投的Vacuum期刊，遇到了关于XPS提问的问题，想请专业人士如何回答？

问题如下：1. "The diameter of focus spot was 200 μm, the power was 50 W, and the calibration binding energy of C was 284.8 eV." Note that aligning the spectra to the C 1s peak of adventitious carbon is not reliable as it may lead to unphysical results (ChemPhysChem 18 (2017) 1507, Sci. Rep. 11 (2021) 11195, and Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 5002). Adventitious carbon is in general an unknown compound, not an inherent part of the sample, does not make proper electrical contact to the analyzed sample, BE of the C 1s peak varies in a wide range. You could use the C-C signal from polyamide but you need to verify that the contribution of adventitious carbon to the C 1s spectra is small. If that is not the case the second option is to use the method based on the sample work function (see: Appl. Surf. Sci. 451 (2018) 99)@

这个主编对XPS很在行的。

你最好找身边的老师同学请教，在网上很难有满意的结果

是不是编辑问的？

是的

专业问题建议去相关专业版交流，这里主要交流论文投稿中的一般问题。

好的，谢谢。

好的，谢谢。

哈哈哈哈你也被问XPS了
我两次投稿 两次被问
我怀疑提问的是主编lars hultmann

应该是主编，你怎么回答的，指教下。

我也是，一模一样。改了一遍了，我是做电池的，全是问我XPS问题。