发布时间：
What Environmental Disaster? We have developed a huge and thriving society; and in the process we deforest huge sections of land for living and livestock grazing. This decreases oxygen and increases carbon dioxide in the atmosphere; possibly adding to global warming though the greenhouse effect. This mass population produces mass amounts of waste, so to deal with that we just throw it into the ground, which in turn contaminates our water supply and contributes to further deforestation. We develop motorized transportation; and then burn non-renewable fossil fuels that put lead, carbon monoxide, sulfur and nitrogen oxides, ozone, excess carbon dioxide, and other harmful particulates into the atmosphere (Skjel & Whorton 95-108). This produces dangers like smog and cancer and contributes to global warming. In the production of fuel we exhaust oil reserves and pollute the oceans through spills from tankers. This endangers wilderness and wildlife. We produce an inert, easily producible propellant for aerosols; and then realize it's only inert on the ground. Once it's bombarded by UV ray in the upper atmosphere it releases a highly destructive ion that wreaks havoc on the protective ozone layer shielding us from those same deadly UV rays, creating a hole in the layer allowing the radiation through, increasing cancer and other genetic defects. We build rockets capable of going into space and breaking the earth's gravitational pull; and then immediately start to pollute this new environment with spent rockets and boosters along with other miscellaneous particles of debris (Curran and Haw 3). Michael Crichton writes, "What we call nature is a complex system of far greater subtlety than we are willing to accept. We make a simplified view of nature and then botch it all up. ...You have to understand what you don't understand. How many times must the point be made? How many times must we see the evidence? We build the Aswan Dam and claim it is going to revitalize the country. Instead, it destroys the fertile Nile Delta, produces parasitic infestation, and wrecks the Egyptian economy" (Jurassic Park 91). To the common person our current situation contains little hope. All the advancement and improvements have done little to further our species. With each one has come a new environmental issue. You almost need to evaluate each situation in terms of positives and negatives. However, at the root of all this chaos you'll find anthropocentrism, a human centered way of thinking. This way of thinking as an attitude, and moral theory, centers on humans as the highest of the significant beings. The theory views nature and the environment in terms of their use value for humans only (Michaels 7). So all of the above developments with costs can be justified through their usefulness for humans. The human centered ethic is deeply rooted in the past through the ancient Greek and Roman societies. To pursue further development based on this ethic would be disastrous. With our current numbers of population and rate of growth we're just asking for an environmental catastrophe of the highest magnitude to act as a wake up call. Granted that a great deal of the population realizes that unless action is taken today then we'll have to face that disaster tomorrow. The principle question is how to go about alleviating and repairing the damage we've already caused. We also need to address how to prevent doing further damage for the sake of future generations. The only problem with this view is that it is still a human centered ethic. It still sees the environment as a thing to be utilized by humans for their own pleasure. It doesn't do enough. The problems aren't getting fixed. Better ways of doing things are being researched, but the underlying problem is not receiving any attention. So the environmental downward spiral is only slowed down and is not fixed. We've still got the same problems. To take the conservationist attitude further you would see all sentient beings as holding moral standing and due consideration. This includes most of the animals in the world; any animal capable of experiencing pleasure and pain. Through these experiences you form the basis for the extended moral theory. If the animals perish through their habitat's destruction or outside influences, then their future pleasures will no longer be. When you take into account whole societies and communities of animals then the added value to the environment increases exponentially as you combine their happiness with the happiness never experienced by their future generations (Singer 275-276). So by taking this viewpoint you place even more intrinsic value on the environment through the experiences of all sentient animals involved. But at a time when our behavior may well lead us to extinction, I see no reason to assume that we have any awareness at all. We are stubborn, self-destructive conformists. Any other view of our species is just a self-congratulatory delusion" (The Lost World 7-8). Granted this does not present a case for sentience on the basis of pain vs. pleasure, but it does present an interesting way to think about classifying sentience. So you can see drawing the cut off line for even lower animals could present considerable challenges. You have trouble reaching an adequate definition of "sentient." You are now facing how much awareness a creature has to perceive pain and pleasure along with joy from anticipation of future events to consider it morally significant. If a cat is significant, but not a fish, what makes the cat a moral patient while the fish is not? Where is there a difference? There is a problem of arbitrarily assigning moral value when actual feelings and emotions are beyond description. To go a step further away from human sentience you would hold all living thing to be of moral value. This would then bring plants and non-sentient animals into the picture. This view holds life as the ultimate intrinsic value. Beings have moral value in just being alive. So life is viewed as an intrinsic good, and no verifying pleasures or pains being experienced are needed to allot this worth. Anything living is held with a reverence for that life (Singer 277-278). 2】The Environmental Revolution - We Can Make a Difference! Since the first time having blown bubbles in my Open Water class, I've logged over 100 dives. This love for diving has evolved into an intense passion towards protecting the ocean, and all of its inhabitants. I've chosen to put my love for the ocean into action, as an environmentalist. Actually, this passion extends out towards efforts that look to help all the planetary domains gain protection. As such, I appreciate when others take the time educate me on those other realms for which I know less about. To be an environmentalist, one must choose the cause which resonates within ones sole, and run with it. One must be willing to educate people about the environment while being open to education from those people who support other causes. Together we can help each other towards learning how to become a true "Environmentalist". We must all encourage positive collaboration and education as opposed to being against something. For example, sharks are being decimated to near extinction simply for their fins. The fins are used to make Shark Fin soup, a delicacy popular particularly in Taiwan and Singapore. It would be easy to blame these communities for creating the demand. However, in conversing with Asian environmentalists, they liken the culture around eating Shark Fin soup to the culture surrounding Americans eating turkey for Thanksgiving dinner. There are ongoing efforts to educate these people, by members of their own community, on just how dangerous this cultural practice is and the devastating impact this could have on their (our) world if all the sharks were to disappear as a result. Environmentalists everywhere are making a difference! Famous restaurants have taken endangered Swordfish off their menus, these same restaurants are buying wild-caught salmon (and boosting the economy of local fisheries in the process), laundromats have started selling green detergent, this just to name a few of these enlightened changes. This is how the "Environmentalist" can begin the revolution. Just find something you believe in and make a stand. One by one, we can make our planet a cleaner place to live, steeped in healthy bio-diversity for generations to come. 3Giving 1% to Protect Our Environment Though most of the world's surface is covered by water, since the Earth is so large relative to human horizons, there doesn't appear to be a shortage of land. However, when one begins to think of land in terms of a human resource, ., a producer of food, a provider of wood, an expanse for passage, one realizes that many portions are either too lacking in nutrients, too high in elevation, too prone to flooding, or too cold or ice-ridden for extensive use. Furthermore, habitable lands are becoming less abundant due to desertification (the expansion of deserts due to the misuse of land), agricultural expansions and rising sea levels. Since humans aren't the only species that need land, it isn't surprising that this resource is becoming limited for other forms of life too. In part as a result of this added stress on living things, we are also witnessing extinctions of grand proportions-at a rate of many thousands species per year. Since these losses are largely due to human actions, such as deforestation and non-native species introduction, many are beginning to pay attention to how we use and protect land. Recent ecological research has also recently provided a message of hope concerning the future well-being of life on this planet. In the world today, scientists estimate that the Earth is losing at least 1 percent of species every ten years, and the percentage loss may be close to 5 percent. Even if only the lower rate persists, the Earth will have lost near half of its biological diversity by 2070. Can this be possible? Many esteemed scientists think so. While the future appears bleak, several recent insights tell us that we have the potential to significantly reduce what amounts to a biotic holocaust, one not witnessed on Earth for over 60,000,000 years. While there are hopeful signs in the area of human activities (such as increased acreage of nature preserves and national parks), the hope of which I speak of here stems from specific characteristics of the other forms of life which may enable us to mutually coexist in the long term. The Earth's organisms are wonderfully varied in size, shape, function, behavior, and genetic code. One only need to consider that there are ~ 15,000 species of butterflies and ~50,000 species of mushrooms worldwide to begin to fathom the immensity of variety that this planet has. Yet, as different as the species come, the bulk of living things are also similar in a couple of very important ways. Most living things live in relatively small regions and do not travel far from where they or their parents were born. In fact, recent biological and ecological work has determined that most land species are very particular about where they live. As opposed to humans whose choice of home is largely driven by economic and political forces (mobility driven by availability of wealth or forced relocation), flora and fauna find themselves in locations for which they are adapted. We now know that many species of insects and plants have a very restricted range in which they found. Very few organisms are ubiquitous like we are. It goes without saying that you aren't going to find a Great Blue Heron or a Grizzly visiting Antarctica or climbing Mt. Everest; yet you might find the snow bear (recently discovered and previously known as the Abominable Snowman) doing the latter. Recognizing that most living things are rather localized during their lifetimes has profound implications, both hopeful and cautious. On the one hand, it suggests that we can learn a lot about species by parking our scientific minds in specific locations. On the other hand, it means that if we destroy even small areas of the globe we are likely causing great and even irreversible destruction to the species that are found there. We have also determined that there are specific locations on our planet where a disproportionate number of species live. For our species, Asia serves as the homeland for most. In fact more than 60 percent of humans lives on this largest of continents (which only makes up 24 percent of the land surface on the planet). With other life forms, geographic concentrations sometimes defy description. We only recently became aware that the vast majority of terrestrial (as distinguished from oceanic or riparian) species collectively live on just 1 percent of the Earth's land surface. (If humans lived at a comparable concentration level, we'd all have to cluster together in an area roughly the size of Antarctica or twice that of Australia.) This mind-blowing realization has prompted those that have been struggling to protect organisms a new way of thinking about such protection. They have concluded that if we humans could somehow find a way to avoid disturbing just 1-2 percent of the land surface, nearly 70 percent of the world's terrestrial species might be able to survive. Recently some conservationists have refocused their attention on these unique locations. The regions of the globe that contain such a splendid array of biological diversity have been named "hot spots," a name that communicates their critical status. In what has to be the most beautiful books I have seen, Hotspots represents the collective work of scientists Russ and Cristina Mittermeier and Norman Myers as well as photographer Patricio Robles Gil. In this oversized volume, these four scholars have assembled more than three hundred vivid photographs of some of the world's endangered species and threatened ecosystems. These absolutely breath-taking images come from the what they refer to as "the 25 most critically important regions" in the world. These regions originally constituted almost 12 percent of the world's land surface but now, due to human pressure at many levels, only a little more than 1 percent remains intact. What makes these locations, which are found on all continents except Antarctica, so "hot" is that they are home to hordes of the Earth's plants and animals and they face imminent danger from a variety of human activities. The Hotshot authors and others strongly believe that the global community can do wonders if these areas move to the top of our priority list. But what will have to happen for these spots to be protected? There are no simple answers to this central question. Unfortunately, those of us in the United States who have the luxury of time to even ponder such questions, face many obvious difficulties. First, nearly all of the hotspots are located outside of our territorial boundaries, exceptions being the forests of Oregon and California as well as portions of Southern Florida (namely the Keys and the Everglades). Key hotspots are found in New Zealand, Madagascar, and Indonesia as well as the continental parts of south-east Asia. Obviously we cannot expect that we will be able to force other countries to enact and enforce laws that will greatly reduce biological degradation. Yet, while many other countries have ratified the Biodiversity Treaty that was drafted at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, it has never reached the floors of the . Congress for a vote; Canada, Japan, and the European Union are among those to ratify it. By this inaction our nation apparently lacks the wherewithal to support global conservation efforts as a matter of principle. However, given that the wealthy nations in concert with international banks promote unsustainable extraction of resources in the world's developing countries, it would appear that we have an obligation to do so. If our national policy makers are unwilling to commit themselves to the protection of global ecosystems and species, we still have ourselves to look to for sources of positive change. All of us have tremendous purchasing power, especially in comparison to the majority of the other human residents on this planet; Barry Bearak, a Pulitzer Prize-winner journalist who recently spoke at Knox College's convocation, referred to the residents of the United States as "filthy rich," a conclusion he came to after spending a great deal of time in the poorer regions of the world, particularly Afghanistan and India. What we buy makes a difference. The environmental campaign to support shade coffee rather than sun coffee is just one of many attempts for the consumer to support sustainable practices in regions of great ecological diversity. According to the Northwest Shad Coffee Campaign, shade coffee agricultural allows for the extraction of a desired resource but at the same time allows between 3-8 times as many birds species to persist not to mention many more mid-size mammals as well as amphibians and beetles. Coffee is also a particularly important commodity in terms of the health of ecological systems because the countries that produce the bulk of it are precisely the same countries that are home to the majority of the world's species; the countries of Brazil, Bolivia, Indonesia, Vietnam collectively produce ~40 percent of the 17 billion pounds of coffee that are harvested each year (folks, that's more than 3 pounds per person!). Burdensome debts also force many developing countries to endlessly delay infrastructure investment. Debt-for-nature swaps, an idea proposed by Dr. Thomas Lovejoy of the World Wildlife Federation in the mid-1980s, have enabled poor countries to relieve foreign debt and international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to increase commitment to conservation programs both at the same time. In these swaps, NGOs pay off a poor country's debt to a bank or well-to-do country at greatly reduced costs in order to establish agreements for investment in national parks, for example. While not a cure-all, these efforts have begun the paradigm shift from unabated expansion and unhealthy extraction to one supportive of saving natural ecosystems and securing the health and welfare of all human populations. Threats to these locations represent massive scale intrusions taken by societies found on every continent. Unfortunately, there is so much that will be lost if these "special" places aren't quickly protected from future degradation. On the bright side though, so much of the world's genetic diversity lives in just a couple handfuls of "hotspots" that if these locations were saved hordes of species would be able to persist into the next millennium. The time is now to respond to this fairly recent observation and insight. It is time for the world to begin to act like a civilized 21st Century society. It is incumbent upon us, those with time and wealth, to maintain the momentum that others have started. The masses of life forms are relying on us to make the best attempt at this daunting yet critical task. Hopefully our species will be sensible enough to leave at least 1 percent of land alone, so that other life forms may continue to exist. Do we need all 100 percent? 都是老外写的
There are still many problems of environmental protection in recent years. One of the most serious problems is the serious pollution of air, water and soil. the polluted air does great harm to people’s health. The polluted water causes diseases and death. What is more, vegetation had been greatly reduced with the rapid growth of modern cities. To protect the environment, governments of many countries have done a lot. Legislative steps have been introduced to control air pollution, to protect the forest and sea resources and to stop any environmental pollution. Therefore, governments are playing the most important role in the environmental protection today. In my opinion, to protect environment, the government must take even more concrete measures. First, it should let people fully realize the importance of environmental protection through education. Second, much more efforts should be made to put the population planning policy into practice, because more people means more people means more pollution. Finally, those who destroy the environment intentionally should be severely punished. We should let them know that destroying environment means destroying mankind themselves. 保护环境 目前环保还存在着许多问题。最严重的问题就是空气、水和土壤的严重污染。污染的空气对人类的健康十分有害。污染的水引起疼病，造成死亡。更有甚者，随着现代社会的迅速扩建，植被大大的减少。 为了保护环境，各国政府做了大量的工作。采用了立法措施控制大气污染，保护森林资源和海洋资源，制止任何环境污染。因此，在当今的环保中政府起着最重要的作用。 我的看法是，为了保护环境，政府应当采取更具体的措施。首先，应当通过教育的方法使人们充分謒到环境保护的重要性。第二，应更加努力把计划生育政策付诸实施，因为人口多就意味着污染严重。最后，要严惩那些故意破坏环境者。使他们破坏环境就是毁灭人类自己。
环境影响评价的过程包括一系列的步骤，这些步骤按顺序进行。在实际工作中，环境影响评价的工作过程可以不同，而且各步骤的顺序也可变化。一种理想的环境影响评价过程，应该能够满足以下条件：(1)基本上适应所有可能对环境造成显著影响的项目，并能够对所有可能的显著影响做出识别和评估，(2)对各种替代方案(包括项目不建设或地区不开发的情况)、管理技术、减缓措施进行比较；(3)生成清楚的环境影响报告书(EIS)，以使专家和非专家都能了解可能影响的特征及其重要性；(4)包括广泛的公众参与和严格的行政审查程序；(5)及时、清晰的结论，以便为决策提供信息。环境影响评价分：环境质量评价、环境影响预测与评价、环境影响后评价环境影响评价的功能:判断功能、预测功能、选择功能与导向功能编辑本段分类按照对象分为：建设项目环境影响评价，规划环境影响评价，战略环境影响评价；按照环境要素分为：大气环境影响评价，水环境影响评价，噪声环境影响评价，固体废物环境影响评价等；按照时间分为：环境质量现状评价，环境影响预测评价，环境影响后评价。中华人民共和国环境影响评价法（2002年10月28日第九届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第三十次会议通过）跟则这个来
环境影响评价Environmental impact assessmentHuman health and wellbeing in environmental impact assessment in New South Wales, Australia: Auditing health impacts within environmental assessments of major projects作 者：Patrick J. Harris；Elizabeth Harris；Susan Thompson；Ben Harris-Roxas；Lynn Kemp期 刊：Environmental impact assessment review 年，卷(期)：2009, 29(5) 关键词：health environmental impact assessment major projects正文语种：eng Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Audit in Large-Scale Public Infrastructure Construction: The Case of the Qieghai-Tibet Railway作 者：Guizhen He；Lei Zhang；Yonglong Lu期 刊：Environmental Management 年，卷(期)：2009, 44(3) 关键词：Environmental performance Construction project Large-scale construction program Environmental audit Environmental Impact Assessment Qinghai-Tibet Railway正文语种：eng Linking environmental impact assessment, environmental management systems and green procurement in construction projects: lessons from the City Tunnel Project in Malmo, Sweden作 者：Annika Varnas；Charlotta Faith-Ell；Berit Balfors期 刊：Impact assessment and project appraisal 年，卷(期)：2009, 27(1) 关键词：Environmental impact assessment Environmental management system Green procurement Construction industry正文语种：eng Environmental information system for visualizing environmental impact assessment information作 者：Angelika Cserny；Zsofia Kovacs；Endre Domokos期 刊：Environmental Science and Pollution Research 年，卷(期)：2009, 16(1) 关键词：Data visualisation Environmental impact assessment Environmental monitoring GIS Surface water正文语种：eng The screening and scoping of Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage in the Netherlands作 者：Joris Koomneef；Andre Faaij；Wim Turkenburg期 刊：Environmental Impact Assesment Review 年，卷(期)：2008, 28(6) 关键词：carbon capture and storage spatial policy strategic environmental impact assessment regulation implementation正文语种：eng 还有很多，要是上面都不好，你再HI我哈~记得给分噢。
参考文献自动生成：
知网
百度学术：
谷歌学术：
查找参考文献的网站：
1、文献党下载器（）一款资源集成的文献下载平台，几乎整合了所有中外文献数据库资源，覆盖全科以及各种文献类型。整合资源包括知网、万方、维普、SpringerLink、Elsevier（sciencedirect）、Wiley 、Web of Science、PubMed 、EI、ProQuest（国外学位论文）等数据库资源，还有大量的世界知名期刊，如：nature《自然》、science《科学》、CELL《细胞》、PNAS《美国科学院院报》等等。只要有互联网，在哪里都可以查找下载文献。
2、知网：全球最大的中文数据库。提供中国学术文献、外文文献、学位论文、报纸、会议、年鉴、工具书等各类资源，并提供在线阅读和下载服务。涵盖领域包括：基础科学、文史哲、工程科技、社会科学、农业、经济与管理科学、医药卫生、信息科技等。
3、万方数据库：是由万方数据公司开发的，涵盖期刊、会议纪要、论文、学术成果、学术会议论文的大型网络数据库；也是和中国知网齐名的中国专业的学术数据库。
学科分类：综合，机械，电子电气，计算机/信息科学，能源/动力工程，建筑/土木工程，艺术，社会科学，语言/文学，教育，哲学，政治，生物，材料科学，环境科学，化学/化工，物理，数学。
4、Web of Science是获取全球学术信息的重要数据库。其中以SCIE、SSCI、A&HCI等引文索引数据库，JCR期刊引证报告和ESI基本科学指标享誉全球科技和教育界。Web of Science收录了论文中所引用的参考文献，通过独特的引文索引，用户可以用一篇文章、一个专利号、一篇会议文献、一本期刊或者一本书作为检索词，检索它们的被引用情况，轻松回溯某一研究文献的起源与历史，或者追踪其最新进展；可以越查越广、越查越新、越查越深。
5、Wiley 作为全球最大、最全面的经同行评审的科学、技术、医学和学术研究的在线多学科资源平台之一，Wiley及旗下的子品牌出版了超过500位诺贝尔奖得主的作品。“Wiley Online Library”覆盖了生命科学、健康科学、自然科学、社会与人文科学等全面的学科领域。Wiley Online Library上有1600多种经同行评审的学术期刊，20000本电子图书，170多种在线参考工具书，580多种在线参考书，19种生物学、生命科学和生物医学的实验室指南（Current Protocols），17种化学、光谱和循证医学数据库（Cochrane Library）。
6、Elsevier（sciencedirect）是荷兰一家全球著名的学术期刊出版商，每年出版大量的学术图书和期刊，大部分期刊被SCI、SSCI、EI收录，是世界上公认的高品位学术期刊。scienceDirect是爱思唯尔公司的全文数据库平台，是全球最大的科学、技术与医学全文电子资源数据库，提供2500余种学术期刊以及37000余种图书的全文内容。包括全球影响力极高的CELL《细胞杂志》、THE LANCET《柳叶刀杂志》等。
7、SpringerLink是全球最大的在线科学、技术和医学(STM)领域学术资源平台。Springer 的电子图书数据库包括各种的Springer图书产品，如专著、教科书、手册、地图集、参考工具书、丛书等。具体学科涉及：数学、物理与天文学、化学、生命科学、医学、工程学、计算机科学、环境科学、地球科学、经济学、法律。
8、PubMed 是一个免费的搜寻引擎，提供生物医学方面的论文搜寻以及摘要的数据库。它的数据库来源为MEDLINE。其核心主题为医学，但亦包括其他与医学相关的领域，像是护理学或者其他健康学科。PubMed 的资讯并不包括期刊论文的全文，但可提供指向全文提供者（付费或免费）的链接。
参考文献标准格式：
1、参考文献类型：
普通图书[M]、期刊文章[J]、报纸文章[N]、论文集[C]、学位论 文[D]、报告[R]、标准[s]、专利[P]、数据库[DB]、计算机程序[CP]、电 子公告[EB]、联机网络[OL]、网上期刊[J／OL]、网上电子公告[EB／OL]、其他未 说明文献[z]。
2．参考文献格式及示例：
(1)专著、论文集、学位论文、报告：
[序号]主要责任者．文献题名[文献类型标识]． 出版地：出版者，出版年：起止页码(任选)．
[1]刘国钧，陈绍业，王凤翥．图书馆目录[M]．北京：高等教育出版社，1957： 15—18．
[2]辛希孟．信息技术与信息服务国际研讨会论文集：A集[c]．北京：中国社会科学 出版社．1994．
[3]Radden G&Kovecses Z．Towards a Theory of Metonymy[M]．Amsterdam：John Benjamins，1999．
(2)期刊文章：
[序号]主要责任者．文献题名[T]．刊名，年，卷(期)：起止页码．
[4]金显贺，王昌长，王忠东，等．一种用于在线检测局部放电的数字滤波技术[T]． 清华大学学报(自然科学版)，1993，33(4)：62—67．
[5]Hubscher—Davidson S E．Personal diversity and diverse personalities in translation： A study of individual differences[J]．Perspectives&u西es in Translatology，2009，1 7 (3)：175-192．
(3)论文集中的析出文献：
[序号]析出文献主要责任者．析出文献题名[C]／／原文献主要 责任者(任选)．原文献题名．出版地：出版者，出版年：析出文献起止页码．
[6]钟文发．非线性规划在可燃毒物配置中的应用[C]／／赵玮．运筹学的理论与应 用——中国运筹学会第五届大会论文集．西安：西安电子科技大学出版社，1996： 468-471．
[7]Barcelona A．Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy[C]／／Benczes R，Barcelona A．Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics：Towards a Consensus View． Philadelphia：John Benjamins Publishing Co．，20 11：7—57．
(4)报纸文章：
[序号]主要责任者．文献题名[N]．报纸名，出版日期(版次)．
[8]谢希德．创造学习的新思路[N]．人民El报，1998—12—25(10)．
(5)国际、国家标准：
[序号]．标准编号，标准名称[s]．
[9]GB／T 16159—1996，汉语拼音正词法基本规则[s]．
(6)专利：
[序号]专利所有者．专利题名[P]．专利国别：专利号，出版日期．
[10]姜锡洲．一种温热外敷药制备方案[P]．中国专利：881056073，1989—07—26．
(7)电子文献：
[序号]主要责任者．电子文献题名[电子文献及载体类型标识]．(发表或 更新日期)[引用日期]．电子文献的出处或可获得地址．
[11]王明亮．关于中国学术期刊标准化数据库系统工程的进展[EB／OL]．(1998—08— 16)[1998—10—04]．http：Hwww．cajcd．edu．cn／pub／wml．txt／980810—2．html．
[12]万锦坤．中国大学学报论文文摘(1983--1993)．英文版[DB／CD]．北京：中国 大百科全书出版社，1996．
(8)各种未定义类型的文献：
[序号]主要责任者．文献题名[z]．出版地：出版者，出 版年．
论文参考文献可以找的网站如下：
1、知网国内最大知识库，还有批量导出参考文献功能。
2、谷歌学术收录各个领域学术资料的免费搜索引擎。ScienceDirect收录的期刊是世界上公认的高质量学术期刊。
3、Web of Science数据库是国际公认的反映科学研究水准的数据库。检索精确到文献被收录的期刊、出版公司、作者、日期、页码等。
按照字面的意思，参考文献是文章或著作等写作过程中参考过的文献。然而，按照GB/T7714-2015《信息与文献 参考文献著录规则》的定义，文后参考文献是指：为撰写或编辑论文和著作而引用的有关文献信息资源。
根据《中国学术期刊（光盘版）检索与评价数据规范（试行）》和《中国高等学校社会科学学报编排规范（修订版）》的要求，很多刊物对参考文献和注释作出区分，将注释规定为对正文中某一内容作进一步解释或补充说明的文字，列于文末并与参考文献分列或置于当页脚地。
以下所有文献，中国知网都能查到。[1]董利民,李璇.洱海水污染动态模型的构建及分析研究[j].生态经济(学术版),2011,02:384-388.[2]房春娟,陈晓燕.淡水污染的微生物治理[j].湖南农机,2011,11:245+247.[3]张志锋,王燕,韩庚辰.中国近海海水主要参数基线值及其污染状况探究[j].海洋环境科学,2012,02:211-215.[4]魏正明.水危机——寻找解决淡水污染的方案[j].上海环境科学,2003,01:5.[5]迟凤玲.浅淡水污染对我国食物安全的影响及解决对策[j].中国食物与营养,2006,05:14-16.[6]尚立照.风力发电对河西走廊生态环境影响初探[j].环境研究与监测,2010,01:3-5.[7]杨贵本杨丽丽.我国淡水污染问题必须加大力度解决[n].延安日报,2007-03-12002.[8]刘洪波.不同水域淡水蚌类中元素积累和分布的特征研究[d].南京农业大学,2010.[9]项继权.湖泊治理:从“工程治污”到“综合治理”——云南洱海水污染治理的经验与思考[j].中国软科学,2013,02:81-89.[10]陈登勤,方宗熙.用紫露草微核技术监测海水污染的初步研究[j].山东海洋学院学报,1981,02:80-85.[11]高圣龙,柯明德.mobilemarinegis于海上污染监控之应用[a].中国航海学会救助打捞专业委员会.救捞专业委员会2004年学术交流会论文集[c].中国航海学会救助打捞专业委员会:,2004:11.[12]高乐华.我国海洋生态经济系统协调发展测度与优化机制研究[d].中国海洋大学,2012.[13]张德君.海水入侵地下水污染对土壤生态影响研究[d].辽宁师范大学,2007美国进口普卫欣天猫
[1]程发良，孙成访.环境保护与可持续发展[ M].北京：清华大学出版社，2009.[2]曲向荣.环境保护与可持续发展[ M].北京:清华大学出版社,2010.[3]周敬宣.环境与可持续发展[ M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社，2007.[4]蒋展鹏，杨宏伟.环境工程学[ M].北京:高等教育出版社,2013.[5]徐新华，吴忠标，陈红.环境保护与可持续发展[ M].北京:化学工业出版社.，2000.[6]伊武军.资源、环境与可持续发展[M].北京:海洋出版社,2001.
有关疾病与环境的关系的参考文献有如下这些：1、罗成旺，刘起勇 《自然疫源性疾病流行因素分析及对策》2、张志凯，俞东征 《我国的鼠疫现状及控制》3、邢权，《大气污染与肺癌》4、蔡宏道，主编的《现代环境卫生学》5、胡雁，《青岛市大气污染对人体健康经济损失评估》6、陈士杰，李秀央，周连芳.《大气污染物致肺癌的潜伏期灰色定量分析》7、黄欣欣，蔡琳 《大气污染与肺癌关系研究进展》
[1] 李德生，孙旭红，宋文华等. 经济林木在北方城市中的运用. 现代城市研究，2004，(7)：51~53[2] 朱玉强.天津市环境空气污染特征及对策. 天津科技，2001，(5)：10~11[3] 张蔚. 浅析天津的城市绿化与发展.大众科技，2005，(9)：130~131[4] 蒋展鹏. 环境工程学. 北京：高等教育出版社. 1992．272[5] 董希文，崔强，王丽敏等. 园林绿化树种枝叶滞尘效果分类研究. 防护林科技, 2005,(1)：28~29[6] 张秀梅，李景平等. 城市污染环境中适生树种滞尘能力研究. 环境科学动态, 2001, (2)：27~30[7] 张新献，古润泽，陈自新等. 北京城市居住区绿地的滞尘效益. 北京林业大学学报，1997，19(4) ：12~17[8] 吴中能，于一苏，边艳霞.合肥主要绿化树种滞尘效应研究初报.安擞农业科学，2001，29(6)：780~783[9] 李顺，唐建华，雍枫.城市绿化抗污染树种的选择.黑龙江环境通报，2005，29(1)：25、68[10] 王焕校．污染生态学．北京：高等教育出版社．2000．5(1)[11] 张永生，房靖华. 森林与大气污染．环境科学与技术，2003，26(4)：61~63
罗成旺，刘起勇 《自然疫源性疾病流行因素分析及对策》. 张志凯，俞东征 《我国的鼠疫现状及控制》. 邢权 《大气污染与肺癌》.蔡宏道，主编的《现代环境卫生学》.胡雁 《青岛市大气污染对人体健康经济损失评估》陈士杰，李秀央，周连芳．《大气污染物致肺癌的潜伏期灰色定量分析》黄欣欣，蔡琳 《大气污染与肺癌关系研究进展》.
[1]刘南威.自然地理学[M].北京:科学出版社,2001:548. [2]李春华.环境科学原理[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2003,(4). [3]叶文虎.可持续发展引论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003:21
[1]程发良，孙成访.环境保护与可持续发展[ M].北京：清华大学出版社，2009.[2]曲向荣.环境保护与可持续发展[ M].北京:清华大学出版社,2010.[3]周敬宣.环境与可持续发展[ M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社，2007.[4]蒋展鹏，杨宏伟.环境工程学[ M].北京:高等教育出版社,2013.[5]徐新华，吴忠标，陈红.环境保护与可持续发展[ M].北京:化学工业出版社.，2000.[6]伊武军.资源、环境与可持续发展[M].北京:海洋出版社,2001.
图书信息[回目录] 书 名: 水环境保护 作 者：雒文生 出版社： 中国水利水电出版社 出版时间： 2009年01月 ISBN: 9787508459905 开本： 16开 定价: 27元 内容简介[回目录] 《水环境保护》根据我国水环境保护需要，在水资源保护、规划与管理方面形成了一套理论体系和技术体系，内容吸纳了成熟的、先进的研究成果。其基本内容包括：水环境保护的主要措施与技术，水环境监测与实验，水污染负荷分析与预测，水环境演化原理，水环境模拟预测数学模型，水环境质量评价，水环境保护规划与管理等。 《水环境保护》为水文水资源专业通用教材，也可供其他水利水电类专业应用和有关工程技术人员参考。 图书目录[回目录] 总前言 前言 第1章 绪论 水环境保护的意义、内容与任务 水体污染物及其危害 水文循环中水的污染与自净 水环境保护的生态工程措施 水环境质量的度量与评价 思考题与习题 第2章 水环境监测 水环境监测的对象与内容 水质监测采样位置的布设 水样的采集与保存 水环境指标的测定 思考题与习题 第3章 水污染负荷预测 概述 点源污染负荷预测 面源污染负荷预测 思考题与习题 第4章 水环境演化原理 污染物在水中的迁移转化 水体的耗氧过程和复氧过程 水质迁移转化基本方程及其解 思考题与习题 第5章 水环境数学模型及预测 水温的模拟预测 河流水环境数学模型 湖泊、水库水环境数学模型 思考题与习题 第6章 水环境质量评价 概述 水环境质量评价的标准和准则 污染源的调查与评价 水体质量评价 底质质量评价和水生生物评价 水环境影响评价 思考题与习题 第7章 水环境保护规划与管理 概述 水环境保护规划 水环境质量管理 思考题与习题 参考文献 ……
[1] 李德生，孙旭红，宋文华等. 经济林木在北方城市中的运用. 现代城市研究，2004，(7)：51~53[2] 朱玉强.天津市环境空气污染特征及对策. 天津科技，2001，(5)：10~11[3] 张蔚. 浅析天津的城市绿化与发展.大众科技，2005，(9)：130~131[4] 蒋展鹏. 环境工程学. 北京：高等教育出版社. 1992．272[5] 董希文，崔强，王丽敏等. 园林绿化树种枝叶滞尘效果分类研究. 防护林科技, 2005,(1)：28~29[6] 张秀梅，李景平等. 城市污染环境中适生树种滞尘能力研究. 环境科学动态, 2001, (2)：27~30[7] 张新献，古润泽，陈自新等. 北京城市居住区绿地的滞尘效益. 北京林业大学学报，1997，19(4) ：12~17[8] 吴中能，于一苏，边艳霞.合肥主要绿化树种滞尘效应研究初报.安擞农业科学，2001，29(6)：780~783[9] 李顺，唐建华，雍枫.城市绿化抗污染树种的选择.黑龙江环境通报，2005，29(1)：25、68[10] 王焕校．污染生态学．北京：高等教育出版社．2000．5(1)[11] 张永生，房靖华. 森林与大气污染．环境科学与技术，2003，26(4)：61~63