发布时间：
语言学类核心期刊：修辞学习，语言科学，当代语言学。 翻译类核心期刊：上海翻译，中国翻译，中国科技翻译。 文学类核心期刊：外国文学研究，世界文学，。外国文学评论
你说的是《语言文字应用》吧？发稿难度大。 此刊是北大、南大双核心期刊。季刊，创刊于1992年，是中华人民共和国教育部主管、语言文字应用研究所主办的全国性语言文字应用学术刊物，是国家语言学/汉语类核心期刊。本刊贯彻执行国家语言文字工作的方针政策，致力于语言文字的规范化、 标准化，集中发表语言文字应用领域的学术研究成果，努力促进语言文字应用学科的发展。主要栏目：语言文字规划、语言文字规范、推广普通话、社会语言学、语言教学、对外汉语教学、计算机多媒体辅助教学、计算语言学、面向中文信息处理的现代汉语基础研究，并追踪报道国内外有关语言文字应用的热点问题。文章形式包括学术论文、学术报告、笔谈、资料等。 《语言文字应用》面向语言文字研究与教学工作者。主要读者对象包括：语言文字研究部门、信息处理部门、编辑出版部门和文秘系统的专业人员，高校中文系、计算机系、外语系和对外汉语教学专业的教师、博士生、硕士生和大学生，中等师范和中学的语文教师、各级语委的业务干部以及其他语文爱好者。资料来源：学术资讯网
《现代语言学》可以投你说的。而且周期很短。 是一本关注语言学领域最新进展的国际中文期刊，主要刊登国内外语言学领域最新动态，研究进展及前沿报道、学者讨论和专业评论等多方面的论文。
这本期刊近年发展较快，是一本用全英文写作的中国面向世界的国际期刊，意义非凡。
汉语言文学作为一门传统的人文学科,主要功能是对我国文化精神及全民语言的传承。下面是我带来的关于汉语言文学毕业论文选题的内容，欢迎阅读!
汉语言文学毕业论文选题一：现代汉语
1、论民族共同语的形成及普及
2、论中国语文现代化运动
3、论五四运动中的国语运动和白话文运动
4、论书面语发展中的保守性和书面语的现代化
5、论废除文言文与学习文言文的关系
6、关于普通话和方言相互影响的考察
7、论广告语言技巧的变化趋势
8、论当前语言生活中的问题及对策
9、关于校园普通话应用情况的调查
10、关于双语生活的调查
11、论一部文艺作品的比喻(比拟)语言艺术
12、关于身体部位的方言词的比较调查
13、家乡方言和周围方言基本词的对比研究
14、家乡方言和普通话的对比研究
15、方言保存的古代汉语特殊成分
16、报刊图书中的汉语拼音应用考察
17、“正词法”和汉语的书写改革
18、论网络时代的语言生活
19、现代汉语规范化问题研究
20、普通话语音研究
21、XX作家(或作品)语言研究
22、网络汉语研究
23、句式(或句型)研究(选择某些有特点的句式)
24、现代汉语虚词研究(选择某些虚词)
25、现代生活中的新型句式研究
26、新词新语研究
27、外来词规范研究
28、字母词研究
29、成语研究
30、同义词反义词运用研究
31、现代汉语词义研究(选择某类词)
32、语文政策和语言规划研究
33、汉字和汉文化
34、现代汉字学的研究
35、限制和减少汉字字数研究
36、部件研究
37、坚持汉字简化的方向
38、如何整理异体字
39、如何整理异形词
40、规范汉字的研究
汉语言文学毕业论文选题二：写作类(写作学方向)
1、从穿越小说的虚构时空看当代创作的历史认知及写作惯性
2、《红楼梦》对穿越小说的影响(以《春光里》或某作品为为例)
3、试析穿越小说中的新奴婢形象(以《春光里》或某作品为例)
4、节俗场境对穿越小说叙事的意义
5、茶馆酒楼在武侠小说中的作用
6、试析当代小说中的茶馆场境
7、试析当代言情小说中的野蛮女友形象
8、论广告文案写作中传统文化元素的运用
9、论朱自清俞平伯同题散文《桨声灯影里的秦淮河》的审美追求
10、论模糊语言在写作中的作用
11、包法利夫人中的结构特色
12、巴金作品中的朴实语言风格特征
13、文学叙述与应用性叙述的关系和差异
14、论中国传统文论之“义法”与西方文学理论中“结构”的异同
15、浅谈语言表达的诸多形式
16、论沈从文《边城》里的人物美
17、论当代诗歌的语言流变
18、浅论中国传统小说中的“白话”语言特色
19、试论张爱玲小说的语言繁复美
20、试论现代主义的艺术表达方式
21、《庄子·逍遥游》对现实生活的启示
22、《大明宫词》剧本创作语言特色探析
23、余华《兄弟》的结构艺术
24、读王海鸰《新结婚时代》有感
25、欧·亨利小说的结尾艺术
26、散文的“形散神不散”论
27、手机短信文学的价值
28、流行歌词对古典诗歌意境的现代解读
29、钱钟书写作艺术初探
30、陶渊明笔下的和谐世界
31、电脑写作时代网络语言之我见
32、写作过程与写作能力
33、《史记》写作特色管窥
34、《白鹿原》创作心理略论
35、池莉创作个性透析
36、《儒林外史》的创作动机与创作主旨
37、《倾城之恋》创作意识论
38、白居易诗歌创作风格论
39、试论微型小说的艺术特征
40、论鲁迅小说《药》的剪裁艺术
41、“戏拟”表现手法在杂文写作中的运用
42、新闻写作中的主体意识强烈渗入的模式分析
43、第一人称与全知视角的交融----余华《在细雨中呼喊》的叙事方式分析
44、写作中典故使用与情境出现的关系
45、戏剧中“冲突”出现的写作技巧
汉语言文学论文的题目有哪些呢?下文是我为大家整理的关于汉语言文学论文题目的范文，欢迎大家阅读参考!
1.著名作家作品语言运作特色的研究
2.讽刺语言中的文化底蕴
3.语法中的语义因素
4.“是”字用法研究
5.语用与语法的关系
6.新兴词缀研究
7.祈非主谓句的修辞作用
8.论动词重叠式的使用条件
9.论句群纳入中学语文教学的实用意义
10.新兴辞格研究
11.语言环境对句式选择的制约作用
12.××方言(包括语音、词汇、语法等部分)
13.××方言现象专题报告
14.代词的语用研究
15.语言副词的语用研究
16.助动词的语用研究
17.时下新词描写
18.句型的语用研究
19.语气词的语用研究
20.言语行为在句子里的表现
1.论小说的叙述视角
2.论小说的误乐性
3.心态小说的 艺术魅力
4.论现代小说性情节结构类型
5.论小说的新典型观
6.论小说语言的创新
7.论小说的写作技巧
8.论广告辞的审美特性
9.从报告文学的轰动效应探视读者的审美要求
10.试论新时期女性散文的艺术特色
11.试论毕淑敏小说的创作特色
12.试论诗歌中意象的类型与特征
13.论鲁迅小说对人物灵魂的深刻穿透力
14.试论当今散文的 发展走向
15.论小说中的意识流手法
16.试论新时期散文创作的艺术特色
17.论新闻文体的审美特质
18.试论新闻写作的真实性
19.论想象在文学创作中的功用
20.试谈散文笔法的多元化趋势
21.论新时期散文的艺术嬗变
22.任选当今一个散文作家的作品进行评论
23.任选当今一个小说作家的作品进行论述
24.论散文的“自叙体”色彩
25. 论文学语言的审美特性
26.试论王蒙小说的艺术特色
27.试论王安忆小说的艺术特色
28.论文学人物性格的立体结构
29.意识流写法的魅力
30.任选当今一个诗人的作品进行论述
1. 论 艺术真实
2. 论文艺欣赏中的心理距离
3.文艺欣赏中的共鸣与沟通
4.论艺术直觉
5. 论艺术虚构
6.论典型
7.文学流派在艺术创作中的意义
8.简论文学作品形式的独立审美特征
9.新时期文学 发展与典型内涵的新变化
10.新时期诗歌审美特点的新变化
11. 论当代 中国的大众文化
12.论艺术创作的通感与错位
13.论审美变形
14.论艺术想象在文学创作中的价值
15.论文艺作品可能产生的负面影响
艺术语言和普通语言功能比较研究普通语言与艺术语言的功能比较研究语言权利和少数民族语言权利保障研究普遍语言与文学语言略论诗歌语言与普通语言的差异性普通语言的认识功能和艺术语言的美学功能比较文学自觉背景下的文学语言与普通语言语言的结构之思 程序设计语言模型的设计与实现语言沉思之路窥探商务书面文体中模糊语言的语用分析论中英文化差异对汉英语言形式及语词含义的影响语用学视角下的广告语言研究从中国古代文字狱看社会文化对语言的影响
1.文章标题：一般不超过20个汉字，必要时加副标题，并译成英文。2.作者姓名、工作单位：题目下面均应写作者姓名，姓名下面写单位名称（一、二级单位）、所在城市（不是省会的城市前必须加省名）、邮编，不同单位的多位作者应以序号分别列出上述信息。3.提要：用第三人称写法，不以“本文”、“作者”等作主语，应是一篇能客观反映文章核心观点和创新观点的表意明确、实在的小短文，切忌写成背景交代或“中心思想”，100－200字为宜。4.关键词：3－5个，以分号相隔，选择与文章核心内容相关的具有独立性的实在词。5.正文标题：内容应简洁、明了，层次不宜过多，层次序号为一、（一）、1、（1），层次少时可依次选序号。6.正文文字：一般不超过1万字，正文用小4号宋体，通栏排版。7.数字用法：执行GB/T15835－1995《出版物上数字用法的规定》，凡公元纪年、年代、年、月、日、时刻、各种记数与计量等均采用阿拉伯数字；夏历、清代及其以前纪年、星期几、数字作为语素构成的定型词、词组、惯用语、缩略语、临近两数字并列连用的概略语等用汉字数字。8.图表：文中尽量少用图表，必须使用时，应简洁、明了，少占篇幅，图表均采用黑色线条，分别用阿拉伯数字顺序编号，应有简明表题（表上）、图题（图下），表中数据应注明资料来源。9.注释：注释主要包括释义性注释和引文注释，集中列于文末参考文献之前。释义性注释是对论著正文中某一特定内容的进一步解释或补充说明；引文注释包括各种不宜列入文后参考文献的引文和个别文后参考文献的节略形式，其序号为①②③……。10.参考文献：参考文献是作者撰写论著时所引用的已公开发表的文献书目，是对引文作者、作品、出处、版本等情况的说明，文中用序号标出，详细引文情况按顺序排列文尾。以单字母方式标识以下各种参考文献类型：普通图书[M]，会议论文[C]，报纸文章[N]，期刊文章[J]，学位论文[D]，报告[R]，标准[S]，专利〔P〕，汇编[G]，档案[B]，古籍[O]，参考工具[K]，其他未说明文献〔Z〕。格式与示例如下：（1）图书类格式：[序号]主要责任者.文献题名:其他题名信息(任选)[文献类型标识].其他责任者(任选).出版地:出版者,出版年:起止页码.（2）期刊文章格式：[序号]主要责任者.文献题名[J].刊名(建议外文刊名后加ISSN号),年,卷(期):起止页码.（3）报纸文章格式：[序号]主要责任者.文献题名[N].报纸名,出版日期(版次).（4）古籍格式：[序号]主要责任者.文献题名[O].其他责任者(包括校、勘、注、批等) .刊行年代 (古历纪年)及刊物机构(版本).收藏机构.（5）析出文献格式：[序号]析出文献主要责任者.析出文献题名[文献类型标识]//原文献主要责任者(任选).原文献题名.出版地:出版者,出版年:析出文献起止页码.（6）电子文献格式：主要责任者.文献题名[文献类型标识/载体类型标识].出处或可获得地址，发表或更新日期/引用日期（任选）.（7）文献重复引用标记：同一作者的同一文献被多次引用时，在文后参考文献中只出现一次,其中不注页码；而在正文中标注首次引用的文献序号，并在序号的角标外著录引文页码。11．基金项目： 获得国家基金资助和省部级科研项目的文章请注明基金项目名称及编号，按项目证明文字材料标示清楚。14．其他：请勿一稿两发，并请自留原稿。
标准期刊论文格式要求
在社会的各个领域，大家对论文都再熟悉不过了吧，借助论文可以有效训练我们运用理论和技能解决实际问题的的能力。怎么写论文才能避免踩雷呢？下面是我精心整理的标准期刊论文格式要求，欢迎大家分享。
标准期刊论文格式要求
一、标题不超过20个字
三号黑体居中，可以分成1或2行；段后空一行
二、作者姓名两人以上，以逗号分隔
4号仿宋体居中，段后空0.5行
三、作者单位、邮编
小4号宋体居中，段后空一行
四、摘要、关键词
“摘要”二字小四号黑体。，摘要内容要小四号宋体，段后空一行；“关键词”三字小四号黑体。摘要内容要小四号宋体，段后空一行，关键词数量为3～5个，每一关键词之间用分号分开，最后一个关键词后不打标点符号。
五、中图分类号、文献标志码、文章编号
小四号黑体。
六、正文
小四号宋体。行距20磅，字符间距为标准。
一级标题，4号黑体，段前段后1行
二级标题，5号黑体，段前段后0.5行
三级标题，5号楷体，段前段后0.5行
七、图
图题配英文翻译，距正文段后0.5行。
图题位于图下方；中文用6号宋体，加粗，英文用6号TimesNewRoman，加粗；英文采用段后0.5行。
八、表
表题配英文翻译，距正文段前0.5行。表中量与单位之间用“/”分隔。
表题位于表上方；中文用6号宋体，加粗，英文用6号TimesNewRoman，加粗；中文采用段前0.5行。
九、参考文献配英文翻译。
标题：小5号黑体，内容：6号宋体。
[序号]主要责任者．文献题名[M]．出版地：出版者，出版年：起止页码． 学位论文：
[序号]主要责任者．文献题名[D]．出版地：出版者，出版年:起止页码． 研究报告：
[序号]主要责任者.文献题名[R]．出版地：出版者，出版年:起止页码． 期刊文章：
[序号]主要责任者．文献题名[J]．刊名，年，卷期。：起止页码． 论文集：
[序号]主要责任者．论文集题名[C].出版地：出版者，出版年：起止页码． 论文集中的析出文献：
[序号]析出文献主要责任者．析出文献题名[C]//论文集主要责任者．论文集题名．出版地：出版者，出版年：析出文献起止页码．
报纸文章：
[序号]主要责任者．文献题名[N]．报纸名，出版日期版次． 国际、国家标准：
[序号]标准编号标准名称[S]．出版地：出版者，出版年． 专利：
[序号]专利申请者或所有者．专利题名：专利国别：专利号[P]．公告日期或公开日期[引用日期]．获取和访问路径．
电子文献：
[序号]主要责任者.电子文献题名[电子文献类型标志/电子文献载体标志]． 电子文献出版地：出版者，出版年更新或修改日期。[引用日期].获取和访问路径．
各种未定义类型的文献：
[序号]主要责任者.文献题名[Z].出版地:出版者，出版年．
扩展：
标准期刊论文写作格式模板
1、论文题目：（下附署名）要求准确、简练、醒目、新颖。
2、目录
目录是论文中主要段落的简表。（短篇论文不必列目录）
3、内容提要：
是文章主要内容的.摘录，要求短、精、完整标准的毕业论文格式模板标准的毕业论文格式模板。字数少可几十字，多不超过三百字为宜。
4、关键词或主题词
关键词是从论文的题名、提要和正文中选取出来的，是对表述论文的中心内容有实质意义的词汇。关键词是用作计算机系统标引论文内容特征的词语，便于信息系统汇集，以供读者检索。每篇论文一般选取3-8个词汇作为关键词，另起一行，排在“提要”的左下方。
主题词是经过规范化的词，在确定主题词时，要对论文进行主题分析，依照标引和组配规则转换成主题词表中的规范词语标准的。（参见《汉语主题词表》和《世界汉语主题词表》）。
5、论文正文：
（1）引言：引言又称前言、序言和导言，用在论文的开头。引言一般要概括地写出作者意图，说明选题的目的和意义, 并指出论文写作的范围。引言要短小精悍、紧扣主题。
（2）论文正文：正文是论文的主体，正文应包括论点、论据、论证过程和结论
主体部分包括以下内容：
a.提出问题-论点;
b.分析问题-论据和论证;
c.解决问题-论证方法与步骤;
d.结论标准的毕业论文格式模板默认。
6、参考文献
一篇论文的参考文献是将论文在研究和写作中可参考或引证的主要文献资料，列于论文的末尾。参考文献应另起一页，标注方式按《GB7714-87文后参考文献著录规则》进行。
中文：标题--作者--出版物信息（版地、版者、版期）
英文：作者--标题--出版物信息
所列参考文献的要求是：
（1）所列参考文献应是正式出版物，以便读者考证。
（2）所列举的参考文献要标明序号、著作或文章的标题、作者、出版物信息。
免责声明：本文仅代表作者个人观点,与本网无关。
格式：
1、字数要求
3000字左右。
2、封面格式
3、排版格式
（1）纸张：A4纸，单面打印。
（2）标题：三号黑体字加粗。
（3）正文各标题用小四号宋体字加粗，内容则用小四号宋体字。
（4）参考文献四个字用小四号宋体字加粗，参考文献内容用五号宋体字，其格式按毕业论文参考文献的格式书写。常用参考文献书写格式如下：
a、期刊类格式：作者．文章名．期刊名称，出版年份．卷号（期号）：起止页码。
b、书籍类格式：作者．书名．版次（第一版应省略）．出版地：出版者，出版年份：起止页码。
c、论文集类格式：著者．题名．编者．论文集名．出版地：出版者，出版年份：起止页码。
d、学位论文类格式：作者．题名．保存地：保存单位，年份。
（5）页眉页脚小五号宋体字居中。
（6）页面设置。页边距：上下左右均为2.5厘米；行间距为1.5倍行距；字符距离：标准。
不同的期刊要求不一样，如果普通期刊，在百分之二十五到三十之间，省级期刊在百分之十五到二十五之间，国家期刊，在百分之十到百分之十五之间，如果是核心期刊，一般在百分之五到百分之十之间。
要求
1、在文后的参考文献表中，各条参考文献应按其在正文中出现的先后用阿拉伯数字连续排序。注意一定要按在文中出现的顺序编号。
2、文后参考文献表中的中文参考文献请改为中英文对照。
3、文后期刊类、会议论文集中的参考文献表中的英文期刊名称、会议论文集名请写全称。
4、各类参考文献请严格按照“二、各类参考文献写法”中的标点符号写。
转摘More and more scholars are now showing an interest in adopting linguistic approaches to translation studies. Between 1949 and 1989, an incomplete survey by the author revealed that there were only about 30 textbook passages discussing the relationship between linguistics and translation, including aspects of general linguistics, pragmatics, stylistics, text linguistics, rhetoric and machine translation. From 1990 to 1994, there was an incredible increase in the number of passages looking at translation from a linguistic point of view. Almost 160 articles published over these five years concerned translation and general linguistics, stylistics, comparative linguistics, semantics, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, text linguistics, rhetoric, etc. New terms such as discourse analysis, hermeneutics, dynamic equivalence, deep structure and surface structure, context, theme and rheme, cooperative principles, to mention just a few, appeared in the field of translation studies. We can definitely identify a trend of applying linguistics theories to translation studies in these years. Today, we are at the point of questioning whether linguistics is a necessary part of translation. In recent years, some scholars who are in favour of free translation, have repeatedly raised this question to the public and appealed for an end to the linguistic approach to translation. Some firmly believe that translation is an art and that therefore linguistics is neither useful nor helpful. Such a claim is wrong if we look at translation as a whole, including scientific translation where meanings are rigid and restricted and the degree of freedom is limited. Flexibility, in this case, is neither required nor appreciated. But even in literary translation, linguistics is hardly a burden. Wang Zongyan pointed out that « If one sees linguistics as a body of rules regulating language, translators most probably will yawn with boredom. If it signifies the use of words and locutions to fit an occasion, there is nothing to stop translators from embracing linguistics » (Wang 1991: 38). The controversy over « literal » versus « free » translation has a long history, with convincing supporters on each side. For example, ancient Western scholars like Erasmus, Augustine, and others were in favour of literal translation. Among early Chinese translators, Kumarajiva is considered to be of the free school, while Xuan Zuang appears as literal and inflexible. In modern China, Yan Fu advocated hermeneutic translation, while Lu Xun preferred a clumsy version to one that was free but inexact. There is nothing wrong in any of these stances. When these translators emphasized free translation they never denied the possibility of literal translation, and vice versa. Problems only arise when the discussion turns to equivalent translations. The problem of equivalence has caused much controversy. Some people believed that there could be an equivalence of language elements independent of the setting in which they of occurred. Based on this assumption, some « literal » translators tried to decompose a text into single elements in hopes of finding equivalents in the target language. This is a naive idea. Jakobson (1971: 262) notes that « Equivalence in difference is the cardinal problem of language and the pivotal concern of linguistics. » He does not refer to « equivalence » but to « equivalence in difference » as the cardinal problem. Nida was also misunderstood by many for his notion of « equivalence, » which he took to mean that « Translating consists in reproducing in the receptor language the closest natural equivalent of the source-language message, first in terms of meaning and secondly in terms of style » (1969: 12). He further concluded that « Absolute equivalence in translating is never possible » (1984: 14). De Beaugrande and Dressler believed that the success or failure of either free or literal approaches was uncertain: an unduly « literal » translation might be awkward or even unintelligible, while an unduly « free » one might make the original text disintegrate and disappear altogether. To them, equivalence between a translation and an original can only be realized in the experience of the participants (cf. de Beaugrande and Dressler 1981: 216-217). Catford (1965: 27) expressed the same concern that equivalent translation is only « an empirical phenomenon, discovered by comparing SL and TL texts. » In citing the above examples, I have absolutely no intention of insisting on untranslatability. What I mean is that a translator should incorporate his or her own experience and processing activities into the text: solving the problems, reducing polyvalence, explaining away any discrepancies or discontinuities. Linguistic knowledge can help us treat different genres in different ways, always with an awareness that there are never exact equivalences but only approximations. Therefore, amplification and simplification become acceptable. If we agree that texts can be translated, then, in what way does linguistics contribute to translation? To answer this question, we must look at the acceptance of western linguistics in China and its influence on translation. Systematic and scientific study of the Chinese language came into being only at the end of the last century, when Ma Jianzhong published a grammar book Mashi Wentong «马氏文通» in 1898, which was the first in China and took the grammar of Indo-European languages as its model. The study of language was, in turn, influenced by translation studies in China. In Mashi Wenton, the main emphasis is on the use of morphology, which takes up six-sevenths of the book. Influenced by the dominant trend of morphological studies, a word was regarded as the minimum meaningful unit, and a sentence was therefore the logical combination of words of various specific types. Translation was, then, principally based on the unit of the word. In the West, Biblical translation provided a very good example, just as the translation of Buddhist scriptures did in China. Not until the end of the 19th century did some linguists come to realize that sentences were not just the summary of the sequenced words they contained. The Prague School, founded in the 1920s, made a considerable contribution to the study of syntax. According to the analytic approach of the Functional Perspective of the Prague School, a sentence can be broken down into two parts: theme and rheme. Theme is opposed to rheme in a manner similar to the distinction between topic and comment, and is defined as the part of a sentence which contributes least to advancing the process of communication. Rheme, on the other hand, is the part of a sentence which adds most to advancing the process of communication and has the highest degree of communicative dynamism. These two terms help enlighten the process of translating Chinese into English. In the mid-1950s, the study of syntax peaked with the Chomsky's establishment of transformational-generative grammar. This theory of the deep structure and surface structure of language influenced translation tremendously. Nida relied heavily on this theory in developing his « analyzing-transfering-reconstructing » pattern for translation. Some Chinese linguists, in the meantime, tried to raise language studies to a higher plane. Li Jinxi (1982) enlarged the role of sentence studies in his book A New Chinese Grammar, two thirds of which was devoted to discussing sentence formation or syntax. He writes that « No words can be identified except in the context of a sentence. » The study was then improved by other grammarians, including Lu Shuxiang, Wang Li. With the development of linguistic studies, translation based on the unit of the sentence was put forward by some scholars. It was Lin Yu-Tang who first applied the theory to translation in his article « On Translation. » He claimed that « translation should be done on the basis of the sentence [...] What a translator should be faithful to is not the individual words but the meaning conveyed by them » (Lin 1984: r 3). The importance of context in the understanding of a sentence was therefore emphasized. Chao Yuanren, a Chinese scholar and professor at Harvard University, criticized scholars and translators who tended to forget this point and take language for something independent and self-sufficient. In fact, it is obvious that when we translate a sentence, we depend on its context; when we interpret an utterance we rely on the context of the speech (cf. Chao 1967). When a sentence is removed from the text, it usually becomes ambiguous due to the lack of context. Therefore, translation becomes difficult. In the 1960s, people began to realize that the study of language based on sentences was not even sufficient. A complete study should be made of the whole text. A simple sentence like « George passed » may have different interpretations in different contexts. If the context is that of an examination, it means George did well on a test; in a card game it would indicate that George declined his chance to bid; in sports it would mean the ball reached another player. Without a context, how could we decide on a translation? Linguists therefore shifted their attention to the study of texts and to discourse analysis. Text linguistics have become increasingly popular since that time. Van Dijk was a pioneer in this field, and his four-volume edition of the Handbook of Discourse Analysis is of great value. Halliday's Cohesion in English and Introduction to Functional Grammar help us to better understand the English language on a textual level. It is worth noting that de Beaugrande and Dressler (1981) provided an overall and systematic study of text, which is useful to translation studies. De Beaugrande actually wrote a book called Factors in a Theory of Poetic Translating in 1978. The book did not become very popular as it confined the discussion to translating poetry. At the same time, books on a linguistic approach to translation were introduced into China, such as the works of Eugene Nida, Peter Newmarks, J.C. Catford, Georges Mounin, and others. These books gave a great push to the application of linguistic theories to translation studies in China. Textual or discoursive approaches to the study of translation could not keep pace with the development of text linguistics. Some studies remained on the syntactic or semantic level, though even there textual devices were employed. In talking about the translation units of word and text, Nida wrote: ... average person naively thinks that language is words, the common tacit assumption results that translation involves replacing a word in language A with a word in language B. And the more « conscientious » this sort of translation is, the more acute. In other words, the traditional focus of attention in translation was on the word. It was recognized that that was not a sufficiently large unit, and therefore the focus shifted to the sentence. But again, expert translators and linguists have been able to demonstrate that individual sentences, in turn, are not enough. The focus should be on the paragraph, and to some extent on the total discourse. (Nida and Tabber 1969: 152) From that statement we can see that Nida regards a discourse as something larger than a paragraph, as an article with a beginning and an ending. Nida himself never applied text linguistics to translation, and there might be some confusion if we use his term in our interpretation of discourse, because discourse analysis is not merely a study based on a larger language structure. Some Chinese scholars did make the effort to apply text linguistics to the theory and practice of translation. Wang Bingqin's article (1987) was the first academic paper of this sort. He stated his aim to study and discover the rules governing the internal structure of a text in light of text linguistics. He analyzed numerous examples using textual analysis, but unfortunately, all the samples he collected were descriptions of scenery or quotations from the books of great scholars--no dialogue, no illocutionary or perlocutionary forces in the language. He failed to provide a variety of examples. For this reason, his research findings are largely restricted to rhetorical texts in ancient China (cf. Wang 1981; Luo 1994). Scholars like He Ziran applied pragamatics to translation. He's article (1992) put forth two new terms, « pragmalinguistics » and « socio-pragmatics » which, in translation, refer respectively to « the study of pragmatic force or language use from the viewpoint of linguistic sources » and to « the pragmatic studies which examine the conditions on language use that derive from the social and cultural situation. » He discusses the possibility of applying the pragmatic approach to translation in order to achieve a pragmatic equivalent effect between source and target texts; that is, to reproduce the message carried by the source language itself, as well as the meaning carried by the source language within its context and culture. In this article he tries to distinguish « pragma-linguistics » from « socio-pragmatics » but finally admits that « Actually, a clear line between pragma-linguistics and socio-pragmatics may sometimes be difficult to draw. » Still he insists that the application of the pragmatic approach to translation is helpful and even necessary. Ke Wenli (1992) argued that semantics, which in a broad sense combines semantics and pragmatics, should be studied to help understand, explain and solve some of the problems encountered in translation. In this article, he examines four semantic terms--« sense and reference, » « hyponomy, » « changes of meaning » and « context »--giving many examples to illusrate the importance of having some general knowledge of semantics and of understanding the relationship between semantics and translation. This article is clearly written and readers can easily draw inspiration from it. These linguistics approaches shed new lights on the criteria of « faithfulness, expressiveness and elegance » defined by Yan Fu. Chinese scholars began to criticize the vagueness of these three criteria and endeavored to give them concrete significance through the theories of western linguistics. The result is that the content of these three traditional criteria has been greatly enriched, especially by the effect equivalence theory, which in a broad sense means that the target language should be equivalent to the source language from a semantic, pragmatic, and stylistic point of view. But we are still unable to evaluate translations in a very scientific way. Therefore, Chinese scholars like Fan Shouyi, Xu Shenghuan and Mu Lei embarked on quantitative analyses of translations and used the fuzzy set theory of mathematics in accomplishing their analysis. Fan published several articles on this field of study. His 1987 and 1990 articles evaluate translations according to a numerical quantity of faithfulness. Xu's article « A Mathematical Model for Evaluating a Translation's Quality » presents a normal mathematical model. He states that it is difficult to produce an absolutely accurate evaluation of translations with this model because of the uncertainty and randomness of man's thought process. Making such analysis more accurate and objective would require further research. The unit in translation is a hard nut to crack. Without solving this problem, no research in translation studies will ever be sufficient. To date, very few people have focused their research on this area. Nida holds that the unit should be the sentence, and in a certain sense, the discourse. Barkhudarov (1993: 40), Soviet linguist and translation theorist, suggests that: translation is the process of transforming a speech product (or text) produced in one language into a speech product (or text) in another language. [...] It follows that the most important task of the translator who carries out the process of transformation, and of the theorist who describes or creates a model for that process, is to establish the minimal unit of translation, as it is generally called, the unit of translation in the source text. Though he notes the importance of the unit of translation in a text and considers that this unit can be a unit on any level of language, he fails to point out what a text is and how it might be measured in translation. Halliday's notion of the clause might be significant in this case. To him, a clause is a basic unit. He distinguishes three functions of a clause: textual, interpersonal and ideational. According to Halliday, these functions are not possessed by word or phrase. But he is not quite successful in analyzing the relationship between clause and text (cf. Halliday 1985). In China, some people have tried to solve this problem. Wang Dechun (1987: 10) more or less shares Bakhudarov's view that the translation unit cannot be confined just to sentences. In some ways, the phoneme, word, phrase, sentence, paragraph, or even text can all serve as a unit. At this point, we cannot find anything special in treating text translation except for having text as the highest level among translation units. This is not the aim of text linguistics or discourse analysis. If we want to apply these to the theory and practice of translation, we will require a textual approach.
语言学可以写的内容很多。基本上不外乎以下一些：一，语音类如语音的属性、音韵与语音的关系、强弱、轻浊、音节等二，词汇类如词汇形态学，语义学，构词，词化，语义场等等三，语法类如语法结构，层次，修辞等四，句子类如分析句子的各种成分，语序，基本句型等五，语篇类如连贯性，思维逻辑性，结构修辞，主体与客体意识等这方面的教材很多，就看你的要求了。现在英语与汉语的对比语言学和对比文学比较热，从这方面下手也不错。
Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition Strategies 二语词汇习得策略 [摘 要] 词汇是构成语言的基本单位，词汇习得在语言学习中占有重要地位。英国著名语言学家D.A. Wilkins (1972) 说过：“没有语法，人们不能表达很多东西；而没有词汇，人们则无法表达任何东西。”这就说明了词汇在学习中的重要性。本文旨在分析二语词汇习得策略并应用于不同水平的学习者。学习者根据自己的水平选择正确的习得方法和策略学习词汇，从而提高学习效率和习得效果。 关键字： 二语词汇习得 词汇习得策略 元认知策略 认知策略 Abstract Vocabulary is the basic unit of a language. Language acquisition plays an important role in language learning. Famous linguistics D. A. Wilkins said, “Without grammar, very little can be conveyed, without vocabulary, nothing can be conveyed (Lewis, 1993:16).” It speaks volumes for the importance of vocabulary in language learning. This paper aims to analysis the second language acquisition strategies and applies to different levels of learners. According to the different levels, the learners should choose the proper methods and strategies to promote learning efficiency and acquisition effect. Key words: Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition； Vocabulary Acquisition Strategies； Metacognitive strategy； Cognitive strategy Introduction With economic globalization and multi-polarization of the world, especially the population of the internet, English becomes more and more important, because it is considered as the tool for absorbing and communicating information. As we all known, vocabulary acquisition is one of the most noticed-question of the second language learners. “Vocabulary” appears in the area of linguists’ study. Nowadays, researchers still can not give a complete and reasonable definition of vocabulary. Since 1970s, the second language vocabulary acquisition research has gradually become the hot point and important subject in the second language vocabulary acquisition research area. These researches aim to discuss the efficiency vocabulary memory strategies to promote the memory skills and vocabulary levels. Then how to acquire vocabulary become popular among the researchers. Wenden &Rubin (1987), O’Malley& Chamot (1990) refer to the content of vocabulary acquisition strategies; Rubin (1987) and Oxford (1990) classify the memory strategy to the direct cognitive strategies. Especially, CohenAphek (1981), Porte (1988), O’Malley (1990), Vann (90), Cohen (1990), etc made a basic searching of vocabulary acquisition. In a word, there are various opinions in how to acquire vocabulary. Firstly, it talks about the importance of vocabulary. Secondly, what does it mean to “acquire” a word? This paper mainly aims to the detail analysis of the vocabulary acquisition from three aspects：Meta-cognitive Strategy; Cognitive Strategy and Social or Affective Strategy. Especially, it highlights the effect of the context and rending to vocabulary acquisition. This paper talks about the applications of the vocabulary acquisition strategies. And it puts forward some problems and difficulties of vocabulary acquisition. This paper also discusses the influencing factors to the acquisition. It includes the mother tongue, age, language contact, logical thinking ability, identity degree, and academic motivation . The purpose of this paper is to rise the awareness of English learners that the importance of vocabulary in language learning and the vocabulary acquisition strategies can not be neglected, and each strategies is deeply rooted in its language. Through the analysis of the theory of study, the paper tries to draw the learner’s attention to the strategies of the second language vocabulary acquisition and using the vocabulary in communication. In order to improve the acquisition efficiency, some strategies put into practice are introduced. The first presents the importance of vocabulary, some basic concepts of vocabulary and vocabulary learning, the second part tells what does it mean to know a word, the third part deals with the theory of vocabulary acquisition and presents the factors and differences influencing the vocabulary acquisition. The fourth part is detailed discussion of vocabulary acquisition strategies in different levels of learners. The last part is conclusion. Literature review 1. The importance of vocabulary As the first time, when we go to school and our English teacher will tell us that vocabulary is of great importance in learning English. After several years, we understand words gradually, especially when we study in high school. If we know a little about vocabulary, we may have poor English. That is because the listening, speaking, reading and writing show the necessary of learning vocabulary. Many researchers agree that lexis is at least as important as structure, because it is using wrong words and not wrong grammar that usually breaks down communication. Mistakes in lexis much more often lead to misunderstanding and may be less generously tolerated outside classroom than mistakes in syntax. (Carter, 1987). As Stephen Krashen remarked, “When students travel, they don’t carry grammar books, they carry dictionaries. A significant role of vocabulary in both teaching and learning processes was first stated by Stephen Krashen in The Natural Approach (1985): “Vocabulary is basic for communication. If acquirers do not recognize the meaning of the key words used by those who address them they will be unable to participate in the conversation.” Words are basic tools in human communication; therefore they determine the main part of people’s life-relationships between people and associations with the surrounding world that people live in. The larger one’s vocabulary, the easier it is to express one’s thoughts and feelings. In real communication, correctly and idiomatically used vocabulary can even decrease some structural inaccuracy and grammar errors. (Zhang Jiying, 2002). So learners should enrich and expand their knowledge of words as much as possible in order to communicate effectively in a foreign language. 2. What does it mean to “know” a word? Knowing a word is not a simple phenomenon. In fact, it is quite complex and goes far beyond the word’s meaning and pronunciation. (Zhang Jiying, 2002). Richards (1976) think knowing a word means also knowing the frequency of words and their likely collocates; being aware of the functional and situation limitations that apply; knowledge of the “syntactic behavior”; derivational forms and word class; associative and connotative knowledge; semantic value-breaking down words into minimal units as with componential analysis (see Katz&Fodor1963or Leech1974); knowing the other (possible) meaning associated. Nagy and Scott (2000) identify several dimensions that describe the complexity of what it means to know a word. First, word knowledge is incremental, which means that readers need to have many exposures to a word in different contexts before they “know” it. Second, word knowledge is multidimensional. This is because many words have multiple meanings and serve different functions in different function in different sentences, texts, and even conversations. Third, word knowledge is interrelated in that knowledge of one word connects knowledge of other words. What all of this means is that “knowing” a word is a matter of degree rather than an all-or-nothing proposition (Beck&Mckeown, 1991; Nagy&Scott, 2000). The degree of knowing a word are reflected in the precision with which we use a word, how quickly we understand a word, and how well we understand and use words in different modes and different purpose. The memory strategy, cognitive strategy, social strategy and metacognitve strategy are used more frequently than the affective strategy and compensative strategy. Conclusion This paper has attempted to provide some theories of second language vocabulary acquisition and some strategies. Such as metacognitive strategy, cognitive strategy, and social strategy. However, this paper also put forward some microcosmic strategy. As a matter of fact, vocabulary acquisition should combine the context. In addition, this paper hasn’t mentioned that culture is also an important factor in vocabulary acquisition. In the study of second language vocabulary acquisition, we should pay attention to the process and the acquiring results. This paper focuses on the study of the second language vocabulary acquisition strategies. Bibliography [1] A.U. Chamot. The Learning Strategies of ESL Students. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin, (eds), Learner Strategies in Language Learning, 1987. [2] Cater. R. and M. McCarthy. Vocabulary and Language Teaching. New York: Longman, 1987. [3] Nation, L. S. P. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New Newbury House Publishers, 1990. [4] O’Malley, J. & Chamot, A. U.. Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition [J]. Cambridge University Press, 1990:12-15. [5] 陈桦，张益芳.中国儿童英语词汇记忆策略探究[J].外语学刊,2001(4). [11] 戴曼纯. 论第二语言词汇习得研究[J]. 外语教学与研究，2002(2). [12] 徐德凯.大学英语词汇教学理论与实践[M].长春：吉林出版集团有限责任公司，2009. [6] 王文宇.观念、策略与英语词汇记忆[J].外语教学与研究，1998(1). [13] 文秋芳. 英语学习策略论.上海：上海外语教育出版社，1996. [7] 吴霞，王蔷.非英语专业本科生词汇水平研究. 外语教学与研究，1998(1). [15] 张纪英.英语词汇学教学与研究[M]. 武汉：华中科技大学出版社,2007. [16] 朱厚敏. 英语词汇学习策略研究[M] 长春：吉林大学出版社，2009.
语言学教案 - Chapter 1 Invitations to Linguistics (2)What is linguistics?1.6 What is linguistics?Linguistics is the branch of learning which studies the languages of any and all human societies. It can be defined as the scientific study of language. In a word, linguistics studies the general principles upon which all languages are constructed and operate as systems of communication in the societies in which they are used.The guiding principles for linguistic studies:Exhaustiveness---the aim is to specify totally the linguistic contrasts in a set of data, and ultimately in the language as a whole.Consistency---total statements should be logically self-consistent.Economy---a criterion requires that, other things being equal, an analysis should aim to be as short and use as few terms as possible. It is a measure which permits one to quantify the number of formal constructs used in arriving at a solution to problem, and has been used, explicitly or implicitly, in most areas of linguistic investigation.Objectivity---linguistic analyses should be as objective as possible. Truth should come from facts1.7 Some basic distinctions in linguistics1.7.1 speech and writingthe primacy of speech:1) Speech is prior to writing historically2) genetically, children always learn to speak before they learn to write.The importance of writing:1) space displacement2) time displacement3) a visual recording of a speech
《现代语文》《语文学刊》等等，省级刊物。给版面费就可以发表了又有什么学术价值呢
1、ACTA LINGUISTICA HUNGARICA 《匈牙利科学院语言学学报》匈牙利 QuarterlyISSN: 1216-8076 AKADEMIAI KIADO, PRIELLE K U 19, BUDAPEST, HUNGARY, H-1117 2、AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 《美国言语病理学杂志》美。 Quarterly， ISSN: 1058-0360 AMER SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOC, 10801 ROCKVILLE PIKE, ROCKVILLE, USA, MD, 20852-3279 3、AMERICAN SPEECH 《美国语言》美国 Quarterly ISSN: 0003-1283DUKE UNIV PRESS, 905 W MAIN ST, STE 18-B, DURHAM, USA, NC, 27701 4、APPLIED LINGUISTICS 《应用语言学》英国 Quarterly ISSN: 0142-6001OXFORD UNIV PRESS, GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX2 6DP 5、APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS 《实用心理语言学》美国 Quarterly ISSN: 0142-7164 CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS, 32 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10013-24736、BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION 《双语：语言与认知》美国 Tri-annual ISSN: 1366-7289 CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS, 32 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10013-2473 7、BRAIN AND LANGUAGE 《大脑与语言》美国 Monthly ISSN: 0093-934X ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE, 525 B ST, STE 1900, SAN DIEGO, USA, CA, 92101-4495 8、CANADIAN MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW-REVUE CANADIENNE DES LANGUES VIVANTES 《加拿大现代语言评论》加拿大 Quarterly ISSN: 0008-4506 CANADIAN MODERN LANGUAGE REV, UNIV TORONTO PRESS, JOURNALS DIVISION, 5201 DUFFERIN ST,, N YORK, CANADA, ONTARIO, M3H 5T 9、CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS 《临床语言学与语音学》英国 Bimonthly ISSN: 0269-9206 TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON, ENGLAND, OXON, OX14 4RN 10、COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS 《认知语言学》德国 Quarterly ISSN: 0936-5907MOUTON DE GRUYTER, GENTHINER STRASSE 13, BERLIN, GERMANY, 10785 11、COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS 《计算语言学》美国 Quarterly ISSN: 0891-2017MIT PRESS, 238 MAIN STREET, STE 500, CAMBRIDGE, USA, MA, 02142-1046 12、ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES 《专业英语》英国 Quarterly ISSN: 0889-4906PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB 13、OREIGN LANGUAGE ANNALS 《外国语言纪事》美国 Quarterly ISSN: 0015-718X AMER COUNCIL TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES, 700 SOUTH WASHINGTON STREET, STE 210, ALEXANDRIA, USA, VA, 22314 14、UNCTIONS OF LANGUAGE 《语言的功能》荷兰 Semiannual ISSN: 0929-998XJOHN BENJAMINS B V PUBL, PO BOX 36224 , AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1020 ME 15、HISPANIA-A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO THE TEACHING OF SPANISH AND PORTUGUESE 《西班牙》美国 Quarterly ISSN: 0018-2133 16、INTERACTION STUDIES《交互作用研究》荷兰 Tri-annual ISSN: 1572-0373JOHN BENJAMINS B V PUBL, PO BOX 36224 , AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1020 ME 17、INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BILINGUALISM 《国际双语杂志》英国 Quarterly ISSN: 1367-0069KINGSTON PRESS SERVICES LTD, 43, DERWENT RD, WHITTON TWICKENHAM, MIDDLESEX, ENGLAND, TW2 7HQ 18、INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 《国际语言及交流障碍杂志》英国 Quarterly ISSN: 1368-2822TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON, ENGLAND, OXON, OX14 4RN 19、INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEXICOGRAPHY 《国际词汇学杂志》英国Quarterly ISSN: 0950-3846OXFORD UNIV PRESS, GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX2 6DP 20、INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND THE LAW 《国际言语、语言和法律杂志》英国 Semiannual ISSN: 1748-8885EQUINOX PUBL LTD, UNIT SIX, THE VILLAGE, 101 AMIES ST, LONDON, ENGLAND, SW11 2JW 21、JOURNAL OF AFRICAN LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTICS《非洲语言和语言学杂志》德国 Semiannual ISSN: 0167-6164MOUTON DE GRUYTER, GENTHINER STRASSE 13, BERLIN, GERMANY, 10785 22、JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE 《儿童语言杂志》美国 Tri-annual ISSN: 0305-0009CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS, 32 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10013-2473 23、JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS 《中国语言学杂志》香港 Semiannual ISSN: 0091-3723JOURNAL CHINESE LINGUISTICS, CHINESE UNIV HONG KONG, CENTRE EAST ASIAN STUDIES, SHATIN, NEW TERRITORIES, PEOPLES R CHINA, HONG KONG, 00000 24、JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 《语言交流障碍杂志》美国 Bimonthly ISSN: 0021-9924ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10010-1710 25、JOURNAL OF EAST ASIAN LINGUISTICS 《东亚语言学杂志》荷兰 Quarterly ISSN: 0925-8558SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS, 3311 GZ 26、JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS 《口吃病杂志》美国 Quarterly ISSN: 0094-730XELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10010-1710 27、JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL PRAGMATICS 《历史语用论杂志》荷兰 Semiannual ISSN: 1566-5852JOHN BENJAMINS B V PUBL, PO BOX 36224 , AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1020 ME
《中国语文》、《方言》、《语文研究》、《语言科学》、《语言研究》、《南开语言学刊》，还有各大学的学报。不过，发语言学的论文实在是太难了！
中国主要语言研究刊物基本信息其他信息目录1摘要2基本信息3其他信息《中国语言学报》中国语言学会主办的大型语言研究刊物，1982年创刊，不定期，1～2年出版 1期，现已出版 3期。基本信息《中国语言学报》中国语言学会主办的大型语言研究刊物，1982年创刊，不定期，1～2年出版 1期，现已出版 3期。每期30～40万字。主要选载中国语言学会会员和某些非会员的语言科学方面的论文。内容比较广泛，涉及现代汉语、近代汉语、古代汉语、汉语方言、少数民族语言，以及文字学、实验语音学、社会语言学、应用语言学等方面。《中国语言学报》由商务印书馆出版。具体编辑工作由执行编委轮流承担。第 1期的执行编委是：朱德熙、周祖谟、王均；第 2期的执行编委是：周祖谟、邢公畹、王均；第 3期的执行编委是：王均、邢公畹、周祖谟。《中国语文》中国社会科学院语言研究所主办的语言研究刊物，中国社会科学出版社出版。现为双月刊。以刊登现代汉语 、近代汉语 、古代汉语的语音、词汇、语法、修辞，汉语方言，以及理论语言学、实验语音学、数理语言学、应用语言学、社会语言学等方面的论文为主。主要读者对象为语言文字研究工作者和大学中文系的师生。语言学家罗常培、林汉达、丁声树、吕叔湘曾先后担任过主编，现任主编为侯精一。《中国语文》于1952年 7月创刊。最初为月刊，由中国文字改革委员会、中国科学院语言研究所合办。当时除刊登有关汉语研究和文字改革的文章外，还有普及语言科学知识、讨论语文教学、评论一般语文问题，研究介绍国内少数民族语言文字以及其他国家的语言学等方面的文章。1957年以后，编辑工作由语言研究所承担。1963年改为双月刊，发表的文章以研究性质的居多，内容也较为专门。1966年被迫停刊。1978年复刊，仍以研究性的文章为主。其他信息《语文建设》中国国家语言文字工作委员会主办的综合性语文刊物，由语文出版社出版。双月刊。主要宗旨是：宣传、贯彻国家关于语言文字工作的方针和政策，促进语言文字的规范化标准化，研究语言文字的理论、应用以及中文信息处理问题，讨论并继续推动文字改革工作。主要读者对象为具有中等以上文化程度的各级各类学校有关专业的师生、语言文字研究工作者、一般语文工作者和爱好者。现任主编为王均。《语文建设》于1986年 2月创刊。它的前身是《文字改革》月刊，由中国文字改革委员会主办，于1956年8月创刊。最初的刊名是《拼音》,1957年8月改名为《文字改革》。随着文字改革形势的发展，《文字改革》一度改为半月刊。1966年被迫停刊，1982年复刊。复刊后的《文字改革》为双月刊,1983年改为月刊,仍由中国文字改革委员会主办，主要刊登汉语研究、文字改革、推广普通话、语言学知识、语文教学以及一般语文问题等方面的文章。《语文建设》及其前身《文字改革》，在普及语文知识、促进语言文字规范化标准化、进行文字改革、推广普通话、指导语文应用等方面，都发挥了积极的作用。《方言》中国社会科学院语言研究所方言研究室主办的语言研究刊物，中国社会科学出版社出版。1979年 2月创刊，季刊，主要刊载汉语方言的调查报告和研究论文。读者对象为方言研究者、方言学教学者和方言学爱好者。现任主编为李荣。《方言》 每期大体有一个中心内容， 如概况描写、语音分析、词汇记录、语法研究、本字考释、方言比较、分区论述等等。1984年以来刊登的关于汉语方言分区的文章和地图，引起学术界的注意。《民族语文》中国社会科学院民族研究所主办的语言研究刊物,由中国社会科学出版社出版。1979年2月创刊，1979～1981年为季刊，1982年改为双月刊。主要读者对象为中国少数民族语言文字的研究者、教育者和工作者。现任主编为傅懋。《民族语文》的宗旨是宣传国家关于少数民族语文工作的方针政策，研究中国少数民族语言文字使用和发展中的理论及实际问题。发表的文章还涉及翻译理论和技巧,双语研究和民族语文教学,少数民族语言文字的调查研究，以及国内外有关学术论著的介绍、评述等。《民族语文》先后设立了“中国民族文字”、“中国民族语言概况”、“中国民族语言话语材料”、“民族语言调查研究讲话”等专栏，对中国少数民族语言文字的调查研究和汉藏语系、阿尔泰语系等诸语言的比较研究，起了促进作用。此外，比较重要的语言研究刊物还有：《语言学论丛》，北京大学中文系语言专业主办，商务印书馆出版，1957年创刊，不定期，已出版13辑，主要刊登北京大学中文系师生的语言学论文，内容比较广泛，是一种综合性的语言学研究刊物。《语言研究》，由华中工学院中国语言研究所主办,华中工学院出版社出版，1981年7月创刊,半年刊,主要发表语言理论、汉语史、文字学、现代汉语、汉语方言、少数民族语言等方面的论文，尤其重视语言学同现代科学技术相结合的研究，是一种大型的语言学研究刊物。《语文研究》，由山西省社会科学院语言研究室主办，语文出版社出版，1980年 6月创刊，季刊，主要刊载语言学理论、现代汉语、古代汉语、汉语方言、语文教学、文字及文字改革等文章, 是一种综合性的语言研究刊物。《国外语言学》，由中国社会科学院语言研究所国外语言学研究室主办，中国社会科学出版社出版，1980年 2月创刊，先为双月刊，1981年改为季刊，主要刊载介绍、翻译、研究、评论国外语言学重要论著的文章。《中国语文天地》，由《中国语文》杂志社主办，语文出版社出版，1986年 2月创刊，双月刊，主要发表一般语文问题研究、语文应用、语文教学、语文评论、语文书刊评介等文章。《外语教学与研究》，由北京外国语学院外国语言研究所主办,1957年创刊,季刊，主要交流外语教学信息、评介国外语言学理论、推荐应用语言学在国内的成果。《语言教学与研究》，由北京语言学院主办，北京语言学院出版社出版，1977年 2月创刊，先是不定期，后为季刊,主要刊登语言教学理论、对外汉语教学、汉语研究、 汉语和外语对比、汉语词汇统计、汉语句型分类、词义辨析、虚词铨释等文章,在对外汉语教学方面有较大影响。《语文导报》,由杭州大学中文系主办，《语文导报》杂志社出版，原名《语文战线》，1985年 1月改为现名，月刊，内容包括语言和文学。语言学部分，主要刊登介绍、评论语言学研究新观点、新成果、新学科的文章，综述语言学各学科的研究情况和学术讨论情况。此外，还有延边大学中文系主办的《汉语学习》（双月刊），全国高等院校文字改革学会主办的《语文现代化》 (不定期，已出8辑)，中国写作学会主办的《写作》（月刊）等。关于语文教学方面的刊物，主要有：上海教育出版社出版的《语文学习》（1977年10月创刊，月刊），人民教育出版社出版的《中学语文教学》（1979年 7月创刊，月刊），全国小学语文教学研究会主办的《小学语文教学》（1980年 5月创刊，原为双月刊，1985年改为月刊）等。免责声明头条百科的词条系由网友创建、编辑和维护，如您发现头条百科词条内容不准确或不完善，欢迎您前往词条编辑页共同参与该词条内容的编辑和修正；如您发现词条内容涉嫌侵权，请通过 与我们联系，我们将按照相关法律规定及时处理。未经许可，禁止商业网站等复制、抓取头条百科内容；合理使用者，请注明来源于。意见反馈©2020 baike.com