英语新闻论文

英语论文大致的写作结构如下：

liuwenqiangThe Australian Middle School Student Visit Our SchoolOn June second,the ten people Australian delegation visited our arrived in school at 9 . and receive warmly president and the guests talked to us in the conference severally after the ceremony of 9: also visited our school lab library and industrial they listened to the english lesson. At . the guests chatted with some teachers and students then they left school at .

我在洛基英语上班，是英语专业毕业的，下面是一篇关于高考的文章，你看看。My Opinion of the GaoKaoIn China it's GaoKao, in America it's SATs. Both are exams designed to test a student's entire academic career. Both are gateways to higher education. In both countries your score dictates the quality of your future education. Low scores do not a Harvard man make - or a Tsinghua one, either. While it is true that, in both countries the exam can be retaken, the difference between SAT and GaoKao is that, in China, each student has one shot to go to university, and that one chance is immediately after high school, and predicated on a successful GaoKao. Also, as I understand it, the standards are more rigorous on the GaoKao. Before talking about GaoKao, I'd like to address cookie-cutter teaching. Not every student has the same aptitude, not everyone learns the same way. Some are visual learners who absorb knowledge better with charts, pictures, etc. Kinesthetic learners need hands-on experience to optimize their intelligence and auditory learners absorb by hearing lessons, in the form of lectures and the like. Clearly the present teaching method benefits the latter, leaving the other two types at a , cookie cutter testing is only beneficial to a small group of students: those good at rote memorization. I contend those are auditory learners. Ironically, kinesthetic learners are good at writing - a mechanical skill. (As I understand it, writing is a large part of the GaoKao) So: if the current method of instruction is beneficial only to about one third of the students but testing is geared toward a different third, how can we say that this exam fairly measures every student's intellect?In America a college student can experience a broader slice of life - working, co-habitated relationships, living off campus, possibly even marriage and children. In China the focus is strictly on education. Some students take part time jobs and campus activities range from special interest groups to further academic pursuits but essentially, students are limited to college life: living in a dorm and focused on classwork. Whereas in America, college aged students have varied life skills like cooking, driving and managine money, most of my students here have no idea how to prepare food or budget. I aver these skills broaden a young person's perspective, while narrowly focusing on education stunts students' social and life skills, leaving them learned but unprepared for the world. Now, back the to the GaoKao: I believe it is unfair to students. That single marker should not be an indicator of future success and family honor. Having only one shot at higher education, and that education dictating their status in society puts undue pressure on children who actually have only a vague idea of what social status/success means. Already these children feel the pressure of family legacy. The all too real possibility of failure puts undue strain on them. Reducing the weight of the English score, or doing away with it altogether is a small but meaningless gesture toward easing that pressure. If English is taught from the students' first academic year, as math and Chinese is, removing it only serves to indicate that English is not that important after all. Allowing points for civic contributions and/or morality is equally unproductive. Surely we want moral, educated citizens leading society, but good people sometimes test poorly, and the added points might not make that vital difference between college entrance and being doomed to serve fries at McDonalds. For all that, I don't believe the GaoKao should disappear. Instead I believe that students should be allowed to experience life a bit: work, volunteer or maybe just travel around to gain some sort of social experience and a perspective on the wider world. Perhaps capping college entrance age at 20 would allow students time to figure out where they want their life to go and how to get there. By forcing students to prolong their academic career when, after 12 years most are burned out on formal studying does our future and society in general a disservice. Testing - GaoKao'ing by age 19 will give students a chance to choose their path and give them renewed energy to get there successfully. Also, a year untethered to the education machine would show them what the world is really like, fueling their desire to improve their station in life... or not. Finally, a year off from studying would give the students a 物极必反 cushion before plunging further into academic endeavors. 请采纳，谢谢！