如题
人要认识自己的平庸,自己是真的不适合学术呀
机械工程学报,初审 终审都没收到意见,直接进入编辑加工了,请问这种情况怎么样?就怕直接退稿,审稿好久了。
机械工程学报初审完了就编辑加工状态,外审意见没出,求分析。。。有没有大佬展示一下机工报的审稿时间表
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science期刊的账号登不上,改了密码只能登录一次,再次登录就登不进去了。有没有人知道这是怎么回事啊。
ORCID能登上去,但是不知道怎么投稿,有知道的吗
有投过的吗 交了审稿费一天了
Biosensors and Bioelectronics 编辑报告看不太懂,请求帮忙,谢谢。认真回答的大虾送5个币。
我投稿于Biosensors and Bioelectronics 上。编辑给的意见是修改后重投,有一个审稿人的意见需要一些修改。但是,在信件末尾有Editors' report:An "X" has been placed before the paragraph that you need to take into consideration. 这个到底是什么意思?好像是说有“X”的需要修改,但信件里没有出现“X”。那到底怎么办?
因为编辑报告的第三条,好像说是要我改成short communication,还有第五点要我重写摘要。。。。但是这些都没打X。您投这个杂志时是怎么样的?
请求帮忙,谢谢。(其实金币不是很重要,只是非常感谢您帮我解决问题,因为我第一次投稿,没有经验。所以最好请投过的大虾帮忙解决).
以下是编辑给我的邮件:
Dear Dr.
Your paper has been reviewed and we have carefully considered all our referees' comments concerning your manuscript and reviewed your manuscript. We have unfortunately decided not to publish your paper in
Biosensors and Bioelectronics on this occasion.
However, we would be happy to review your re-submission, as a new submission via the website, if you would like to revise your paper according to our reviewers' comments. In order for us to deal with this rapidly could you please provide a detailed letter containing the manuscript number and your responses specifically and clearly to EACH point raised in the referees' reports.
For each point, please
(a) list the Referees questions;
(b) indicate whether you agree or disagree with the referee and why;
(c) describe what specific changes have been made in response to the points in the revised manuscript and in which pages. Please also highlight the changes to the
manuscript in RED.
We trust that you will not be discouraged from submitting further papers to us in the future. We would like to take this opportunity to thank you for choosing Biosensors and Bioelectronics as your publishing medium.
We have done our utmost to process your manuscript swiftly and fairly. You are welcome to write to us if you believe that we have made a factual error, but in matters of discretion the Editors' decision is final.
Biosensors and Bioelectronics is the principal international journal in its field and is seeking to maintain and continually improve its reputation for publishing top quality papers.
We wish you every success with your future endeavours and hope that we will receive further submissions from you in the future.
The reviewers' comments are appended below.
Reviewers' comments:
Editors' report:
You need to take into consideration the following issues marked with "X" in the Editor's report when revising your manuscript:
1. Review Articles should present a thorough and comprehensive overview of the chosen subject and be extensively referenced and comprise around 8000 words. Authors are expected to go beyond a simple compilation of references and analyse trends, shortcomings and accomplishments in their chosen field, charting possible future directions of the research. Illustrations and summary tables are encouraged. Flexibility of presentation is permitted, but authors are urged to arrange the subject matter clearly under the general headings of Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Main text (The heading and the sub-headings of the main text are left to author's discretion), Summary and Conclusions, Future Perspectives, Acknowledgements, References.
2. Full papers should be complete descriptions of full investigations comprising around 5000 words with up to 6 single figures/tables/schemes in total, but your manuscript is too long or comprises too many figures/tables/schemes. You could use the supplemental information feature for extra figures/tables/. Supplementary files supplied will be published online alongside the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Science web products, but will not appear in the printed issue. You can find the details at
3. We would consider your revised manuscript for publication as a Short Communication. It should be complete descriptions of original limited investigations comprising around 3000 words with up to three single figures/tables/schemes. Alternatively, you could use the supplemental information feature for extra figures/tables/schemes. Supplementary files supplied will be published online alongside the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Science web products, but will not appear in the printed issue. You can find the details at
4. Most referees still prefer to read hard copy when they review your manuscript. In order to aid referees in printing you are strongly recommended to make your manuscript text compact and to check that it will print out in a convenient format.
5. Please rewrite the Abstract. In general, the abstract is a condensation of the information (facts) in the paper (150-250 words) and should present briefly and clearly the methods of the research and the principal results.
6. A maximum of six keywords should be given below the Abstract to describe the contents of the paper.
7. The Results and Discussion section needs to be expanded. The Results and Discussion should deals with the interpretation of the results in the light of previously published findings and must be clearly presented.
8. Please add the Conclusions section. It must be fully supported by the results reported and should include the major conclusions, the limitations of the work and the future work.
9. Please rewrite the Conclusions.
9.1 The Conclusions section is too long. It should be kept short and must be fully supported by the results reported.
9.2 The Conclusions section is not sound. It should include the major conclusions, the limitations of the work and the future work.
10. Please do not place a list of abbreviations in the text. Do not use an abbreviation without explaining it beforehand. The first time the word/phrase is introduced, put the abbreviation in brackets after the word/phrase.
11. In order to demonstrate the repeatability/reproducibility of the method authors are asked to include Error Bars in figures, and relative standard deviations (RSD) or coefficient of variation (CV) in the figures captions or in the text.
12. In order to demonstrate the repeatability/reproducibility of the method authors are asked to include relative standard deviations (RSD) or coefficient of variation (CV) in Tables.
13. We strongly suggest you to find a native English speaker to check your manuscript.
14. Please number the headings and sub-headings of the manuscript.
15. The format of the paper is incorrect. Please correct it according to the instructions of the Guide for Authors of Biosensors and Bioelectronics at
16. The format of references is incorrect. Please correct it according to the instructions of the Guide for Authors of Biosensors and Bioelectronics at Please note it is not necessary to add the title of the publications in the list of references.
17. Please delete the title of the publications in the list of references.
18. In order for the publisher to edit your paper the article must be saved in the native format of the word processor used, e.g., Word Perfect, Microsoft Word, etc.
19. All the figures/tables/schemes with captions should be inserted in the text where the authors want.
请问一下各位,我是6.22号投的science of the total environment ,但是到今天还是with editor,请问送审的机会大吗?
中文核心论文投稿,终审过后两个月都没动静了,这是什么情况?
麻烦咨询下,第一次投ACS,问下投稿时 Cover Art,Cover Art Caption,Graphic for manuscript都有什么区别啊
之前都是硕士论文见刊前,
英文文章同步出来了,
但是这次写作速度慢了一些,
想先中文的快一些,
不知道各位虫友是否有相关宝贵经验呢!
非常感谢指导!
《2023年中国科学院文献情报中心期刊分区表》正式发布。由中国地震局主管,中国地震局工程力学研究所主办的《Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration》(《地震工程与工程振动(英文刊)》)位列工程技术2区。又多了篇二区论文!
我在Journal of Applied Polymer science (JAPS) 投稿,两周了,依然是Manuscript Submitted,有懂的大神吗,周期什么的,谢谢了
如今,如果你以通讯作者身份投稿,很多期刊都会要求你提供 Orcid。有人说 ORCID 没什么用,其实并不是这样。你投稿时将自己的 ORCID 关联后,发表的文章肯定是你的,同名同姓的人就算和你在同一个工作单位工作也冒领不了你这篇文章。 另外,它还可以关联其它的 ID, 如 Research ID,有了这个 ID, 研究者们如果发表的文章高被引比较多,有可能获得 Highly Cited Researcher (Clarivate) 的光荣称号。还有,它还可以关联 Scopus Author ID, 斯坦福大学每年发布的 World's Top 2% Scientists 应该就是根据这个 ID 上作者文章的发表数量,引用量及 H-Index 来确认一个研究者是否能够入围。总之, 我觉得它很好用,并且收获良多(最近几年有幸先后荣登这两个光荣榜)。 希望广大科研人员趁早注册 ORCID,Research ID,和 Scopus Author ID,早插秧,早收谷,早登榜单早幸福!
期刊energies,影响因子3.2,q3,主题绿色氢能与环境,涉及催化、氢能、绿色环境技术、氢能政策的领域均可投稿,欢迎各位学子和老师、同行不吝赐稿。