？没有书籍与文字，人类怎能探究历史、展望未来？语文在生活中，也是调剂生活、陶冶情操的重要手段。语文给人精神上的震撼是巨大的。一个人心浮气躁时，一篇优美的散文可以使他心如止水；一个人心情低落时，一篇慷慨激昂的文章可以使他重燃信心，语文带给生活的影响是无法比拟的。 9
要的，高考语文议论文分论点可以放在一段的开头，即在开头用一句话概括本段主旨，也即全文的一个分论点，这在写作学中称“段首撮要”。
如果采用这一形式，按照分段要求，前面空两格。即使加上“第一，第二，第三”等形式的序数，前面也是空两格。
高考作文的结尾技巧：
1、首尾呼应
这是结束一篇文章的常见方式。对开头的内容做出回应，而不是简单地重复。这种绳索方式能从心理上唤起读者的美感，并产生一种从头到尾的共鸣，一种统一的感觉。
2、照亮主题
一些最后的叙述，同时提醒读者理解文章的主题，作者不是简单的逻辑思维方式，但随着隐喻和象征来可视化的方式暗示给读者留下了想象的空间，让读者更多思考，认为，词汇意义和没完没了的效果。
高考作文驳论文的格式需要顶格。
高考作文的注意事项：
1、 正确的检验，独特的命题
因为它的材料，所以选择视图和对象有很多，所以我们必须正确的主题，区分的关键对象，材料的正确理解你想表达的意思后，结合社会现实，小说和独特的，不相关的作文题目，从而增加标志着老师读，提高作文分数。
2、卷面整齐干净
整洁并不一定意味着你的笔迹看起来像印刷体，但它确实意味着你的笔迹至少和印刷体一样整洁。毕竟，近年来的评卷都是先扫过电脑，评卷后老师在评卷。
扩展资料：
高考作文的结尾技巧：
1、首尾呼应
这是结束一篇文章的常见方式。对开头的内容做出回应，而不是简单地重复。这种绳索方式能从心理上唤起读者的美感，并产生一种从头到尾的共鸣，一种统一的感觉。
2、照亮了主题
一些最后的叙述，同时提醒读者理解文章的主题，作者不是简单的逻辑思维方式，但随着隐喻和象征来可视化的方式暗示给读者留下了想象的空间，让读者更多思考，认为，词汇意义和没完没了的效果。
What is the advantage of going to a university Time flies. We are leaving our beloved High School. Now one question hanges on everyone's mind is:"What is the advantage of going to a university" Well - I shall adress this question in three aspects. a) By going to university, we'll have four more years to study. That will give us the advantage of better preparing us for the society; So - it get's us time. b) It would also allow us to be trained and specialised in a more focused discipline at a university. That is very important - since it would allow us to get better qualified for more interesting jobs. Therefore, it would give us better job opportunities. c) University life is also fun - we would be able to make new friends - friends for life. So by going to a university would help us to build a better human network. Well, what is the downside？ There is only one: having to take more exams for four more years. Thank you all very much.
There are many advantages to a college or university education.Students have ample opportunity to explore a variety of interests,increase both their general and specific knowledge,prepare for a chosen career and develop independence.All of these are valuable goals to achieve,but it is my belief that most students today pursue higher education insgroupsto prepare for their future careers.In the past,only the rich and privileged had the opportunity to attend a university and their goals were very different.Coming from wealthy families,few of them would have to compete for a job after graduation,and most wished only to be considered well-educated.Today's students are more practical.They must be able to compete in a very competitive job market; therefore,a practical education is very important.Furthermore,higher education is a big investment and so most students want to get all they can out of it.For these students,it is better to have clearly defined career and education goals rather than to try and find themselves in college.Of course,all students want to increase their knowledge,but I believe that most students today want that knowledge to be relevant to their future careers.The world has changed a great deal since universities were established.They are still wonderful places for acquiring broad knowledge and for personal development.However,in today's competitive world these pursuits must be balanced with the pursuit of more specific goals.That is why I think most students view higher education as a valuable tool in career preparation.
In any academic area or professional field, it is just as important to recognize the limits of our knowledge and understanding as it is to acquire new facts and information.“Personally, I hold that knowledge knows no bounds, therefore, on realizing this awkwardness, the only thing man should do is to absorb as much new knowledge as he can for the sake of not lagging behind the pacing steps of our world. 但是作者完全是从另外一个角度去论证，且看下文。Does recognizing the limits of our knowledge and understanding serve us equally well as acquiring new facts and information, as the speaker asserts?注意这一句经典的反问式开头了，这是最引人注目的。While our everyday experience might lend credence to this assertion, further reflection reveals its fundamental inconsistency with our Western view of how we acquire knowledge. Nevertheless,虽然是原则上不尽同意但还是提出妥协的办法，从而显出作者是critical thinking的，这一点很重要，也是拿分的重头戏也。a careful and thoughtful definition of knowledge can serve to reconcile the two.让我们记一记一些好词好句：lend credence to this assertion (有足够的证据)证明这一观点的正确性;further reflection reveals its fundamental inconsistency with…;Nevertheless, a careful and thoughtful definition of knowledge can serve to reconcile the two.On the one hand, the speaker"s assertion accords with the everyday experience of working professionals. For example, the sort of "book”knowledge that medical, law, and business students acquire, no matter how extensive, is of little use unless these students also learn to accept the uncertainties and risks inherent in professional practice and in the business world.Any successful doctor, lawyer, or entrepreneur would undoubtedly agree that new precedents and challenges in their fields compel them to acknowledge the limitations of their knowledge, and that learning to accommodate these limitations is just as important in their professional success as knowledge itself.在驳论的第一段，作者就举例子说明知识的有限性并不一定意味着各行各业的人就必须汲取其他方面的知识，恰恰相反，对于医生、律师或企业家来说意识到了自我知识的有限，并且寻求方法去适应调和这一有限性反而是必要的。Moreover, the additional knowledge we gain by collecting more information often diminishes-sometimes to the point where marginal gains turn to marginal losses. Consider, for instance, the collection of financial- investment information. No amount of knowledge can eliminate the uncertainty and risk inherent in financial investing. Also, information overload can result in confusion, which in turn can diminish one"s ability to assimilate information and apply it usefully. Thus, by recognizing the limits of their knowledge, and by accounting for those limits when making decisions, investment advisors can more effectively serve their clients.作者进一步通过金融投资业信息的赘余的危害性来驳斥原文的观点。On the other hand, the speaker"s assertion seems self-contradictory, for how can we know the limits of our knowledge until we"ve thoroughly tested those limits through exhaustive empirical observation--that is, by acquiring facts and information. For example, it would be tempting to concede that we can never understand the basic forces that govern all matter in the universe. Yet due to increasingly precise and extensive fact- finding efforts of scientists, we might now be within striking distance of understanding the key laws by which all physical matter behaves. Put another way, the speaker"s assertion flies in the face of悍然不顾，公然违抗the scientific method, whose fundamental tenet is that we humans can truly know only that which we observe. Thus Francis Bacon, who first formulated the method, might assert that the speaker is fundamentally incorrect.说实话，我觉得这一段里，作者玩了一个诡辩的小伎俩：先是指出原文观点的自相矛盾性，然后引出自己的看法——认识论远重要于获取新的事实和信息，也就是要“先认识知识和理解力的局限然后才是摄取新知。”How can we reconcile our experience in everyday endeavors with the basic assumption underlying the scientific method? Perhaps the answer lies in a distinction between two types of knowledge--one which amounts to a mere collection of observations (i.e., facts and information), the other which is deeper and includes a realization of principles and truths underlying those observations. At this deeper level "knowledge" equals "under- standing": how we interpret, make sense of, and find meaning in the information we collect by way of observation.作者就上一段提出的问题推出自己的解决方法，即认识到“知识”分成两种：纯观察行为所得的信息;萃取之后的经过自己消化后的“理解”。但我觉得这里还有待发挥，估计是时间不够了，仓促间收笔吧。没有很好的说明白。In the final analysis, evaluating the speaker"s assertion requires that we define "knowledge,"which in turn requires that we address complex epistemological issues best left to philosophers and theologians. Yet perhaps this is the speaker"s point: that we can never truly know either ourselves or the world, and that by recognizing this limitation we set ourselves free to accomplish what no amount of mere information could ever permit.最后一句玩了复杂句的构句技巧，想搏ets一笑。但我觉得还是总结的不够好，没有说到点子上。其实，我们平实的写作大可不必如此玩弄文字，因为如果当别人都不知道你在说什么的话，一味专心于难句，无异于“喧宾夺主”了。个人认为，作者写得有点不知所云了。