发布时间：
《失乐园》是一部长篇史诗，取材于《圣经旧约·创世纪》，共12卷，共一万多行，用无韵体写成。《失乐园》生动反映了英国资产阶级革命失败后革命者的生活、情绪和斗争精神。也体现了诗人愤世嫉俗、向往自由的反抗精神。通过亚当和夏娃的堕落，指出人类不幸的根源在于缺乏理性、放纵情欲、易受外界的影响。同时作者也借古讽今，暗示英国资产阶级革命所以失败，是由于革命者道德堕落，骄奢淫逸。
《失乐园》是日本小说家渡边淳一创作的一部长篇小说，讲述了一对中年男女因婚外恋而双双殉情的故事。
主要内容简介：
55岁的男主人公久木和38岁的女主人公凛子各有家庭，两人是几个月前相识的。当时久木刚从一家大出版社的出版部长位子上下来，凛子正在一家文化中心临时讲授书法。久木欣赏凛子端庄的书法高雅的气质和美貌，凛子则为久木“带有抑郁味儿的孩子气”所动心。
两人经过频繁的交往，终于一起走进了旅馆。
后来，久木妻子几次催他在离婚书上签字，出版社在出示一封恶语中伤的密告信的同时通知他将被调往下属的一家分社。
凛子的丈夫则以偏不离婚作为对她的惩罚，母亲宜布同她断绝母女关系。最后，久木留下房子和存款，只提一袋秋令毛衣告别妻女，同凛子一起悠然走向人生最后一站，在一家山庄式旅馆里相拥服毒自杀。
两人在致“大家”的遗书中写道：“原谅我们最后的我行我素吧，务请把我们合葬一处。”
《失乐园》获得2003年日本菊池宽奖 。
《失乐园》在1997年发表后在日本文坛引起了很大的轰动。随后《失乐园》也被翻译成多国文字。
扩展资料
一、作家简介
渡边淳一，男，日本籍
日本医家、小说家
1933年10月24日出生于日本北海道砂川市，2014年4月30日逝世于日本东京都，享年80岁。
二、创作灵感
作者曾坦白说：“我在写《失乐园》这本小说时，也正在谈恋爱，所以说这部小说是梦和现实相交织的产物，加上过去体会的的恋情，以及回想那时时听到的音乐和情景，使我进入了不可抗拒的的恋爱状态，沉浸在其中。”
渡边坦言创作动机：“我之所以要写《失乐园》，是因为我有一种很深的危机感，我觉得，与现代社会的高度文明相反，我们人类终归还是动物，与地球上的其他生物没有任何区别，都是由雌性与雄性构成的，可惜我们已经丧失了这个最基本的认识。”
三、作品主题
渡边淳一在《失乐园》中表现的情爱观主要有：
1、年轻人的爱固然纯洁，但是中年人在社会中会有各种复杂的关系和角色，他们背负着各种负担还能获得爱，这种爱更加纯洁。
2、真正情投意合的爱侣，随着精神之爱的加深，肉体之爱也必然不断地深化，而肉体之爱的深化又反过来促进精神之爱的不断升华。
3、两个人由心底里深深相爱而不能自拔，但爱到达绝对排他的程度时，则势必破坏这种爱，并且最终将其引向死亡。
参考资料来源：百度百科-失乐园
参考资料来源：百度百科-渡边淳一
《失乐园》是描写人类堕落的长篇史诗，讲述了人祖亚当和夏蛙在伊甸园中原奉纯真无邪，因魔魁撒旦的诱惑而反抗上帝的旨意，以致干堕落致罪的过程。诗中的主角是撒旦(也以恶魔之名出现)是第一个背叛上帝，发动天国叛乱的堕落天使，他的同伴也是破逐出天国的天使。为了唆使亚当与夏蛙反抗上帝，撒旦经历了各种危险和考验。在这部复杂的作品中，人类失去乐园的故事表达了作者的清教主义，对撒旦的描写则倾注着他的革命思想，正是那些歌颂叛逆者的响亮诗行构成了诗中最动人的篇章。
兄弟，我奉劝你一句，也许你不爱听，这里都是复d制的，分的，这种事情还得靠自己啊！~你说是不兄弟
弥尔顿失乐园句法探讨论文如果写作要求不高有个简单方法是：首先，大概确定自己的选题然后在网上查找几份类似的文章，通读一遍，对这方面的内容有个大概的了解，参照论文的格式，列出提纲，补充内容，实在不会，把这几份论文综合一下，从每篇论文上复制一部分，组成一篇新的文章希望帮到你。
约翰·弥尔顿是十七世纪英国最伟大的诗人，他的代表作《失乐园》是一部宗教政治性史诗，其主题是“人类的堕落”，也即人类的违抗和伊甸园的丧失，其根本原因是撒旦。撒旦是《失乐园》中最具生命力、塑造最为成功的形象，作者借助撒旦的形象巧妙地表达了他的革命情感与政治主张《失乐园》是一部长达十二卷的长篇史诗。故事的原型取材于《圣经》中的《创世纪3:1-24》。弥尔顿选择了人类的堕落这一主题。人类的沉沦是由于原罪——夏娃受撒旦(Satan)的引诱，人类由于违背上帝的旨意而失去了位于天堂的伊甸园。《失乐园》中最为精彩的部分就是对地狱的生动描绘，而撒旦正是这首诗歌真正的主人公。撒旦这个气度恢弘的人物形象被认为是世界文学史上刻画最为成功、最为淋漓尽致的人物形象之一。
无师自通日语
呵呵、 楼主 这个忙不好帮 。你自己查查有关资料 或者去咨询一下老师把。实在太难 。 楼主自己想想 自己写写吧 ！祝你早日写成啊 。。
论文的题目是一篇论文的灵魂，好的题目可以吸引人们的眼球。下面是我带来的关于美国文学方向论文选题的内容，欢迎阅读参考! 美国文学方向论文选题(一) 1. 从《在路上》看五六十年代美国社会价值观 2. 评希思克利夫被扭曲的心路历程 3. 试论马克·吐温短篇小说的幽默特色 4. 惠特曼的死亡哲学 5. 论《呼啸山庄》--原始古朴与文明理性的交错色彩 6. 论《了不起的盖茨比》中“二元主角”手法的运用 7. 透过小说《威廉·威尔逊》和《黑猫》看艾伦·坡的善恶观 8. 从《飘》看内战对美国文学的影响 9. 论《美国丽人》一片中人物的两面性 10. 论海明威小说中的死亡主题 11. 浅析艾丽丝·沃克的《紫颜色》 12. 女性作家的共性 13. 《倾城之恋》与《飘》的女权意识比较研究 14. 《失乐园》 与《圣经》中撒旦形象的对比 15. 《老人与海》与《鲁宾逊漂流记》的比较研究 16. 哥特式风格在《弗兰克斯坦》中的体现 17. 浅议反讽手法在《蝇王》中的运用 18. 分析麦尔维尔《白鲸》中的象征主义 19. 艾略特早期诗歌中的人物形象分析 20. 《丧钟为谁而鸣》中的女性形象分析 美国文学方向论文选题(二) 1. 从《简爱 》看早期女权主义的理想和追求 2. 十九世 纪英国小说家笔下的真、善、美 3. 英国十 八世纪浪漫主义诗人的自然观 4. Romanticism in Mark Twin's works 5. 批评方法之我见 段燕 6. 浅谈泰戈尔的生命 段燕 7. 浅谈《红字》中珠儿形象的作用 8. 论《 红字》中的道德主题 9. 论海丝特·白兰的性 格发展 10. 《红字》中象征手法的运用 11. 论霍桑《红字》中“A”的象征意义 12. 象征意向在《了不起的盖茨比》中的运用 13. 论《了不起的盖茨比》的艺术特点 14. 伍尔夫创作中的女权主义立场 15. 弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫的女权思想 16. 伍尔夫女 性视角中的女性形象分析 17. 流派研究 18. 世纪美国浪漫主义与英国浪漫主义 19. 超现实主义 20. 魔幻现实主义 21. Jane as a narrator and as a character 22. Character Analysis of Nancy, the “criminal” in Oliver Twist 23. Virginia Woolf and Modern Feminine Independence 24. An Analysis of Charles Dickens' Great Expectation 美国文学方向论文选题(三) 1、 透过《傲慢与偏见》看现代社会爱情观 2、生与死的抗争--《厄舍古厦的倒塌》主题解读 3、浅谈“欧·亨利式结尾”及其文学影响 4、从宗教角度解读简爱的多重性格 5、从女权主义角度剖析《小妇人》中的乔 6、 “英雄”的陨落--悲剧美学角度分析《老人与海》 7、 从《菊花》中看女主人公Elisa实现自我价值的障碍 8、奉献与宽容---浅析《双城记》中的仁爱精神 9、 《格列佛游记》中对理性的反思与批判 10、浅析《警察和赞美诗》的戏剧化特色 11、一场失败革命的反思---论《动物庄园》中所表现的象征意义 12、论詹姆斯·乔伊斯《阿拉比》的精神顿悟 13、从后印象主义角度解读《到灯塔去》中的双性同体观 14、 从中西方道德观差异谈《伊利亚特》与《封神演义》人物品德 15、 韦伯《猫》中的女性主义 16、 浅析《儿子与情人》中的心理冲突 17、浅析中西方喜剧文化---以《武林外传》和《老友记》为例 18、从女性主义看《傲慢与偏见》中的女性形象 19、《瓦尔登湖》中自然主义的现实意义 20、 从男性角色解读《简爱》中的女性反抗意识 猜你喜欢： 1. 英美文学方向毕业论文 2. 文化方向论文题目 3. 英美文学方向论文 4. 美国文化学术论文格式 5. 美国文化学术论文格式要求
共有记录20条 首页 上页 下页 末页 /1 序号 篇名 作者 刊名 年/期 1 Free to Fall:The Theme of "Free Will" in Paradise Lost and Milton’s Religion 刘轶 科技信息(学术研究) 2008/16 2 新古典主义时期的《失乐园》评论综述 乔莉萍 辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版) 2008/02 3 论知青作家的“失乐园”心态 刘起林 海南师范大学学报(社会科学版) 2007/05 4 “失乐园”:人与自然的背离——沈从文小说中的生态哲学意蕴 佘爱春 玉林师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版) 2007/06 5 浅析约翰·弥尔顿《失乐园》的创作目的和革命主题 常艳莉 东北农业大学学报(社会科学版) 2007/05 6 试析《失乐园》中撒旦的艺术形象 齐军 江西科技师范学院学报 2007/02 7 弥尔顿《失乐园》的文学特征 李万立 合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版) 2007/03 8论《失乐园》 张隆溪 外国文学 2007/01 9 英国资产阶级革命一曲赞歌——评弥尔顿的《失乐园》 于海军 成都大学学报(教育科学版) 2007/01 10 《废都》与《失乐园》中的女性观照 樊冠钰 宁波职业技术学院学报 2006/03 11 一曲回望天堂的牧歌——评叶芝的《茵内斯弗利湖岛》 李小均 山东外语教学 2005/05 12 灵魂的“失乐园”——徐坤《厨房》的叙事结构及意蕴分析 周建华 哈尔滨学院学报 2005/11 13 《失乐园》的艺术风格 王翠瑛 嘉兴学院学报 2005/04 14 《失乐园》中撒旦形象的重新审视 黄德林 上海大学学报(社会科学版) 2004/05 15 渡边淳一小说《失乐园》略说 王秋华 武汉大学学报(人文科学版) 2004/03 16 《失乐园》 JohnMieton 中学生英语(高中版) 2003/10 17 失落的乐园 郑闽江 西安外国语学院学报 2003/01 18 论撒旦作为诱惑者的变化——从《失乐园》到《复乐园》 徐贵霞 淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版) 2003/01 19 反思叛逆,企盼理性——《失乐园》主题探微 张勤 浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版) 2002/05 20 失乐园的哀歌──试论李金发象征主义诗歌创作 李力 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版) 2000/04 希望对你有帮助，在我个人中心帮你下了 1。 16。
不确定性的狂欢——《达芬奇密码》的后现代主义解读从文学文体学角度浅析《汤姆叔叔的小屋》中的反奴斗争接受美学视角下《暮光之城》字幕翻译的审美再现策略针对“00后”学生特点的初中英语个性化教学研究
I am from America. Hope this helps!Paradise Lost is the famous epic by 17th-century English poet John Milton. Published in 1667, the poem tells the story of Satan's rebellion against God, his expulsion from Heaven along with the rest of the rebel angels, and how he tempted Adam and Eve to eat of the forbidden fruit and fall from grace (hence the title). Its sequel, Paradise Regained, tells the story of Jesus' temptation in the wilderness by Satan and how he resisted the Devil's blandishments, thereby passing on humanity's behalf the test which Adam and Eve failed. Paradise Lost is an epic in every sense of the word: vast and ambitious in scope, powerful and moving in its language, vivid in its depictions, its plot proceeding inevitably from the first couple's initial bliss to their ultimate tragic fall. Milton's Satan is one of the most three-dimensional characters in anything I have ever read. As a work of fiction, it is superb. However, as a depiction of actual events, I find it not just false, but unacceptable. Though inadvertently, Milton's work has almost perfectly enumerated the reasons why I am not a Christian, to wit: its infinitely unjust conception of infinite punishment for finite sins; its inexplicably incompetent deity who allows his omnipotent will to be so easily thwarted; its flagrant and revolting sexism in repeatedly styling women the inferior of men in every respect; its anti-humanistic outlook that values blind faith and obedience and denigrates knowledge and understanding; and the many logical contradictions inherent in the Christian system. I can appreciate its artistic merit, but I wholeheartedly reject its viewed as two parts of a whole, Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained give a very consistent message. That message is this: Doubt is evil. Critical thinking is evil. Reason is to be denied and denigrated. Seeking to understand the world is at best unprofitable and pointless and at worst a straight road to eternal torment. Instead, virtue consists of absolute obedience and blind belief: as Satan mused, ignorance is indeed "the proof of [our] obedience and [our] faith". As has been noted, the arguments given by Satan in these books make sense, more so than the replies. Why should God have let the devils out of Hell when the only purpose that served was to allow them to drag others down to damnation? Why should God value ignorance and envy those who gain knowledge? Yet we are not to give these arguments any serious consideration; the appropriate response is to dismiss them out of hand. In Milton's theology, moral goodness consists of rejecting the desire to learn, ignoring all contrary arguments, and when doubt arises, overcoming it by redoubling one's belief. For those who do seek to question and learn, the story of others who did the same and fell into misery for it - bringing upon us all the misery that anyone has ever experienced in the process - is presented as a cautionary tale. The message is as subtle as a sledgehammer blow. As human beings, we should all be appalled by this kind of willfully ignorant superstition. Our rational, reasoning mind is the most precious thing we possess, and used in the right ways, it can achieve astounding things. In the centuries that have passed since Milton first set pen to paper, the previously inconceivable advances we have made as a result of our dedicated quest to understand the universe through science more than vindicate the humanist philosophy and discredit anti-intellectualism such as this. Even Milton's own epic shows that knowledge is superior to ignorance. Raphael's long monologue telling Adam who and what Satan is and warning against listening to him does not appear in Genesis. Is this Milton's tacit admission that in the Eden story as written, God is left culpable by not providing humanity with sufficient warning? Has it occurred to him that Adam and Eve's enforced ignorance was the very thing that made them so vulnerable to Satan's guile? Even in an epic where the author offers himself ample opportunity for apologetics and self-justification, the logical problems with this theology shine through. God's defenses of his actions are insufficient, and Jesus' responses to Satan's arguments are often patently weak and flawed, but Milton always depicts Satan as being stung and left overwhelmed and speechless by them. Of course, in real debates against knowledgeable opponents where the outcomes cannot be so easily scripted and controlled, Christian apologists rarely fare as well. I am aware that not all Christians believe the same as John Milton. I realize that many reject the doctrines of the inequality of women, condemnation for honest questioning, and the literal interpretation of Genesis altogether. I applaud this courage, but it cannot be denied that many of these ideas are explicitly taught in the Bible. The solution is not merely to discard them and retain belief in the rest of the Bible - the solution is to set the Bible and its anti-humanistic claims aside entirely. There was no past Paradise from which we fell for the crime of wanting to understand the world. There is no future Hell awaiting those who dare to question and think for themselves. There is nothing for an honest investigator to fear. We are not fallen, we are not sinners, we are not wretches. We are human beings, all equal, and when we finally awake from the mythological dreams of our past, we will know and understand the much brighter light of the world as it truly is - and in that understanding lie the true keys to an earthly paradise.
约翰·弥尔顿是十七世纪英国最伟大的诗人，他的代表作《失乐园》是一部宗教政治性史诗，其主题是“人类的堕落”，也即人类的违抗和伊甸园的丧失，其根本原因是撒旦。撒旦是《失乐园》中最具生命力、塑造最为成功的形象，作者借助撒旦的形象巧妙地表达了他的革命情感与政治主张《失乐园》是一部长达十二卷的长篇史诗。故事的原型取材于《圣经》中的《创世纪3:1-24》。弥尔顿选择了人类的堕落这一主题。人类的沉沦是由于原罪——夏娃受撒旦(Satan)的引诱，人类由于违背上帝的旨意而失去了位于天堂的伊甸园。《失乐园》中最为精彩的部分就是对地狱的生动描绘，而撒旦正是这首诗歌真正的主人公。撒旦这个气度恢弘的人物形象被认为是世界文学史上刻画最为成功、最为淋漓尽致的人物形象之一。
太长时间了吗你太
新华书店有渡边淳一的小说中日对照版你可以去看看
百度 google如果都帮不上你的话，那其他人基本也就算了。
I am from America. Hope this helps!Paradise Lost is the famous epic by 17th-century English poet John Milton. Published in 1667, the poem tells the story of Satan's rebellion against God, his expulsion from Heaven along with the rest of the rebel angels, and how he tempted Adam and Eve to eat of the forbidden fruit and fall from grace (hence the title). Its sequel, Paradise Regained, tells the story of Jesus' temptation in the wilderness by Satan and how he resisted the Devil's blandishments, thereby passing on humanity's behalf the test which Adam and Eve failed. Paradise Lost is an epic in every sense of the word: vast and ambitious in scope, powerful and moving in its language, vivid in its depictions, its plot proceeding inevitably from the first couple's initial bliss to their ultimate tragic fall. Milton's Satan is one of the most three-dimensional characters in anything I have ever read. As a work of fiction, it is superb. However, as a depiction of actual events, I find it not just false, but unacceptable. Though inadvertently, Milton's work has almost perfectly enumerated the reasons why I am not a Christian, to wit: its infinitely unjust conception of infinite punishment for finite sins; its inexplicably incompetent deity who allows his omnipotent will to be so easily thwarted; its flagrant and revolting sexism in repeatedly styling women the inferior of men in every respect; its anti-humanistic outlook that values blind faith and obedience and denigrates knowledge and understanding; and the many logical contradictions inherent in the Christian system. I can appreciate its artistic merit, but I wholeheartedly reject its viewed as two parts of a whole, Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained give a very consistent message. That message is this: Doubt is evil. Critical thinking is evil. Reason is to be denied and denigrated. Seeking to understand the world is at best unprofitable and pointless and at worst a straight road to eternal torment. Instead, virtue consists of absolute obedience and blind belief: as Satan mused, ignorance is indeed "the proof of [our] obedience and [our] faith". As has been noted, the arguments given by Satan in these books make sense, more so than the replies. Why should God have let the devils out of Hell when the only purpose that served was to allow them to drag others down to damnation? Why should God value ignorance and envy those who gain knowledge? Yet we are not to give these arguments any serious consideration; the appropriate response is to dismiss them out of hand. In Milton's theology, moral goodness consists of rejecting the desire to learn, ignoring all contrary arguments, and when doubt arises, overcoming it by redoubling one's belief. For those who do seek to question and learn, the story of others who did the same and fell into misery for it - bringing upon us all the misery that anyone has ever experienced in the process - is presented as a cautionary tale. The message is as subtle as a sledgehammer blow. As human beings, we should all be appalled by this kind of willfully ignorant superstition. Our rational, reasoning mind is the most precious thing we possess, and used in the right ways, it can achieve astounding things. In the centuries that have passed since Milton first set pen to paper, the previously inconceivable advances we have made as a result of our dedicated quest to understand the universe through science more than vindicate the humanist philosophy and discredit anti-intellectualism such as this. Even Milton's own epic shows that knowledge is superior to ignorance. Raphael's long monologue telling Adam who and what Satan is and warning against listening to him does not appear in Genesis. Is this Milton's tacit admission that in the Eden story as written, God is left culpable by not providing humanity with sufficient warning? Has it occurred to him that Adam and Eve's enforced ignorance was the very thing that made them so vulnerable to Satan's guile? Even in an epic where the author offers himself ample opportunity for apologetics and self-justification, the logical problems with this theology shine through. God's defenses of his actions are insufficient, and Jesus' responses to Satan's arguments are often patently weak and flawed, but Milton always depicts Satan as being stung and left overwhelmed and speechless by them. Of course, in real debates against knowledgeable opponents where the outcomes cannot be so easily scripted and controlled, Christian apologists rarely fare as well. I am aware that not all Christians believe the same as John Milton. I realize that many reject the doctrines of the inequality of women, condemnation for honest questioning, and the literal interpretation of Genesis altogether. I applaud this courage, but it cannot be denied that many of these ideas are explicitly taught in the Bible. The solution is not merely to discard them and retain belief in the rest of the Bible - the solution is to set the Bible and its anti-humanistic claims aside entirely. There was no past Paradise from which we fell for the crime of wanting to understand the world. There is no future Hell awaiting those who dare to question and think for themselves. There is nothing for an honest investigator to fear. We are not fallen, we are not sinners, we are not wretches. We are human beings, all equal, and when we finally awake from the mythological dreams of our past, we will know and understand the much brighter light of the world as it truly is - and in that understanding lie the true keys to an earthly paradise.
兄弟，我奉劝你一句，也许你不爱听，这里都是复d制的，分的，这种事情还得靠自己啊！~你说是不兄弟