本人电力系统小硕一枚，着急毕业，投了一篇applied science的文章，是开源sci，影响因子一点多，目前回复了两个意见，请问录用有机会么，编辑还没给意见
专家1意见：
English language and style
( ) Extensive editing of English language and style required
(x) Moderate English changes required
( ) English language and style are fine/minor spell check required
( ) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English language and style
Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Is the research design appropriate? ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Are the methods adequately described? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Are the results clearly presented? ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
I think the section on problem statement should be shortened, as this problem has already been reported in the literature. I suggested to add the following relevant paper to the references as well:
A. Hooshyar, M. A. Azzouz and E. F. El-Saadany, "Three-Phase Fault Direction Identification for Distribution Systems With DFIG-Based Wind DG," IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 747-756, July 2014.
专家2意见：
English language and style
( ) Extensive editing of English language and style required
( ) Moderate English changes required
(x) English language and style are fine/minor spell check required
( ) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English language and style
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
I believe the above paper fall in the periphery of the Applied Sciences journal purposes.
The paper is too technical and focused on the power systems and wind turbines area.
Thus, I would propose to suggest the authors to submit their work in a technical journal of the specific area of power systems and wind turbines/RES technical aspects. Article has serious flaws, additional experiments needed, research not conducted correctly
安德鲁鱼
